All posts by medical

Will this COVID-19 wave lead to herd immunity? Are you less likely to get sick again if you had omicron? Why this ‘milder’ variant is a double-edged…

I think were all going to get it. Its just a matter of time.

How many times have you heard a friend or family member say that in the last few weeks? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has relaxed its isolation guidelines. Is it any wonder that some people appear to be letting their guard down, and dining out in crowded restaurants as a highly contagious variant blazes its way through schools, social venues and households?

So what if you have tested positive for omicron, the highly transmissible variant of COVID-19, the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Now, what? Can you go about your business in the knowledge that you have the COVID-19 antibodies and youre less likely to test positive for the coronavirus again anytime soon? Should you be as afraid of omicron as, say, delta?

Epidemiologists are weighing the significance of the latest omicron wave, and wondering how if at all it could change the course of the pandemic. Theyre breathing a sigh of relief that the omicron variant appears to be less severe, but beyond that the world is once again playing Russian Roulette with a virus that is finding new ways to survive.

Thank God omicron is a less severe illness.

Have you heard of omicron parties where people get together with others who are infected with omicron in order to get the milder infection? asks Dr. Gregory Poland, who studies the immunogenetics of vaccine response at the Mayo Clinic. Were experiencing what were experiencing because of virus behavior and human behavior. Human behavior is the only thing we can control, and weve ceded that.

Aaron Glatt, chair of the Department of Medicine at Mount Sinai South Nassau, is more optimistic. We are seeing many, many more people getting infected, but thank God omicron is a less severe illness. Were seeing less hospitalizations, less ICU admissions, less intubations and less death. Thats as a proportion of new cases, which has reached a daily average of 678,271, up 271% over two weeks.

Omicron may be proving less severe than delta, but its rapid infection rate is still creating a high number of very sick Americans. The high rate of contagion has also led to a 16% increase in deaths over the last two weeks to a daily average of 1,559 fatalities. The hospitalization rate has risen 83% over the last two weeks to reach a daily average of 132,086, per to the New York Times daily tracker.

While children still have the lowest rate of hospitalization of any group, pediatric hospitalizations are at the highest rate compared to any prior point in the pandemic, Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, said. Sadly, we are seeing the rates of hospitalizations increasing for children zero to four, children who are not yet currently eligible for COVID 19 vaccination.

Public-health advisers obviously advise against throwing caution to the wind, and going out and mixing socially with other people indoors with no masks and little social distancing and not only because of the impact people taking time off work would have on the economy. Ideally, the less potential for omicron to spread, the less likely there will be for new strains to pop up, Glatt told MarketWatch.

Among the latest variants discovered was IHU in France, which is thought to have come from Cameroon. It has not been marked as a variant of interest, variant of concern or variant of consequence by the World Health Organization. But it is a portentous sign that the world is a far from the end of the pandemic. We long ago gave up the opportunity to eradicate this, Poland told MarketWatch.

First, some potential good news. Research led by Alex Sigal, a researcher at the Africa Health Research Institute and associate professor at University of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, found that omicron infection enhances neutralizing immunity against the Delta variant. The study was a small project with just over a dozen patients. It was published last month, and has not yet been peer-reviewed.

We long ago gave up the opportunity to eradicate this.

The increase in delta variant neutralization in those infected with omicron may result in a reduced ability of delta to re-infect them, the research suggested. Along with emerging data indicating that omicron, at this time in the pandemic, is less pathogenic than delta, such an outcome may have positive implications in terms of decreasing the COVID-19 burden of severe disease.

If omicron does prove to be less pathogenic, then this may show that the course of the pandemic has shifted, Sigal said in a statement. Omicron will take over, at least for now, and we may have less disruption of our lives. However, thats a big if and perhaps an even bigger maybe, infectious disease doctors contend. It does not preclude more variants finding their way across the world.

Now, the bad news. The spread of the virus opens up the possibility of more variants, and in this viral game of whack-a-mole the next one may be worse than the last. It has more of a chance of doing so in the unvaccinated, the immunocompromised, the elderly and other vulnerable populations. Given its transmissibility, we have been very fortunate that omicron wasnt more deadly.

Paul Sax, clinical director of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Brigham and Womens Hospital, wrote on Twitter TWTR that vaccination helped enormously: It boggles the mind to contemplate what would have happened if omicron had encountered a completely immunologically naive population, and efficiently replicated in the lung like other variants.

The omicron wave could provide a wall of immunity for the more vulnerable people. It certainly has the potential to infect many people and that could be a positive thing, at least they have immunity against COVID-19 or the omicron strain, Glatt said. That could theoretically bring us closer to herd immunity, and get around those who are not vaccinated.

Thats only a theory, and a tough one to prove at that. Herd immunity the idea that once a high proportion of a population has contracted or been vaccinated against a disease, the likelihood of others in the population being infected is drastically reduced remains tantalizingly out of reach even with 62% of the U.S. population fully vaccinated.

Heres one take on increasing a societys immunity, if not reaching herd immunity: Takeshi Arashiro, an infectious disease researcher at Japans National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Tokyo, and his fellow researchers, published a study that has not yet been peer-reviewed suggesting that countries that saw infections from other variants may have been spared the worst of the omicron wave in 2022.

Its not clear how long you are protected from getting sick again.

Theres a catch. A key tenet of achieving herd-immunity is the separation of those at a lower risk of dying from the higher-risk group people over 70 and with pre-existing conditions. As the lower-risk group contracts the virus, immunity spreads in the so-called herd, lowering the risk for those in the higher-risk group. The real world is notoriously unpredictable, and not a neat laboratory setting.

Ultimately, asymptomatic spreading is another Achilles heel and complicates any herd-immunity strategy where infected people are kept separate from the more vulnerable. The latter group, in reality, cannot remain house bound and without contact with anyone who is not considered vulnerable for months possibly years or however long it takes to reach the critical herd-immunity level.

And it would take 70% of the population or over 200 million people to recover from the virus, according to the Mayo Clinic. This number of infections could lead to serious complications and millions of deaths, especially among older people and those who have existing health conditions, the Mayo Clinic wrote. The health care system could quickly become overwhelmed.

As WHO points out, nor does herd immunity by infection account for the possibility of reinfection with the omicron or delta variants and, as mentioned, the emergence of new, unknown variants. Its not clear how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19. Even if you have antibodies, you could get COVID-19 again, the Mayo Clinic says.

Read next: COVID-19 vs. the flu. If you test negative on an antigen test, dont assume its a common cold or influenza. Heres why

Go here to read the rest:
Will this COVID-19 wave lead to herd immunity? Are you less likely to get sick again if you had omicron? Why this 'milder' variant is a double-edged...

What Does ‘Adulting’ Mean? – The Atlantic

Sign up for Calebs newsletter here.

English words constantly evolve, not only in terms of what they mean, but how they mean. They transform their parts of speech all the time without so much as a changed syllable. The adjective green came to mean the part of the golf course that can be described by this adjective. The prepositions up and down came to mean the experiences in life that feel like the spatial relationships that these prepositions describelifes ups and downs. We transform proper names willy-nilly into adjectives, such as when we see a dress our friend Jessica would love and describe it as so Jessica. But the most fascinating method of linguistic conversion is to verbifyan autological (self-describing) word denoting the transformation of a noun into a verb. Such a process recently occurred with the noun adult, which became to adult, or, more commonly, adulting.

Verbification happens all the time. Soon after the website Google allowed us to search web pages for specific keywords and phrases, we verbed that act into Googling. We tend to verb animal names to mean human behavior that evokes that animal, such as parrot, grouse, and monkey (or horse) around. Verbs as common as to access began as nouns (we once said to gain access). We could probably understand almost any noun as a verb, given the right context: The flight attendant Pepsied my cup or I playlisted all your song recommendations or Can anyone peace the world? Calvin said it best (to Hobbes, of course) in a 1994 Bill Watterson comic strip: Verbing weirds language.

But what allows some nouns to become widely verbed? To me, commonly verbed nouns typically seem to contain an action within thema specific Deed linked closely enough to the Thing for the conversion to be intuitive and useful. You can only do one thing on the website Google; we all know what a parrot is famous for doing all the time; having access is inextricable from the activity of accessing. Meanwhile, Pepsi, playlists, and peace have a multitude of associated activities and therefore must rely heavily on context if were going to verb them. To turn a Thing into an Action, you need the Thing to be bound up in an associated Action to begin with, so the meaning of the new verb unfurls naturally from the old noun.

So what action unfurls naturally from the noun adult? Adulting means more than just reaching biological maturity or becoming fully grown. To adult is to engage in the responsibilities of modern adulthood. Filing taxes, cooking a meal, buying renters insuranceMillennials coming of age use the verb to describe engaging in the mundane tasks of mature life with characteristic self-effacing irony. The so-called snowflake generation, for whom stages of development, such as starting a family or owning a home, have commonly been delayed, engages in the normal day-to-day activities of adulthood with a smirking, surreal surprise. Adult became adulting as a generation entered that period feeling somewhat unprepared, wanting to express that maturity means not only reaching a certain point in your life, but also attending to the concomitant tasks. Hence our Thursday-level clue: Doing grown-up tasks, in Millennial slang.

View post:
What Does 'Adulting' Mean? - The Atlantic

Here’s How Researchers Trained Lab Rats To Drive Tiny Cars – Snopes.com

To learn more about how environmental factors influence the cognitive abilities of humans, researchers have trained rodents to drive tiny cars.

It may sound far out, but rats have similar pathways and chemicals in their brains as do people, and these often serve as a starting point to learn more about how the human brain works. And one such video that has circulated the internet for the last several years shows that just like people do, lab rats can be taught how to drive tiny cars.

The video itself is not necessarily new. Research conducted by psychologist from the University of Richmond in 2019, then published in January 2020 in the peer-reviewed journal Behavioural Brain Research, first described the astute rats. At the time of its publication, media outlets likeNPR, BBC and New Scientist shared the video and the findings that it embodied.

The driving rats resurfaced again in early January 2022 when the video was shared to the Reddit thread r/todayilearned. As of this writing, the video had since been removed but had received 2,700 upvotes beforehand.

The area of research focus is known as experience-based neuroplasticity, or how a persons environment and interactions with the world around them can shape the brain and its neural networks.

We love to study these animals, and were always amazed at what they can do in the lab with their behavior, their cognitive flexibility, and their emotional resilience. The rodent behavior and their brains help us learn more about human behavior and brains, explained study author Kelly Lambert, professor of behavioral neuroscience, in a news release at the time.

Lab rats used in the study live a somewhat bourgeoise life for a rodent. They have larger cages, more animals to interact with, and plenty of stimulus to create an enriched environment closer to those where they may naturally live. Studies show that these animals are more motivated and train more efficiently than those found in traditional laboratory settings.

Training is a big part of their life, and we know even with humans that training can change the brain in really interesting ways. Just learning to juggle can increase the density or the area of certain areas of our brains cortex, said Lambert.

Cue the rodent operated vehicle (ROV). Rats were taught to drive their pint-sized vehicles in a forward direction, as well as steer in more complex navigational pattern. When compared to other rats, those housed in enriched environments demonstrated more robust learning in their performance and a heightened interest even after the trials ended.

The ROV was made up from a modified ELEGOO EL-KIT-012UNO Project Smart Robot Car Kit V 3.0 (you can buy one here) designed so that the rad could move the car by touching or grabbing a bar. Movement could be stopped simply by releasing contact. stop movement by releasing contact. The rats were trained to touch the bars and move the car with the incentive of tiny pieces of Fruit Loops cereal, which were eventually placed at the end of the driving range. As training progressed, the distance to the tiny marshmallow treats increased with the longest distance travelled by a rat being 110 centimeters after about a month of training.

This research study found that rats housed in a complex, enriched environment (i.e., environment with interesting objects to interact with) learned the driving task, but rats housed in standard laboratory cages had problems learning the task (i.e., they failed their driving test). That means the complex environment led to more behavioral flexibility and neuroplasticity, said Lambert.

Following the study, researchers analyzed rat poop and found ratios of dehydroepiandrosterone and corticosterone, two types of stress hormones, that suggested driving training created a sort of emotional resilience in rats that lived both enriched and normal housing.

Though rats driving cars are adorable, the scientists note that their findings could inform future strategies for addressing mental health and helping to understand various illnesses. Neuroplasticity and the ability to learn new skills could have indications for anxiety, depression, emotional resilience and cognitive ability. This type of training can change a brain and learning to juggle multiple tasks can increase areas prone to certain conditions.

It appears the study above was just the beginning. In 2021, the team unveiled the Rat Car II which featured new equipment with less than 1,000 horse power, advance control for tiny rat hands, and once again motivation in the form of fruit loops.

Curious about how Snopes writers verify information and craft their stories for public consumption? Weve collected some posts that help explain how we do what we do. Happy reading and let us know what else you might be interested in knowing.

Sources

Amazon.Com: KEYESTUDIO Smart Car Robot,4WD Programmable DIY Starter Kit for Arduino for Uno R3 Electronics Programming Project/STEM Educational/Science Coding Robot Toys for Kids Teens Adults,12+: Toys & Games. https://www.amazon.com/KEYESTUDIO-Bluetooth-Controller-Ultrasonic-Programming/dp/B08276N3D9/ref=asc_df_B08276N3D9/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=507731305156&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=2989603916883922511&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9021356&hvtargid=pla-1045715635134&psc=1. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

Scientists Have Trained Rats to Drive Tiny Cars to Collect Food. New Scientist, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2220721-scientists-have-trained-rats-to-drive-tiny-cars-to-collect-food/. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

Crawford, L. E., et al. Enriched Environment Exposure Accelerates Rodent Driving Skills. Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 378, Jan. 2020, p. 112309. ScienceDirect, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112309.

Kelly Lambert Media Kits Expert Guides Newsroom University of Richmond. News, https://news.richmond.edu/experts/media-kits/lambert.html. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

Scientists Taught Rats How To Drive Tiny Cars. NPR, 23 Oct. 2019. NPR, https://www.npr.org/2019/10/23/772557752/scientists-taught-rats-how-to-drive-tiny-cars.

Neuroplasticity: How to Rewire Your Brain. BBC Reel, https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p098v92g/neuroplasticity-how-to-rewire-your-brain. Accessed 7 Jan. 2022.

Newman, Amy E. M., et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone and Corticosterone Are Regulated by Season and Acute Stress in a Wild Songbird: Jugular Versus Brachial Plasma. Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 5, May 2008, pp. 253745. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-1363.

Richmond, University of. Driving On: Latest on Driving Rats Research Project. 2021. Vimeo, https://vimeo.com/519057874.

substantial-freud. TIL Rats Can Learn to Drive, and Seem to Enjoy It. R/Todayilearned, 5 Jan. 2022, http://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/rwv0tm/til_rats_can_learn_to_drive_and_seem_to_enjoy_it/.

See original here:
Here's How Researchers Trained Lab Rats To Drive Tiny Cars - Snopes.com

46000 people and counting: How COVID has impacted the study of human behavior – Genetic Literacy Project

The GLP Needs Your Help

It is easier than ever for advocacy groups to spread disinformation on pressing science issues, such as the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. No, vaccines are not harmful. Yes, the use of biotechnology, GMOs or gene editing to develop antigens for treatments including vaccines are part of the solution. To inform the public about whats really going on, we present the facts and challenge those who don't. We cant do this work without your help. Please support us a donation of as little as $10 a month helps support our vital myth-busting efforts.

Visit link:
46000 people and counting: How COVID has impacted the study of human behavior - Genetic Literacy Project

Into the wild: Scientists strive to stop animal diseases from igniting the next pandemic – AAMC

In the mid-1300s, fleas hitching rides on rats helped to set off the deadliest pandemic in human history. The rodents, infected with bubonic plague, had climbed aboard merchant ships and caravans heading from Asia to Europe where, historians believe, the fleas abandoned the dying rats and moved in with humans. The infected bugs are cited as a major cause of the Black Death, which killed an estimated 75 million to 200 million people.

Nearly seven centuries later, another fatal illness that appears to have jumped from animals to people spread more quickly on the efficient wheels of modern travel. While the bubonic plague took weeks (at least) to reach neighboring regions from Asia on the sluggish transportation of the Middle Ages, the COVID-19 virus whisked across continents and oceans from China in days, riding with people on planes, trains, and automobiles. It ranks as the sixth most deadly human epidemic or pandemic in history, claiming 5.4 million lives and counting.

COVID-19 is the latest disease to demonstrate an alarming trend in infections: Zoonoses diseases that spill from animals to humans are occurring more frequently and spreading faster than ever. Zika, swine flu, West Nile virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and Middle East respiratory syndrome are just some of the major zoonotic epidemics and pandemics from the past several decades. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) estimated in 2016 that up to 75% of emerging infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic.

Its going to happen more often, says David Morens, MD, senior advisor to the directorat the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), based in Bethesda, Maryland.

Thats not because viruses are getting stronger; rather, infectious disease experts say, human behavior has increased conditions for people to catch diseases from animals and accelerate the spread of infections, largely by bringing people and animals into more frequent contact through development and travel.

The world is getting closer together, says Jay Varma, MD, director of the new Center for Pandemic Prevention and Response at Weill Cornell Medicine Medical College in New York City.

The center is among a slew of recent initiatives designed to address the problem. Last year, NIAID began funding an $82 million grant program to create a global network of Centers for Research in Emerging Infectious Diseases (CREID), with an emphasis on zoonoses. This past May, several international organizations including the UNEP and the World Health Organization created a One Health High-Level Expert Panel to improve understanding of how diseases with the potential to trigger pandemics, emerge and spread, also with a focus on zoonoses. This fall, the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn Vet) in Philadelphia opened the Institute for Infectious and Zoonotic Diseases to foster innovative strategies with health researchers, wildlife management agencies, and others.

Among the strategies for all: Improve surveillance of animals to curtail and maybe even prevent the spread of zoonotic diseases.

Preventing spillover [to humans] is the real way to prevent epidemics, says Jonathan Epstein, DVM, PhD, MPH, vice president for science and outreach at EcoHealth Alliance, a nonprofit that leads a collaboration in the CREID Network to improve the understanding of and response to zoonotic outbreaks in Southeast Asia. But because prevention involves so many complicated strategies, thats the hardest thing to do.

Animals and humans trade bacteria, parasites, and fungi all the time, usually to no harmful effect. As explained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, people commonly contract animal germs through contact with infected creatures (typically with their bodily fluids or through a bite), time spent in areas where those creatures live (such as among chicken coops, caves, and collections of water), or consumption of contaminated food (such as fruit soiled by animals).

Among the challenges to preventing zoonoses is that their routes to humans can be direct or circuitous. The viruses that cause versions of swine flu, for example, jump from pigs to humans mostly at farms, researchers believe. Other zoonoses are delivered by so-called vector insects, which transfer pathogens from host animals to people. These illnesses include Zika (from monkeys via mosquitos) and Lyme disease (from deer and mice via ticks). Some zoonoses use animals as intermediaries: The leading theory behind the outbreak of COVID-19 is that a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) jumped from bats to other animals in China before infecting humans through contact with infected animals sold for consumption at wet markets.

The ensuing pandemic has given scientists an opportunity to focus the worlds attention on the zoonotic phenomenon and how to protect against more pandemics. The reasons for the growing risk include the expansion of human development (such as suburban sprawl) and activity (such as deforestation) into the territories of wild animals; climate change, which is forcing animals to migrate into areas populated by people; the globalization of trade, including of animals and animal meat for consumption; urbanization, which is squeezing people and animals into denser living conditions; and more frequent and speedy human travel around the world.

In summary, Morens says, Were stirring the pot.

Some of the worlds most active pots are in Southeast Asia, where scientists frequently venture into animal habitats to track zoonotic outbreaks.

In Thailand, bats are ubiquitous around woodlands, waterways, farms, and homes; theyre even pitched as tourist attractions. Bats are also among the worlds most prolific culprits of zoonoses because they host lots of viruses that dont sicken them but that they spread as they fly from place to place, biting and getting eaten by other creatures and dropping guano, which people harvest as fertilizer.

Thats why scientists spent two decades there (2001-20) collecting blood, urine, and nasal samples from fruit bats, pigs, and hospital patients to see if they carried the Nipah virus (NiV), a rare but deadly zoonotic disease that killed 100 people in neighboring Malaysia and Singapore in 1999 and keeps reemerging among humans in several countries. The pig and human samples in Thailand tested negative, but in 19 of the years the scientists found the virus in bats.

The risk of a NiV outbreak in Thailand is increasingly possible, the researchers warned in a report published last July.

Animal surveillance is a growing strategy to detect the spread of pathogens from one species to the other. The process is routine among livestock used in food production to get an early jump on diseases that might wipe out animals as well as infect people but scattershot among wildlife, due to the effort and cost of getting to habitats and collecting samples. The scientists in Thailand, for example, visited farms to swab mucus from pig noses and forests to draw blood from bat wings and lay tarp under trees to catch bat urine all to track a potential outbreak.

Putting in that effort for an uncertain return is why preventive surveillance is not the norm. Governments and universities typically launch surveillance after a patient is stricken by an illness suspected of coming from an animal because the virus is unknown among humans or has been found in animals before. The detective work includes determining what animals and animal spaces the patient had been in contact with and searching genetic databases kept by universities and governments to see if the pathogen in the patient matches any that have been found in animals.

You want to get an idea of where the problem is most likely to be coming from, then do more close-up surveillance of animals and humans in that area to hone in on the hot spots where transmission is most likely occurring, Morens says.

Once hot spots are found, mitigation actions include continuously testing people and animals to track the contagion; improving human sanitation practices; minimizing human contact with species that host the pathogen (such as by not consuming the host animal and not entering its habitats); and, as a last and controversial resort, killing off thousands of the host animals.

During the project in Thailand, government and academic institutions launched a campaign based on a book, Living Safely with Bats, developed by the U.S. Agency for International Development to teach people how to protect themselves. The strategies included not killing, cooking, or eating bats (which is common in parts of Asia) and not drinking water that might include bat droppings.

Sampling animals also increases knowledge about how a pathogen works. Understanding these viruses gives us the ability to inform the development of drugs and vaccines, to know what other related viruses are out there, and to more rapidly trace outbreaks, says Epstein at EcoHealth, which is based in New York City.

He adds, however, that animal surveillance as its currently carried out has significant limitations.

Early research indicated that Ebola was transmitted to humans by apes maybe. And that SARS was transmitted to humans by civets maybe. Later evidence pointed to bats as the natural reservoir. One limitation of animal surveillance and genetic sequencing of viruses is that they cannot always determine precisely how a pathogen spilled over to people.

Another drawback is the after-the-fact nature of all responses to zoonoses.

Thats the traditional paradigm: Wait until theres a human outbreak, then put intervention into place, Epstein says. Look what happened with COVID. By the time we recognized a handful of cases, it was too late.

He and other veterinary leaders advocate for more surveillance to be regularly carried out in places with high concentrations of animals that harbor viruses that might infect humans and where people come in frequent contact with them. Scientists could see what known and potential zoonoses are spreading among animals and monitor humans more closely, as was done in Thailand.

We need to be thinking about doing that in areas where spillover events are quite possible, like wet markets, notes Daniel Beiting, PhD, associate director of Penn Vets new Institute for Infectious and Zoonotic Diseases.

That approach has limits, too: Its impossible to predict what virus or bacteria from an animal might infect people. I cannot take a sequence of a virus that came out of an animal and tell you that it is definitely going to be a human pathogen, says W. Ian Lipkin, MD, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health in New York City.

Thats one reason that surveillance is just one of several strategies against zoonoses. Epstein and others who follow the One Health approach which emphasizes managing the shared environments of people, animals, and plants advocate for larger changes in human behavior, such as curbing development into areas heavily populated by wildlife, reducing deforestation, confronting climate change, and reducing consumption of certain animals.

At Weill Cornell Medicine, Varma sees academic medicine playing a larger role in these efforts, including increasing coordination among veterinary, academic medicine, and public health institutions to share data; providing more interdisciplinary training in medical and veterinary education to increase understanding of contagion; and helping physicians know when to ask ill patients about their contacts with animals that might spread disease.

Says Varma: Doing cross-education about the role of environmental change in the emergence and transmission of disease, understanding how diseases emerge in animals and how human and animal health is integrated building that into the training of clinicians will, over time, help to build the cultural change that leads to better protection for everyone.

More here:
Into the wild: Scientists strive to stop animal diseases from igniting the next pandemic - AAMC

A Wharton study on the best ways to boost workout habits | Penn Today – Penn Today

In a new megastudy, lead author Katy Milkman, along with Angela Duckworth, partnered with 24 Hour Fitness to create a 28-day workout rewards program that tested inexpensive, scalable, science-based interventions for building exercise habits among more than 60,000 of its millions of members.

The study, published in the journal Nature, sought to solve motivational problems most people face when it comes to visiting the gym regularly. The megastudy approach to research is a new take on behavioral science, seeking a better way to compel gym attendance by testing many hypotheses at once.

The research tested 53 programs over four weeks at 24 Hour Fitness gyms, where participants entries into the gym were recorded. The simplest form of the program encouraged participants to plan their workouts ahead of time, reminded them with a text message 30 minutes before they were scheduled to work out, and offered them points convertible for small cash rewards redeemable on Amazon (these were worth about $0.22 per gym visit, so the researchers call them micro-incentives.)

Were incredibly excited about the potential of this new way of identifying promising strategies to promote behavior change, says Milkman, the James G. Dinan Professor at the Wharton School and co-director of the Behavior Change for Good Initiative at Penn, which has pioneered the megastudy approach to behavioral science.

One of the key finding from the study is that 45% of these interventionsranging from text reminders to weekly emailssignificantly increased weekly gym visits by 9-27%.

Lots of things worked, and our programs were also extremely cheap, Milkman says. Most programs tested could be deployed at scale for roughly $0.75 per person per month.

The top performing intervention sent gym members who missed a scheduled workout 125 bonus points (or $0.09) on top of their usual micro-incentives if they made it back to the gym for their next planned workout. This led to a 27% boost in gym visits.

We think this finding is really interesting, Milkman explains. It suggests how important it is to avoid having a series of missteps when youre pursuing a goal. Well all slip up from time-to-time, but this simple intervention that discouraged people from letting a single miss accumulate into a streak of failures helped people quite a lot.

Another top-performing incentive informed gym members that most Americans are exercising, and that exercise is trending up resulted in a 24% boost in visits.

The trending norms intervention was developed by our collaborator Robert Cialdinia brilliant psychologist who has long studied the power of norms to shape behavior, says Duckworth, the Rosa Lee and Egbert Chang Professor in the School of Arts & Sciences and Wharton who co-directs the Behavior Change for Good Initiative at Penn with Milkman. The contribution here is that learning that exercise is increasingly popular motivated people to visit the gym more often.

The megastudy model allows scientists to compare dozens of different behaviors change interventions, which can accelerate the development and testing of new insights about human behavior.

The study has helpful insights for those hoping to build exercise into more of their daily lives, but its impact stretches beyond that, according to the researchers.

Were really doing two things in this work, Milkman says. The first is introducing a new methodology for accelerating the generation of rigorously tested behavioral science insights. The second is learning more about what techniques can be used to encourage physical activity and more generally motivate the pursuit of effortful goals.

This kind of study is having important implications for the future, and the method has been used to test the best messages to encourage people to get vaccinated.

Were tremendously proud that weve been able to leverage the nearly 150 brilliant scientific minds affiliated with the Behavior Change for Good Initiative to help generate key insights about pressing social problems, says Duckworth. We hope to continue advancing the science and practice of behavior change for good in leaps and bounds in the years ahead.

See more here:
A Wharton study on the best ways to boost workout habits | Penn Today - Penn Today

Faith and Values: The important distinction between justice and equity – The Spokesman-Review

What, exactly, is fair? What is justice? Definitions abound but few satisfy. One example, the principle of moral rightness, begs more questions. What is moral? What is rightness?

A recent Faith and Values column called for a higher standard that reflects Christs teachings so that they become visible in our own life by the way we show unity and love in a world of division and violence. Such morality is captured by the golden rule, an ideal found in most religions but rarely realized. Bahaullah wrote, if thine eyes be turned towards justice, choose thou for thy neighbor that which thou choosest for thyself.

Elsewhere he wrote, The best beloved of all things in My sight is Justice. Justice provides inherent wisdom. It allows us to see with our own eyes and not through the eyes of others and know with our own knowledge and not through the knowledge of our neighbors. Verily justice is My gift to thee, writes Bahaullah, and the sign of My loving-kindness. Set it then before thine eyes.

Equity confers a higher justice. Often confused with justice, equity implies a justice that transcends the strict letter of the law. It is in keeping with what is reasonable rather than what is merely legal. Essentially, justice is the letter of the law, equity the spirit of the law.

Justice isnt always equitable; applying a law equitably seems sometimes impossible, partly because of legal precedents. Is it justice to prosecute a trespasser who cant read the No Trespassing sign? What would be an equitable application of this law?

Justice and equity are twin Guardians that watch over men the cause of the well-being of the world and the protection of the nations, Bahullh wrote.

Abdul-Baha observes that humans are created and adorned differently from, and above, other animals. This requires man to have love and affinity for his own kind, nay rather, to act towards all living creatures with justice and equity.

Such guidance suggests that human behavior toward all living things, as well as the nonliving elements that support them, should reflect this ethic. Ecosystems provide sustenance, life itself. Is it equitable for some of us to damage and degrade systems that support all of us? We create pollution and greenhouse gases that affect our entire planet. These are not easy questions to resolve, but resolve them we must if we are to avoid further consequences of our reckless behavior.

A standard of behavior based on justice and equity was described by Shoghi Effendi, grandson of Abdul-Baha. He calls for a rectitude of conduct, with its implications of justice, equity, truthfulness, honesty, fair-mindedness, reliability, and trustworthiness.

High standards indeed! Yet essential if we are to overcome division and violence. Solving these problems must employ, yet transcend, technological solutions. It will require morality justice and equity for all sisters and brothers sharing our planet.

Its unlikely any of us can meet all these standards, yet we can try even knowing we wont attain them. Staying aware of such standards is a good beginning. We can bring ourselves to daily account and ask, Howd I do? And we can respond truthfully. Maybe resolve to do better.

By doing this, we purify our characters and improve our conduct. The purpose of Gods revelation is to educate the souls of men, and refine the character of every living man.

This education begins with parents prayers before the birth of each child. It continues as children learn to speak and pray, and to love the Creator. Such love generates a spiritual sense of equity and justice in us all.

Armed with a bachelors degree in English literature, Pete Haug plunged into journalism fresh out of college. That career lasted five years while he reported for a metropolitan daily, edited a rural weekly and worked in industrial and academic public relations. Petes columns on the Bahai faith represent his own understanding and not any official position.

Read the original post:
Faith and Values: The important distinction between justice and equity - The Spokesman-Review

Using Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Adherence to COVID-19 Behavioral Guidelines – DocWire News

This article was originally published here

Behav Med. 2022 Jan 10:1-10. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2021.2021383. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has become a global pandemic. Throughout most of the pandemic, mitigating its spread has relied on human behavior, namely on adherence to protective behaviors (e.g., wearing a face mask). This research proposes that Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) can contribute to understanding differences in individual adherence to COVID-19 behavioral guidelines. PMT identifies four fundamental cognitive components that drive responses to fear appeals: perceptions of susceptibility (to the disease), severity (of the disease), self-efficacy (to protect oneself), and response efficacy (i.e., recommended behaviors effectiveness). Two online self-report studies assessed PMT components capacity to predict adherence to protective behaviors concurrently and across culturally different countries (Israel, Germany, India; Study 1), and again at six-week follow-up (Israeli participants; Study 2). Study 1s findings indicate excellent fit of the PMT model, with about half of the variance in adherence explained. No significant differences were found between participants from Israel (n = 917), Germany (n = 222) and India (n = 160). Study 2 (n = 711) confirmed that PMT components continue to predict adherence after six weeks. In both studies, response efficacy was the PMT component most strongly associated with adherence levels. This study demonstrates that PMT can serve as a theoretical framework to better understand differences in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviors. The findings may further inform the design of adherence-promoting communications, suggesting that it may be beneficial to highlight response efficacy in such messages.

PMID:35000566 | DOI:10.1080/08964289.2021.2021383

More:
Using Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Adherence to COVID-19 Behavioral Guidelines - DocWire News

Gravitational forces of the Sun and Moon impact behavior of all organisms even humans – Study Finds

SO PAULO, Brazil Maybe there really is something to the stories that strange things happen during a full moon. A new study finds that all biological organisms, from plants, to animals, to human beings, all have a connection to the gravitational forces coming the Sun and Moon.

Researchers from Brazil and the United Kingdom say their work reinforces the historical link between gravitational tides and how they affect the behavior of all life on Earth.

All matter on Earth, both live and inert, experiences the effects of the gravitational forces of the Sun and Moon expressed in the form of tides. The periodic oscillations exhibit two daily cycles and are modulated monthly and annually by the motions of these two celestial bodies. All organisms on the planet have evolved in this context. What we sought to show in the article is that gravitational tides are a perceptible and potent force that has always shaped the rhythmic activities of these organisms, study author Cristiano de Mello Gallep says in a media release.

The team reviewed past studies and also conducted experiments of their own, examining how both plants and animals set their biological clocks to the movement of these celestial objects. The new study shows that even when organisms dont have light to judge the time of day, their bodies alter their behavior according to the gravitational tides acting on the planet.

The data shows that in the absence of other rhythmic influences such as lighting or temperature, local gravitational tides are sufficient to organize the cyclical behavior of these organisms. This evidence questions the validity of so-called free-run experiments, in which several environmental factors are controlled but gravitational oscillations are not taken into consideration. These oscillations continue to exist, and may modulate the behavior of living organisms, Gallep explains.

Body rhythms which sync up with night and day, better known as circadian rhythms, are a popular topic in sleep studies. Despite their importance to sleep patterns and general health, researchers found that they could take creatures out their natual light-and-dark environments, and they still maintained a regular body rhythm cycle in line with Sun-Moon tidal forces. One of these animals are crustaceans, such as crabs and lobsters.

These animals modulate their behavior in tune with the ebb and flow of the tides, in a cycle of approximately 12.4 hours that derives from lunisolar dynamics, even when theyre moved to a laboratory with stable and controlled aquatic conditions, Gallep says. The pattern persists for several days, matching lunisolar tidal timing at the site where the organisms were collected in nature.

The team notes that even though the gravitational effect of the Sun and Moon only have a fraction of the impact Earths gravity has on life, its still enough to cause changes to the oceans, rivers, lakes, and planets tectonic plates.

In experiments examining the sprouting of seeds, the team found that even plants make periodic adjustments to these cycles.

I observed that changes in the signal collected appeared every 12 or 24 hours, but differed in each germination test. When I looked for support in the literature, I found studies pointing to a possible correlation with gravitational tides. We explored this phenomenon in subsequent tests on various types of seed, and also added results obtained in the laboratory by collaborators in Prague, Czech Republic, in Leiden, Netherlands, and in Hamamatsu, Japan, Gallep concludes.

Previous studies have revealed that people can also sync up with the Moon cycles when they dont get enough sunlight. Study authors note that humans staying in the dark for long periods of time (like living in a cave) still established a cyclical fluctuation of 24.4 to 24.8 hours which is in harmony with a lunar cycle.

This body rhythm cycle manages a persons sleeping and wake times, mealtimes, and other metabolic processes.

The study is published in the Journal of Experimental Botany.

Read this article:
Gravitational forces of the Sun and Moon impact behavior of all organisms even humans - Study Finds

Year of the grizzly: how 2021 conflicts might shape our perspectives on bears – Missoulian

Editor's note:

This story is part of the Lee Enterprises series "Grizzlies and Us." The project examines the many issues surrounding the uneasy coexistence of grizzly bears and humans in the Lower 48, which have comemoreinto focusin recent years as the federally-protected animal pushes farther into human-occupied areas. The 10-part series, comprised of more than 20 stories, was produced byreporters and photojournalists across the Rocky Mountain West.

OVANDO - Which grizzly bear defined the summer of 2021?

Was it Monica, the aging sow on the northern edge of Glacier National Park who had to be killed by game wardens after she and her subadult cubs of the year went on garbage-raiding sprees at cabins along the North Fork of the Flathead River?

Or Felicia, an equally prolific female with cubs who became a traffic hazard on Togwotee Pass east of Grand Teton National Park, inspiring a posse of volunteer bear patrollers who tried to keep the peace between camera-slinging tourists and bears trying to make a living along a federal highway?

People are also reading

Or was it the unnamed 4-year-old male grizzly that killed a bike-camper in her tent in Ovando, roughly halfway between Glacier and Grand Teton, in the middle of whats fast become one of the most contentious Endangered Species Act debate in the nation?

The July 6 mauling death of Leah Davis Lokan, 65, made international headlines.

To say the incident happened in downtown Ovando overstates the size of the ranching center along Highway 200 thats grown equally popular with trout anglers and long-distance bike tourists. But looking at where Lokan pitched her tent, a dozen feet from the Brand Bar Museum, next door to the post office and across the main street from a grocery, caf, and fly-fishing store, puts the attack squarely in the center of human habitat.

Grizzly attack 1

Jamie Jonkel, a Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks wildlife management specialist, helped search for the bear that was involved in the fatal Ovando mauling.

Grizzly attack 2

Businesses in Ovando were open the day after the attack. The mauling remained a topic of discussion.

Grizzly attack 3

State wildlife officials eventually matched DNA taken from a grizzly killed on July 9 to evidence from the fatal mauling in Ovando on July 6. The suspect grizzly had also raided two chicken coops in the Ovando area, and was killed by a federal Wildlife Services agent near one of the coops.

Grizzly attack 4

One of five bear traps that was set up in Ovando shortly after the attack.

Grizzly attack 1

Jamie Jonkel, a Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks wildlife management specialist, helped search for the bear that was involved in the fatal Ovando mauling.

Grizzly attack 2

Businesses in Ovando were open the day after the attack. The mauling remained a topic of discussion.

Grizzly attack 3

State wildlife officials eventually matched DNA taken from a grizzly killed on July 9 to evidence from the fatal mauling in Ovando on July 6. The suspect grizzly had also raided two chicken coops in the Ovando area, and was killed by a federal Wildlife Services agent near one of the coops.

Grizzly attack 4

One of five bear traps that was set up in Ovando shortly after the attack.

The details of the other two grizzlies, including the names Monica and Felicia, illustrate how humans have pushed the other way, into places grizzlies used to dominate. When Lewis and Clark made their Voyage of Discovery at the opening of the 19th century, an estimated 50,000 grizzly bears inhabited the Lower 48 States west of the 100th meridian the longitudinal line running roughly from North Dakota to Texas.

A dozen decades later, the bear emblazoned on the flag of California was nearly extinct throughout its natural range. Systematic destruction of its habitat and numbers, by ranchers, farmers and government agents, removed the grizzly bear from virtually every place except the preserves of Yellowstone and Glacier national parks.

Remarkably, the grizzlys attractiveness to tourists spared it from National Park Service predator culls. An 1895 Yellowstone superintendents report mentions the bears had increased notably after the U.S. Army put out garbage to feed them, while other bounty hunters were eradicating the wolves, mountain lions and coyotes in the park.

When the grizzly bear became the eighth animal given protection under the Endangered Species Act in 1975, somewhat fewer than 600 individual bears remained between Canada and Mexico. Over the next 45 years, two numbers changed: Grizzly populations grew from 600 to an estimated 2,100 in the recovery zones of Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. And humans in the same space expanded from 1.9 million to 3.4 million.

What didnt change was the size of the landscape. Put another way, people in the Rocky Mountain West went from 5.9 per square mile to 10.3 per square mile between 1975 and 2020. Grizzlies went from .002 to .006 per square mile.

Monica the North Fork grizzly was about 20 years old when Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks killed her and her three yearling cubs in early September. In her lifetime, annual visitation to Glacier National Parks Polebridge entrance went from 31,000 to 89,000, data shows.

While she often spent time near homes and was observed by residents, she did not cause conflicts that we knew about until the fall of 2018 when she had just two of her three yearlings with her, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks bear manager Tim Manley noted in a report to the North Fork Preservation Association. The initial reports we had were that the family group had ripped into a yurt, damaged two vehicles, got into unsecured garbage and had pushed on a trailer.

Wardens captured Monicas two yearlings, who were suspected of causing the most trouble, and killed them. She gave birth to three more cubs in 2020, but had no reported conflicts. Things stayed quiet until this summer.

Manley said in late August, Monica and her triplet yearlings got into trouble all over the Polebridge vicinity. They knocked over barbecues, broke into improperly closed bear-resistant trash cans, pulled garbage out of a horse trailer, broke windows out of a pickup topper to get food, damaged a car that didnt have any food, and tore the wall out of a camper trailer to get a big food reward.

The sow and all three of her yearlings were captured and killed.

I have said it many times before, killing bears is the worst part of my job, Manley told the homeowners. We try to avoid having to do it, but when bears become very food-conditioned and start causing property damage and breaking into vehicles, trailers and cabins, those bears are removed.

Outside Grand Teton, the opposite problem developed. People wouldnt leave Felicia alone.

Wildlife biologists call the bear by her number, 863, which means she was the 863rd bear to be caught and affixed with a telemetry collar in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. On social media, she became Felicia.

Either way, the female with cubs wholikes to munch on grass and clover near Highway 26/287 in western Wyoming has become one of the most famous grizzly bears after fellow Grand Teton Bear 399. And her propensity to be near traffic and apparent nonchalance about hordes of people gathering to take pictures helped make her into a bit of a social media sensation. She also created a traffic hazard, according to Wyoming wildlife and law enforcement officials, not to mention the daily possibility that one of those photographers will inch just a little too close before everyone remembers too late that grizzly bears on the side of the road are still grizzly bears.

Wildlife watchers pull off along the side of U.S. Highway 26/287 east of Moran, Wyoming, to catch a glimpse of grizzly bear 863, known as Felicia.

Were trying to alter the bears behavior but also trying to fix peoples behavior, and thats where the big challenge is, said Dan Thompson, large carnivore section supervisor for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. From a human psychological standpoint its been fascinating to be involved with.

Draw a line about 25 miles to the south and the human behavior aspect of the story changes.

Ranchers say theyre struggling against an increasing number of grizzlies preying on their cattle. Problem grizzlies must be managed, and often lethally removed. Their ranching livelihoods depend on it. Conservation groups are suing to stop those killings, and leasing in general. Grizzlies and cattle dont mix, they say, among other things.

At the same time, new homeowners are buying houses and property, often sight unseen, throughout the stretch of land bordering Yellowstone National Park on any side. The buffer has long been a place where grizzlies could wander with minimal impact, with its human residents long-ago trained in the art of keeping food away from bears. Wildlife managers worry the flood of new residents may not be so bear wise, and that conflicts will only increase.

The Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Wyoming Highway Patrol and Forest Service tried placing flashing signs telling people not to stop on the side of the road. They threatened tickets to those standing in traffic, ignoring oncoming vehicles. Eventually, the Fish and Wildlife Service decided to spend a couple of weeks hazing the female with cubs to make her leave the road and move further into the mountains.

Jack Bayles understands that some people behaved irresponsibly. Watchers started a live video stream from Togwotee Pass to alert anyone following them when she appeared. People from as far as Montana, Salt Lake City, Utah and Colorado came to the area, and some approached her and her cubs far too closely.

The grizzly sow known as Felicia and her cub of the year saunter down the highway onTogwotee Pass in 2019. A multi-agency effort has begun to haze the grizzly away from the roadside due to regular traffic jams.

But the best reaction wasnt to shoot the bear with rubber bullets and bean bags, he said. Instead, Bayles said he believes officials should have managed the human side of the situation.

They have no problem when that section is a parking lot in the weekend in the winter and people are dragging trailers 90 mph down icy roads, Bayles said. Its not the land of many uses, just the land of uses we approve of.

Bayles is one of countless guides in the Yellowstone region and across bear country stretching from Jackson to Katmai National Park in Alaska that take people out to watch bears and other wildlife. He started his business in 2015 with his wife, Gina, and named it Team 399 after the regions other famous bear.

The accidental ambassador of her species, she is representative of a new age in human wildlife relationships where coexistence and understanding are the new way, where a love of the wild is foremost in our hearts and minds, their website reads.

He wants to raise awareness for conservation issues. He wants to give back to the wild places and wild creatures that have given so much to us. He also knows that most people coming to Yellowstone or other areas with grizzly bears are there, at least in part, for the chance to see a grizzly bear.

Its the only place in the world where the common middle class person can see a grizzly bear in the wild, Bayles said. You could say over the course of our life, bear 399 is a billion-dollar bear to the Wyoming economy.

Grizzly bear No. 399 and her four cubs cross a road as Cindy Campbell stops traffic in Jackson Hole, Wyoming on Nov. 17, 2020. Many people watched and followed the travels of the well-known 24-year-old bear and her cubs right up until they denned for the winter.

There is going to be conflict between bears and people, Thompson said. We will have to lethally remove grizzly bears for the greater good theres the potential for humans to be injured and even killed, and thats the reality of it. The notion of a future of bears and humans together without conflict is very nave.

As far as the future? I dont think its going to get any easier.

In Ovando, the future holds a lot of work.

While complete details surrounding the death of Lokan await the release of a Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee Board of Review report, a big part of the small town was on the scene that night, trying to staunch the campers fatal wounds and wondering what had triggered the attack.

For many, it was a replay of The Night of the Grizzlies, the famous book chronicling the 1967 tragedy when two women in two separate campgrounds were attacked and killed by two separate grizzlies on the same night in Glacier National Park. At the time, resort managers in both Glacier and Yellowstone national parks deliberately left garbage out to attract grizzly bears for tourist viewing. Some Yellowstone hotels even set up bleachers to watch the evening show.

That food conditioning combined with growing popularity of backcountry camping put two 19-year-old hotel workers in the path of two predators in a place marketed and managed for recreation.

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Night of the Grizzlies newspaper clip

Link:
Year of the grizzly: how 2021 conflicts might shape our perspectives on bears - Missoulian