All posts by medical

On Fatherlessness and Mass Shootings – Daily Citizen – Daily Citizen

As the unspeakable evil of mass shootings continue to increase, each of us are trying to understand what could be driving these tragedies. There are no shortage of explanations being bandied about with absolute certainty, from ineffectual gun control laws, mental illness, peer bullying, first-person shooter video games, violence in movies and television shows, growing personal anger and alienation. Fatherlessness has even been mentioned as a driver. Others strongly deny the linkage and blame guns.

Senator Mike Lee, R-Utah, considered the role of family breakdown and fatherlessness in a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. Lee said, Every time one of these tragedies occurs, for too long we have failed to look back at the root causes of rampage violence. Why is our culture all of sudden producing so many young men who want to murder innocent people? Lee continued, It raises the question, could fatherlessness, the break-down of the family, isolation from civil society or the glorification of violence be contributing factors?

The Senator is asking important questions. But others disagree.

A faculty member at the highly conservative Brigham Young University recently opined in the Mormon-owned Deseret News that as a sociologist of family and fatherhood, I can tell you that the best available evidence suggests that neither is responsible for the increase in these horrific events. He denies father absence and family breakdown are drivers. He says its guns.

But leading mainstream sociologists and the larger body of data disagree with this dismissal. Brad Wilcox, a sociologist at the University of Virginia and founder and Senior Fellow at the Institute for Family Studies, contends, Sen. Mike Lee is right to wonder if fatherlessness and family breakdown are factors in the tidal wave of violence that has engulfed America since 2020.

Professor Wilcox adds, We know that young men who are raised without the benefit of good fathers are more likely to engage in violent behavior. Of course, other factors are also likely in play

It has long been consistently demonstrated that fatherlessness, violence, and criminal behavior go together in dramatic ways. The U.S. Department of Justice explains that the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reported in 1997 that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. This scholarly journal also reported, According to a 1993 Metropolitan Life Survey, Violence in Americas Public Schools, 71 percent of teachers and 90 percent of law enforcement officials state that the lack of parental supervision at home is a major factor that contributes to the violence in schools. And fatherlessness decreases the amount and quality of this supervision dramatically.

More recently, a 2021 meta-analysis in the scientific journal Psychology, Crime & Law examined 48 different academic studies on the relationship between fatherlessness and criminal behavior, finding a remarkably strong correlation. These scholars explain, the results suggest that growing up in a single-parent family and adolescent involvement in crime are related since a large majority of the studies shows a positive relation between single-parent families and the level of crime. They add their findings are in accordance with previous literature reviews on the topic.

These scholars seem to agree with leaders like Senator Mike Lee when they conclude their journal article with this encouragement: it is important to investigate in more detail how this relation between single-parent families and crime works to ensure that criminal behavior by adolescents is minimized.

Deserert News countered such findings with curious statements from a variety of miscellaneous scholars like Shawn Fremstad, a scholar at the Center for Economic Policy Research,

Mass shootings are extreme events, so we dont have a lot of demographic or survey data to look at, but there is no evidence-based reason for believing that mass shootings are caused by single mothers, grandmothers who raised their grandchildren or lesbian couples, all examples of fatherless household arrangements.

Fremstad is correct from a number of angles. But wrong in others.

Yes, the violent and public slaughter of innocent lives with high-powered guns is an extreme event that confounds all reason. And no one is saying fatherlessness alone is driving such tragedies. But to dismiss it altogether is unsound.

There has not been a great deal of research breaking down the psychological profiles and reasoning behind such shootings. But there has been some, as we will examine below. But isolating single reasons for such madness is nearly impossible because such atrocities challenge any sort of reasoning. It is nearly impossible to find reasons for inherently irrational actions. And certainly, a mass shooter does not a fatherless home create. But it certainly does cause all such children to walk with significant emotional, developmental and spiritual limps.

That is the problem with trying to explain the unspeakable evil of mass shooting with a single driver like gun possession, mental illness, violent video games, or the breakdown of the family. Yes, psychologists find that fatherlessness negatively impacts nearly every measure of well-being for children, including criminal and violent behavior. Sociologists find the same thing. Fatherlessness does not generally benefit any measure of child well-being. None.

But guns and fatherlessness have been widely experienced in our society for decades. Neither can be isolated as the primary cause of the dramatic increase in mass shootings we are experiencing in the last twenty years. There must be other troubling factors as well.

The U.S. Department of Justices National Institute of Justice (NIJ) recently reported that [p]ersons who committed public mass shootings in the U.S. over the last half century were commonly troubled by personal trauma before their shooting incidents, nearly always in a state of crisis at the time. Specially, NIJ reported, Suicidality was found to be a strong predictor of perpetration of mass shootings. In fact, among young people, NIJ reports that 92% of mass shooters committed by those in the K-12 age range were found to be suicidal at the time of the shootings and 100% of college-age shooters were suicidal at the time!

Family breakdown and father abandonment certainly fit as a major life driver of such individual pain and life trauma. Who can deny this fact? But we must also be open to considering additional evils at work today driving such horrific social problems if we are going to find real solutions. Human behavior is indeed complex. Pure evil is too and that is what each mass shooting is.

Photo from Shutterstock.

Original post:
On Fatherlessness and Mass Shootings - Daily Citizen - Daily Citizen

Rice’s top-ranked I-O psychology program has helped its alumni stand out – Rice News

Earlier this year, Rice Universitys graduate program in industrial organizational psychology was ranked No. 1 in the nation by U.S. News and World Report .

The top ranking comes as no surprise to the faculty, students and alumni affiliated with the program, long known for excellence in the field of I-O psychology, the scientific study of human behavior in organizations and the workplace.

"I am so proud of the world-class scholars in our I/O Psychology program who bring such energy and skill to their work," said Rice Dean of Social Sciences Rachel Kimbro. "This is a well-deserved recognition!"

The I-O program is an undiscovered diamond at Rice, said Eduardo Salas, department chair and I-O professor of psychological sciences. Just look at the accomplishments of the faculty from national scholarly lifetime achievement awards to national teaching awards winners. Our faculty and graduate students conduct impactful research on a range of issues, including diversity and inclusion, resilience in organizations, employee training and testing, team science, safety, the aging workforce and artificial intelligence in the workplace. Our expertise is sought out worldwide.

Rice I-O psychological sciences faculty include three past presidents of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology and five fellows of the organization. They have authored books, won numerous teaching, mentoring and research awards, and received millions of dollars in grant funding.

In short, theyre exactly what you would expect in the No. 1-ranked program in this discipline, Salas said.

Perhaps the biggest indicators of the programs success are its alumni, who have flourished in fields ranging from academia to health care to aerospace.

Eden King, the Lynette S. Autrey Professor of Psychology and graduate of Rice with a bachelors degree and Ph.D. in psychological sciences, was attracted to Rices culture before attending as an undergraduate. She returned for graduate school because of the chance to work with Mikki Hebl, the Martha and Henry Malcolm Lovett Chair of Psychology, to address meaningful questions about prejudice and discrimination at work.

I definitely had a competitive edge because of the mentorship I received, King said, recalling professors who stopped at nothing to make sure she was prepared for entering the workforce. The faculty at Rice helped make sure that I had the knowledge, skills and scholarly evidence to propel me forward in my career.

Stephanie Zajac, a leadership practitioner at MD Anderson Cancer Center, picked Rice and the Department of Psychological Sciences because she was seeking a smaller, more personal environment for grad school.

In the grad school rankings, the culture at Rice was mentioned as something that really drew students there, and I could tell when I visited that it was very supportive and collegial. Both the students and the professors were warm and inviting, she said. Also, Rice overall is an amazing university with a very good reputation in the field.

Zajac said the programs rigor, in combination with professors who were truly invested in her success, helped her determine her career direction and find success in this field.

Whatever your goals are, they are invested in helping you get there, she said. I still have a great relationship with our I-O professors and have worked with many of them throughout my professional career.

Like King and Zajac, Kelly Goff, currently senior director of talent strategy for Blue Origin, came to Rice because of the I-O programs quality, support of graduate students and the reputation of the university overall as well as its central location in Houston. She is responsible for workforce planning, compensation, talent management, talent analytics and employer branding for her company, which is working to enable a future where millions of people are living and working in space for the benefit of Earth.

It was important to me to select a program that was supportive of not only the academic research, but the practical application in the real world, she said. I knew before grad school that I wanted to use my education by applying research-backed solutions within companies. Rice provided that balanced approach strong academics coupled with industry connections.

Goff said Rices affiliation with a variety of organizations provided a pathway to practical work experiences in the Texas Medical Center and an internship at NASA.

Rices I-O program provided a very strong foundation in how to do research identify a problem, investigate, understand relevant research in the field, experimentation, statistical analysis and writing, she said. My success in my career is largely due to these skills applied to a variety of problems. Knowing how to do research has given me the ability to tackle any problem, especially new ones, and work through them successfully.

More information on Rices Department of Psychological Sciences is available online at https://psychology.rice.edu.

Originally posted here:
Rice's top-ranked I-O psychology program has helped its alumni stand out - Rice News

DiPiazza named Delaware Behavioral Specialist of the Year – Milford LIVE

Rosa DiPiazza, BHP, a behavioral specialist with Milford School District was recently named Delaware Behavioral Health Specialist of the Year. DiPiazza has been with Milford since completing an internship as part of her masters degree.

Ive always been interested in the intersection of science and behavior, but it took me some time to find the right balance for me, DiPiazza said. I worked in a neuroscience research lab for a while in college, but quickly realized I needed more human interaction. That led me to work with Domestic Violence Services, which solidified my desire to work with children and my belief in the importance of early intervention. Part of that work included partnering with schools to run prevention education groups. I loved working in schools and being able to provide consistent services to children. I initially started my graduate work in clinical psychology, but when I learned about school psychology, I realized it was a great fit for me and switched programs. I love school psychology because it combines data-driven interventions and science with direct human service. Its the best of both worlds.

DiPiazza graduated from Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania in 2013 with a bachelors degree in neuroscience. She worked as a Childrens Advocate with Domestic Violence Services of Lancaster County before starting graduate school at Millersville University in Millersville, Pennsylvania, where she earned a bachelors degree psychology and an educational specialist certification in school psychology. While DiPiazza was finishing her masters degree, her mother moved to Delaware. She felt it made sense to search for internships and was selected for one in Milford where she has remained.

One of the most challenging things about this job is how long it can take to see progress in student mental health, DiPiazza said. I think theres sometimes a perception that everything gets better immediately if you just get someone started with counseling or other mental health supports. Thats usually not the case. Progress in mental health can be a slow process that sometimes doubles back on itself. Its important to stay hopeful and optimistic. You have to be able to look for the incremental changes and hold expectations that are both high and reasonable. Sometimes it feels like there isnt any progress being made at all, and then all of a sudden everything will come together. That can be a different kind of challenging. Thats usually when students graduate from my caseload, which means I see them less when everything is going well.

One of the best parts of her job is building relationships with students, colleagues and families. DiPiazza explained that she loves feeling like she is part of the school community.

I love watching students grow and learn and apply their new skills in new situations, DiPiazza said. Being involved in problem-solving teams and providing consultative support to colleagues is deeply rewarding. Not only can I see students improving, I am often also able to watch colleagues take those same skills and strategies and apply them in other situations with other students. Anything I can do to share my knowledge and expertise with others and build collective capacity is rewarding. Hoarded knowledge helps one person; shared knowledge helps us all.

As part of the recognition, DiPiazza receives a $2,000 personal award in recognition of being chosen as the district Behavioral Specialist of the Year. She also receives an additional $3,000 as a state winner and the Delaware Department of Education provides her with a $5,000 grant to be used for the educational benefit of her students.

I hope to use this platform to advocate for universal implementation of trauma-informed practices and well-functioning multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS) in our schools, DiPiazza said. Things like having calming areas in our classrooms and schools, building consistent structure and routines into our days, and praising effort and growth feel like small changes, but they can go a long way towards making our students feel safe and cared for at school. When these things are part of every students school experience, we are then able to identify students who need additional supports and provide them with what they need without overwhelming our systems.

Laura Manges, Director of Student Services, believes this was an amazing honor for DiPiazza, but is not at all surprised she received it.

From the moment Rosa began working with our students in Milford, she provided a level of compassion, maturity and expertise that was extremely rare to find in such a young practitioner, Manges said. The Milford School community is truly fortunate to have Rosa DiPiazza on our team. She most certainly is a leader in behavioral health. I look for more great things to come from her leadership in the future.

Dr. Kevin Dickerson, Superintendent, echoed the sentiments of Manges.

We are incredibly proud of Ms. DiPiazza for her deserved recognition as Delawares Behavioral Health Professional of the Year, stated Dr. Dickerson. We are extremely grateful to have Ms. DiPiazza working in the Milford School District and, furthermore, for the exceptional work that she does with our students, staff and families. This is a tremendous honor and is reflective of the huge impact she has serving our students and the entire Mispillion Elementary Schools school-community.

See original here:
DiPiazza named Delaware Behavioral Specialist of the Year - Milford LIVE

Ancient DNA helps reveal social changes in Africa 50000 years ago that shaped the human story – Roanoke Times

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

(THE CONVERSATION) Every person alive on the planet today is descended from people who lived as hunter-gatherers in Africa.

The continent is the cradle of human origins and ingenuity, and with each new fossil and archaeological discovery, we learn more about our shared African past. Such research tends to focus on when our species, Homo sapiens, spread out to other landmasses 80,000-60,000 years ago. But what happened in Africa after that, and why dont we know more about the people who remained?

People are also reading

Our 2022 study, conducted by an interdisciplinary team of 44 researchers based in 12 countries, helps answer these questions. By sequencing and analyzing ancient DNA (aDNA) from people who lived as long ago as 18,000 years, we roughly doubled the age of sequenced aDNA from sub-Saharan Africa. And this genetic information helps anthropologistslikeus understand more about how modern humans were moving and mingling in Africa long ago.

Tracing our human past in Africa

Beginning about 300,000 years ago, people in Africa who looked like us the earliest anatomically modern humans also started behaving in ways that seem very human. They made new kinds of stone tools and began transporting raw materials up to 250 miles (400 kilometers), likely through trade networks. By 140,000-120,000 years ago, people made clothing from animal skins and began to decorate themselves with pierced marine shell beads.

While early innovations appeared in a patchwork fashion, a more widespread shift happened around 50,000 years ago around the same time that people started moving into places as distant as Australia. New types of stone and bone tools became common, and people began fashioning and exchanging ostrich eggshell beads. And while most rock art in Africa is undated and badly weathered, an increase in ochre pigment at archaeological sites hints at an explosion of art.

What caused this shift, known as the Later Stone Age transition, has been a longstanding archaeological mystery. Why would certain tools and behaviors, which up until that point had appeared in a piecemeal way across Africa, suddenly become widespread? Did it have something to do with changes in the number of people, or how they interacted?

The challenge of accessing the deep past

Archaeologists reconstruct human behavior in the past mainly through things people left behind remains of their meals, tools, ornaments and sometimes even their bodies. These records may accumulate over thousands of years, creating views of daily livelihoods that are really averages over long periods of time. However, its hard to study ancient demography, or how populations changed, from the archaeological record alone.

This is where DNA can help. When combined with evidence from archaeology, linguistics and oral and written history, scientists can piece together how people moved and interacted based on which groups share genetic similarities.

But DNA from living people cant tell the whole story. African populations have been transformed over the past 5,000 years by the spread of herding and farming, the development of cities, ancient pandemics and the ravages of colonialism and slavery. These processes caused some lineages to vanish and brought others together, forming new populations.

Using present-day DNA to reconstruct ancient genetic landscapes is like reading a letter that was left out in the rain: some words are there but blurred, and some are gone completely. Researchers need ancient DNA from archaeological human remains to explore human diversity in different places and times and to understand what factors shaped it.

Unfortunately, aDNA from Africa is particularly hard to recover because the continent straddles the equator and heat and humidity degrade DNA. While the oldest aDNA from Eurasia is roughly 400,000 years old, all sequences from sub-Saharan Africa to date have been younger than around 9,000 years.

Breaking the tropical ceiling

Because each person carries genetic legacies inherited from generations of their ancestors, our team was able to use DNA from individuals who lived between 18,000-400 years ago to explore how people interacted as far back as the last 80,000-50,000 years. This allowed us, for the first time, to test whether demographic change played a role in the Later Stone Age transition.

Our team sequenced aDNA from six individuals buried in what are now Tanzania, Malawi and Zambia. We compared these sequences to previously studied aDNA from 28 individuals buried at sites stretching from Cameroon to Ethiopia and down to South Africa. We also generated new and improved DNA data for 15 of these people, trying to extract as much information as possible from the small handful of ancient African individuals whose DNA is preserved well enough to study.

This created the largest genetic dataset so far for studying the population history of ancient African foragers people who hunted, gathered or fished. We used it to explore population structures that existed prior to the sweeping changes of the past few thousand years.

DNA weighs in on a longstanding debate

We found that people did in fact change how they moved and interacted around the Later Stone Age transition.

Despite being separated by thousands of miles and years, all the ancient individuals in this study were descended from the same three populations related to ancient and present-day eastern, southern and central Africans. The presence of eastern African ancestry as far south as Zambia, and southern African ancestry as far north as Kenya, indicates that people were moving long distances and having children with people located far away from where they were born. The only way this population structure could have emerged is if people were moving long distances over many millennia.

Additionally, our research showed that almost all ancient eastern Africans shared an unexpectedly high number of genetic variations with hunter-gatherers who today live in central African rainforests, making ancient eastern Africa truly a genetic melting pot. We could tell that this mixing and moving happened after about 50,000 years ago, when there was a major split in central African forager populations.

We also noted that the individuals in our study were genetically most like only their closest geographic neighbors. This tells us that after around 20,000 years ago, the foragers in some African regions were almost exclusively finding their partners locally. This practice must have been extremely strong and persisted for a very long time, as our results show that some groups remained genetically independent of their neighbors over several thousand years. It was especially clear in Malawi and Zambia, where the only close relationships we detected were between people buried around the same time at the same sites.

We dont know why people began living locally again. Changing environments as the last Ice Age peaked and waned between about 26,000-11,500 years ago may have made it more economical to forage closer to home, or perhaps elaborate exchange networks reduced the need for people to travel with objects.

Alternatively, new group identities may have emerged, restructuring marriage rules. If so, we would expect to see artifacts and other traditions like rock art diversify, with specific types clumped into different regions. Indeed, this is exactly what archaeologists find a trend known as regionalization. Now we know that this phenomenon not only affected cultural traditions, but also the flow of genes.

As always, aDNA research raises as many questions as answers. Finding central African ancestry throughout eastern and southern Africa prompts anthropologists to reconsider how interconnected these regions were in the distant past. This is important because central Africa has remained archaeologically understudied, in part because of political, economic and logistical challenges that make research there difficult.

Additionally, while genetic evidence supports a major demographic transition in Africa after 50,000 years ago, we still dont know the key drivers. Determining what triggered the Later Stone Age transition will require closer examination of regional environmental, archaeological and genetic records to understand how this process unfolded across sub-Saharan Africa.

Finally, this study is a stark reminder that researchers still have much to learn from ancient individuals and artifacts held in African museums, and highlights the critical role of the curators who steward these collections. While some human remains in this study were recovered within the past decade, others have been in museums for a half-century.

Even though technological advances are pushing back the time limits for aDNA, it is important to remember that scientists have only just begun to understand human diversity in Africa, past and present.

Licenced as Creative Commons - attribution, no derivatives.

Thank you! You've reported this item as a violation of our terms of use.

Error! There was a problem with reporting this article.

This content was contributed by a user of the site. If you believe this content may be in violation of the terms of use, you may report it.

Get local news delivered to your inbox!

Continue reading here:
Ancient DNA helps reveal social changes in Africa 50000 years ago that shaped the human story - Roanoke Times

For Electric Cars To Be Viable, Charging Station Locations Need To Be Optimized – Science 2.0

One thing electric car owners who have lost the mystique tell you is that you live your life around them. Some report going to a store like Costco to charge their cars, they need new service panels at their house, and one owner famously blew up his Tesla with dynamite rather than pay $22,000 to replace the batteries when they wore out. An article in the Wall Street Journal was by someone excited to rent an electric car for a trip, only to find they spent more time charging it than sleeping.

But, like ethanol, as long as government mandates and subsidizes it, it is here to stay and won't improve a lot, so it would be wise to think about optimizing charging stations. Otherwise we will continue to have cultural theater like owners looking at their watches and griping at someone already plugged in.

The big problem in mass uptake is not just that it won't improve emissions, it is that utilities are often so regulated they cannot improve the grid. An electric car service at a house is equal in load to another home on the grid so they have to be placed carefully for mass consumer use. They are of no benefit if they are not placed based on travel patterns and user demand but right now they are not, they are only based on how little they will harm the grid.

When charging stations are placed based on what will work best for the existing power system rather than the transportation system, travel flow is not considered at all. Since electric cars are still in the novelty'gimmick/environmental halo stage, users will go out of their way to charge a car but gas stations are placed where users go, and for electric cars to become common they need to be just as convenient.

A new simulation hopes to account for power grids, transportation, and user demand. The limitation is what occurs in all models, from economics to political science - if it is just United Nations-style 'splitting the difference' it gives prestige to bad decisions and makes no one happy. The model uses existing power flow and the routes drivers they take when traveling, hoping to minimize travel time for users.

Does it work? The problem with using nonlinear terms and lots of variables is there is no right answer, you can only converge on an answer - and that is predicated on solving the right problem. If I want to know if a bridge will collapse, I am not going to simulate the whole bridge in some super-fine tetrahedral mesh, I will find areas of concern and model those in detail. But with human behavior you have to pick your spots and that is tricky. With electric cars, duration of charging, time of day and even location are in flux because driving patterns are different.

Then there is the energy generation problem itself. Electric car buyers are more literate than organic food shoppers so eventually they will realize that despite $3 trillion in subsidies, solar and wind have not reduced the share of energy produced by fossil fuels. And at least in the US natural gas has joined nuclear as targets of the anti-science left so we have as much chance of building new plants in 13 populous states as we do large astronomy telescopes - not much.

Yet more charging stations with inconsistent usage patterns are going to require greater need for 'reactive' energy generation, which is only possible using 'always on' plants like natural gas. Scientists can solve the math issue pretty well but fixing culture wars is a challenge no one can face.

See original here:
For Electric Cars To Be Viable, Charging Station Locations Need To Be Optimized - Science 2.0

New research indicates that romantic successes and failures can have profound impacts on how men think – PsyPost

A mans popularity in the dating market can influence his sexual attitudes and even his views about socio-political issues, according to new research published in the scientific journal Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology. The study offers new experimental evidence that being unpopular with the opposite sex can shift heterosexual mens views about the minimum wage and healthcare.

It may seem farfetched to say that an individuals dating life can influence the individuals socio-political attitudes. Yet, it is becoming more evident that romantic successes and failures in our everyday dating life can have profound impacts on the ways we think and act, said study author Francesca R. Luberti, a postdoctoral research fellow at Nipissing University in North Bay.

One needs to look no further than the incel phenomenon to have a concrete example of how dating can influence politics. Involuntary celibate (incel) men (an internet subculture thats become more popular in recent years) hold misogynistic attitudes and oppose gender equality because they believe they are unfairly rejected by women. I was interested in these phenomena, and I wanted to experimentally test whether dating popularity with opposite-sex potential partners could really affect heterosexual peoples socio-political attitudes.

In the study, which included 237 single heterosexual young adults, the participants first rated their self-perceived level of desirability as a romantic partner. The participants were then asked to record a short video of themselves in which they explained why they would make a good dating partner.

The participants were told that this video would be viewed by five opposite-sex peers, who would provide feedback in the form of brief video responses. While waiting for the video feedback, the participants completed demographic questionnaires and watched an ostensible loading page where links to the feedback videos slowly appeared one by one.

In reality, however, the video feedback had been prerecorded by actors and actresses. The participants randomly received one of six combinations of feedback, ranging from all positive to all negative.

After viewing the feedback videos, the participants then completed questionnaires related to traditional gender roles, casual sex, the minimum wage and healthcare, and implicit sexual and political attitudes.

We found that unpopular men (those who received a higher number of rejections from their peers) reported less support for casual sex than popular men (those who received a higher number of positive responses). Dating popularity did not affect any of womens socio-political attitudes, Luberti told PsyPost.

We also found that unpopular men reported lower positive affect (positive emotions such as happiness, enthusiasm, and pride) than popular men, and in turn men with lower positive affect reported less support for casual sex, as well as less support for increasing the minimum wage and access to healthcare, than men with higher positive affect.

Thus, the main take away from this study is that womens socio-political attitudes do not seem to be affected by dating popularity, whereas mens dating popularity causes changes in mens positive emotions and these changes in turn can shift some, although not all, of mens socio-political attitudes, Luberti said.

The new findings are in line with previous research, which has found that dating popularity is associated with mens support (or lack of support) for casual sex.

While earlier studies had already shown that dating popularity affects mens attitudes toward casual sex, to the best of my knowledge, this is the first experiment showing that experimentally manipulated dating feedback can also indirectly affect attitudes toward the minimum wage and access to healthcare through changes in mens positive emotions, Luberti explained.

Since these findings were not predicteda priori, further research is necessary to understand why we found significant relationships between dating popularity, positive emotions, and these pro-social attitudes in heterosexual men.

Further research should also try to replicate these findings in other samples, since we only collected data from young heterosexual Australian participants. It would be important to replicate these findings in other countries or include non-heterosexual participants, for example, to further prove the robustness of these patterns, Luberti said.

Moreover, with this study, we could only prove that unpopular men reported significantly different attitudes than popular men, but we could not show whether it is receiving more rejections, receiving fewer positive responses, or both that causes shifts in attitudes. These mechanisms should also be further investigated in future research.

The new findings are also in line with research that has indicated the incel subculture is driven in part by mating markets with higher competition among men.

Overall, this study provides evidence that dating can impact some of heterosexual mens politics, Luberti said. Phenomena like the incel subculture have caused real-world violence, and in recent years increasing political polarization has resulted in more political conflicts. Scientific research that focuses on mating and reproductive strategies can provide valuable insights into the causes of these current social issues.

The study, Changes in Positive Affect Due to Popularity in an Experimental Dating Context Influence Some of Mens, but Not Womens, Socio-Political Attitudes, was authored by Francesca R. Luberti, Khandis R. Blake, and Robert C. Brooks.

See more here:
New research indicates that romantic successes and failures can have profound impacts on how men think - PsyPost

Food for thought on the climate crisis | Courier-Herald – Enumclaw Courier-Herald

Too many people think they know more than experts.

For the sake of discussion lets say there was a very rich man who had been feeling poorly for some time and he couldnt understand what could be the matter, so he went to doctor after doctor to find out what the problem might be. Not being happy with the diagnosis, he continued until he had consulted with 100 doctors.

Out of those 100 doctors, 97 of them came up with the same diagnosis, which was, if he didnt make some serious changes in his lifestyle he was going to become very seriously ill and could quite possibly die. Three of those doctors said that his problem was not caused by his lifestyle and it was just the natural course of living and he neednt do anything.

Now lets extrapolate that situation to our planet. Ninety-seven percent of the climate scientists in the world are of the opinion that global warming is a serious problem, it is caused by human behavior and that drastic measures need to be taken to save our planet from dire consequences. One example of the huge problems that may be caused by our inaction is the permafrost in the Arctic Circle. If this starts to melt it will release an unstoppable supply of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that may lead to our planet being uninhabitable for human beings.

Unfortunately for us, there is a large segment of the population who choose to believe the three percent of those climate scientists that say that we are not causing global warming, so there is no need to change our lifestyles. We have come to a point, in our country at least, where there is a lot of My ignorance is as good as your knowledge moments, not only with science but with politics too.

For instance, the fact that seventy-four million people voted for a man who was a failure at nearly every business he started, filing bankruptcy several times, stiffing his investors, his suppliers and his contractors, was made by the courts to pay students of his sham university $25 million dollars and fined $5 million for using money from his own charity for private purposes and on top of everything else attempted to overthrow our duly elected government. And yet today he still has a very large following of voters.

Unfortunately, these are the times we are living in and this is my small attempt to interject some reason into the conversation.

Larry Benson

Enumclaw

View original post here:
Food for thought on the climate crisis | Courier-Herald - Enumclaw Courier-Herald

Is Bitcoin Immune To Government Regulation? – Bitcoin Magazine

Jesse Colzani is a regulatory specialist and Bitcoin researcher.

When asked whether the Bitcoin network can be regulated or not, people tend to answer in a binary way. On one side, there are those who say that everything can be regulated. On the other, there are those who believe that Bitcoin has already irreversibly separated money from the state. This article is an attempt to better understand what Bitcoin regulation depends on and what are the tools that regulators can reasonably use to limit its adoption.

For the purpose of this article, regulation is considered as state-mandated legal restrictions. But laws are not the only forces shaping society. In what is often referred to as the pathetic dot theory, Professor Lawrence Lessig identifies three other forces that constrain the action of an individual.

Each force can intentionally or not influence other ones. Laws can limit deforestation (architecture), social norms can shape markets, and weather (architecture) can affect agricultural production and food prices.

Forces can have an influence on other forces

When a law cannot directly target individuals, lawmakers look to regulate other forces. This happens when the government causes the price of cigarettes to increase (market), when it prohibits the use of specific words on TV to influence citizens behavior (social norms) or when it builds concrete barriers to create pedestrian zones (architecture).

Law can impact markets, architecture and social norms

But can laws always influence architecture? Can laws make a virus disappear? In todays world, highly contagious viruses cannot be eradicated due to a combination of biological reasons (architecture), financial constraints (market) and hostility to restrictions (social norms).

Like a virus, Bitcoin spreads globally (mutating when necessary) and depends on the right market incentives or socio-political momentum. Lawmakers cant shut down Bitcoin nor can they eradicate a virus, but they can use legal restrictions to mitigate the risk of specific undesired outcomes.

Law can have a direct impact on individuals

As long as one has a phone and an internet connection, she will be able to use Bitcoin. The efficacy of direct enforcement therefore depends on the jurisdiction where it takes place. In fact, only a disproportionate restriction of individual freedom might limit Bitcoin adoption in the short term (underground peer-to-peer markets will probably emerge in the long run).

Also, individuals tend to be more willing to violate laws when their money is at stake. That's why the past decade is full of instances where software developers, political activists and criminals used more or less sophisticated techniques to escape the governments scrutiny on their bitcoin.

Law can impact architecture

Although John Perry Barlows Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace is still relevant to some peoples lifestyle today, governments generally exercise a certain degree of control over the internet architecture. In fact, the data that flows through devices goes through centralized bottlenecks that make it possible for public authorities to shut down websites, identify anonymous users and control online traffic.

Bitcoin is different because its significantly more decentralized than most web applications we use today. Thanks to a strong network of nodes and mining rigs, changing the blockchain would be a Herculean task for any government.

At the same time, Bitcoin does rely on the internet infrastructure for nodes to communicate. In theory, this gives lawmakers a regulatory access point over the technical infrastructure. For example, since Bitcoin transactions are not encrypted, internet service providers could use special techniques to recognize them and even decide to not process them. However, even with the most draconian measures in place, experienced users will always have ways to broadcast transactions to the network (including last resort options such as SMS and Morse code).

Another solution would be to target core developers. This is a bad idea for at least two reasons. First, if threatened, identifiable developers could easily disappear and continue their work anonymously. Second, because the Bitcoin community relies on wide consensus, even the most influential developers wouldnt be able to push government-imposed changes into the code.

Law can impact markets

Governments can offer their citizens compelling market incentives to slow Bitcoin adoption or maintain control over the money flows. For example, the government of El Salvador offered $30 to every citizen who downloaded the Chivo wallet a custodial solution where the government has full control of the funds.

The most popular way governments currently attempt to regulate Bitcoin is through exchanges, liquidity providers and other intermediaries. By complying with know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, these new banks are able to offer compelling prices and attract the most inexperienced users. This has important consequences for the fungibility of the bitcoin supply and probably constitutes one of the greatest threats to Bitcoins promise of individual self-sovereignty.

It is not clear if, when and how governments will introduce central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) into their economies, but just like a government could promote the use of its CBDC through economic incentives, it could disincentivize bitcoin payments. For example, fees to access public services or local taxes could be reduced when using a government-issued digital currency while being full-priced or even more expensive if using bitcoin. This is important because while CBDCs will not have an impact on the network per se, they can slow down the adoption of bitcoin. Such an approach is often defined as libertarian paternalism, since individuals can freely choose whether they want to opt in or opt out of a specific system.

Law can impact social norms

Its undeniable that a lot of institutional skepticism shaped the publics perception of Bitcoin in a negative way. In fact, laws can attempt to shape the public perception in a variety of ways. For example, banning Bitcoin-related words on TV or establishing school programs that focus on the risks of using bitcoin.

Policymakers could even go a step further and promote bottom-up campaigns as an attempt to change the Bitcoin code. Although not backed by any public authority, a rather unconventional coalition is attempting such a strategy.

Just like we can assume that no government thinks it can completely eliminate a virus from its country, regulators finally understood that the same applies to the Bitcoin network, and their best option is to try limiting the way it spreads. Rather than taking the risk of watching their monetary power slowly erode, governments will likely experiment with different combinations of the tools described above to slow down the hyperbitcoinization process.

Bitcoin was engineered to be an extremely secure and decentralized system, but one needs to remember that its most important components are humans, which can be unreliable and unpredictable. Governments are not always ahead of the curve on understanding technology, but they do have a successful track record in driving human behavior.

This is a guest post by Jesse Colzani. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc. or Bitcoin Magazine.

Follow this link:
Is Bitcoin Immune To Government Regulation? - Bitcoin Magazine

Discriminating tastes: Why academia must tackle its "race science" problem – Salon

Former University of Toronto Professor of Clinical Psychology Jordan Peterson recently received a flurry of condemnation for a tweet in which he criticizedSports Illustrated's choice to put plus-size model Yumi Nu on the magazine's cover. His tweet (below) not only criticized her looks, but also suggested that her appearance was an authoritarian attempt by the left to force people like him to appreciate her beauty.

The backlash to Peterson's comments was swift and broad, and included social media influencers; online political commentators (likeHasan Piker andVaush); independent news outlets (like The Young Turks); mainstream news sources (NBC News, New York Post); and even international news outlets (The Independent, and Toronto Sun). In America's current political climate, incidents like the one caused by the aforementioned tweet are becoming more common as culture war issues are at the forefront of the public mind. Popular intellectual figures like Peterson have built their careers off of stoking these hot-button issues and then claiming that they are being persecuted when others disagree with them.

Interestingly, much of the blowback ignored Peterson's follow up tweet (above), in which he justifies his position by linking to scientific articles that purportedly validate his opinion. Peterson raises an interesting question: Can science be used to measure whether or not someone is attractive? While some recent studies have tried to do just that, far more studies refute these claims.

The sociology of human sexuality and race has long held that concepts like beauty and race are social constructions determined by a range of cultural, biological, and other complex social factors. On some innate level, just about everyone recognizes this truism; famously, it was embodied in the classic The Twilight Zone episode "Eye of the Beholder," whose lesson is that beauty is a local characteristic rather than a universal one. Yet, the intellectual dark web (of which Peterson is an adherent) and practitioners of this kind of "science" try to apply their model to nearly everything linking and reducing all kinds of aspects of human behavior as serving an evolutionary function.

The crowd that engages in this type of oft-sophistic debate over beauty should be familiar to anyone who follows the machinations of this latest iteration of the culture wars. Sometimes dubbed the Intellectual Dark Web (or IDW for short), they constitute a group of disgraced academics and other pseudo intellectuals (including podcaster Joe Rogan, and conservative commentator Dave Rubin) who claim that their voices are being silenced by traditional institutions who have become overly concerned with political correctness or "wokeness."

Peterson's claims run the full spectrum of biological determinism, from justifying social hierarchies as natural to claiming patriarchy should be the preferred organizing principle in societies.

However, researchers in the field of evolutionary studies (an area which focuses on how much of our behavior is a product of our biology) whose work is well-regarded tend to be far more cautious than Peterson and his ilk in their claims as to what we can definitely say about the so-called science of beauty. Against the overly deterministic model posed by the IDW, current consensus among scholars in this field is that human "nature" is a complex combination of biology and other social factors. These researchers are quick to note that they can't tell us with any great deal of precision what their findings necessarily mean for society at large.

The kind of model advocated by the IDW more closely resembles that of the 18th and 19th century biological determinism the kind that served as the basis for eugenics programs in Nazi Germany and even here in the United States. Peterson's claims run the full spectrum of biological determinism, from justifying social hierarchies as natural to claiming patriarchy should be the preferred organizing principle in societies. He also appears, at points in his book, to vindicate violent men like the Buffalo shooter or the Uvalde shooter by asserting that young men have to endure an unfair burden. To say that the ideas espoused by Peterson and the IDW connect to white supremacist ideology is more than just conjecture, as their ideas are observably trickling down from academia to far-right groups online.

RELATED:How the far right co-opted science

Indeed, the parallels between the rhetoric of the Buffalo shooter, and of the rhetoric espoused by Peterson and the like, are eerily similar. Far-right groups rejoice in Peterson's claims that hierarchies are natural and good for society, as they serve as a "legitimate" scientific basis for promoting racist ideologies. Laced throughout the manuscript left behind by the Buffalo shooter are references to a range of claims espoused by race scientists. These include tweets, memes, and links to prominent thinkers in this field like Steven Pinker and his colleagues who have published and espoused flawed literature directly cited by the shooter. The most infamous of these models is Charles Murray's book "The Bell Curve," in which he argues that intelligence and race are correlated the implication being that most people of color are "naturally" somehow less intelligent.These models continue to be invoked by prominent academics like Stanley Goldfarb, a former Dean of Medicine and current faculty at the University of Pennsylvania's medical school, who also opposes anti-racist efforts in medicine.

Taken together, these events suggest that biological determinism has permeated the ivory tower of academia more than many realize. While some of the examples mentioned here are explicit in their bigotry, there are far more cases of miscommunicated or poorly communicated scientific research being co-opted by far-right groups.

Some anti-racist academics in genetics have criticized their colleagues (above) and called for change from within. They emphasize that scientists can and should protect against the exploitation of their work in recognizing the importance of clearly communicating their findings.

When scientists fail to consider the ways their ideas might be used, for good and for bad, the results can be disastrous. Such was the case when some sociologistslevied a social constructionist critique of the use of the psychiatric system, which was subsequently used by conservatives to justify dismantling the state public health system in the United States. Scientists must use caution when trying to convey their ideas lest they be used to justify heinous acts, including terrorism.

The radicalization of the Buffalo shooter should serve as a warning to other scholars, as he was one in a long line of domestic terrorists who relied heavily upon "race science" to justify their actions.

The radicalization of the Buffalo shooter should serve as a warning to other scholars, as he was one in a long line of domestic terrorists who relied heavily upon "race science" to justify their actions. The same kinds of logic have also motivated people to commit heinous attacks against the LGBTQ+ community.

While the Buffalo shooter may have lacked the scientific literacy necessary to understand the studies he cites, researchers must work to not be complicit in this process. Whether it be scientific racism to justify one's beliefs, or a lack of full consideration as to the larger impact of one's findings, scientists need to better understand how working in science is a social activity. Science itself is a powerful tool when used in pursuit of helping lead the way towards the betterment of society, and it is equally a tool for harm when used to naturalize hierarchies and inequality found throughout society.

Frankfurt School philosopher Max Horkheimer famously wrote a critique of instrumental reason, in which Horkheimer argued that science could be co-opted if it was not consciously guided by those practicing it. This was the focus of his classic work, "The Eclipse of Reason," in which he showed how the Nazi party weaponized science by treating it as an end to itself, rather than a tool to be harnessed in pursuit of an goal. Today we face the same issues and problems in science, and for our collective good we must decide to what ends these tools are used and what we as a society wish to prioritize.

Read more on race and pseudoscience:

Continued here:
Discriminating tastes: Why academia must tackle its "race science" problem - Salon

The ‘Benjamin Button’ effect: Scientists can reverse aging in mice; the goal is to do the same for humans – WDJT

By Sandee LaMotte, CNN

(CNN) -- In molecular biologist David Sinclair's lab at Harvard Medical School, old mice are growing young again.

Using proteins that can turn an adult cell into a stem cell, Sinclair and his team have reset aging cells in mice to earlier versions of themselves. In his team's first breakthrough, published in late 2020, old mice with poor eyesight and damaged retinas could suddenly see again, with vision that at times rivaled their offspring's.

"It's a permanent reset, as far as we can tell, and we think it may be a universal process that could be applied across the body to reset our age," said Sinclair, who has spent the last 20 years studying ways to reverse the ravages of time.

"If we reverse aging, these diseases should not happen. We have the technology today to be able to go into your hundreds without worrying about getting cancer in your 70s, heart disease in your 80s and Alzheimer's in your 90s." Sinclair told an audience at Life Itself, a health and wellness event presented in partnership with CNN.

"This is the world that is coming. It's literally a question of when and for most of us, it's going to happen in our lifetimes," Sinclair told the audience.

"His research shows you can change aging to make lives younger for longer. Now he wants to change the world and make aging a disease," said Whitney Casey, an investor who is partnering with Sinclair to create a do-it-yourself biological age test.

While modern medicine addresses sickness, it doesn't address the underlying cause, "which for most diseases, is aging itself," Sinclair said. "We know that when we reverse the age of an organ like the brain in a mouse, the diseases of aging then go away. Memory comes back; there is no more dementia.

"I believe that in the future, delaying and reversing aging will be the best way to treat the diseases that plague most of us."

In Sinclair's lab, two mice sit side by side. One is the picture of youth, the other gray and feeble. Yet they are brother and sister, born from the same litter -- only one has been genetically altered to age faster.

If that could be done, Sinclair asked his team, could the reverse be accomplished as well? Japanese biomedical researcher Dr. Shinya Yamanaka had already reprogrammed human adult skin cells to behave like embryonic or pluripotent stem cells, capable of developing into any cell in the body. The 2007 discovery won the scientist a Nobel Prize, and his "induced pluripotent stem cells," soon became known as "Yamanaka factors."

However, adult cells fully switched back to stem cells via Yamanaka factors lose their identity. They forget they are blood, heart and skin cells, making them perfect for rebirth as "cell du jour," but lousy at rejuvenation. You don't want Brad Pitt in "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" to become a baby all at once; you want him to age backward while still remembering who he is.

Labs around the world jumped on the problem. A studypublished in 2016 by researchers at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, showed signs of aging could be expunged in genetically aged mice, exposed for a short time to four main Yamanaka factors, without erasingthe cells' identity.

But there was a downside in all this research: In certain situations, the altered mice developed cancerous tumors.

Looking for a safer alternative, Sinclair lab geneticist Yuancheng Lu chose three of the four factors and genetically added them to a harmless virus. The virus was designed to deliver the rejuvenating Yamanaka factors to damaged retinal ganglion cells at the back of an aged mouse's eye. After injecting the virus into the eye, the pluripotent genes were then switched on by feeding the mouse an antibiotic.

"The antibiotic is just a tool. It could be any chemical really, just a way to be sure the three genes are switched on," Sinclair said. "Normally they are only on in very young developing embryos and then turn off as we age."

Amazingly, damaged neurons in the eyes of mice injected with the three cells rejuvenated, even growing new axons, or projections from the eye into the brain. Since that original study, Sinclair said his lab has reversed aging in the muscles and brains of mice and is now working on rejuvenating a mouse's entire body.

"Somehow the cells know the body can reset itself, and they still know which genes should be on when they were young," Sinclair said. "We think we're tapping into an ancient regeneration system that some animals use -- when you cut the limb off a salamander, it regrows the limb. The tail of a fish will grow back; a finger of a mouse will grow back."

That discovery indicates there is a "backup copy" of youthfulness information stored in the body, he added.

"I call it the information theory of aging," he said. "It's a loss of information that drives aging cells to forget how to function, to forget what type of cell they are. And now we can tap into a reset switch that restores the cell's ability to read the genome correctly again, as if it was young."

While the changes have lasted for months in mice, renewed cells don't freeze in time and never age (like, say, vampires or superheroes), Sinclair said. "It's as permanent as aging is. It's a reset, and then we see the mice age out again, so then we just repeat the process.

"We believe we have found the master control switch, a way to rewind the clock," he added. "The body will then wake up, remember how to behave, remember how to regenerate and will be young again, even if you're already old and have an illness."

Studies on whether the genetic intervention that revitalized mice will do the same for people are in early stages, Sinclair said. It will be years before human trials are finished, analyzed and, if safe and successful, scaled to the mass needed for a federal stamp of approval.

While we wait for science to determine if we too can reset our genes, there are many other ways to slow the aging process and reset our biological clocks, Sinclair said.

"The top tips are simply: Focus on plants for food, eat less often, get sufficient sleep, lose your breath for 10 minutes three times a week by exercising to maintain your muscle mass, don't sweat the small stuff and have a good social group," Sinclair said.

All these behaviors affect our epigenome, proteins and chemicals that sit like freckles on each gene, waiting to tell the gene "what to do, where to do it, and when to do it," according to the National Human Genome Research Institute. The epigenome literally turns genes on and off.

What controls the epigenome? Human behavior and one's environment play a key role. Let's say you were born with a genetic predisposition for heart disease and diabetes. But because you exercised, ate a plant-focused diet, slept well and managed your stress during most of your life, it's possible those genes would never be activated. That, experts say, is how we can take some of our genetic fate into our own hands.

The positive impact on our health from eating a plant-based diet, having close, loving relationships and getting adequate exercise and sleep are well documented. Calorie restriction, however, is a more controversial way of adding years to life, experts say.

Cutting back on food -- without inducing malnutrition -- has been a scientifically known way to lengthen life for nearly a century. Studies on worms, crabs, snails, fruit flies and rodents have found restricting calories "delay the onset of age-related disorders" such as cancer, heart disease and diabetes, according to the National Institute on Aging. Some studies have also found extensions in life span: In a 1986 study, mice fed only a third of a typical day's calories lived to 53 months -- a mouse kept as a pet may live to about 24 months.

Studies in people, however, have been less enlightening, partly because many have focused on weight loss instead of longevity. For Sinclair, however, cutting back on meals was a significant factor in resetting his personal clock: Recent tests show he has a biological age of 42 in a body born 53 years ago.

"I've been doing a biological test for 10 years now, and I've been getting steadily younger for the last decade," Sinclair said. "The biggest change in my biological clock occurred when I ate less often -- I only eat one meal a day now.That made the biggest difference to my biochemistry."

Sinclair incorporates other tools into his life, based on research from his lab and others. In his book "Lifespan: Why We Age and Why We Don't Have To," he writes that little of what he does has undergone the sort of "rigorous long-term clinical testing" needed to have a "complete understanding of the wide range of potential outcomes." In fact, he added, "I have no idea if this is even the right thing for me to be doing."

With that caveat, Sinclair is willing to share his tips: He keeps his starches and sugars to a minimum and gave up desserts at age 40 (although he does admit to stealing a taste on occasion). He eats a good amount of plants, avoids eating other mammals and keeps his body weight at the low end of optimal.

He exercises by taking a lot of steps each day, walks upstairs instead of taking an elevator and visits the gym with his son to lift weights and jog before taking a sauna and a dip in an ice-cold pool. "I've got my 20-year-old body back," he said with a smile.

Speaking of cold, science has long thought lower temperatures increased longevity in many species, but whether it is true or not may come down to one's genome, according to a 2018 study. Regardless, it appears cold can increase brown fat in humans, which is the type of fat bears use to stay warm during hibernation. Brown fat has been shown to improve metabolism and combat obesity.

Sinclair takes vitamins D and K2 and baby aspirin daily, along with supplements that have shown promise in extending longevity in yeast, mice and human cells in test tubes.

One supplement he takes after discovering its benefits is 1 gram of resveratrol, the antioxidant-like substance found in the skin of grapes, blueberries, raspberries, mulberries and peanuts.

He also takes 1 gram of metformin, a staple in the arsenal of drugs used to lower blood sugars in people with diabetes. He added it after studies showed it might reduce inflammation, oxidative damage and cellular senescence, in which cells are damaged but refuse to die, remaining in the body as a type of malfunctioning "zombie cell."

However, some scientists quibble about the use of metformin, pointing to rare cases of lactic acid buildup and a lack of knowledge on how it functions in the body.

Sinclair also takes 1 gram of NMN, or nicotinamide mononucleotide, which in the body turns into NAD+, or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. A coenzyme that exists in all living cells, NAD+ plays a central role in the body's biological processes, such as regulating cellular energy, increasing insulin sensitivity and reversing mitochondrial dysfunction.

When the body ages, NAD+ levels significantly decrease, dropping by middle age to about half the levels of youth, contributing to age-related metabolic diseases and neurodegenerative disorders. Numerous studies have shown restoring NAD+ levels safely improves overall health and increases life span in yeast, mice and dogs. Clinical trials testing the molecule in humans have been underway for three years, Sinclair said.

"These supplements, and the lifestyle that I am doing, is designed to turn on our defenses against aging," he said. "Now, if you do that, you don't necessarily turn back the clock. These are just things that slow down epigenetic damage and these other horrible hallmarks of aging.

"But the real advance, in my view, was the ability to just tell the body, 'Forget all that. Just be young again,' by just flipping a switch. Now I'm not saying that we're going to all be 20 years old again," Sinclair said.

"But I'm optimistic that we can duplicate this very fundamental process that exists in everything from a bat to a sheep to a whale to a human. We've done it in a mouse. There's no reason I can think of why it shouldn't work in a person, too."

The-CNN-Wire & 2022 Cable News Network, Inc., a WarnerMedia Company. All rights reserved.

Link:
The 'Benjamin Button' effect: Scientists can reverse aging in mice; the goal is to do the same for humans - WDJT