All posts by medical

Science Talk – What is discovery science? – The Institute of Cancer Research, London – The Institute of Cancer Research

Frequently overshadowed by clinical research, discovery science in the laboratory might sometimes seem to be hidden behind the scenes. But this research is crucial in the fight against cancer and at The Institute of Cancer Research we are determined to shine a spotlight upon discovery science.

Cancer discovery science is research that aims to transform our fundamental understanding of cancer biology. It is sometimes called basic or fundamental science (although its usually very complicated!). Discovery science investigates a huge range of topics within cancer biology ranging from the process involved in the regulation of cell division to how cancer can evolve and adapt, from the immune systems interactions with cancer cells to the role of chemical signal networks in cancerous cell growth.

Discovery science is often done on cells or in model systems, such as yeast, fruit flies, nematode worms and mice, where scientists try to recreate the cancers found in the human body. It also includes computational science which uses mathematical models to analyse and answer scientific questions.

Conclusions from discovery science can then, with further research, be used to translate the findings into results that directly benefit people: a process often described as going from bench to bedside.

Although their work is some way off from the clinic, discovery scientists at the ICR are determined to choose areas of research that have the potential to ultimately benefit patients. They focus on finding clues from fundamental cancer biology that might lead to the development of promising, innovative new cancer treatments.

The ICR has hundreds of discovery science researchers, I spoke to some of them about their work and why they think discovery science deserves to be celebrated.

Professor Jon Pines is Head of the Division of Cancer Biologyat the ICR. As a PhD student Professor Pines worked in the lab of Nobel Prize laureate Sir Tim Huntat the University of Cambridge. Jon contributed to the discovery science research on cyclins (proteins involved in the control of cell division cycles) in sea urchin eggs which earned Hunt the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicinealongside Sir Paul Nurseand Leland H. Hartwell.

There is nothing quite like discovering the answer to something in science and a brief moment realising that you are the only person in the world who knows it. Professor Pines says. I had that feeling when I cloned and sequenced cyclin in Tims lab.

The discovery that cyclins are key regulators of cell growth and division allowed cancer researchers to explore whether the inhibition of protein complexes containing cyclins, called cyclin-dependent kinases(CDKs), might have potential as a cancer treatment. One of these CDK inhibitors, palbociclib, is now a common treatment for some types of breast cancer.

Without the discovery science done by Tim Hunt and others we wouldnt have palbociclib. The origins of every drug discovery can be traced to discovery research and that, for me, is the reason that we should be celebrating discovery science.

It might be hard to see how studying animals like sea urchins can tell us anything about cancers in humans. I asked Dr Lucas Dent, Postdoctoral Training Fellow in the Dynamical Cell Systems Labat the ICR, about the importance of cell and animal models in discovery science.

One way to understand the intricate mechanisms going on within and between cells is to first look at cells isolated in the lab and simple life forms. Dr Dent explained, These model organisms have very similar basic biology to humans and can provide clues to how cancer works in humans. It is also possible to genetically modify a lot of model organisms to investigate the role of certain genes and proteins.

In our lab we genetically modify fruit flies, as well as using computational methods, and human cells, to understand more about how complex biochemical signalling networks are rewired during the development of cancer.

He continued, However, its important to be clear that findings in discovery science are a starting point in the process, when considering future patient benefit. Cells can behave differently when isolated in the lab and within animals that are not closely related to humans. So, discovery science findings should be viewed as pieces of a puzzle, it takes a lot of puzzle pieces coming together before we see the picture.

Another great example of discovery science leading to a vital new treatment for patients is the work by ICR scientists on characterising the BRAF geneand its role in cancer.

In the early 1990s, a team of ICR researchers led by Professor Chris Marshallbegan studying a cell signalling pathway involved in the control of cell growth. Their research looked at the role of the pathway known as the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway in cancer. Further work by the team suggested that a protein called BRAF might contribute to cancer development.

The researchers then went on to confirm mutated BRAF as an oncogene capable of driving the development of cancer even in the absence of other major genetic defects.

These findings from discovery science research helped pharmaceutical companies discover cancer drugs which act by inhibiting the mutated BRAF protein. These selective inhibitors of mutated BRAF include dabrafenibwhich has been approved to treat melanoma skin cancer.

Professor Jon Pines, who has the title of the Chris Marshall Chair of Cell Biology at the ICR, spoke to me about this work. Chris worked at the ICR for 35 years, he was an extremely insightful and rigorous scientist. Its fantastic to be able to trace his discovery in the lab and see it go all the way to the point where it has a positive effect on the lives of patients.

Professor Pines continued, There are few organisations where you can see the research go from lab bench to patient bedside as you do at ICR, and thats pretty special.

Dabrafenib was discovered by a GlaxoSmithKlineteam which included Dr Olivia Rossanese who is now Head of the Division of Cancer Therapeuticsand Director of the Cancer Therapeutics Unitat the ICR. Dr Rossanese agrees that discovery science is essential to drug discovery and development.

Whats really important for us is to understand the underlying mechanisms and genetic alterations in cancer that lead to uncontrolled tumour growth and spread. she explains, And when we begin to understand those mechanisms, we really have a good idea of what the targets are for therapeutics.

The discovery science research into the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway by Professor Marshall and others at the ICR also led to identification of the mechanism by which mutated RAS proteins cause cells to become cancerous.

The team showed that the RAS protein activates an important signalling pathway in cells called the MAP kinase pathway. In cancer cells with a mutated RAS the MAP kinase pathway is always switched on and drives cancers to grow.

Further research found that two molecules, RAF and MEK, transmit signals from RAS to MAP kinase and are essential to cancer growth. RAF and MEK are excellent drug targets and translational research based on the ICRs fundamental science led to the discovery of the MEK inhibitor trametinib. Trametinib is now licensed for use and regularly used alongside dabrafenibto treat melanoma.

Someone who has directly benefited from the science at the ICR which led to the discovery of dabrafenib and trametinib is patient advocate Debbie Keynes.

Debbie was diagnosed with advanced melanoma in April 2016 and was treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for a number of years.

We spoke to Debbie in 2018 and she told us about her experience of being diagnosed with melanoma and her treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib.

At the ICR we are extremely proud of our discovery science research. I spoke to the Chief Executive and President of the ICR, Professor Kristian Helin, about why this part of our research is so key.

Take the Covid-19 vaccines for example, what most people dont realise is that there will have been at least 25 years of discovery research in labs which enabled the vaccines to be developed and taken to clinical trialsso quickly. Without discovery science we would not have vaccines, its that simple.

For cancer its the same there would be no new drugs if it wasnt for discovery science. Its an absolutely fundamental part of the work we do at the ICR.

Go here to read the rest:
Science Talk - What is discovery science? - The Institute of Cancer Research, London - The Institute of Cancer Research

Endpoints News Expands Editorial Team With Appointments of Jared Whitlock and Aayushi Pratap – Business Wire

LAWRENCE, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Endpoints News, the biopharma industrys leading source for daily news and analysis, announced today the expansion of its editorial team with the appointments of Jared Whitlock as Features Editor and Aayushi Pratap as News Reporter.

Jared Whitlock has written for a variety of publications, including The New York Times, WIRED, STAT and the San Diego Union-Tribune. He was a Knight Science journalism fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and formerly served as a healthcare, biotech and projects reporter at the San Diego Business Journal. As Features Editor, Jared will be writing in-depth reports as well as working with all the writers on staff as Endpoints pursues a broad slate of deep dives on the global biopharma scene.

Aayushi Pratap is coming on board as a News Reporter, and was previously an assistant editor at Forbes, covering healthcare. She also worked as a health reporter in Mumbai, India, with the Hindustan Times, a daily newspaper where she extensively reported on drug resistant infections such as tuberculosis, leprosy and HIV. She has an M.A in Science and Health Journalism from Columbia University. She has an M.Sc in biochemistry and a B.Sc. in zoology. Aayushi has also worked in a molecular and a cell biology laboratory, and won the EurekAlert! 2018 Fellowship for International Science Reporters.

Were thrilled to have Jared and Aayushi join the Endpoints News team at this time of rapid growth. In the last few months, weve expanded and launched several new editorial coverage areas based on subscriber feedback, said John Carroll, Editor & Founder, Endpoints News. With over 145,000 active daily biopharma subscribers and growing, were dedicated to attracting top talent and remaining the top news and analysis destination for biopharma executives globally.

Endpoints is the premier destination for biopharma and life sciences news, and were delighted to welcome two veteran journalists to our editorial team, said Arsalan Arif, Publisher & Founder, Endpoints News. As we continue to expand our news coverage, we are dedicated to ensuring high-quality journalism for our readers.

More here:
Endpoints News Expands Editorial Team With Appointments of Jared Whitlock and Aayushi Pratap - Business Wire

Summer science programs at the library – Bonners Ferry Herald

BONNERS FERRY Science adventures are happening at the Boundary County Library every other Friday.

In 2016 and until COVID-19, the BCL has put on regular science programs. Now they are bringing back video conferences with different zoos and science centers throughout the country.

Many of the summer programs are video conferences and typically a presenter will walk around a zoo with a camera and provide a guided tour and information on the exhibits, said Amy Maggi, science program coordinator for the library.

This allows young learners to travel around the world without leaving the library, she added.

Science programs at the library include craft and coloring pages, which are good ways for kids to develop motor skills. These programs are held year-round with about two events each month, Maggi said.

At the July 8 event, Toledo Zoo's "Venom" live video conference featured a western diamondback rattlesnake and komodo dragon. The guided virtual tour through the zoo featured staff discussing various venomous animals such as sea anemone, cone snail, eyelash viper, pit viper, Goliath birdeater spider, tarantula, scorpion, platypus, and more.

Maggi said that bugs and reptiles are really big with the kids. She said one of her favorite memories of summer science programs was when a python was brought in. About 80 kids were in attendance and got to assist in the handling of the reptile. Kids learned the difference between needed fear and learned fear, she added.

Visual aids are important to grab young learners attention, so any chance Maggi can get she said shell have an animal in the library whether it is a rabbit, turtle or a domesticated animal.

Maggi said she was first inspired to work with animals in Africa after reading a book at the library on volunteering with lions.

So, then I went to Africa and volunteered with lions, she said.

This is also one of the reasons she pulls books on the presentation topics for further reading for participants.

The library still has 70 check-out kits for further learning. The kits include topics of math, science, reading and geography.

The science kits topics include cell biology, a microscope, anatomy, engines, building catapults and much more.

The next upcoming Friday science program is on sea turtle rescues. It will be held July 22 at 10:30 a.m., which is a video conference with Sea Turtle Inc. in Texas.

Coming Aug. 5 Volunteering with Wildlife in Central and South America, presented by Amy Maggi. She has volunteered in Costa Rica, Peru and Ecuador working with animals and conservation efforts.

Read this article:
Summer science programs at the library - Bonners Ferry Herald

Advancing cell therapies – T cells and the combination factor – Marketscreener.com

Please give some background on TC BioPharm and its aims

Kobel: As the global leader in allogeneic gamma delta () T-cell technologies, we are focused on the use of our platform allogeneic T cells from healthy donors as a therapeutic for oncology indications. Right now, we are targeting blood cancers, with clinical data in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), and moving into solid tumours, most likely in some version of a combination therapy or as a modified such as a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR).

Our work is establishing whether it is possible to use allogeneic innate immune cells from a healthy donor to support the immune system of a person with cancer in combatting the condition. It is really the idea of reinforcing nature and letting the immune system do what it was intended to do, which is use this universal, inherent killer to fight diseases.

Why gamma delta T cells?

Kobel: There is no bad cell therapy out there, but all therapies have limitations - there is no such thing as a limitless cell therapy or drug. CAR T-cell therapies, for example, have two: firstly, because they are typically autologous (ie, use a patient's own cells), some patients are simply too sick to be able to donate cells to produce the treatment.

Additionally, CARs target T-cell receptors, and those receptors happen to exist on both healthy and diseased cells, so they can destroy both, causing what is called "onsite off tumour toxicity". This toxicity limits the possible dose that can be given to patients, so it is hard to give a sufficiently large dose to enable the treatment to leave the vasculature and permeate tissues to interact with and fight solid tumours.

T cells are the first line of defence in the immune system to eradicate diseases. They have an inherent ability to seek out and destroy damaged and diseased cells due to the presence of an antigen called isopentenyl pyrophosphate, or IPP for short. All tumours ever discovered and studied emit IPP, while healthy cells do not.

T cells act somewhat like a shark smelling blood; when they sense IPP, the cells slowly make their way towards the concentration until they find the source and affect cell death.

What is beneficial about them is that they have a limited toxicity profile; they have very few side effects, unlike traditional cancer treatments such as chemotherapy. You can also give them to people in conjunction with other drugs because there is no drug-on-drug profile.

Gamma delta T-cell biology

T cells are 'unconventional' T cells and there are relatively few present in peripheral blood. Unlike their better know CD4+ helper T cell and CD8+ cytotoxic T cell cousins, which express alpha beta () T-cell receptors (TCRs), they express TCRs composed of and chains.

In contrast to T cells, the majority of T cells are activated in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent manner, by both self and non-self ligands. Self ligands that activate T cells in a TCR-dependent manner include IPP, often accumulated by cancer cells, and other markers of cellular stress resulting from infection or tumorigenesis. In response, T cells produce cytokines, chemokines, interact with other immune cells and affect cytolysis of infected or transformed target cells.

As tissue-associated populations of T cells have been identified in the epithelium and mucosa, scientists believe they may serve as the first line of defence against pathogens.

Source: Eberl M, Hayday A. Gamma Delta () T Cells, British Society for Immunology.

For what indications are gamma delta T cells being developed?

Kobel: We are currently in a Phase IIb/III clinical trial for AML using T cells as a second-line therapy, also known as a failed first-line induction. This is a bridge to bone marrow or stem-cell transplant, which is the next step in your standard of care.

The data from our Phase Ib/IIa trial in AML was positive, so we are excited to see if we can replicate these results in other blood cancers, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma, through some form of an umbrella trial.

I think the way forward for cell therapy is in combining therapies; so not developing monotherapies but instead combining the benefits of two or more treatments, for instance, T cells and checkpoint inhibitors or natural killer (NK) cells

In the Phase Ib/IIa study, the average blast count (measured disease) in patients when they entered the trial was 38 percent; 28 days later, after one dose of T cells, their average blast count had been reduced to six percent, which is borderline remission.

We saw two complete responses including one MLFS or morphological leukaemia-free state, which means they were no longer leukemic. One patient went from a 60 percent blast count to 10 percent within 28 days and another patient lived more than two years after the trial.

These results were really encouraging, especially in patients that were in palliative care - expected to live four to six weeks. We are excited to see what these therapeutics can do in healthier patients, which conceptually should have a better response.

We are also starting to look at solid tumour opportunities in combination with other partners; investigating prostate, pancreatic, colorectal, ovarian and head and neck cancers.

We have developed a costimulatory CAR approach specifically for solid tumours such as ovarian cancer, neuroblastoma and glioblastoma, which is designed to overcome off-tumour toxicity. This is achieved by taking the CAR T-cell receptor and combining it with the T cells' function around IPP. The therapeutic cell expresses both CAR and receptors.

Say the expressed CAR receptor is for CD19; if the CAR binds to a cell expressing CD19 but not IPP, then the receptor does not bind and the therapeutic cell detaches. However, if the cell expresses both CD19 and IPP, and therefore both the CAR and receptors bind, then it completes a biological circuit that kills the cancerous cell. Because of this on-off switch, the damage to healthy cells is minimised and we should therefore be able to dose patients with larger amounts of these CAR T cells safely, allowing them to escape the vasculature and enter tissues to reach tumours in the organs.

How do you envision cell therapies developing in future?

Kobel: Development in the cell therapy landscape is akin to how Ernest Hemingway described going broke; it happens very slowly at first then all of a sudden. Right now, technology is advancing so quickly it is incredible.

Personally, I think the way forward for cell therapy is in combining therapies; so not developing monotherapies but instead combining the benefits of two or more treatments, for instance, T cells and checkpoint inhibitors or natural killer (NK) cells. We believe T cells can form the backbone of these combinations going forwards, given their innate ability within the immune system and their function as tumour killers.

We are very excited by the progress being made in the NK cell arena, as combining allogeneic NK cell infusions with T-cell infusions could be an interesting dynamic. We are of the mindset that you can rebuild, or recreate, the immune system to a certain degree artificially.

Conceptually, you could receive an infusion of T cells, then repeated infusions of NK cells for several weeks before a further T-cell infusion. Repeating this over and over, to the extent that you are basically taking an exogenous version of the immune system, could provide efficacy with limited toxicity.

We also think combining cell therapies with checkpoint inhibitors and bispecific antibodies is interesting, as it could help overcome the iceberg problem. Existing treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors can be limited to accessing the tip of the iceberg when it comes to cancers; they benefit patients with a stable immune system that is able to proliferate immune cells such as T or NK cells. But if you do not have a stable immune system, ie, it is suppressed or compromised, which is the case for the majority of patients, it does not matter how many times you try to invigorate an immune response - the immune system is unable to respond. We are excited to see how combining checkpoint inhibitors and the exogenous infusion of immune cell therapies could benefit patients.

Which challenges must be overcome to continue to advance cell therapies?

Kobel: There is a major bottleneck across all cell therapies and that is supply and demand for the base product of cells. Companies are continually building manufacturing plants to support production, as well as advancing allogeneic technologies to remove certain burdens, both of which are great. However, if we really want to use cell therapies in the way that I believe they can be used, which is not just in oncology but in numerous areas including viral and inflammatory diseases, etc, there are not enough donors to support the potentially vast needs of product creation.

The next step is really developing what we call a "universal donor", which would be induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines that can produce the requisite cell types, whether they be T cells, NK cells, macrophages or T cells.

We must solve this supply-demand bottleneck, so over the next five to 10 years, I anticipate the removal of the donor entirely and the use of iPSCs as the source for production instead.

Bryan Kobel is the Chief Executive Officer of TC Biopharm and joined the company in June 2021. Bryan has been active in healthcare and life sciences for over 15 years, advising private and public companies on capital structuring and sourcing, and bringing a broad range of investors from private family capital to traditional corporate venture investors to his clients.

TC BioPharm is a publicly-traded (TCBP), clinical-stage cell therapy company developing advanced allogeneic CAR T-cell therapy products for the treatment of cancer, as well as developing gamma delta T-cell therapies for the treatment of infectious disease. The company was established in 2014 and now has five global locations, with its headquarters in Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

About the author

Hannah Balfour is the Science Writer for European Pharmaceutical Review

The post Advancing cell therapies - T cells and the combination factor appeared first on European Pharmaceutical Review.

Russell Publishing Limited, 2022. All Rights Reserved., source Trade Journals

Continue reading here:
Advancing cell therapies - T cells and the combination factor - Marketscreener.com

MIT Engineers Work To Harness the Liver’s Regenerative Abilities To Treat Chronic Disease – SciTechDaily

By tracing the steps of liver regrowth, MIT engineers hope to harness the livers regenerative abilities to help treat chronic disease. Hepatocytes, the one pictured here, are the main functional cells of the liver. Credit: NIH

By tracing the steps of liver regrowth, MIT engineers are striving to harness the livers regenerative abilities to help treat chronic disease.

The human liver has incredible regeneration capabilities: Even if up to 70% of it is removed, the remaining tissue can regrow a full-sized liver in just months.

Being able to take advantage of this regenerative capability could provide doctors with a plethora of options for treating chronic liver disease. MIT engineers have now taken a step toward that goal, by creating a novel liver tissue model that allows them to more precisely trace the steps involved in liver regeneration than has been possible before.

Using the new model can yield information that couldnt be gleaned from studies of mice or other animals, whose biology is not identical to that of humans, says Sangeeta Bhatia, the leader of the research team.

For years, people have been identifying different genes that seem to be involved in mouse liver regeneration, and some of them seem to be important in humans, but they have never managed to figure out all of the cues to make human liver cells proliferate, says Bhatia, the John and Dorothy Wilson Professor of Health Sciences and Technology and of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT and a member of MITs Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and Institute for Medical Engineering and Science.

The new study, which appears this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has identified one molecule that appears to play a key role, and also yielded several other candidates that the researchers plan to explore further.

The lead author of the paper is Arnav Chhabra, a former MIT graduate student and postdoctoral researcher.

Most of the patients who need liver transplants suffer from chronic illnesses such as viral hepatitis, fatty liver disease, or cancer. However, if researchers had a reliable way to stimulate the liver to regenerate on its own, some transplants could be avoided, Bhatia says. Or, such stimulation might be used to help a donated liver grow after being transplanted.

From studies in mice, researchers have learned a great deal about some of the regeneration pathways that are activated after liver injury or illness. One key factor is the reciprocal relationship between hepatocytes (the main type of cell found in the liver) and endothelial cells, which line the blood vessels. Hepatocytes produce factors that help blood vessels develop, and endothelial cells generate growth factors that help hepatocytes proliferate.

Another contributor that researchers have identified is fluid flow in the blood vessels. In mice, an increase in blood flow can stimulate the endothelial cells to produce signals that promote regeneration.

Right now when patients come in with liver failure, you have to transplant them because you dont know if theyre going to recover on their own. But if we knew who had a robust regenerative response, and if we just needed to stabilize them for a little while, we could spare those patients from transplant. Sangeeta Bhatia

To model all of these interactions, Bhatias lab teamed up with Christopher Chen, the William F. Warren Distinguished Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Boston University, who designs microfluidic devices with channels that mimic blood vessels. To create these models of regeneration on a chip, the researchers grew blood vessels along one of these microfluidic channels and then added multicellular spheroid aggregates derived from liver cells from human organ donors.

The chip is designed so that molecules such as growth factors can flow between the blood vessels and the liver spheroids. This setup also allows the researchers to easily knock out genes of interest in a specific cell type and then see how it affects the overall system.

Using this system, the researchers showed that increased fluid flow on its own did not stimulate hepatocytes to enter the cell division cycle. However, if they also delivered an inflammatory signal (the cytokine IL-1-beta), hepatocytes did enter the cell cycle.

When that happened, the researchers were able to measure what other factors were being produced. Some were expected based on earlier mouse studies, but others had not been seen before in human cells, including a molecule called prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).

The MIT team found high levels of this molecule, which is also involved in zebrafish regeneration, in their liver regeneration system. By knocking out the gene for PGE2 biosynthesis in endothelial cells, the researchers were able to show that those cells are the source of PGE2, and they also demonstrated that this molecule stimulates human liver cells to enter the cell cycle.

The researchers now plan to further explore some of the other growth factors and molecules that are produced on their chip during liver regeneration.

We can look at the proteins that are being produced and ask, what else on this list has the same pattern as the other molecules that stimulate cell division, but is novel? Bhatia says. We think we can use this to discover new human-specific pathways.

In this study, the researchers focused on molecules that stimulate cells to enter cell division, but they now hope to follow the process further along and identify molecules needed to complete the cell cycle. They also hope to discover the signals that tell the liver when to stop regenerating.

Bhatia hopes that eventually, researchers will be able to harness these molecules to help treat patients with liver failure. Another possibility is that doctors could use such factors as biomarkers to determine how likely it is that a patients liver will regrow on its own.

Right now when patients come in with liver failure, you have to transplant them because you dont know if theyre going to recover on their own. But if we knew who had a robust regenerative response, and if we just needed to stabilize them for a little while, we could spare those patients from transplant, Bhatia says.

Reference: A vascularized model of the human liver mimics regenerative responses by Arnav Chhabra, H.-H. Greco Song, Katarzyna A. Grzelak, William J. Polacheck, Heather E. Fleming, Christopher S. Chen and Sangeeta N. Bhatia, 28 June 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115867119

The research was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, Wellcome Leap, and the Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship Program.

Excerpt from:
MIT Engineers Work To Harness the Liver's Regenerative Abilities To Treat Chronic Disease - SciTechDaily

p53 in liver cancer: The ultimate betrayal? – Newswise

Newswise Osaka, Japan p53 is one of the most important proteins in cancer biology. Often referred to as a guardian of the genome, p53 becomes activated in response to various cellular stressors like DNA damage. Its activation induces different processes, such as controlled cell death, that prevent cancer development if a cell becomes abnormal. Because of this, p53 mutations are extremely common in cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma. However, in a recent article published inCancer Research, a team of researchers at Osaka University observed that constant activation of p53 in liver cells of patients suffering from chronic liver disease (CLD) could actually promote the development of liver cancer.

CLD can be brought on by different factors including viruses, alcohol use, and fat accumulation, all of which can induce p53 activation. Previous studies have shown that p53 is in a constant state of activation in the liver cells of CLD patients. Yet, it is not clear what role this plays in CLD pathophysiology.

Clinical data clearly show that p53 is activated in the hepatocytes of individuals with CLD, says Yuki Makino, lead author of the study. Because p53 is such a vital part of how the human body prevents tumor formation, its role in CLD became even more intriguing.

To address their questions, the team generated a mouse model with p53 accumulation in hepatocytes. This was done by deleting Mdm2, the protein responsible for regulating p53 expression by targeting it for degradation. These mice developed liver inflammation with higher amounts of hepatocyte apoptosis and senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), a phenomenon where cells produce signals within the microenvironment that can cause nearby cells to become cancerous. In fact, mice with p53 accumulation did have increased liver tumor development.

We also observed an expanded population of hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs), which have stem cell-like characteristics, explains senior author Tetsuo Takehara. When the HPCs were isolated, grown in culture, and then injected under the skin of lab mice, these animals developed tumors. This suggested that HPCs played a key part in the liver tumor formation seen in the animals with p53 accumulation.

Interestingly, acceleration of liver tumor development and the other observed phenotypes did not occur when p53 was deleted in addition to Mdm2 in the hepatocytes. These results demonstrated the significance of constant p53 activity in the tumorigenesis.

We then compared samples from 182 CLD patients with 23 healthy liver samples, says Dr. Makino. The CLD liver biopsy samples showed activated p53 was positively correlated with apoptosis levels, SASP, HPC-associated gene expression, and later cancer development.

The authors concluded that constitutively activated p53 in hepatocytes of CLD patients can create a microenvironment that is supportive of tumor formation from HPCs. Their work proposes a novel and paradoxical mechanism of liver tumorigenesis because p53 is one of the most well-known tumor suppressor genes. These data could highlight p53 as a potential cancer-prevention treatment target for CLD patients.

###

The article, Constitutive activation of the tumor suppressor p53 in hepatocytes paradoxically promotes non-cell autonomous liver carcinogenesis, was published inCancer Researchat DOI:https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-4390

About Osaka University

Osaka University was founded in 1931 as one of the seven imperial universities of Japan and is now one of Japan's leading comprehensive universities with a broad disciplinary spectrum. This strength is coupled with a singular drive for innovation that extends throughout the scientific process, from fundamental research to the creation of applied technology with positive economic impacts. Its commitment to innovation has been recognized in Japan and around the world, being named Japan's most innovative university in 2015 (Reuters 2015 Top 100) and one of the most innovative institutions in the world in 2017 (Innovative Universities and the Nature Index Innovation 2017). Now, Osaka University is leveraging its role as a Designated National University Corporation selected by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to contribute to innovation for human welfare, sustainable development of society, and social transformation.

Website:https://resou.osaka-u.ac.jp/en

The rest is here:
p53 in liver cancer: The ultimate betrayal? - Newswise

Opinion: More bears will be put at risk because of human behavior – Citizen Times

Laurel Rematore| OPINION COLUMNIST

John Boyles column of Humans should be euthanized, not bears, brought out the need for people to become savvy about how to store food when in bear country and directed readers to BearWise.org, an excellent source for the basics of co-existing with bears.

Boyle focused on reactions to a recent bear encounter that resulted in human injury. After gaining access to the inside of a family's tent, a bear scratched a 3-year-old girl and her mother. The father was able to scare the bear from the tent and campsite, but only after several attempts. Wildlife biologists successfully captured the bear that was responsible, and due to the risk to human safety, the bear was humanly euthanized.

In this case, when the news media sensationalized this negative humanbear interaction as an attack, it sent the wrong message. Usually, when bears rip into tents and scratch people, they have learned to expect food as a reward.

More: Great Smokies rangers: Bear euthanized after ripping tent, scratching child and mother

According to National Park Service bear management staff, two or three bears have to be killed in Great Smoky Mountains National Park each year. The reason for these bears deaths can almost always be traced back to food.

When people hear the slogans garbage kills bears or a fed bear is a dead bear, they may think that if bears eat garbage, it gives them stomach issues and they die as a result.

The truth is much more complex and gruesome. When bears get access to the food humans eat and feed their pets, bears come to expect this kind of food, which is often much easier for them to obtain than their natural diets of nuts and berries.

More: Man likely killed by bear attack in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: autopsy report

Bears have a powerful sense of smell 100 times as many olfactory sensors as we have so the aroma of food at a campsite and even inside a tent is definitely going to attract them. But they have often learned to seek this kind of food in park gateway communities.

Bears have excellent long-term memory and a highly evolved ability to make connections. They eat what is readily available and teach their young what they have learned about obtaining food. When they can more easily access the food that humans eat and feed to their pets, they become food conditioned and their conflict behavior escalates.

When a bear hurts someone which naturally happens when a large, clawed animal rummages for a snack wildlife managers often must kill the bear because it has become a threat. Rehabilitating a food-conditioned bear is extremely challenging, and transporting the bear to another location and then releasing it has been shown to have mixed results.

No one wants to kill these regional icons or see them killed. Drawn in part by the chance to see a live bear, over 14 million people visit the park annually, and gateway community populations are increasing. If we humans are not willing to change our behavior, we will be putting many more bears at risk to becoming food conditioned and potentially being euthanized due to conflict with humans.

More: NC Wildlife biologists: Bear that attacked couple on Blue Ridge Parkway climbed onto car

Some gateway city and county officials are moving in a positive direction with new road signs that raise awareness about stashing your trash. But these leaders also need to provide specially designed bear-resistant containers and strictly enforce proper food storage in them throughout all park gateway communities and any other developed areas where black bears live.

Because people traveling into the area are not always aware that they need to change their food-storage behaviors, officials must further require signage to raise awareness and instruct visitors about the BearWiseBasics throughout these communities especially at vacation rental companies where visitors may be much less informed than locals about proper food storage. They are:

Never feed or approach bears

Secure food, garbage, and recycling

Remove bird feeders when bears are active

Never leave pet food outdoors

Clean and store grills

Alert neighbors to bear activity.

More: Word from the Smokies: Bodacious Bear to help BearWise Taskforce raise funds for education

Id like to quote a line from Richard Powers best-seller "Overstory:" People arent the apex species they think they are. Other creatures bigger, smaller, slower, faster, older, younger, more powerful call the shots, make the air, and eat sunlight. Without them, nothing.

It's time for society to prioritize bears importance and ensure they are not fed intentionally or unintentionally. I am a part of the Smokies BearWisetask force, and on a recent Zoom call a fellow member suggested we should declare a state of wildlife emergency. I agree.

Laurel Rematore isCEO ofGreat Smoky Mountains Association.

More:
Opinion: More bears will be put at risk because of human behavior - Citizen Times

20 New Books on Behavioral Science That Will Help You Understand Humans Better – Inc.

Between Us by Batja Mesquita. "We may think of emotions as universal responses, felt inside, but in Between Us, acclaimed psychologist Batja Mesquita asks us to reconsider them through the lens of what they do in our relationships, both one-on-one and within larger social networks."

Different by Frans de Waal. "World-renowned primatologist Frans de Waal draws on decades of observation and studies of both human and animal behavior to argue that despite the linkage between gender and biological sex, biology does not automatically support the traditional gender roles in human societies."

Don't Trust Your Gut by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz. "Stephens-Davidowitz exposes that, while we often think we know how to better ourselves, the numbers disagree. Hard facts and figures consistently contradict our instincts." Here's one example of his unexpected conclusions.

Evolutionary Ideas by Sam Tatam. "Tatam shows how behavioral science and evolutionary psychology can help us solve tomorrow's challenges, not by divining something the world has never seen, but by borrowing from yesterday's solutions -- often in the most unexpected ways. " You can read an excerpt on Behavioral Scientist.

From Strength to Strength by Arthur C. Brooks. "At the height of his career at the age of 50, [Harvard professor] Arthur Brooks embarked on a seven-year journey to discover how to transform his future from one of disappointment over waning abilities into an opportunity for progress. From Strength to Strength is the result." Get a sneak peek at Brooks's thinking here.

Get it Done by Ayelet Fishbach. "With fascinating research from the field of motivation science and compelling stories of people who learned to motivate themselves, Get It Done illuminates invaluable strategies for pulling yourself in whatever direction you want to go."Read an article by Fishbach on Behavioral Scientist.

Hidden Games by Erez Yoeli and Moshe Hoffman. "In Hidden Games,Moshe Hoffman and Erez Yoeli find a surprising middle ground between the hyperrationality of classical economics and the hyper-irrationality of behavioral economics. They...use it to explain our most puzzling behavior, from the mechanics of Stockholm syndrome and internalized misogyny to why we help strangers and have a sense of fairness."

How Minds Change by David McRaney. "How Minds Change is a book about the science, and the experience, of transformation.... It's an eye-opening journey among cult members, conspiracy theorists, and political activists -- from Westboro Baptist Church picketers to LGBTQ campaigners in California -- that ultimately challenges us to question our own motives and beliefs."

How to Stay Smart in a Smart World by Gerd Gigerenzer. Many in the tech industry predict "machines will soon do everything better than humans. In How to Stay Smart in a Smart World, Gerd Gigerenzer shows why that's not true, and tells us how we can stay in charge in a world populated by algorithms."

Imaginable by Jane McGonigal. "How do we map out our lives when it seems impossible to predict what the world will be like next week, let alone next year or next decade? [...] Jane McGonigal draws on the latest scientific research in psychology and neuroscience to show us how to train our minds to think the unthinkable and imagine the unimaginable."

Influence Is Your Superpower by Zoe Chance. "Influence doesn't work the way you think because you don't think the way you think. Move past common misconceptions -- such as the idea that asking for more will make people dislike you -- and understand why your go-to negotiation strategies are probably making you less influential."

Mindwandering by Moshe Bar. "Our brains are noisy; certain regions are always grinding away at involuntary activities like daydreaming, worrying about the future, and self-chatter, taking up to forty-seven percent of our waking time. This is mindwandering.... Cognitive neuroscientist Moshe Bar is here to tell you about the method behind this apparent madness."

The No Club by Linda Babcock, Brenda Peyser, Lise Vesterlund, and Laurie Weingart. "The No Club started when four women...vowed to say no to requests that pulled them away from the work that mattered most to their careers. This book reveals...their over-a-decade-long journey and subsequent groundbreaking research showing that women everywhere are unfairly burdened with 'non-promotable work,' a tremendous problem we can -- and must -- solve."

The Power of Regret by Daniel H. Pink. "Drawing on research in social psychology, neuroscience, and biology, Pink debunks the myth of the 'no regrets' philosophy of life. And using the largest sampling of American attitudes about regret ever conducted as well as his own World Regret Survey -- which has collected regrets from more than 15,000 people in 105 countries -- he lays out the four core regrets that each of us has." Here's a sneak peak of Pink's thinking in the book.

Ritual by Dimitris Xygalatas. Ritualspresent"a profound paradox: people ascribe the utmost importance to their rituals, but few can explain why they are so important. Apparently pointless ceremonies pervade every documented society, from handshakes to hexes, hazings to parades.... Ritual reveals the deep and subtle mechanisms that bind us together."

The Secret Life of Secrets by Michael Slepian. "At what age do children develop the cognitive capacity for secrecy? Do all secrets come with the same mental load? How can we reconcile our secrets with our human desires to relate, connect, and be known? When should we confess our secrets? Who makes for the ideal confidant? And can keeping certain types of secrets actually enhance our well-being?"

Streets of Gold by Ran Abramitzky and Leah Boustan. "Using the tools of modern data analysis and ten years of pioneering research, new evidence is provided about the past and present of the American Dream, debunking myths fostered by political opportunism and sentimentalized in family histories."

Thinking Like an Economist by Elizabeth Popp Berman. "Elizabeth Popp Berman tells the story of how a distinctive way of thinking -- an 'economic style of reasoning' -- became dominant in Washington between the 1960s and the 1980s and how it continues to dramatically narrow debates over public policy today."

The Voltage Effect by John A. List. "Drawing on his original research, as well as fascinating examples from the realms of business, policymaking, education, and public health, [List] identifies five measurable vital signs that a scalable idea must possess, and offers proven strategies for avoiding voltage drops and engineering voltage gains." You can read an article by List on Behavioral Scientist.

Wired for Love by Stephanie Cacioppo. "Stephanie tells not just a science story but also a love story. She shares revelatory insights into how and why we fall in love, what makes love last, and how we process love lost.... Woven through it all is her moving personal story, from astonishment to unbreakable bond to grief and healing."

Follow this link:
20 New Books on Behavioral Science That Will Help You Understand Humans Better - Inc.

Pandemic restrictions had a lasting effect on behavior patterns – Earth.com

In a new study published in the journal PLoS ONE, researchers have investigated how COVID-19 restrictions changed behavior patterns, and how these patterns continue to change. The study focused on the U.K., where activities and social events were restricted near the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to slow the spread of the virus.

A lot of research has already looked at how COVID-19 restrictions changed human behavior. The new study is unique in looking at how behavior in the U.K. changed over time as restrictions continued to evolve.

To understand their research topic better, the scientists conducted six different online surveys to track changes in behavior patterns among 203 respondents. The surveys asked participants about different activities they engaged in during various phases of the pandemic, and whether they did these activities in person or online.

An analysis of the results showed that the biggest changes were the investment of time in social and cultural activities and travel. The surveys also confirmed that most individuals shifted from more in-person activities to more online events. Furthermore, although all pandemic restrictions were removed on July 19, 2021, many of these behavioral shifts still remain in place.

This longitudinal study determines the frequency and way of people doing activities from Spring 2020 to Summer 2021 during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK, said study co-author Lan Li of University College London.

The findings provide an invaluable insight into understanding how people in the UK changed their lifestyle, including what activities they do, and how they accessed those activities in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health policy implemented to address the pandemic.

The scientists hope that their work will help inform policy makers on the impact of their restrictions for future decision making.

By Erin Moody , Earth.com Staff Writer

Originally posted here:
Pandemic restrictions had a lasting effect on behavior patterns - Earth.com

Human-like robot tricks people into thinking it has a mind of its own – Livescience.com

An uncannily human-like robot that had been programmed to socially interact with human companions tricked people into thinking that the mindless machine was self-aware, according to a new study.

The digital deceiver, which the researchers dubbed "iCub," is a child-size humanoid robot created by the Italian Institute of Technology (IIT) in Genoa to study social interactions between humans and robots. This advanced android, which stands at 3.6 feet (1.1 meters) tall, has a humanlike face, camera eyes that can maintain eye contact with people and 53 degrees of freedom that allow it to complete complex tasks and mimic human behaviors. Researchers can program iCub to act remarkably humanlike, as demonstrated in its 2016 appearance on Italy's Got Talent (opens in new tab) when the robot performed Tai Chi moves and wowed the judges with its clever conversational skills.

In the new study, researchers programmed iCub to interact with human participants as they watched a series of short videos. During some of the experiments, iCub was programmed to behave in a human-like manner: greeting participants as they entered the room, and reacting to videos with vocalizations of joy, surprise and awe. But in other trials, the robot's programming directed it to behave more like a machine, ignoring nearby humans and making stereotypically robotic beeping sounds.

The researchers found that people who were exposed to the more human-like version of iCub were more inclined to view it with a perspective known as "the intentional stance," meaning they believed that the robot had its own thoughts and desires, while those who were exposed to the less human version of the robot did not. The researchers had expected that this would happen, but were "very surprised" by how well it worked, lead study author Serena Marchesi and study co-author Agnieszka Wykowska, both part of the Social Cognition in Human-Robot Interaction unit at IIT, told Live Science in a joint email.

Related: Human-like robot creates creepy self-portraits

The iCub robot does have a limited capacity to "learn" like a neural network (a type of artificial intelligence, or AI, that mimics the processes of a human brain), but is far from being self-aware, the researchers said.

In each of the experiments, a single human participant sat in a room with iCub and watched three short two-minute video clips of animals. The research team decided to use video-watching as the shared task because it is a common activity among friends and family, and they used footage that featured animals and "did not include a human or a robot character" in order to avoid any biases, the researchers said.

In the first set of experiments, iCub had been programmed to greet the human participants, introducing itself and asking for their names as they entered. During these interactions, iCub also moved its camera "eyes" to maintain eye contact with the human subjects. Throughout the video-watching activity, it continued to act in a human-like way, vocalizing responsively as people do. "It laughed when there was a funny scene in the movie or behaved as if it was in awe with a beautiful visual scene," the researchers said.

In the second set of experiments, iCub did not interact with participants, and while watching the videos its only reaction to the scenes was to make machine-like noises, including "beeping sounds like a car sensor would do when approaching an obstacle," the researchers said. During these experiments, the cameras in iCub's eyes were also disabled, so the robot could not maintain eye contact.

Before and after the experiments, the researchers made participants complete the InStance Test (IST). Designed by the research team in 2019, this survey is used to gauge people's opinions of the robot's mental state.

Using the IST, the study authors assessed participant's reactions to 34 different scenarios. "Each scenario consists of a series of three pictures depicting the robot in daily activities," the researchers said. "Participants then choose between two sentences describing the scenario." One sentence used intentional language that hinted at an emotional state (for example: "iCub wants") and the other sentence used mechanistic language that focused on actions ("iCub does"). In one scenario when participants were shown a series of pictures where iCub selects one of several tools from a table, they chose between statements that said the robot "grasped the closest object" (mechanical) or "was fascinated by tool use" (intentional).

The team found that if participants were exposed to iCub's human-like behaviors in the experiments, they were more likely to switch from a mechanistic stance to an intentional stance in their survey responses, hinting that iCub's human-like behavior had changed the way they perceived the robot. By comparison, participants that interacted with the more robotic version of iCub firmly maintained a mechanistic stance in the second survey. This suggests that people need to see evidence of relatable behavior from a robot in order to perceive it as human-like, the researchers said.

These findings show that humans can form social connections with robots, according to the study. This could have implications for the use of robots in healthcare, especially for elderly patients, the researchers said. However, there is still much to learn about human-robot interactions and social bonding, the scientists cautioned.

One of the big questions the team wants to answer is if people can bond with robots that do not look human, but still display human-like behaviors. "It is difficult to foresee how a robot with a less human-like appearance would elicit the same level of like-me experience," the researchers said. In the future, they hope to repeat the study's experiments with robots of different shapes and sizes, they added.

The researchers also argue that in order for humans to form lasting social bonds with robots, people must let go of preconceived notions about sentient machines that are popular fear-mongering fodder in science fiction.

"Humans have a tendency to be afraid of the unknown," the researchers said. "But robots are just machines and they are far less capable than their fictional depictions in popular culture." To help people overcome this bias, scientists can better educate the public on what robots can do and what they can't. After that, "the machines will become immediately less scary," they said.

The study was published online July 7 in the journal Technology, Mind and Behavior (opens in new tab).

Originally published on Live Science.

Original post:
Human-like robot tricks people into thinking it has a mind of its own - Livescience.com