All posts by medical

Tennessee wildlife officials warn residents to be aware of bears on the move – Chattanooga Times Free Press

A fed bear is a dead bear. Humans should never feed bears. Mime Barnes, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency spokeswoman

Black Bear in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Black Bear in the Great Smoky Mountains National...

Photo by Contributed Photo /Times Free Press.

As summer approaches, activities such as hiking, camping and cookouts can bring people in close contact with black bears, and state officials want people to be aware of the dangers.

The Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency receives more calls about black bears in the spring than any other time. It's the time of year when bears are hungry and on the move.

Wildlife officials say young bears are seeking new territory and are often unfamiliar with terrain and human inhabitants.

"Young, second-year cubs are leaving their mothers. Females won't go far to establish their territories," TWRA spokeswoman Mime Barnes said. "Sometimes their territories even overlap with their mother's."

Young male bears, however, go farther afield, leading to a higher likelihood of encounters with humans.

"We've not had any incidents," Barnes said Friday. "We've had sightings, but sightings are normal this time of year."

Obviously, a hike in the Cherokee National Forest or the Great Smoky Mountains National Park can lead to bear encounters, but so can ordinary outdoor activities for folks who live near bear habitats.

Gardening, hiking, camping and grilling increase the potential for more bear-human interactions.

Resources agency officials said many people are unsure of how to live in an area where bears are present, and they can unknowingly attract and provide for wild animals that live nearby. Attractants include bird feeders, trash, bird baths and pet food bowls with leftover food, officials said.

Don't feed bears no matter where they are encountered, because bears accustomed to food provided by humans are easily conditioned and pose a greater threat, officials said. The smell of grease on a grill, ripe vegetables in a garden, trash and bird feeders provide effortless meals for bears, and once a bear gets this easy meal, it doesn't forget.

Nuisance bears are serious problems.

"There is a lot taken into consideration before a bear is moved," Pickett County wildlife officer Craig Norris said in a resources agency statement. Officials evaluate several things, including females with cubs, the number of times a bear has caused an issue, the level of aggressiveness, the location and the nuisance concern itself. Problems are most often linked to humans, Norris said. Bears will travel impressive distances to return to an area where they easily found food.

"Euthanization isn't our goal, and it's disconcerting when we reach this level," TWRA biologist Ben Layton said. "Our goal is helping people understand that human behavior most often causes nuisance bear issues.

"People think they're protecting something or helping it when they purposefully put out table scraps or leave feeders in their yards. However, they're encouraging a dangerous situation, and in the end it causes harm to wildlife," Layton said.

Barnes said the rule is simple.

"A fed bear is a dead bear," she said of an adage repeated by state officials every season. "Humans should never feed bears."

Contact staff writer Ben Benton at bbenton@timesfreepress.com or 423-757-6569.

Here are some tips for avoiding problems with bears when enjoying the outdoors or for homeowners in rural areas:

Look large and make a lot of noise, back slowly away should you encounter a bear.

Never run from a bear.

Do not purposefully feed bears.

Store garbage in bear-proof containers or in a manner that is inaccessible to bears.

Do not feed birds between April and January when bears are most active.

Remove uneaten pet food from outside areas or feed pets indoors.

Do not add greasy foods to your compost piles or compost in bear-proof containers.

Keep cooking grills clean and stored indoors when not in use.

Report problem bears or any odd behavior to your regional TWRA office.

Visit Bebearaware.org, a national site dedicated to reducing human-bear conflicts.

Source: Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency

Go here to read the rest:
Tennessee wildlife officials warn residents to be aware of bears on the move - Chattanooga Times Free Press

‘This is not the end’: Using immunotherapy and a genetic glitch to … – Washington Post

The oncologist was blunt: Stefanie Johos colon cancer was raging out of control and there was nothing more she could do. Flanked by her parents and sister, the 23-year-old felt something wet on her shoulder. She looked up to see her father weeping.

I felt dead inside, utterly demoralized, ready to be done, Joho remembers.

But her younger sister couldnt accept that. When the family got back to Johos apartment in New Yorks Flatiron district, Jess opened her laptop and began searching frantically for clinical trials, using medical words shed heard but not fully understood. An hour later, she came into her sisters room and showed her what shed found. Im not letting you give up, she told Stefanie. This is not the end.

That search led to a contact at Johns Hopkins University, and a few days later, Joho got a call from a cancer geneticist co-leading a study there. Get down here as fast as you can! Luis Diaz said. We are having tremendous success with patients like you.

What followed is an illuminating tale of how one womans intersection with experimental research helped open a new frontier in cancer treatment with approval of a drug that, for the first time, capitalizes on a genetic feature in a tumor rather than on the diseases location in the body.

The breakthrough, made official last week by the Food and Drug Administration, immediately could benefit some patients with certain kinds of advanced cancer that arent responding to chemotherapy. Each should be tested for that genetic signature, scientists stress.

These are people facing death sentences, said Hopkins geneticist Bert Vogelstein. This treatment might keep some of them in remission for a long time.

In August 2014, Joho stumbled into Hopkins for her first infusion of the immunotherapy drug Keytruda. She was in agony from a malignant mass in her midsection, and even with the copious amounts of oxycodone she was swallowing, she needed a new fentanyl patch on her arm every 48 hours. Yet within just days, the excruciating back pain had eased. Then an unfamiliar sensation hunger returned. She burst into tears when she realized what it was.

As months went by, her tumor shrank and ultimately disappeared. She stopped treatment this past August, free from all signs of disease.

[Negotiating cancer: Tips from one whos done it ]

The small trial in Baltimore was pivotal, and not only for the young marketing professional. It showed that immunotherapy could attack colon and other cancers thought to be unstoppable. The key was their tumors genetic defect, known as mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency akin to a missing spell-check on their DNA. As the DNA copies itself, the abnormality prevents any errors from being fixed. In the cancer cells, that means huge numbers of mutations that are good targets for immunotherapy.

The treatment approach isnt a panacea, however. The glitch under scrutiny which can arise spontaneously or be inherited is found in just 4percent of cancers overall. But bore in on a few specific types, and the scenario changes dramatically. The problem occurs in up to 20percent of colon cancers and about 40percent of endometrial malignancies cancer in the lining of the uterus.

In the United States, researchers estimate that initially about 15,000 people with the defect may be helped by this immunotherapy. That number is likely to rise sharply as doctors begin using it earlier on eligible patients.

Joho was among the first.

***

Even before Joho got sick, cancer had cast a long shadow on her family. Her mother has Lynch syndrome, a hereditary disorder that sharply raises the risk of certain cancers, and since 2003, Priscilla Joho has suffered colon cancer, uterine cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

Stefanies older sister, Vanessa, had already tested positive for Lynch syndrome, and Stefanie planned to get tested when she turned 25. But at 22, several months after she graduated from New York University, she began feeling unusually tired. She blamed the fatigue on her demanding job. Her primary-care physician, aware of her mothers medical history, ordered a colonoscopy.

When Joho woke up from the procedure, the gastroenterologist looked like a ghost, she said. A subsequent CT scan revealed a very large tumor in her colon. Shed definitely inherited Lynch syndrome.

She underwent surgery in January 2013 at Philadelphias Fox Chase Cancer Center, where her mother had been treated. The news was good: The cancer didnt appear to have spread, so she could skip chemotherapy and follow up with scans every three months.

[More than two-thirds of cancer mutations are due to random DNA copying errors, study says]

By August of that year, though, Joho started having relentless back pain. Tests detected the invasive tumor in her abdomen. Another operation, and now she started chemo. Once again, in spring 2014, the cancer roared back. Her doctors in New York, where she now was living, switched to a more aggressive chemo regimen.

This thing is going to kill me, Joho remembered thinking. It was eating me alive.

She made it to Jesss college graduation in Vermont that May. Midsummer, her oncologist confessed he was out of options. As he left the examining room, he mentioned offhandedly that some interesting work was going on in immunotherapy. But when Joho met with a hospital immunologist, that doctor told her no suitable trials were available.

Joho began planning to move to her parents home in suburban Philadelphia: I thought, Im dying, and Id like to breathe fresh air and be around the green and the trees.

Her younger sister wasnt ready for her to give up. Jess searched for clinical trials, typing in immunotherapy and other terms shed heard the doctors use. Up popped a trial at Hopkins, where doctors were testing a drug called pembrolizumab.

***

Pembro is part of a class of new medications called checkpoint inhibitors that disable the brakes that keep the immune system from attacking tumors. In September 2014, the treatment was approved by the FDA for advanced melanoma and marketed as Keytruda. The medication made headlines in 2015 when it helped treat former president Jimmy Carter for melanoma that had spread to his brain and liver. It later was cleared for several other malignancies.

Yet researchers still dont know why immunotherapy, once hailed as a game changer, works in only a minority of patients. Figuring that out is important for clinical as well as financial reasons. Keytruda, for example, costs about $150,000 a year.

By the time Joho arrived at Hopkins, the trial had been underway for a year. While an earlier study had shown a similar immunotherapy drug to be effective for a significant proportion of patients with advanced melanoma or lung or kidney cancer, checkpoint inhibitors werent making headway with colon cancer. A single patient out of 20 had responded in a couple of trials.

Why did some tumors shrink and others didnt? What was different about the single colon cancer patient who benefited?

Drew Pardoll, director of the Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Hopkins, and top researcher Suzanne L. Topalian took the unusual step of consulting with the cancer geneticists who worked one floor up.

This was the first date in what became the marriage of cancer genetics and cancer immunology, Pardoll said.

[A consumers guide to the hottest field in cancer treatments immunotherapy]

In a brainstorming session, the geneticists were quick to offer their theories. They suggested that the melanoma and lung cancer patients had done best because those cancers have lots of mutations, a consequence of exposure to sunlight and cigarette smoke. The mutations produce proteins recognized by the immune system as foreign and ripe for attack, and the drug boosts the systems response.

And that one colon-cancer patient? As Vogelstein recalls, We all said in unison, He must have MMR deficiency! because such a genetic glitch would spawn even more mutations. The abnormality was a familiar subject to Vogelstein, who in the 1990s had co-discovered its role in the development of colon cancer. But the immunologists hadnt thought of it.

When the patients tumor tissue was tested, it was indeed positive for the defect.

The researchers decided to run a small trial, led by Hopkins immunologist Dung Le and geneticist Diaz, to determine whether the defect could predict a patients response to immunotherapy. The pharmaceutical company Merck provided its still-experimental drug pembrolizumab. Three groups of volunteers were recruited: 10 colon cancer patients whose tumors had the genetic problem; 18 colon cancer patients without it; and 7 patients with other malignancies with the defect.

The first results, published in 2015 in the New England Journal of Medicine, were striking. Four out of the 10 colon cancer patients with the defect and 5 out of the other 7cancer patients with the abnormality responded to the drug. In the remaining group, nothing. Since then, updated numbers have reinforced that a high proportion of patients with the genetic feature benefit from the drug, often for a lengthy period. Other trials by pharmaceutical companies have shown similar results.

The Hopkins investigators found that tumors with the defect had, on average, 1,700 mutations, compared with only 70 for tumors without the problem. That confirmed the theory that high numbers of mutations make it more likely the immune system will recognize and attack cancer if it gets assistance from immunotherapy.

The studies were the foundation of the FDAs decision on Tuesday to green-light Keytruda to treat cancers such as Johos, meaning malignancies with certain molecular characteristics. This first-ever site-agnostic approval by the agency signals an emerging field of precision immunotherapy, Pardoll said, one in which genetic details are used to anticipate who will respond to treatments.

***

For Joho, now 27 and living in suburban Philadelphia, the hard lesson from the past few years is clear: The cancer field is changing so rapidly that patients cant rely on their doctors to find them the best treatments. Oncologists can barely keep up, she said. My sister found a trial I was a perfect candidate for, and my doctors didnt even know it existed.

Her first several weeks on the trial were rough, with an early hospitalization after she cut back too quickly on her fentanyl and went into withdrawal. She still has some lasting side effects today joint pain in her knees, minor nausea and fatigue but they are manageable.

I have had to adapt to some new limits, she acknowledged. But I still feel better than I have in five years.

The FDAs decision last week was an emotional moment. Diaz, now at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, immediately texted her. We did it! he exulted.

I got chills all over my body, Joho said. To think that I was at the end of the road, with no options, and then to be part of such a change.

Her experience has prompted her to drop plans to go back into marketing. Now she wants to help patients navigate the new cancer landscape. Become an expert on your cancer is her message. Dont be passive. She encourages patients to try clinical trials.

As a cancer survivor with Lynch syndrome, Joho will be closely watched; if she relapses, she is likely to be treated again with immunotherapy. And if her mother relapses, Keytruda might now be her best chance.

Coming out the other side, I feel really lucky, Joho said. Shes also grateful for something else: A few years ago, her sister Jess was tested for the disorder that has so affected their family. She was negative.

Continue reading here:
'This is not the end': Using immunotherapy and a genetic glitch to ... - Washington Post

Anatomy of a Goal: Morrow Makes it 2 – Massive Report

Welcome to the Anatomy of a Goal, where each week we dissect one goal (or near goal) from Columbus Crew SCs previous match.

For match 14 of the 2017 MLS Season, we take a look at Toronto FC midfielder Justin Morrows 39th minute goal that put Toronto up 2-0 as part of the 5-0 win over Crew SC on Friday.

Heres a look at the finish from the Toronto FC midfielder.

It was hard to pick just one of Torontos five goals to break down, but Morrows goal is indicative of Torontos successful strategy in this match. When Columbus pushed up the field, Toronto looked to counter quickly, often playing a long pass into the Crew SC defense, looking to build off of a turnover or a win of possession by TFC.

During the first half, Crew SC lined up in what the official lineup called a 4-4-2, with Wil Trapp and Federico Higuain playing together in the midfield. This 4-4-2 sacrificed a defensive midfielder for an attacker, and left Trapp with much more ground to cover. As the lone defensive midfielder, Trapp was often the only player in the middle of the field, leaving acres of space for Toronto runners and creating chaos for the Crew SC defense.

Morrows goal begins with this Kekuta Manneh clearance. Manneh, lined up at forward, stuck to the left side of the field for much of the match. Here, Manneh has tracked back on defense, and seeing no other options, clears the ball up the field.

TFC center-back Eriq Zavaleta, pressured by Ola Kamara, heads the ball forward into the path of Michael Bradley.

Bradley immediately plays a risky pass back to Zavaleta, who is directed to clear the ball by fellow center-back Drew Moor. Notice here that Crew SC has 4 players in Toronto FCs defensive half. Wil Trapps midfield partner, Federico Higuain, provides the most pressure to Zavaletas clearance. By providing this pressure, Higuain leaves Trapp alone to cover much of the midfield.

Once Zavaleta clears the ball forward, Toronto immediately has a numerical advantage over Crew SC. Wil Trapp, highlighted near midfield, is almost totally alone in the midfield, because Higuain was pressuring the TFC center-backs. Jonathan Mensah is back the furthest on defense. Nicolai Naess is marking TFC striker Ben Spencer, while Harrison Afful doesnt seem to realize that Justin Morrow is totally unmarked right behind him.

As Waylon Francis receives the ball, he has two options: get the ball to Trapp, alone in the middle of the field, or send the ball up the sideline/out of bounds.

Francis opts to send the ball toward Trapp, but note the way the he heads the ball. Francis heads the ball with his momentum going away from the ball. Because his momentum is away from the ball, Francis slows the ball down, sending an incredibly weak and slow pass toward Trapp, who has to speed up to receive the ball.

Ben Spencer notices the weak pass, and immediately heads toward the ball.

Trapp and Spencer are in a footrace to the ball while the Crew SC defense drops into shape. Notice that Harrison Afful, just above the highlighted Ben Spender, is still unaware of Justin Morrow.

Trapp appears to be on track to win the ball, but has Ben Spencer bearing down on him. To make a successful pass, Trap would have to immediately play a first touch pass to one of the three Crew SC players near him: Nico Naess, Jonathan Mensah, or Waylon Francis.

However, as the above video shows, the ball takes a high bounce right before it gets to Trapp, and the Crew SC midfielder is unable to play a first touch pass. Forced to take an awkward touch on the ball, Trapp is dispossessed by the much larger Ben Spencer. Trapp is listed at 58 and Spencer is listed at 65 and Spencer easily knocks Trapp off the ball to spring the Toronto attack.

Having just dispossessed Trapp, Spencer has two options. Because Naess has shifted to cover him, Spencer will have to make a pass: a slotted ball to Tosaint Ricketts, who would be marked by Jonathan Mensah, or an easy pass to Justin Morrow, who is running at pace and will be just ahead of Harrison Afful. To Affuls credit, he finally noticed Morrow sprinting behind him, but will start his run too late to catch the TFC midfielder.

With Afful having pushed high up the field, notice now much space is open on the Crew SC defensive right flank.

Spencer opts to push the ball to the onrushing Morrow, who has already pushed ahead of Harrison Afful. As has happened a few times this year, Afful is forced to catch up with a midfielder who has built up pace while Afful was pushed up the field. This isnt necessarily Affuls fault, but the Crew SC right back, and the Crew SC managerial staff, have to realize that teams have punished Afful being pushed too far upfield multiple times this season. When Afful pushes that far up field, he does not have the luxury of being able to mentally switch off, and must be aware of his surroundings at all times. Afful was absolutely switched off until he noticed Morrow streaking over his left shoulder.

As Morrow approaches the ball, Afful catches up to him. If Afful can get in front of Morrow, he can force the TFC midfielder to take a difficult shot or make a cross to one of the, well-defended, TFC players in the box.

As Morrow prepares to shoot or pass, notice the Crew SC defense. For some reason, Naess has totally abandoned Ben Spencer, the tallest player on the field, who is now making an undefended run into the box. Naess may be attempting to get in front of Morrow, but the TFC midfielder already has a difficult angle on goal. Naess should have stayed with Spencer in an attempt to prevent TFCs tall striker from being open for a chipped cross.

But, Naesss leaving Spencer doesnt matter. Morrow fires a left-footed rocket at the near post. Afful has recovered, and does a good job to cut off Morrows crossing angles, forcing that shot from a tough angle. Afful should expect his goal keeper to have the near post covered from that angle.

However, Zack Steffen is caught flat-footed and is beaten to his near post by Morrows shot. Morrows shot here is excellent and perfectly placed, but Steffen cannot afford to be beaten to his near post from that angle.

Findings:

See more here:
Anatomy of a Goal: Morrow Makes it 2 - Massive Report

Neuroscience at UWM – Neuroscience at UWM

UWM neuroscience faculty are engaged in research on several important questions. This work is funded by research grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation as well as several private foundations and the private sector. Multiple approaches and levels of analysis are represented by the various laboratories including behavioral, cellular, cognitive, molecular, and systems neuroscience. Specific areas of interest include molecular signaling and neural development, hormonal control of behavior and reproduction, and the neurobiology of memory and cognition in humans and laboratory animals. Specific research interests are listed on the individual faculty pages listed on the People page.

Read the original:
Neuroscience at UWM - Neuroscience at UWM

Anatomy Of Two Would-be Mesh Network Startups – Aviation Week

One up-and-coming mesh network provider has cut metal, produced simulations and conducted dozens of hours of flight tests before going public with a system that could allow airliners to daisy-chain broadband data across the sky. The other went public from the start, forged plenty of deals and watched its penny stock climb from $0.25 to higher than $4.00 per share. Its first demonstration flight was scheduled for the first quarter of this year but is now delayed until the fourth ...

Read the original here:
Anatomy Of Two Would-be Mesh Network Startups - Aviation Week

CFM | Research – umassmed.edu

The Therapeutic Neuroscience Lab builds on the foundational work of the Center for Mindfulness by bringing a new team of scientists to tackle the neurobiological underpinnings of how mindfulness affects the mind and related behaviors.

Using scientific tools including fMRI, EEG, and mobile device enabled experience sampling, our research is focused on developing and improving evidence-based mindfulness treatments grounded in biological mechanisms and optimized for personalized benefit.

"As an addiction psychiatrist, I work everyday with people who are suffering. Yet the current tools that we have to help people who are struggling with disorders related to the mind, whether depression, anxiety, addiction or everyday stress often miss the mark or fall short.

We are at a unique time in history where mental skills such as mindfulness are becoming commonplace. Mindfulness training is accessible to more and more people. And importantly, mindfulness is meeting with the modern age. We now have tools that can be used to map the mind, helping us understand how it works.

At the Therapeutic Neuroscience Lab, we now have the tools to study how mindfulness changes the brain. And we can use these to not only understand the mind, but importantly, to improve our array of treatments to decrease suffering and improve the lives of many."

More about Judson Brewer

Original post:
CFM | Research - umassmed.edu

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ season 13 coming to Netflix next month – Blasting News

Greys Anatomy fans can rejoice. Season 13 of the show will be on Netflix US very soon. It will come later to the rest of the world, where the show is currently available. The June release on Netflix is due to a licensing agreement with the United States version of the streaming service and #ABC.

Greys Anatomy season 13 will be available on June 17. This is exactly 30 days after the air date of the season 13 finale. ABC and Netflix US have had an agreement for the last few days for the full season to be made available for streaming 30 days after the finale. Most fans have been expecting this release since knowing the date of the finale, but Netflix has only just confirmed this news.

The same day will see the release of another Shonda Rhimes drama. Scandal season 6 will be made available in full on the US version of the streaming service. How to Get Away with Murder season 3 has been available on the streaming service since March 23, 2017.

For the rest of the world, the exact date is unknown. It is highly likely that most countries will get Greys Anatomy season 13 around the middle of September, just before season 14 starts on the network.

There are a few other notable mentions for Netflix in June. The CW also has an agreement with the streaming service. Eight days after season finales, the full season of all shows will be available. For June that means Arrow season 5 and The 100 season 4 will be available in full on the first of the month and Reign season 4 will be available on June 24.

The Flash and Supergirl will be available at the end of this month. Supernatural is already availablereleased in full just yesterday. Riverdale is also already available on the streaming service, with The Originals, and iZombie coming towards the start of July.

ABC also has an agreement with other shows. Quantico and Marvels Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D will be available on June 14 and June 15 respectively. Shooter season 1 and Baby Daddy season 6 are also coming to Netflix this month.

Of course, fans also want to know when new episodes will be released. There is currently no confirmed date for the release of Greys Anatomy season 14. However, fans can realistically expect towards the end of September 2017. September is usually when new episodes are released on ABC. The show will keep its Thursday night 8 p.m. slot for the fall 2017 schedule. #Grey Anatomy #Grey's Anatomy

Go here to see the original:
'Grey's Anatomy' season 13 coming to Netflix next month - Blasting News

The anatomy of caliphate colonialism (2) – Vanguard

By Douglas Anele

Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the dominant political parties that emerged in Nigeria before independence and played prominent roles in defining the direction of her future political evolution were largely regional parties. For instance, in northern Nigeria, the political landscape was dominated by the Northern Peoples Congress (NPC), whose catchphrase One North, One People, accurately encapsulates its core agenda.

It was unabashedly a political organisation specifically set up to cater for the concerns of northern region alone, particularly the interests of the domineering feudalist conservative elite, to the extent that it refused to present candidates for elections in the south. Interestingly, NPC leaders were surprised that its gesture of separateness was not reciprocated by political parties in the south.

Consequently, they strongly resisted efforts by parties in southern Nigeria to field candidates in the north, which Balewa saw as appropriate to response to the invasion of northern region by southerners, and considered southern politicians campaigning in northern Nigeria an unwelcome challenge to norths territorial sovereignty. Action Group (AG) was the major party in western Nigeria, whereas the first truly national political party was the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC), although it eventually mutated into a regional party called the National Council of Nigerian Citizens dominated by the Igbo.

Given this tripartite regional political configuration, two scenarios were inevitable. One, although the NPC was dominant because of British preferential treatment and the norths huge land mass compared to the other two regions in the south, none of the parties could govern Nigeria without forming a coalition with at least one other party. Two, because the three main parties were established along ethnic lines (except for NCNC which in its earlier stages was truly nationalistic in outlook) ethnic rivalries and mutual suspicion created a fertile soil for inter-ethnic conflicts.

The first indication that post-independent Nigeria would be problematic was in 1953 when, through Anthony Enahoro, the AG and NCNC tabled a motion in the federal House of Representatives calling for Nigerias independence in 1956. But the NPC led by Ahmadu Bello, for whom independence on that date was an invitation [for the north] to commit suicide, objected, claiming, correctly, that the north did not have adequate administrative machinery and educated personnel to run a modern democratic government independently of Britain.

That was why, when northerners who were majority in the House diluted Enahoros motion by recommending that independence should be attained when it is practicable to do so, they were heckled and jeered at by crowds in Lagos for foot-dragging on the independence issue. Some key members of the northern establishment and a broad section of northerners neither forgot nor forgave the south for that embarrassment.

Most Nigerians do not know that Britain had already made up her mind to hand over power to northerners by October 1, 1960, thereby laying the foundation for caliphate colonialism, despite the huge educational gap between the north and the south, the economic dependence of the former on the latter, and reluctance of prominent northern leaders to key into the quest for self governance.

That was why the British colonial office abruptly brought Sir James Robertson from Sudan as the last expatriate governor-general of Nigeria to conduct the 1959 elections, which he manipulated to favour the NPC. Ordinarily, in the interest of merit, fairness and justice, Sir Robertson and his cohorts ought to have worked hard to ensure that the first set of leaders for indepemdent Nigeria emerged from a free and fair election.

Of course, that is wishful thinking: the colonial master was not interested in transferring power to the most competent Nigerians or in building a strong and viable black nation that would eventually explode the white supremacist myth that black peoples are incapable of managing their own affairs without the guidance of whitemen. Besides, northerners preferred British rule to what they imagined as the dangers of being dominated by the south. Their leader, Sir Ahmadu Bello, expressed this fear: A sudden grouping of the eastern and western parties (with a few members from the north opposed to our party) might take power and so endanger the north.

Thus, aside from wanting to reward the north for its pro-British stance, Britain rigged Nigerias independence elections so that its compliant friends in the north, such as Ahmadu Bello and Tafawa Balewa, would win power, dominate the country and serve British interests after independence. This is in line with the psychology of oppressors and colonilalists identified by the psychiatrist and political political philosopher, Frantz Fanon, who posits that colonial masters invariably prefer stooges as their successors, those who would depend on them and who they can easily manipulate.

Chinweizu reports that Sir Robertson named Balewa as Prime Minister in 1957 inspite of the fact that the NPC controlled only one region and a third of the ministers in the federal executive council whereas the NCNC members were dominant in the east and west and had two-thirds of the ministers at the federal level. There is a personal angle to this brazen unfairness as well: the British Man Friday confessed that he became very close to Sir Tafawa Balewa to the extent that they could discuss virtually everything, including Balewas difficulties with noisy southerners who seemed to take all their squabbles and troubles to him.

As I pointed out earlier, Sir James Robertson was seconded to Nigeria from Sudan, a country dominated by muslims. Therefore, since like old soldiers old habits die hard, he was more comfortable handing over power to a muslim school teacher who the western world had hyperbolically and cynically propped up as a great statesman rather than to Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, leader of the NCNC and a brilliant political philosopher with a doctorate degree from Lincoln University, United States.

At independence, the incendiary plan of British colonial administrators was successful. Sir Balewa became Prime Minister while Sir Ahmadu Bello decided to remain Premier of northern Nigeria. Aside from Britains complicity in the process of northern entrenchment at the centre, two critical observations must be made at this point. First, before independence most prominent northern politicians preferred the north to the entire country, and they did not change their obsessive fixation with the region even after independence.

Sir Ahmadu Bellos arrogant and insensitive remark that I would rather be called Sultan of Sokoto than President of Nigeria sums up the attitude of key members of the northern ruling elite to the idea of a united Nigeria as a sovereign geopolitical entity. Therefore, when Nigerian leaders from the north claim that Nigerias unity is not negotiable, as if notherners are more patriotic than their southern compatriots, they must be reminded that Ahmadu Bello, Tafawa Balewa and most of the prominent northerners assassinated in the first military coup of January 15, 1966, and whose deaths were avenged by northern soldiers and civilians who murdered and maimed tens of thousands of Ndigbo, including many senior Igbo military officers, never really believed in or worked for Nigerian unity.

Instead, they used threats of separation and violence to armtwist wily British colonial administrators and squabbling disunited southern politicians to get concessions favourable to the conservative ruling elements in the north. The change from threats of secession by Ahmadu Bello and his cohorts to morbid obsession with Nigerian unity by successive northern military dicatators and prominent politicians was motivated by the ideology of caliphate colonialism set forth shortly after independence by Sir Ahmadu Bello himself: The new nation called Nigeria should be an estate of our great-grandfather, Uthman Dan Fodio. We must ruthlessly prevent a change of power. We use minorities of the north as willing tools and the south as a conquered territory and never allow them to rule over us, and never allow them to have control over their own future.

In other words, Sir Ahmadu Bello proposed that external colonisation by Britain should be replaced after independence with internal caliphate colonialism by muslim northerners so that Nigeria would remain perpetually the inheritance of the arch jihadist, Uthman Dan Fodio. In my opinion, no single pronouncement by any Nigerian explains better the fixation of the dominant faction of the northern ruling power bloc to our feudalistic federalism and irrational quest for political power at the centre.

View post:
The anatomy of caliphate colonialism (2) - Vanguard

Paper with duplicated image sequentially builds on neuroscience work, authors argue – Retraction Watch (blog)

A neurochemistry journal has retracted a paper from a group in China over a duplicated image.

According to the notice, the authors used the same image in the two papers to represent different experimental conditions. The only distinguishing featurebetween the images:apparent brightness changes.

The authors defended their actions, explainingthat the research published in Journal of Neurochemistry sequentially builds on their previous study in Journal of Neuroinflammation, which they mention in the 2015 papers discussion. In the notice, theauthors were quoted saying:

at the beginning, we performed these experiments and wrote these two manuscripts together

In the 2015 paper, the authors do explain thatthe current study is an extension of previous work:

This work builds on our previous study, in which we hypothesized that CXCL12 and CXCR4 might be implicated in aberrant pain sensitization through directly mediating pronociceptive signaling pathways in spinal glial cells.

But the editors quibbled with this explanation, noting that the wording in the 2015 paper implies that it:

was a follow-up based on a new original data set.

According to the notice, the authors provided the journal with additional information and data, but the editors were not convinced and ultimately could not confirm the data were reliable.

Heres the full retraction notice, which detailsthe disagreement between the authors and journal:

The retraction has been agreed as the same GFAP immunostaining image was used to represent different experimental conditions in two different publications (Shen et al. [2014] in the Journal of Neuroinflammation and Hu et al. [2015] in the Journal of Neurochemistry), with apparent brightness changes between the images. Shen et al. (2014) show in the outer right panel of Figure 4a, as well as in Fig. 8A for the GFAP/sham condition, a GFAP immunostaining after treatment with TCI + Fluorocitrate. The same image, at a lower intensity, is used in Hu et al. (2015) in the first panel of figure 5b as a sham control. The shape of the tissue margins of the spinal cord section as well as several landmark epitopes that point towards identical images are encircled: The authors confirmed that The research published in JNC sequentially builds on our previous study published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, as we have mentioned in the discussion. So, at the beginning, we performed these experiments and wrote these two manuscripts together, whereas the statements in the Hu et al. paper, The testing procedure was performed according to previously standardized protocols (Hargreaves et al. 1988) and our published report (Shen et al. 2014) confirmed our previous report (Shen et al. 2014) imply that the Hu et al. study was a follow-up based on a new original data set. The authors were given the opportunity to respond and to provide the original raw images. Several Sham group GFAP immunostainings were sent. However, the reliability of the data that was presented in the publication could not be confirmed and the paper is therefore being retracted. A corrigendum related to a different problem with data representation that was previously issued for this paper is also being retracted (Hu et al. 2015, Corrigendum).

CXCL12/CXCR4 chemokine signaling in spinal glia induces pain hypersensitivity through MAPKs-mediated neuroinflammation in bone cancer rats also received an erratum in 2015, which explains that the authors used the wrong control number for the rats in several figures. Heres the corrigendum notice, which includes corrected figures:

The following accepted article from the Journal of Neurochemistry entitled, CXCL12/CXCR4 chemokine signaling in spinal glia induces pain hypersensitivity through MAPKs-mediated neuroinflammation in bone cancer rats by Hu etal. (2015), erratically published an incorrect number of animals (n) used for the CXCL12 2g control group shown in Figures 1b and 1f. To clarify, six (n=6) instead of five animals were used. Figures 1a, 1e, 2b, 2c, 2d and 2e also used six animals (n=6) for the CXCL12 2g control group. The corresponding author confirms that the figure panels 1a/b, 1e/f, 2b/d and 2c/e, respectively, include the same cohort of control animals (see filled red circles representing the CXCL12 2g control group in the figures below).

The 2015 paper has been cited 19 times, according to Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, formerly part of Thomson Reuters.

We reached out to last and corresponding author Wen Shen as well as first author Xue-Ming Hu, both based at the The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College in China. We also contacted the journals chief and managing editors. We will update the post if we hear back.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making atax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow uson Twitter, like uson Facebook, add us to yourRSS reader, sign up on ourhomepagefor an email every time theres a new post, or subscribe to ourdaily digest. Clickhere to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what were working on,click here.

See the original post:
Paper with duplicated image sequentially builds on neuroscience work, authors argue - Retraction Watch (blog)

Neuroscience Program || Bucknell University

The neuroscience major offers the degree of Bachelor of Science. Students are strongly encouraged to participate in research with faculty, volunteer in laboratories, or work through independent studies and honors theses.

Faculty research interests include perception, cognition, and psychopathology in humans, learning, and molecular, chemical, cellular, and genetic mechanisms of behavior.

Facilities include cell and molecular wet labs and EEG. Other human behavioral laboratories include those for studies in infant language acquisition, vision and memory. For animal research, Bucknell houses four species of primates, rats, and mice, as well as invertebrates such as fruit flies and honey bees, to study vision, music perception, hormones and behavior.

The BS major in neuroscience requires 12 basic and 5 advanced courses.

We offer numerous other facilities housed across the campus in psychology, biology, chemistry, and animal behavior. In addition to our outstanding on-campus facilities, some faculty research sites are located in interesting places around the globe, including Hawaii and Panama.

Visit link:
Neuroscience Program || Bucknell University