All posts by medical

What is Immunology? – News-Medical.net

By Dr Ananya Mandal, MD

Immunology is the branch of biomedical science that deals with the response of an organism to antigenic challenge and its recognition of what is self and what is not. It deals with the defence mechanisms including all physical, chemical and biological properties of the organism that help it to combat its susceptibility to foreign organisms, material, etc.

The immune system is divided into those which are static, or innate to the organism, and those which are responsive, or adaptive to a potential pathogen or foreign substance.

The innate system of immunity is on evolutionary terms, the older system that forms the first line of defence. It is non-specific and the resistance is static (it does not improve with repeated exposure and there is no memory on subsequent exposures). This includes physical defences such as skin & epithelial surfaces, cilia, commensual flora, acidic gastric contents, fever etc. Others are biochemical defences such as soluble - lysosyme, acute phase reactants and complement, fibronectin, interferons. Cellular components include natural killer cells, RES phagocytes.

The adaptive system is the second line of defence and is activated once the innate system has been overwhelmed. It is specific to the infective agent and can store the information about the invader as memory to show an enhanced response to subsequent challenge.

Immunology deals with physiological functioning of the immune system in states of both health and disease as well as malfunctions of the immune system in immunological disorders like allergies, hypersensitivities, immune deficiency, transplant rejection and autoimmune disorders.

Immunology deals with physical, chemical and physiological characteristics of the components of the immune system in vitro, in situ, and in vivo. Immunology has a vast array of uses in several disciplines of science and medical science.

The word immunity was derived from the Lain word immunis meaning exempt.

The key primary lymphoid organs of the immune system are thymus andbone marrow, and secondary lymphatic tissues such as spleen, tonsils, lymph vessels,lymph nodes, adenoids, and skin.

In good health thymus, spleen, portions of bone marrow, lymph nodes and secondary lymphatic tissues can be surgically removed without much harm to humans.

The actual components of the immune system are cellular in nature and not associated with any specific organ. They are widely present in circulation throughout the body.

Reviewed by April Cashin-Garbutt, BA Hons (Cantab)

Read more here:

What is Immunology? - News-Medical.net

Immunology – Wiley Online Library

Immunology is essential reading for workers in all areas of immunological research. Recognised as one of the leading journals in its field it is also one of the longest established immunology journals, boasting wide trans-continental representation in authors, editors and reviewers.

Immunology publishes papers describing original work in all areas of immunology including cellular and molecular immunology, immunochemistry, immunogenetics, imaging, mathematical modelling, allergy, transplantation immunology, cancer immunology and clinical immunology.

Read the original post:

Immunology - Wiley Online Library

Immunology | NIH Intramural Research Program

View Principal Investigators in Immunology

Immunology and infectious disease research has been central to our mission since the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was founded in 1887 as the Staten Island-based Laboratory of Hygiene, established to find better means of screening for infectious diseases carried by passengers arriving on ships from abroad.

The NIH Intramural Research Program (IRP) is now home to an extraordinary community of researchers and clinicians in the field of immunology. Over 200 IRP laboratories in multiple Institutes and Centers pursue basic, translational, and clinical research on the immune system, with the goal of better-understanding the underlying causes of allergy, infectious diseases, primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, cancer and transplant immunology, and autoimmunity.

Researchers in the IRP have made fundamental discoveries and advances in immunology, including:

Working in partnership with and as part of the largest clinical research hospital in the world, the NIH Clinical Center, IRP physician-scientists have helped develop many now-standard therapies for immunological diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and vasculitis. Many of the first trials of monoclonal antibody therapy and gene therapy took place at the NIH Clinical Center.

Today, IRP researchers work at the forefront of vaccine development for HIV and other emerging infectious disease threats. A dedicated Vaccine Research Center on the main NIH research campus opened in 1999. In addition, the recently launched trans-NIH Center for Human Immunology, Autoimmunity, and Inflammation aims to pioneer a new integrated approach that combines the expertise of basic immunologists, clinicians and epidemiologists to jointly improve clinical therapies and fundamental knowledge of immune-mediated diseases.

Many of the worlds leading immunologists and infectious disease experts make their home within the IRP, including ten members of the National Academy of Sciences. We invite you to explore the research interests of our faculty and our vibrant immunology community by visiting the Immunology Scientific Interest Group.

Follow this link:

Immunology | NIH Intramural Research Program

Immunology | Define Immunology at Dictionary.com

British Dictionary definitions for immunology Expand

the branch of biological science concerned with the study of immunity

Derived Forms

immunologic (mjnldk), immunological, adjectiveimmunologically, adverbimmunologist, noun

Word Origin and History for immunology Expand

by 1906, a hybrid from comb. form of immune + -ology. Related: Immunological; immunologist.

immunology in Medicine Expand

immunology immunology (m'y-nl'-j) n. The branch of biomedicine that is concerned with the structure and function of the immune system, innate and acquired immunity, and laboratory techniques involving the interaction of antigens with antibodies.

immunology in Science Expand

Excerpt from:

Immunology | Define Immunology at Dictionary.com

Immunology Home Page

Visit our site for online job and journal searches, to find a graduate program, to find an address of a scientist, for antibody resources, finding immunochemicals, information on knockout/transgenic mouse strains, and for many other useful databases.

New information on therapeutic antibodies and their naming schema along with FDA approved antibody-based therapeutics are provided in the links on the left.

View post:

Immunology Home Page

Immunology | Article about immunology by The Free Dictionary

branch of medicine that studies the response of organisms to foreign substances, e.g.,

), and the influence of genetic, nutritional, and other factors on the immune system. They also study disease-causing organisms to determine how they injure the host and help to develop vaccines (see

).

In addition to studying the normal workings of the immune system, immunologists study unwanted immune responses such as allergiesallergy, hypersensitive reaction of the body tissues of certain individuals to certain substances that, in similar amounts and circumstances, are innocuous to other persons. Allergens, or allergy-causing substances, can be airborne substances (e.g. ..... Click the link for more information. , essentially immunological responses of the body to substances or organisms that, as a rule, do not affect most people, and autoimmune diseasesautoimmune disease, any of a number of abnormal conditions caused when the body produces antibodies to its own substances. In rheumatoid arthritis, a group of antibody molecules called collectively RF, or rheumatoid factor, is complexed to the individual's own gamma globulin ..... Click the link for more information. (e.g., rheumatoid arthritisarthritis, painful inflammation of a joint or joints of the body, usually producing heat and redness. There are many kinds of arthritis. In its various forms, arthritis disables more people than any other chronic disorder. ..... Click the link for more information. and lupus erythematosus) which occur when the body reacts immunologically to some of its own constituents.

Immunologists have developed a large number of procedures have been developed to detect and measure quantities of immunologically active substances such as circulating antibodies and immune globulinsglobulin, any of a large family of proteins of a spherical or globular shape that are widely distributed throughout the plant and animal kingdoms. Many of them have been prepared in pure crystalline form. ..... Click the link for more information. . Immune globulins that can be given intravenously (IVIGs) have been found to be more effective against antibody deficiencies and certain autoimmune diseases than their older intramuscular counterparts; their use in a wide spectrum of bacterial and viral infections is under study. Current research in immunology is also aimed at understanding the role of T lymphocytes (see immunityimmunity, ability of an organism to resist disease by identifying and destroying foreign substances or organisms. Although all animals have some immune capabilities, little is known about nonmammalian immunity. ..... Click the link for more information. ), which play a major part in the body's defenses against infections and neoplasmsneoplasm or tumor, tissue composed of cells that grow in an abnormal way. Normal tissue is growth-limited, i.e., cell reproduction is equal to cell death. Feedback controls limit cell division after a certain number of cells have developed, allowing for tissue repair ..... Click the link for more information. . AIDSAIDS or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, fatal disease caused by a rapidly mutating retrovirus that attacks the immune system and leaves the victim vulnerable to infections, malignancies, and neurological disorders. It was first recognized as a disease in 1981. ..... Click the link for more information. , for example, is the disease that results when the HIVHIV, human immunodeficiency virus, either of two closely related retroviruses that invade T-helper lymphocytes and are responsible for AIDS. There are two types of HIV: HIV-1 and HIV-2. HIV-1 is responsible for the vast majority of AIDS in the United States. ..... Click the link for more information. virus destroys certain of these T cells.

See studies by R. Desowitz (1988) and R. Gallo (1991).

The division of biological science concerned with the native or acquired response of complex living organisms to the intrusion of other organisms or foreign substances. The immune system allows the host organism to distinguish between self and nonself and to respond to a target (termed an antigen).

It was not until the germ theory of infectious disease was established that the full implication of immunology was realized. First came the recognition that certain bacteria caused corresponding diseases. Second came the recognition that it was a specific resistance to that bacterium or its toxins that prevented recurrence of the same disease. Third came the discovery that after recovery from an infectious disease, protective substances called antibodies could be found in the blood of animals and humans. Antigens, such as bacteria and their products, triggered the production of antibodies and indeed all kinds of chemical and biological molecules. The action of these effector mechanisms, however, has come to be recognized as being not always protective or conferring immunity, but sometimes becoming grossly exaggerated or inappropriate, or capable of turning upon the host in a destructive fashion that causes disease. These responses are classified as allergies. Illnesses associated with a misguided response of the immune system that is directed against the self and results from a breakdown in the normal immunological tolerance of, or unresponsiveness to, self antigens are termed autoimmune. The mechanisms responsible for these disorders are unknown but probably include the intervention of factors such as viruses that either modify or naturally resemble self molecules. Subsequently, the immune response, in seeking out what is foreign, proceeds to attack the self. See Allergy, Autoimmunity

Immunology is also concerned with assaying the immune status of the host through a variety of serological procedures, and in devising methods of increasing host resistance through prophylactic vaccination. There has also been much important investigation of induced resistance and tolerance to transplants of skin and organs, including tumors. See Blood groups, Hypersensitivity, Immunity, Immunoassay, Isoantigen, Phagocytosis, Serology, Transplantation biology, Vaccination

the science concerned with the protective reactions of the body, or those reactions aimed at preserving the bodys structural and functional integrity and its biological individuality. Immunology is a broad and rapidly growing biological discipline which started as a branch of medical microbiology. The theoretical aspects of immunologythe study of the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing the formation of antibodies and their pathogenetic role and the phylogeny and ontogeny of the immune systemare increasingly being described by the term immunobiology.

Immunology originated after it was observed that individuals who had recovered from an infectious disease were usually able to take care of sick persons during an epidemic of that disease without endangering themselves. In 1796, E. Jenner developed a method for artificially immunizing human beings against smallpox by inoculating them with cowpox. L. Pasteurs discovery in 1880 that immunizing chickens with an old cholera culture made them resistant to infection by the highly virulent causative agent of fowl cholera was the beginning of immunology as an independent science. Pasteur formulated the main principle underlying vaccines and produced vaccines against anthrax and rabies. In 1887, E. Metchnikoff discovered the phenomenon of phagocytosis and developed a cellular (phagocytic) theory of immunity. By 1890 the German bacteriologist E. von Behring and his co-workers had shown that protective substances, or antibodies, are formed in the body in response to the introduction of microbes and their toxins. The German scientist P. Ehrlich advanced the humoral theory of immunity (1898, 1900). In 189899 the Belgian scientist J. Bor-det and the Russian scientist N. N. Chistovich discovered that antibodies are formed in response to the injection of foreign erythrocytes and serum proteins. This discovery gave rise to the study of immune responses to agents other than infection. In 1900 the Austrian immunologist K. Landsteiner discovered human blood groups and laid the foundation for the theory of tissue isoantigens. A new direction in immunology (anticipated by the Australian scientist M. Burnet), the theory of immunological tolerance, evolved after this phenomenon was induced experimentally by the English scientist P. Medawar in 1953.

Soviet immunology was initiated by the research of E. Metchnikoff, A. A. Bezredka, G. N. Gabrichevskii, N. F. Gamaleia, and L. A. Tarasevich. In the 1920s and 1930s Soviet immunology not only solved practical problems but engaged in fruitful theoretical research as well (I. L. Krichevskii, V. A. Barykin, V. A. Liubarskii, S. I. Ginzburg-Kalinina). L. A. Zilber, P. F. Zdrodovskii, G. V. Vygodchikov, M. P. Pokrov-skaia, V. I. Ioffe, A. T. Kravchenko, and P. N. Kosiakov made important contributions in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s. Immunology continues to progress very rapidly, especially where it joins with chemistry, genetics, physiology, radiobiology, and other branches of biology and medicine. Immunology itself consists of several more or less distinct branches (see Figure 1); these are described below.

Immunomorphology studies the anatomy, histology, and cytology of the bodys immune system. It makes use of histological

Figure 1. Diagram of the development of ideas in immunology and the appearance of the modern branches of the science (after R. V. Petrov, 1968). Nobel Prizes awarded for research in the field of immunology: (1) first, for the theory of immunity (jointly, with P. Ehrlich, 1908); (2) second, for the creation of antitoxic sera (1902); (3) third, for the discovery of isoantigens and blood groups (1930); (4) fourth, for the discovery of tolerance and a theory of immunity (jointly, with M. Burnet, 1960). (a) First vaccine against cholera (A. V. Khavkin, 1892).

and cytological methods of investigation; cultivation of cells outside the body; light, fluorescent, and electron microscopy; and autoradiography. In recent years the entire primary immune response of lymphoid cells has been successfully duplicated in a test tube. It was found that the specific immune response and, in part, the bodys natural resistance are functions of the lymphoid system and of phagocytic cells scattered through all tissues. Neutrophilic and eosinophilic granulocytes, monocytes, and thrombocytes in the blood, histiocytes in connective tissue, microglia in the brain, cells of the sinuses of the liver, spleen, adrenals, bone marrow, and anterior lobe of the pituitary, reticular cells of the spleen, lymph nodes, bone marrow, and thymus, and some circulating lymphocytes are capable of capturing antigen. Most of the antigen introduced into the body is captured, destroyed, and eliminated by these cells. Only a fraction of the antigenic molecules survive long enough to provoke specific immunological reactions. The antigenic molecules that settle on the surface of the reticular cells in the lymph nodes play an especially important part. The immune response is provoked by the interaction of at least two types of small lymphocytes that constantly migrate in the tissues and circulate through the lymphatic and blood vessels (see Figure 2).

One type of cell (the B cell) originates in bone marrow and, on coming into contact with antigen, is converted into an antibody-forming cell (plasma cell). Another type of cell (the T cell) originates in the thymus. It is able to react specifically to antigen molecules and bring about the interaction of the B cells with antigen.

In an immunologically mature (immunocompetent) organism, phagocytic cells and T and B lymphocytes carry out all forms

Figure 2. Diagram of the interaction of the cells of the immune system

of specific response. They form circulating antibodies belonging to various classes of the immunoglobulins (see Figure 2, upper part) and produce immune reactions of the cellular type delayed increased sensitivity, rejection of transplant, and so forth. The organism responds in this way to a number of bacterial and parasitic invasions (tuberculosis, brucellosis, leishmaniasis) and to the transplantation of cells and tissues from another organism. The differentiation and interaction of these cells under the influence of antigen may lead to the development of immunological memory or of specific immunological tolerance.

Comparative immunology studies the immune response in different animal species. The evolutionary interpretation of immunity phenomena is helpful in elucidating their mechanisms. The lymphoid system and the ability to produce specific antibodies appear only in vertebrates. For example, the sea lamprey has a primitive lymphoepithelial thymus, lymphoid islets in the spleen and bone marrow, and circulating lymphocytes. It forms antibodies and immunological memory develops, but the set of antigens to which the lamprey responds is very limited. The lymphoid system is more developed in primitive cartilaginous fish (sharks and rays), which are capable of reacting to a great many antigens. Typical plasma cells appear in cartilaginous, actinopterygian, and teleost fish, all of which manufacture several types of immunoglobulins. Amphibians are the first in the phylogenetic series to develop the system of plasma cells, which synthesize high- and low-molecular immunoglobulins with different antigenic properties. Reptiles have a very similar system. The complement system (which consists of various native serum proteins) is apparently very ancient; it exists in a similar form both in the lower and in the higher vertebrates.

In most mammals immune reactions reach full development only after birth. A system of selective transfer of immunoglobulins from mother to fetus functions during embryonic development, when the embryo is protected against the effect of antigens. However, the human fetus forms M and G immunoglobulins independently by the fourth or fifth month. Birds and mammals, including man, possess an identical spectrum of immunological reactions. The degree of immunoreactivity is age-related, decreasing noticeably as the body ages.

Physiology of immune reactions studies the mechanisms by which the organism finds and removes foreign elements, or substances that are not normal constituents of the bodys own tissues, such as dead and malignantly degenerated cells, the bodys own injured molecules, foreign cells and molecules, bacteria, viruses, protozoans, and helminths and their toxins. The functional expression of the foreignness of an antigen is its ability to induce the formation of specific antibodies and combine with them. The nature of antigenicity, the question of why the organism does not form antibodies to any of the vast number of its own molecules yet forms antibodies to an infinite number of foreign antigens, and the essence of the specific immune response (specifically, the synthesis of antibodies) are the problems that constitute the main elements of the so-called theory of antibody formation. Antibody formation, that is, the biosynthesis of highly specialized protein molecules, is assumed to occur like the synthesis of other blood-plasma proteins.

A general theory of immunological reactions has to explain the physicochemical nature of antigenicity, describe the molecular mechanisms governing the synthesis of antibodies, and elucidate the nature of immunochemical specificity. Such a theory can be developed if three important and interrelated problems of the immune response are successively solved: (1) the genetic basis for the variety of immunoglobulins; (2) the number of antibodies of different specificity that a cell can synthesize, the nature of the intercellular interactions, and the level (cellular or subcellular) at which antigen acts; (3) the mechanism of specific immunological tolerance (the absence of a specific response to antigen). The first attempt to provide a chemical interpretation of immunological reactions was undertaken by P. Ehrlich in 1900. He suggested that every antibody-forming cell has a preformed side chain that by chance corresponds spatially to an antigen. The side chains, separated from the cell-carrier and entering the bloodstream, were identified with antibodies. This hypothesis is strikingly close to modern ideas of protein biosynthesis, in that it postulates the pre-existence (preceding the action of antigen) of a genetic code for each type of antibody. Antigen molecules must only select the preceding structure and intensify its reproduction. The popularity of Ehrlichs selection idea was shaken by K. Landsteiners discovery (1936) that a great many artificial antigens, produced synthetically, can induce the formation of specific antibodies. Accordingly, the American scientists F. Breinl, F. Haurowitz, D. Alexander, and S. Mudd (1930) conjectured that preformed antibodies do not exist. Antigen interferes with the formation of a globulin molecule by disrupting its assembly. The result is the formation of an antibody with a structure specific to the given antigen. The action of the antigen in this case is described as instructive; this readily accounts for the limitless variety of antibodies synthesized by the organism. The American scientist L. Pauling (1940) ascribed to antigen the role of a template where the polypeptide chains of the antibody are formed.

A new stage in the development of immunology was marked by the appearance of the concept of the Australian scientists M. Burnet and F. Fenner (1941), who regarded antibody synthesis as a special case of adaptive protein synthesis, similar to the synthesis of induced enzymes in bacteria. Antigen in the cell was assumed to have an indirect instructive function, inducing a change in the complex of enzymes participating in the synthesis of the antibody molecule. This concept was subsequently supplemented by the hypothesis of the existence of special labels for the bodys own antigens, which would explain the natural tolerance for them. According to the American scientist R. Owen (1957), an antigen, like a mutagen, causes corresponding changes in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) that result in the biosynthesis of antibody molecules. The American scientist G. Goldstein (1960) suggested that antigen acts in analogous fashion on messenger ribonucleic acid. In 1950 the German scientist N. K. Jerne advanced a new hypothesis, based on Ehrlichs selection idea, to explain the specific immune response. Jernes natural selection hypothesis was essentially that antibody molecules, differing in specificity, are formed in the thymus during the embryonic period. The complex of antigen and corresponding antibody comes into contact with an antibody-synthesizing cell, which uses the antibody as a template to form similar molecules. Jerne postulated the absence of antibodies to the bodys own antigens and the recognition only of foreign configurations.

The clonal-selection theory of acquired immunity, advanced by M. Burnet (1957), was an elaboration of the selection idea. A clone is a group of cells descended by division from a single precursor cell. According to Burnet, the lymphoid system of an immunologically mature organism contains a great many (at least 104105) clones of cells capable of responding specifically to different antigens. The nature of the genetic diversity of the immunoglobulins is unknown. However, the clonal-selection theory seems to be the most plausible and consistent with modern ideas of protein biosynthesis. Burnet ascribed the absence of a reaction to the organisms own antigens to the elimination of any prohibited clones (that is, clones capable of synthesizing antibodies to ones own) during the embryonic period. According to this theory, an antigen entering the organism selects a cell that is capable of forming the corresponding antibody and stimulates it to multiply and then to synthesize the antibody. Where this selection takes placeat the level of the cell clones (as Burnet believes) or at the level of subcellular unitsdepends on how many antibody molecules of different specificities the cell is capable of synthesizing. It is conceivable that the cell bears genetic information for the synthesis of more than 105 different immunoglobulins. However, because of differentiation, the cells ability to synthesize antibodies is in effect neutralized. Antigen depresses the synthesis of corresponding antibodies, so that antibodies of only a single specificity are synthesized. This notion is the basis of the repression-depression hypothesis advanced by the American scientist L. Szilard, the Australian I. Finch, and the Soviet scientists V. P. Efroimson, A. E. Gurvich, and R. S. Nezlin.

Immune-reactions physiology also studies the factors that regulate the quantitative characteristics of the immune response, including the role of the nervous system (especially of the hypothalamus), hormones, age, nutrition, condition of the organism (specifically, the degree of fatigue), and external influences. It is now known that pituitary and adrenal hormones can alter immunological reactivity and that the placenta secretes a special hormone that to a large degree inhibits the mothers immune reactions to the antigens of the fetus.

Immunopathology studies not only extreme or injurious immune reactions but also diseases accompanied by defects in the immune system: hereditary and acquired agammaglobulinemias and immunoglobulinopathies in tumors of the lymphoreticular tissue, in nephroses, after the use of cytostatic drugs, and after irradiation. Special attention is given to methods of inhibiting and stimulating the immune response. Intensification of the immune response by nonspecific stimulants (so-called adjuvants) or by transplantation of active lymphoid tissues is a promising approach to the treatment of infectious diseases and defects of the immune system. Conversely, inhibition of the immune response is a method of treating diseases with extreme or undesirable activity of the immune system. Inhibition is achieved by injuring lymphoid cells by irradiation, nitrogen mustard, antimetabolites, corticosteroid hormones, and antilymphocytic serum. The immune response can also be suppressed by the passive introduction of antibodiesfor example, by injecting the mothers body with antirhesus antibodies to prevent hemolytic jaundice of the newborn.

The bodys reaction to the cells and macromolecules of individuals of the same or of other species has been studied intensively in recent years. This branch of the science is called noninfection immunology (the study of immune responses to agents other than infection). The proteins and cellular membranes of every multicellular organism possess certain unique and inimitable structural features. The differences between individuals are due to genetic mechanisms. It is for this reason that cells and molecules introduced into the organism from without are recognized as foreign and evoke a complex of immune reactions directed toward eliminating them. Hence, despite the finest surgical technique, transplanted organs and tissues are usually rejected, since they are unable to overcome the barrier of tissue incompatibility. This problem is the concern of transplantation immunology. Another branch of noninfection immunology is the immunology of tumors, which studies tumor antigens and the mechanisms of recognition and elimination of malignantly degenerated cells. The scope of noninfection immunology also includes the development of methods for creating specific immunological tolerance; these methods will eventually make organ transplantation a practicable method of treating all kinds of diseases. The data obtained by immunology are the basis for the development of applied and clinical immunology and their various concerns, such as immunoprophylaxis, immunotherapy, and immunodiagnosis.

Immunological methods of research are widely used for purposes of precise analysis in diverse branches of medicine (hematology, obstetrics, dermatology), and biology (biochemistry, embryology, genetics, and anthropology).

There are more than 50 scientific-research institutes in the USSR dealing with the problems of immunology. The most important of these are the N. F. Gamaleia Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR (the department of immunology and oncology of this institute is an international center for the study of tumor-specific antigens), the E. Metchnikoff Moscow Institute of Vaccines and Sera, the L. A. Tarasevich State Control Institute of Biomedical Preparations, the Moscow Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology, and the Leningrad Institute of Experimental Medicine.

Among the foreign organizations doing research in immunology are the Institute of Immunology (Basel) and the Institute of Biochemistry of Lausanne University (Switzerland), the National Institute of Medical Research (Mill Hill, Great Britain), the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Health, and the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research (United States), the Scientific Research Institute of Immunology (Prague, Czechoslovakia), and the L. Pasteur Institute (Paris, France). Since 1963, as part of its program on immunology, the World Health Organization has been developing information centers for immunology and immunoglobulins and sponsoring symposia and conferences on immunopathology, the immunology of parasitic diseases, the immunotherapy of cancer, the typing of antigens of tissue incompatibility, and cellular immunity.

Immunological studies in the USSR are published in a number of medical and biological journals: Zhurnal mikrobiologii, epidemiologii i immunobiologii (since 1924), Patologicheskaia fiziologiia i eksperimentalnaia terapiia (since 1957), Voprosy virusologii (since 1956), Meditsinskaia parazitologiia i parazitar-nye bolezni (since 1923), and Biulleten eksperimentalnoi biologii i meditsiny (since 1936).

The following foreign journals are devoted entirely to immunology: Journal of Immunology (Baltimore, since 1916), Journal of Experimental Medicine (New York, since 1896), Journal of Allergy (St. Louis, since 1929), Immunology (Oxford, since 1958), Clinical and Experimental Immunology (Oxford, since 1966), Immunochemistry (New York, since 1964), Advances in Immunology (New York-London, since 1961), Zeitschrift fur Immunitats- und Allergieforschung (Jena-Stuttgart, since 1909), International Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology (New York-Basel, since 1950), Revue dImmunologie et de Therapie antimicrobienne (Paris, since 1935).

Many articles on immunology appear in the Russian-language Biulleten Vsemirnoi organizatsiizdravookhraneniia (Bulletin of the World Health Organization), in some issues of the series of WHO technical reports, and in the international Zhurnal gigieny, epidemiologii, mikrobiologii i immunologii, published in Russian in Prague (since 1957).

Practical (including clinical) immunology is concerned with the use of immunological reactions for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of a number of diseases. It is closely related to medical and veterinary microbiology, epidemiology, physiology and pathophysiology, biochemistry, and endocrinology. Viral immunology and the immunology of parasitic diseases are independent branches of practical immunology. Immunology studies the antigenic composition of microorganisms, characteristics of the immune processes in various kinds of infections, and nonspecific forms of resistance to the causative agents of infectious diseases. Study of the immunological processes and the immunological reconstruction of the organism caused by noninfectious antigens of exogenous and endogenous origin and the development of methods for controlling allergic diseases are becoming increasingly important. Other branches of clinical immunology are also developing intensively. These include radiation immunology, which studies the disruption of immunological reactivity by irradiation, and immunohematology, which investigates the antigenic composition of blood cells and the causes and mechanism of development of immunological injury to the circulatory system. Immunology is developing methods of immunoprophylaxis, immunotherapy, and immunodiagnosis.

Clinical immunology uses a variety of research techniques. For example, biochemical and physicochemical methods are used to study the nature and properties of antigens and antibodies. Using isotopic indicators and fluorescence microscopy, im-munologists study the fate of antigens in the body and the laws of antibody formation at the cellular level. The mechanisms of development of nonspecific inflammatory and allergic reactions are investigated by biochemical and cytochemical methods.

Immunological methods of research are based on the specificity of the interaction of an antigen (microbe, virus, foreign protein, and so forth) with antibodies. Serology is a branch of immunology that studies the reaction of antigen with serum antibodies. The most widely used immunological methods include the precipitation reaction, the agglutination reaction, lysis, and the neutralization reaction. The interaction of antigen with immune cells is receiving extensive study. Many immunological methods are highly specific and sensitive (for example, the anaphylactic reaction is more sensitive than the methods of analytical chemistry), and they are employed in other disciplines, such as forensic medicine.

Immunology is taught in the USSR and abroad in medical and veterinary schools in departments of pathological physiology, microbiology, and general pathology, as well as in special scientific research institutes. Problems of clinical immunology are discussed at international congresses on microbiology and allergology and in many Soviet and foreign periodicals.

A. KH. KANCHURIN and N. V. MEDUNITSYN

View post:

Immunology | Article about immunology by The Free Dictionary

Pharyngeal pouch (embryology) – Wikipedia, the free …

In the embryonic development of vertebrates, pharyngeal pouches form on the endodermal side between the pharyngeal arches. The pharyngeal grooves (or clefts) form the lateral ectodermal surface of the neck region to separate the arches.

The pouches line up with the clefts,[1] and these thin segments become gills in fish.

The endoderm lines the future auditory tube (Pharyngotympanic Eustachian tube), middle ear, mastoid antrum, and inner layer of the tympanic membrane.

Derivatives include:

The rest is here:

Pharyngeal pouch (embryology) - Wikipedia, the free ...

The Case Against Abortion: Medical Testimony

Page Summary: It is false to claim that no one knows when life begins and dishonest to argue that abortion does not kill a human being.

Every new life begins at conception. This is an irrefutable fact of biology. It is true for animals and true for humans. When considered alongside the law of biogenesisthat every species reproduces after its own kindwe can draw only one conclusion in regard to abortion. No matter what the circumstances of conception, no matter how far along in the pregnancy, abortion always ends the life of an individual human being. Every honest abortion advocate concedes this simple fact.

Faye Wattleton, the longest reigning president of the largest abortion provider in the United StatesPlanned Parenthoodargued as far back as 1997 that everyone already knows that abortion kills. She proclaims the following in an interview with Ms. Magazine:

I think we have deluded ourselves into believing that people don't know that abortion is killing. So any pretense that abortion is not killing is a signal of our ambivalence, a signal that we cannot say yes, it kills a fetus.1

On the other side of the pond, Ann Furedi, the chief executive of the largest independent abortion provider in the UK, said this in a 2008 debate:

We can accept that the embryo is a living thing in the fact that it has a beating heart, that it has its own genetic system within it.Its clearly human in the sense that its not a gerbil, and we can recognize that it is human life.2

Naomi Wolf, a prominent feminist author and abortion supporter, makes a similar concession when she writes:

Clinging to a rhetoric about abortion in which there is no life and no death, we entangle our beliefs in a series of self-delusions, fibs and evasions. And we risk becoming precisely what our critics charge us with being: callous, selfish and casually destructive men and women who share a cheapened view of human life...we need to contextualize the fight to defend abortion rights within a moral framework that admits that the death of a fetus is a real death.3

David Boonin, in his book, A Defense of Abortion, makes this startling admission:

In the top drawer of my desk, I keep [a picture of my son]. This picture was taken on September 7, 1993, 24 weeks before he was born. The sonogram image is murky, but it reveals clear enough a small head tilted back slightly, and an arm raised up and bent, with the hand pointing back toward the face and the thumb extended out toward the mouth. There is no doubt in my mind that this picture, too, shows [my son] at a very early stage in his physical development. And there is no question that the position I defend in this book entails that it would have been morally permissible to end his life at this point.4

Peter Singer, contemporary philosopher and public abortion advocate, joins the chorus in his book, Practical Ethics. He writes:

It is possible to give human being a precise meaning. We can use it as equivalent to member of the species Homo sapiens. Whether a being is a member of a given species is something that can be determined scientifically, by an examination of the nature of the chromosomes in the cells of living organisms. In this sense there is no doubt that from the first moments of its existence an embryo conceived from human sperm and eggs is a human being.5

Bernard Nathanson co-founded one of the most influential abortion advocacy groups in the world (NARAL) and once served as medical director for the largest abortion clinic in America. In 1974, he wrote an article for the New England Journal of Medicine in which he states, "There is no longer serious doubt in my mind that human life exists within the womb from the very onset of pregnancy..."6 Some years later, he would reiterate:

There is simply no doubt that even the early embryo is a human being. All its genetic coding and all its features are indisputably human. As to being, there is no doubt that it exists, is alive, is self-directed, and is not the the same being as the motherand is therefore a unified whole.7

Don't miss the significance of these acknowledgements. Prominent defenders of abortion rights publicly admit that abortion kills human beings. They are not saying that abortion is morally defensible because it doesn't kill a distinct human entity. They are admitting that abortion does kill a distinct human entity, but argue it is morally defensible anyway. We'll get to their arguments later, but the point here is this: There is simply no debate among honest, informed people that abortion kills distinctly human beings.

The problem is, Roe vs. Wade, the landmark 1973 verdict which legalized abortion in the U.S. is actually built on the claim that there's no way to say for certain whether or not abortion kills because no one can say for certain when life begins. Justice Harry Blackmun, who authored the majority opinion wrote:

The judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to... resolve the difficult question of when life begins... since those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus.8

Justice Blackmun's assertion is a ridiculous one, at least as it applies to the field of medicine. Dr. Nathanson had this to say about the ruling:

Of course, I was pleased with Justice Harry Blackmun's abortion decisions, which were an unbelievably sweeping triumph for our cause, far broader than our 1970 victory in New York or the advances since then. I was pleased with Blackmun's conclusions, that is. I could not plumb the ethical or medical reasoning that had produced the conclusions. Our final victory had been propped up on a misreading of obstetrics, gynecology, and embryology, and that's a dangerous way to win.9

Dr. Nathanson would eventually abandon his support for elective abortion and note that "the basics [of prenatal development] were well-known to human embryology at the time the U.S. Supreme Court issued its 1973 rulings, even though the rulings made no use of them."9 In biological terms, life's beginning is a settled fact. Individual human life begins at fertilization, and there are all sorts of authoritative, public resources to prove this. Consider the evidence below:

"Human development begins at fertilization, the process during which a male gamete or sperm (spermatozoo developmentn) unites with a female gamete or oocyte (ovum) to form a single cell called a zygote. This highly specialized, totipotent cell marked the beginning of each of us as a unique individual."

"A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo)."

Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2003. pp. 16, 2.

"Development begins with fertilization, the process by which the male gamete, the sperm, and the femal gamete, the oocyte, unite to give rise to a zygote."

T.W. Sadler, Langman's Medical Embryology, 10th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. p. 11.

"[The zygote], formed by the union of an oocyte and a sperm, is the beginning of a new human being."

Keith L. Moore, Before We Are Born: Essentials of Embryology, 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2008. p. 2.

"Although life is a continuous process, fertilization (which, incidentally, is not a 'moment') is a critical landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new genetically distinct human organism is formed when the chromosomes of the male and female pronuclei blend in the oocyte."

Ronan O'Rahilly and Fabiola Mller, Human Embryology and Teratology, 3rd edition. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001. p. 8.

"Human embryos begin development following the fusion of definitive male and female gametes during fertilization... This moment of zygote formation may be taken as the beginning or zero time point of embryonic development."

William J. Larsen, Essentials of Human Embryology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998. pp. 1, 14.

"It is the penetration of the ovum by a spermatozoan and resultant mingling of the nuclear material each brings to the union that constitues the culmination of the process of fertilization and marks the initiation of the life of a new individual."

Clark Edward Corliss, Patten's Human Embryology: Elements of Clinical Development. New York: McGraw Hill, 1976. p. 30.

"The term conception refers to the union of the male and female pronuclear elements of procreation from which a new living being develops."

"The zygote thus formed represents the beginning of a new life."

J.P. Greenhill and E.A. Friedman, Biological Principles and Modern Practice of Obstetrics. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1974. pp. 17, 23.

"Every time a sperm cell and ovum unite a new being is created which is alive and will continue to live unless its death is brought about by some specific condition."

E.L. Potter and J.M. Craig, Pathology of the Fetus and the Infant, 3rd edition. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1975. p. vii.

"Every baby begins life within the tiny globe of the mother's egg... It is beautifully translucent and fragile and it encompasses the vital links in which life is carried from one generation to the next. Within this tiny sphere great events take place. When one of the father's sperm cells, like the ones gathered here around the egg, succeeds in penetrating the egg and becomes united with it, a new life can begin."

Geraldine Lux Flanagan, Beginning Life. New York: DK, 1996. p. 13.

"Biologically speaking, human development begins at fertilization."

The Biology of Prenatal Develpment, National Geographic, 2006.

"The two cells gradually and gracefully become one. This is the moment of conception, when an individual's unique set of DNA is created, a human signature that never existed before and will never be repeated."

In the Womb, National Geographic, 2005.

In 1981, a United States Senate judiciary subcommittee received the following testimony from a collection of medical experts (Subcommittee on Separation of Powers to Senate Judiciary Committee S-158, Report, 97th Congress, 1st Session, 1981):

"It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive...It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception."

Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth Harvard University Medical School

"I have learned from my earliest medical education that human life begins at the time of conception."

Dr. Alfred M. Bongioanni Professor of Pediatrics and Obstetrics, University of Pennsylvania

"After fertilization has taken place a new human being has come into being. [It] is no longer a matter of taste or opinion...it is plain experimental evidence. Each individual has a very neat beginning, at conception."

Dr. Jerome LeJeune Professor of Genetics, University of Descartes

"By all the criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception."

Professor Hymie Gordon Mayo Clinic

"The beginning of a single human life is from a biological point of view a simple and straightforward matter the beginning is conception."

Dr. Watson A. Bowes University of Colorado Medical School

The official Senate report reached this conclusion:

Physicians, biologists, and other scientists agree that conception marks the beginning of the life of a human being - a being that is alive and is a member of the human species. There is overwhelming agreement on this point in countless medical, biological, and scientific writings.11

The American Medical Association (AMA) declared as far back as 1857 (referenced in the Roe. vs. Wade opinion) that "the independent and actual existence of the child before birth, as a living being is a matter of objective science. They deplored the popular ignorance...that the foetus is not alive till after the period of quickening.

Why have all the teaching texts and so many medical experts come to this same conclusion? Because there are simple ways to measure whether something is alive and whether something is human. If Faye Wattleton is correct and everyone already knows that abortion kills a human being, they have come to that knowledge in spite of the information circulated by Planned Parenthood and the rest of the abortion-rights community. The abortion section of the Planned Parenthood website explains abortion this way:

"Abortion is a safe and legal way for women to end pregnancy."12

Planned Parenthood either believes that the killing component of abortion is so obvious that it doesn't bear mentioning, or they are simply reinforcing a common and convenient misconception. Biologically speaking, abortion has nothing to do with potential human life. Every abortion at every point in the pregnancy ends the life of a genetically-distinct human being.

Footnotes

Even if an embryo is technically alive at fertilization, it's still just a clump of microscopic cells. Until the heart is beating or the brain is functioning, women should be free to have an abortion.

To learn our response, continue to the next page: Prenatal Development

Read the original:

The Case Against Abortion: Medical Testimony