All posts by medical

NewLink Genetics Corporation (NLNK) Moves Higher on Volume Spike for March 03 – Equities.com

Market Summary Follow

NewLink Genetics Corporation is a A biopharmaceutical company

NLNK - Market Data & News

NLNK - Stock Valuation Report

NewLink Genetics Corporation (NLNK) traded on unusually high volume on Mar. 03, as the stock gained 3.6% to close at $20.44. On the day, NewLink Genetics Corporation saw 870,492 shares trade hands on 6,041 trades. Considering that the stock averages only a daily volume of 324,193 shares a day over the last month, this represents a pretty significant bump in volume over the norm.

Generally speaking, when a stock experiences a sudden spike in trading volume, it may be seen as a bullish signal for investors. An increase in volume means more market awareness for the company, potentially setting up a more meaningful move in stock price. The added volume also provides a level of support and stability for price advances.

The stock has traded between $20.21 and $9.23 over the last 52-weeks, its 50-day SMA is now $12.64, and its 200-day SMA $11.90. NewLink Genetics Corporation has a P/B ratio of 4.3.

NewLink Genetics Corp is a biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on discovering, developing and commercializing immunotherapeutic products to improve treatment options for patients with cancer.

Headquartered in Ames, IA, NewLink Genetics Corporation has 210 employees and is currently under the leadership of CEO Charles J. Link.

For a complete fundamental analysis analysis of NewLink Genetics Corporation, check out Equities.coms Stock Valuation Analysis report for NLNK.

Want to invest with the experts? Subscribe to Equities Premium newsletters today! Visit http://www.equitiespremium.com/ to learn more about Guild Investments Market Commentary and Adam Sarhans Find Leading Stocks today.

To get more information on NewLink Genetics Corporation and to follow the companys latest updates, you can visit the companys profile page here: NLNKs Profile. For more news on the financial markets and emerging growth companies, be sure to visit Equities.coms Newsdesk. Also, dont forget to sign-up for our daily email newsletter to ensure you dont miss out on any of our best stories.

All data provided by QuoteMedia and was accurate as of 4:30PM ET.

DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of equities.com. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please go to: http://www.equities.com/disclaimer

View post:
NewLink Genetics Corporation (NLNK) Moves Higher on Volume Spike for March 03 - Equities.com

Have you made arrangements yet to attend the National Right to Life Convention June 29-July 1? – National Right to Life News

By Dave Andrusko

What a terrific motto for the annual pro-life educational event of the year: Keeping Tomorrow Alive: Life is for Everyone.

Likewise the annual National Right to Life Convention is for everyone. Young and old, novice and veteran, each and every one who attends will learn from the best and brightest minds in our Movement.

And what a time to share insights and words of encouragement. For the first time since 2009, we have a pro-life President who has made many promises to pro-lifers, including (as he already has) to appoint Supreme Court nominees in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia.

Ive attended every convention since 1980. Ive never been disappointed. Every topic from the basics of embryology, the latest legislative and political developments, through how to get a pro-life chapter going in your area is covered.

If you havent had a chance to visit the Convention websitenrlconvention.complease do. Over the next couple of months, it will be updated with new and exciting information.

So, please join this 3-day national meeting of the pro-life grassroots in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, June 29-July 1. It is the best place to learn, grow, and get energized to take a stand for life!

Theres no better way for pro-lifers to access the resources and knowledge they need to accomplish what is, in fact, the most important and most effective work there can be.

Mark your calendars. And to stay up-to-date, visit nrlconvention.com.

Read the original here:
Have you made arrangements yet to attend the National Right to Life Convention June 29-July 1? - National Right to Life News

Robert O’Mara Ryan returns to University as new department chair – Nevada Today

The College of Agriculture, Biotechnology, and Natural Resources is pleased to announce the hiring of Robert O'Mara Ryan as new University of Nevada, Reno Chair of the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

"After a national search, which generated a large number of highly qualified candidates for the chair position, Dr. Ryan emerged as the top candidate," Chris Pritsos, director of the Nevada Agricultural Experimental Station and one of the lead recruiters for CABNR, said. "His energy and expertise in the area of human health will be a strong influence on the department and will strengthen its expertise in the area of human health and disease."

Ryan comes to the University after serving 16 years as senior scientist at the Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute. He has also spent the past 12 years as adjunct professor in the Department of Nutritional Science and Toxicology at the University of California, Berkeley.

"Dr. Ryan is a very strong teacher and researcher," David Shintani, CABNR associate dean for academic programs and associate professor, said. "Because of his diverse research background (ranging from insect to human biochemistry), he will understand and appreciate the current research emphases of the department and be able to lead targeted hires and address programmatic deficiencies."

After obtaining his bachelor's degree from the University of Nevada, Reno in 1977 he continued his education here, earning his doctorate in biochemistry in 1982. Ryan went on to become a professor and research assistant with the Department of Biochemistry at the University of Arizona from 1983 to 1988. He then accepted a position as an assistant professor, and eventually director, of the Department of Biochemistry and Lipid and Lipoprotein Research Group at the University of Alberta, Canada, from 1988 to 2000.

His other accomplishments include numerous scientific publications, honors and awards in areas such as biochemistry and lipoprotein research, and service work with committees in relation to his professional work and achievements.

More here:
Robert O'Mara Ryan returns to University as new department chair - Nevada Today

Here’s How to Keep Your Brain Young, According to Neuroscience and Psychology – Inc.com

Nobody wants to lose cognitive function, especially when so much of business--and life in general--depends on being "on top of it" to stay ahead of the competition. But statistically speaking, the reality is, you have to fight to stay sharp. Doing Sudoku and crossword puzzles isn't going to hurt. But as heard in Is Age Nothing But a Mindset? with Kerri Miller, a neuroscientist and social psychologist both agree there's a better, broader approach.

According to Alexandra Touroutoglou, instructor of neurology at Harvard, researchers studied brain scans of so-called "superagers," who perform as well on word memory tests in their 60s and 70s as individuals in their 20s. The scans revealed that the areas of the brain related to motivation and emotion are thicker in superagers, meaning that there likely is a connection between the motivation we get from emotional experiences and the brain's ability to compensate for the atrophy that naturally occurs.

Accepting that emotion-based motivation supports continued learning and, therefore, maintains a young brain, the obvious next question then becomes, "Okay, well, then, what can I do to experience in an emotional way and increase the motivation I have to keep finding out more?"

Ellen Langer, social psychologist at Harvard and founder of the Langer Mindfulness Institute, thinks one key is being mindful. She asserts that this is crucial given how the absolutes taught in schools cause people to believe they "know" and that, therefore, there's no reason to continue active noticing (engagement).

"By actively noticing," Langer says, "you come to see that the things you thought you knew, you don't know as well as you thought. And that keeps you ever curious. It makes the world exciting. So this active noticing leads to engagement. And what we've found over 40 years of research is [that], the more mindful people are, the longer they live, the healthier they are, the happier they are. It affects virtually everything."

Langer notes just some of what studies have discovered about the incredible power of thought over bodily processes, too. Blood sugar follows perceived time rather than actual time. Maids who were told their work was exercise later showed improvements in weight, blood pressure, BMI and other metrics, even though their workload didn't change. And individuals in nursing homes who are given mindful choices have been shown to live longer than those who are not.

In other words, mindset matters for the mind. "People assume when they get older they're going to start forgetting," Langer says. "Young people also forget. [But] when a young person forgets, they just go on with whatever they're doing. They don't stop and say, 'Oh, my goodness! Am I becoming demented?'...If you start thinking your memory is going, then you're talking to yourself, confuting against yourself, rather than learning whatever the situation demands."

Scientists know the brain needs some challenge to stay "fit". But according to Langer, judging yourself through challenges doesn't do you any favors, and there's not really any magic formula to what's challenging and what's not.

"The reason that people that people [who] do the 'hard stuff' do well is because they tend not to be evaluative," Langer says. "You know, you don't get the answer, you try another way, rather than, you don't get the answer, that means you're stupid or losing your cognitive abilities and so on and you give up. So all tasks are potentially interesting. It all depends on the way we engage them...Rather than look for [whether it's 'hard' or 'difficult'], I think that it should be personally challenging."

Nature says the brain won't stay absolutely perfect as you get older. But by simply being mindful, taking a positive attitude and breaking out of what's easy with what personally challenges you, you'll likely have experiences that are more emotionally rich. Those experiences will keep your flame of curiosity burning and keep your brain healthily engaged. Don't judge yourself. Just be aware and keep trying. Your brain will thank you.

Here is the original post:
Here's How to Keep Your Brain Young, According to Neuroscience and Psychology - Inc.com

Swedish-Cherry Hill neuroscience chair Dr. Johnny Delashaw steps down amid investigation 5 things to know – Becker’s Orthopedic & Spine

Johnny B. Delashaw, MD, resigned from his post as chair of the Seattle-based Swedish Neuroscience Institute on the Cherry Hill campus on March 1, 2017, amid a state health regulatory investigation into complaints filed against him, The Seattle Times reports.

Here are five things to know:

1. On Feb. 10, 2017, The Seattle Times published an investigative report into the spine and neurosurgery services at Providence Health & Services Swedish-Cherry Hill hospital. The report revealed the health system decided to overhaul Cherry Hill's neuroscience program to treat more high risk patients. The invasive brain and spine procedures generated around $500 million in net operating revenue in 2015 as well as saw higher Medicare reimbursement per inpatient visit than any other hospital of its size.

2. Dr. Delashaw joined the Cherry Hill team in 2013, brining in 661 inpatients cases resulting in more than $86 million in billed charges within his first 16 months. Medical staff reported concerns about Dr. Delashaw, citing he "created a culture of retribution, making it difficult to question his decisions," The Seattle Times reports. Other voiced concerns regarded patient care, inappropriate surgeries and little accountability.

3. After analyzing The Seattle Times report, the Department of Health decided to launch an investigation into two complaints filed against Dr. Delashaw in the past 12 months.

4. Dr. Delashaw's resignation comes about a week after Anthony Armada left his post as CEO of Seattle-based Swedish Health Services on Feb. 20, 2017.

5. Interim CEO Guy Hudson sent a memo to Swedish staff on March 2: "As a team, we are firmly committed to supporting our patients and caregivers and are focused on what is most important: safe, compassionate and high-quality care."

More articles on spine: Dr. Jason Lowenstein honored as top doctor 5 highlights Dr. Kalid Kurtom to lead medical mission trip to Jordan 3 spine surgeons & neurosurgeons on the move in February 2017

Continued here:
Swedish-Cherry Hill neuroscience chair Dr. Johnny Delashaw steps down amid investigation 5 things to know - Becker's Orthopedic & Spine

Dying woolly mammoths were in ‘genetic meltdown’ – Nature.com

iStock/Getty Images Plus

Woolly mammoth populations were plentiful 45,000 years ago, but went into genomic freefall as their numbers dwindled around 4,000 years ago.

Isolated on an island in the Arctic Ocean, not only were woolly mammoths the last of a dying species but they were also swamped with bad genes that are likely to have stripped their sense of smell and saddled them with translucent coats.

A study1 published 2 March in PLOS Genetics gives a rare insight into how genomes change as a species dies out. Towards the end of the last Ice Age, around 11,700 years ago, woolly mammoths ranged through Siberia and into the colder stretches of North America. But by about 4,000 years ago, mainland mammoths had died out and only 300 remained on Wrangel Island off the Siberian coast.

In order to examine this disappearance at the genetic level, biologists Rebekah Rogers and Montgomery Slatkin at the University of California, Berkeley, compared the complete genome of a mainland mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) that lived about 45,000 years ago with that of a Wrangel Island mammoth from about 4,300 years ago. The sequences were made available by Love Daln at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm.

As I looked at the sequence data, says Rogers, it became very clear that the Wrangel mammoth had an excess of what looked like bad mutations.

Some of these changes are only visible to a geneticists eye. Compared with the mainland mammoth, the Wrangel Island specimen's genome was riddled with deletions and an abundance of sequences called stop codons which tell a cell when to stop transcribing a section of DNA among other changes to the DNA. But some of these changes would also have been visible in the mammoths behaviour and appearance.

Rogers and Slatkin found that genes related to smell and urinary proteins, which in modern elephants are important for eliciting mating behaviours or signalling social status were shut down by the mutations. These might be related, the researchers hypothesize, because a duller sense of smell may have been hitched in a feedback loop to the loss of urinary proteins, leading to the rapid loss of both. Changes to the Wrangel mammoths coats would have been even more obvious. Rogers and Slatkin propose that a mutation in a part of the genome called FOXQ1 would have given the mammoths a satin coat, marked by fur that is the same colour as normal but is shiny and translucent.

What happened on Wrangel wasnt a matter of inbreeding, Rogers says the genetic signal is different.

What did happen was that the population was simply small, she says, and under these circumstances any mammoth was better than no mammoth at all, so natural selection did not operate in the usual way. This allowed unhelpful mutations to rack up, following a previously identified phenomenon called nearly neutral genome evolution. Bad mutations that would normally be weeded out werent removed from the population because of reduced competition, says Rogers.

Isolation and reducing population size have long been recognized as important factors causing endangerment, says palaeontologist Ross MacPhee of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, but the recognition of the mammoths genetic meltdown is a sign of how far studies of ancient DNA have come, and the work that still lies ahead.

The changes on Wrangel Island took place after mammoths had already been wiped out on the mainland. Tracking the downfall of the species is an ongoing effort, says MacPhee. With additional specimens, drawn from other times and parts of the woolly mammoths enormous range, we may get a better picture of the genetic load that this species was labouring under at the end of its tenure.

Still, MacPhee adds, the study is maybe telling us something very important about what happens in populations already under severe threat because of diminished range and numbers.

MacPhee cautions that no single animal or genome can tell the whole story for an entire species. But he notes that human hunting, climate change or any other external factor wasn't enough by itself to wipe out the woolly mammoth. There had to be some other element operating within the animals, driving them to extinction.

As dramatic as genetic meltdown sounds, Rogers says that its difficult to tell whether the increase in bad mutations contributed directly to the final extinction of the woolly mammoth. Yet the findings have implications for the survival of the mammoths elephant cousins and other endangered mammals. Rogers notes that its better to prevent a species from becoming endangered in the first place than to try to recover its genetic diversity after a sharp plummet.

Even though we can improve the number of individuals in endangered populations, she says, their genomes may still bear the hallmarks of genomic meltdown, which will be difficult to undo.

More here:
Dying woolly mammoths were in 'genetic meltdown' - Nature.com

New light shed on genetics and social mobility – Times LIVE

New light shed on genetics and social mobility

KATHARINE CHILD | 2017-03-02 07:06:54.0

DNA molecule. File photo.

Scientists are learning the first few years of a child's life can be a good predictor of whether they will have a successful life or be condemned to poverty.

Now an international study conducted in South Africa shows that genetics can determine whether an underprivileged baby will respond to interventions to help them.

The study was published in the journal PLOS this week.

Peter Singer, CEO of Grand Challenges Canada, said: "This is a startling finding that changes the way I think about child development. Why is that important? Because child development is the ladder of social mobility to climb out the hole of inequity for millions of children all over this inequitable world."

The first study was conducted by Stellenbosch Professor Mark Tomlinson between 1999 and 2003 in which caregivers taught about 220 Khayelitsha mothers to communicate and engage with their babies to help them form good bonds, a process dubbed "attachment".

Attachment is a psychological measure of a child's bond with its mother and can predict future wellbeing.

Another 220 mothers received no training. Their children were assessed at 18 months and compared with babies whose mothers received training.

The trial was described as only "moderately" successful, registering a small improvement.

But researchers recently found 220 of the original children and analysed if they had a short or long form of SLC6A4 - the serotonin transporter gene, which is involved in nerve signalling, and which has been linked to anxiety and depression.

Children with the short form of the gene, and whose pregnant mothers were mentored, were almost four times more likely to be securely attached to their mothers at 18 months old than children carrying the short form whose mothers did not receive help.

Meanwhile, children with the long form of the serotonin transporter gene did equally well regardless of the mentoring.

Tomlinson told The Times they didn't want to genetically screen children as it would be "morally wrong".

"This raises more questions than answers," he said.

Link:
New light shed on genetics and social mobility - Times LIVE

3 Big Stock Charts for Thursday: Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NUE) – Investorplace.com

For weeks, the market and certain sectors have been operating under uncertainty as doubts over the direction of President Trumps administration were growing. After Tuesday nights speech, investors are beginning to get some clarity, allowing a number of companies that have been locked in a range to begin showing signs that they are ready to move higher.

Todays three big stock charts look at Myriad Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (NYSE:WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NYSE:NUE). These three companies have experienced recent technical trends that suggest they areready to shift back into rally mode.

Myriad, along with a large portion of the health care and biotechnology sectors, has been held back by uncertainty around the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. With this option becoming less likely, these stocks are starting to rally again.

MYGN shares recently broke above their 50- and 100-day moving averages as volume on the stock saw an increase. This suggests that the technical traders are now getting behind the shift in trends.

While breaking above the 50-day, this trendline has started to transition into a rising pattern for Myriad. Our stock modeling programs show that MYGNand other stocks are twice as likely to continue their trend when the 50-day is moving higher.

Myriad shares are coming off an overbought reading after the recent positive earnings results. This suggests that we may see a short-term decline in MYGNshares theres a catch here though.

From a long-term perspective, the market technicals view Myriad Genetics as an oversold, undervalued stock. This means that MYGNshares could more easily remain in short-term overbought territory as the crowd is only beginning to migrate into the stock.

Watch for a pause at $20, but from there the shares should find plenty of technical strength to rally higher.

The retail sector has taken a beating as of late, as the fourth-quarter earnings results have been underwhelming to say the least. One standout, at least from a technical perspective, is Walmart. The SPDR S&P Retail (ETF) (NYSEARCA:XRT) is trading 2.5% lower over the last 12 months compared to the 6% return for WMTshares.

Now, the technical picture for Walmart shares isimproving from an intermediate-term perspective.

Last week, WMT shares broke above the 200-day moving average on a positive earnings report. This move also broke Walmart stock into a technically overbought reading that we expected to see force a pullback, which is exactly what happened.

Now, WMT shares are consolidating around the 200-day trendline, just above $70. The support from this trendline suggests that the stock is now gaining technical strength. Supporting that theory is the fact that Walmarts 50-day trendline is now moving higher. This bullish transition improved the technical outlook for the largest retailer.

Weve seen overhead resistance at $75 for WMT shares since June 2016; however, the growing momentum looks to overtake this hurdle over the next few weeks.

Next Page

Here is the original post:
3 Big Stock Charts for Thursday: Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN), Wal-Mart Stores Inc (WMT) and Nucor Corporation (NUE) - Investorplace.com

Critical thinkers don’t ignore scientific facts – Lethbridge Herald

By Letter to the Editor on March 2, 2017.

Tony Ouwerkerks passing reference to Darwin being wrong on several theories (Feb. 23) is typical of the cherry-picked facts constantly promulgated by Creationists. He asserts that a one-thousandth accuracy quoted in a National Geographic article is shaky evidence.

The November 2004 article included a subsequent statement conveniently omitted from Ouwerkerks assertion. That statement, far from confirming shaky evidence, pointed out that dozens of intermediate forms have subsequently been found. (It was referring to a 40-million-year-old whale fossil and so-called missing links.)

The entire article begins with the question Was Darwin wrong? Using biogeography, embryology, morphology and paleontology, the author correctly answers the question with a resounding No. He further explains his answer using more recent discoveries: Similarities between genetic makeup of species comparing the human genome with that of a mouse, bacterial drug resistance, viral mutations, extinctions and anatomical similarities between species. These latter examples being largely unknown to science in the 19th century.

In Darwins day, chromosomes had yet to be discovered and somewhat earlier, Galileo had been branded a heretic for challenging Catholic earth-centric dogma. Scientific discoveries continue across our world and beyond. Such findings may or may not confirm a particular hypothesis. Science has never relied upon blind faith to stubbornly cling to an outdated line of thinking.

In fact, it was not just Darwin who introduced the then radical idea of Evolution. A.R. Wallace, a contemporary of Darwins, introduced a similar concept. Today, that theory is backed by observation and experiment. It is not just a theory.

That the letter writer insists he is a critical thinker is interesting. Such a thinker must include all the facts and not simply use those that seemingly agree with a point of view or indeed, ignore those that would be critical of an observation. Ouwerkerk fails this test.

The very fact that his letter was defending publicly funded Christian schools and resorted to critiquing a valid component of science (Darwinism, call it what you will), is reason enough to question exactly what sort of scientific education children attending such schools, are receiving.

No doubt that as I write this, there are many of Ouwerkerks persuasion, who think the newly discovered Earth-like planets orbiting a distant star are simply an aberration. After all, the Earth is flat, our sun orbits the Earth and dinosaurs walked with our ancestors.

Science 101, right?

John P. Nightingale

Lethbridge

You must be logged in to post a comment.

See the article here:
Critical thinkers don't ignore scientific facts - Lethbridge Herald

Biochemical ‘fossil’ shows how life may have emerged without phosphate – Phys.Org

March 2, 2017 A schematic depiction of how an early metabolism could have expanded from an initial set of prebiotic molecules, with thioester (S) vs. phosphate (P) as the main driving force. Credit: Joshua Goldford and Daniel Segr

One major mystery about life's origin is how phosphate became an essential building block of genetic and metabolic machinery in cells, given its poor accessibility on early Earth. In a study published on March 9 in the journal Cell, researchers used systems biology approaches to tackle this long-standing conundrum, providing compelling, data-driven evidence that primitive life forms may not have relied on phosphate at all. Instead, a few simple, abundant molecules could have supported the emergence of a sulfur-based, phosphate-free metabolism, which expanded to form a rich network of biochemical reactions capable of supporting the synthesis of a broad category of key biomolecules.

"The significance of this work is that future efforts to understand life's origin should take into account the concrete possibility that phosphate-based processes, which are essential today, may not have been around when the first life-like processes started emerging," says senior study author Daniel Segr of Boston University. "An early phosphate-independent metabolism capable of producing several key building blocks of living systems is in principle viable."

Phosphate is essential for all living systems and is present in a large proportion of known biomolecules. A sugar-phosphate backbone forms the structural framework of nucleic acids, including DNA and RNA. Moreover, phosphate is a critical component of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which transports chemical energy within cells, and a compound called NADH, which has several essential roles in metabolism. But it is unclear how phosphate could have assumed these central roles on primordial Earth, given its scarcity and poor accessibility.

In light of this puzzle, some have proposed that early metabolic pathways did not rely on phosphate. In many of these scenarios, sulfur and iron found on mineral surfaces are thought to have fulfilled major catalytic and energetic functions prior to the appearance of phosphate. One notable origin-of-life scenario suggests that the role of ATP was originally assumed by sulfur-containing compounds called thioesters, which are widely involved in protein, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism. Despite the availability of iron and sulfur on early Earth, concrete evidence supporting these scenarios has been lacking.

To test the feasibility of the "iron-sulfur world hypothesis" and the "thioester world scenario," Segr and his team used computational systems biology approaches originally developed for large-scale analyses of complex metabolic networks. The researchers used a large database to assemble the complete set of all known biochemical reactions. After exploring this so-called "biosphere-level metabolism," the researchers identified a set of eight phosphate-free compounds thought to have been available in prebiotic environments. They then used an algorithm that simulated the emergence of primitive metabolic networks by compiling all possible reactions that could have taken place in the presence of these eight compounds, which included formate, acetate, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium, carbon dioxide, water, bicarbonate, and nitrogen gas.

This analysis revealed that a few simple prebiotic compounds could support the emergence of a rich, phosphate-independent metabolic network. This core network, consisting of 315 reactions and 260 metabolites, was capable of supporting the biosynthesis of a broad category of key biomolecules such as amino acids and carboxylic acids. Notably, the network was enriched for enzymes containing iron-sulfur clusters, bolstering the idea that modern biochemistry emerged from mineral geochemistry. Moreover, thioesters rather than phosphate could have enabled this core metabolism to overcome energetic bottlenecks and expand under physiologically realistic conditions.

"Before our study, other researchers had proposed a sulfur-based early biochemistry, with hints that phosphate may not have been necessary until later," Segr says. "What was missing until now was data-driven evidence that these early processes, rather than scattered reactions, could have constituted a highly connected and relatively rich primitive metabolic network."

Although this non-experimental evidence does not definitively prove that life started without phosphate, it provides compelling support for the iron-sulfur world hypothesis and the thioester world scenario. At the same time, the study calls into question the "RNA world hypothesis," which proposes that self-replicating RNA molecules were the precursors to all current life on Earth. Instead, the results support the "metabolism-first hypothesis," which posits that a self-sustaining phosphate-free metabolic network predated the emergence of nucleic acids. In other words, nucleic acids could have been an outcome of early evolutionary processes rather than a prerequisite for them.

"Evidence that an early metabolism could have functioned without phosphate indicates that phosphate may have not been an essential ingredient for the onset of cellular life," says first author Joshua Goldford of Boston University. "This proto-metabolic system would have required an energy source and may have emerged either on the Earth's surface, with solar energy as the main driving force, or in the depth of the oceans near hydrothermal vents, where geochemical gradients could have driven the first life-like processes."

In future studies, the researchers will continue to apply systems biology approaches to study the origin of life. "My hope is that these findings will motivate further studies of the landscape of possible historical paths of metabolism, as well as specific experiments for testing the feasibility of a phosphate-free sulfur-based core biochemistry," Segr says. "The idea of analyzing metabolism as an ecosystem-level or even planetary phenomenon, rather than an organism-specific one, may also have implications for our understanding of microbial communities. Furthermore, it will be interesting to revisit the question of how inheritance and evolution could have worked prior to the appearance of biopolymers."

Explore further: Metabolism may have started in our early oceans before the origin of life

More information: Cell, Goldford et al: "Remnants of an Ancient Metabolism without Phosphate" http://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(17)30133-2 , DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.001

Journal reference: Cell

Provided by: Cell Press

The chemical reactions behind the formation of common metabolites in modern organisms could have formed spontaneously in the earth's early oceans, questioning the events thought to have led to the origin of life.

The phosphate ion is almost insoluble and is one of the most inactive of Earth's most abundant phosphate minerals. So how could phosphate have originally been incorporated into ribonucleotides, the building blocks of RNA, ...

(Phys.org)A gigantic number of chemical reactions take place inside our bodies every second, all synchronizing with each other to produce the energy and chemical compounds that we need to survive. Together these reactions ...

On the early Earth, light came not only from the sun but also from the incessant bombardment of fireball meteorites continually striking the planet. Now, the recent work of University of South Florida (USF) associate professor ...

(Phys.org) A trio of researchers at the University of Nevada has found that phosphate found in minerals on Mars, is far more soluble than it is in natural Earth minerals. In their paper published in the journal Nature ...

Inorganic phosphate is an essential building block of cell membranes, DNA and proteins. It is also a main component of ATP, the "cell currency" of energy transfer. All cells therefore need to maintain a sufficient concentration ...

Biophysicists at JILA have measured protein folding in more detail than ever before, revealing behavior that is surprisingly more complex than previously known. The results suggest that, until now, much about protein behavior ...

One major mystery about life's origin is how phosphate became an essential building block of genetic and metabolic machinery in cells, given its poor accessibility on early Earth. In a study published on March 9 in the journal ...

(Phys.org)A team of researchers affiliated with several institutions in China has found that adding a certain type of salt to liquid pesticides greatly reduces waste due to splashing. In their paper published in the journal ...

The chemical industry can learn a lot from the common mussel. Not only are the mollusc's mother of pearl and tough threads with which it clings to the seafloor remarkable, but the way in which these materials are produced ...

In an age of booming biotechnology, it might be easy to forget how much we still rely on the bounty of the natural world. Some microbes make us sick, some keep us healthy, while others continue to give us some of our best ...

Using 3-D electron microscopy, structural biologists from the University of Zurich succeeded in elucidating the architecture of the lamina of the cell nucleus at molecular resolution for the first time. This scaffold stabilizes ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Continued here:
Biochemical 'fossil' shows how life may have emerged without phosphate - Phys.Org