All posts by medical

Grey’s Anatomy And Station 19 Hits New Levels Of Danger And Sexiness With Crossovers – CinemaBlend

Expect new levels of danger and sexiness when Greys Anatomy and Station 19 team up for their next big crossover. Not too long ago, ABC announced that Greys Anatomy would be switching time slots, a move that now makes Station 19 the lead-in to the veteran medical drama, which recently celebrated 350 episodes!

Fans should probably get set for more tears and heartache when Greys Anatomy returns, at least as far as the immediate aftermath of that fall finale goes. The shows midseason sendoff set the stage for a life-threatening crossover with Station 19. Ben, Blake, Casey, Chief Herrera, Helm, Jackson, Levi, and Nico were all in Joes Bar when disaster struck.

A car crashed into the bar, endangering the lives of fan favorites, not to mention various other patrons. Station 19's return in 2020 will apparently kick the big crossover off at full speed, while Greys Anatomy will keep the action going in Hour 2. Station 19s Jason George, who's starred as Ben Warren across both series, teased the drama ahead, telling ET:

That they were! Now fans will have to endure the hiatus before finding out what happens next. Station 19 will be the one that directly picks up from the aftermath of the disaster, with emergency responders needed to keep things on track amidst the chaos. Greys Anatomy and its spinoff series are no strangers to dealing out heartbreaking crossovers.

Station 19 underwent some behind-the-scenes changes for Season 3, so there should be some differences in front of the camera. As for the two-hour crossover event, which is set to lead off a more intertwining set of episodes, it was apparently pretty intense to film. These crossovers take a lot of effort and the trend is everywhere! Giving some insight into what it took to do Station 19 and Greys Anatomys, Jason George said:

That had to be hectic! The two-hour event is going to get fans excited and on the edge of their seats. Greys Anatomy and Station 19 are already quite dramatic independently, but together, they are a united force of immense suspense. Jason Georges Ben was in Joes Bar, the very heart of the crossovers action, so he will be front and center when Station 19 returns. There's not a whole lot of insight into how any of this is supposed to bring more sexiness, but we'll take his word for it.

Ben has had a lot going on this season on Greys Anatomy. He and wife Miranda Bailey learned they were expecting a baby earlier in Season 16. Sadly, in the fall finale, Bailey found out that she had lost their baby, and Ben later ended up going with Chief Herrera to the bar with a lot on his mind.

In the same episode, Chief Herrera learned from Bailey that his lymphoma had returned, so a lot of sadness has already taken place. The trailer for the Greys Anatomy/Station 19 crossover showed Bailey telling the authorities to get her husband out of the wreckage of the bar. I can't imagine what'll happen if things only get more dangerous from there.

Station 19 returns on Thursday, January 23, 2020, at 8 p.m. ET on ABC. Greys Anatomy will air directly after it at 9 p.m. ET. New episodes of both shows are part of this winters premieres.

Follow this link:
Grey's Anatomy And Station 19 Hits New Levels Of Danger And Sexiness With Crossovers - CinemaBlend

A Mic Drop on a Theory of Language Evolution – The Atlantic

Read: A rare universal pattern in human languages

LDT told people, basically, dont bother to go look for speech abilities in anything other than modern humans, says Thomas Sawallis, one of the authors of the new paper. Those speech abilities could include distinct vowels and consonants, syllables, or even syntaxall of which, according to LDT, should be impossible for any animal without a human vocal tract. There was always this idea, says Greg Hickok, a cognitive-science professor at the University of California at Irvine who was not involved in the study, that there was one thing that had to happen and that released the linguistic abilities. For Noam Chomsky and his followers, that thing was the invention of syntax. For proponents of LDT, it was the reshaping of the human throat.

Part of the reason LDT caught on to begin with is that language evolution, as a field, lacks concrete data. As John Locke, a linguistics professor at Lehman College, put it, Motor control rots when you die. Soft tissues like tongues and nerves and brains generally dont fossilize; DNA sequencing is impossible past a few hundred thousand years; no one has yet found a diary or rap track recorded by a teenage Australopithecus. So the anatomical argument presented by LDT gave researchers something to latch on to. Until the 60s, people who studied language evolution were considered crackpots because they didnt have any data, Locke says. When youve got nothing on the table, a little something goes a long ways.

The researcher generally credited with developing laryngeal descent theory is Philip Lieberman, now a professor at Brown University. He called the new paper just a complete misrepresentation of the entire field, among other things. One of the quantitative models the new study relies on, he says, doesnt properly represent the shape of the larynx, tongue, and other parts we use to talk: It would convert a mailing tube into a human vocal tract. And according to Lieberman, laryngeal descent theory never claimed language was not possible prior to the critical changes in our ancestors throat anatomy. Theyre trying to set up a straw man, he said.

Yet other experts I spoke with told me that setting an upper bound on when speech, and therefore language, could have possibly evolved was exactly the effect that LDT had on anyone studying language evolution. Hickok said that when he was being trained in linguistics, this was an established, almost dogmatic idea. The new study is a dramatic reversal of the status quo, he said: The phrase that came to mind when I finished it was mic drop.

Read: How F sounds might break a fundamental rule of linguistics

Still, he doesnt agree entirely with Sawallis and his co-authors conclusions. Rather than 27 million years, Hickok proposes that the earliest bound on any sort of speech ability would be nearer to human ancestors split with the Pan genus, which includes chimpanzees and bonobos, our closest living relatives. That split happened about 5 million to 7 million years agocertainly longer than 200,000 years, but a far cry from 27 million. Lieberman argues that the precursors of speech might have emerged about a little more than 3 million years ago, when artifacts like jewelry appear in the archaeological record. The idea is that both language and jewelry are intimately related to the evolution of symbolic thinking.

Read more here:
A Mic Drop on a Theory of Language Evolution - The Atlantic

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 16 Return: The Most Outrageous Things Fans Are Hoping For, Plus Who They Want to Kill Off – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Our beloved medical drama,Greys Anatomy, is on a verylong mid-season break, and fans are restless. Lets take a look at the top favorite scenarios viewers would like to see when Greys Anatomy returns forseason 16on Jan. 23, 2020. They are outrageous, and not one of them involves someone elseaccidentally getting pregnant.

Lets make a whole list of plot lines we think are more interesting than women in their 30s and 40s getting accidentally pregnant, asked the original poster on Reddit.

The following was a list of over 150 comments of what fans want to see on the show. The central theme of the responses is that fans want more interesting medical cases. There is so much devastation and tragedy on the show lately that viewers are calling for a new twist.

I want more crazy medical stuff, wrote one fan in response to the question. Challenge the doctorsgive us a patient that is hard to diagnose (like in House),

Redditors upvoted that one fans comment 169 times. Many fans would like to see more medicine like what was in the medical drama, House.

Omg, yes, responded another fan. I think [Dr. House] would make a great addition to the show.

Dr. House (Hugh Laurie) starred in the fictional medical drama, House, broadcast on Fox for eight seasons. He tackled difficult medical problems in a Sherlock Holmes type of way while playing mind games with his friends and colleagues.

Hell, yes, added yet another Redditor. I love House, and Im sick of Greys being so melodramatic; we used to have interesting characters and actual problems. Dr. House would make things darker and more medicine-centric.

Sticking with the theme of wanting to see more medicine, fans call for a storyline surrounding an outbreak of measles.

A measles outbreak caused by the anti-vaxxers movement, wrote one fan on Reddit regarding what they want to see for the back half of season 16.

The first six months of 2019 produced more measles cases than any other year since 2006, according to theWorld Health Organization. In the wake of this problem, it would be timely to see an episode surrounding an outbreak of measles.

The way I would do this storyline would be having an immunocompromised kid of one of the lead characters die from measles complications after getting infected by an unvaccinated kid of anti-vaxxer, added another Redditor. I think this could be fun.

Im not sure that even Greys Anatomy could be that dark. They do not often show children dying on the show. However, it is plausible that one of the main characters children could contract measles.

The last outrageous thing fans are asking for is the death ofOwen Hunt(Kevin McKidd). Many viewers are still upset with Owens attempt to dissuade Cristina Yang (Sandra Oh) from having an abortion. He eventually went with her for support, but then he threw it in her face on another episode.

You killed our baby; you dont ever forget that, he yelled at Cristina during season 8, episode 12.

Many fans dislike Owen for the way he acted towards Cristina regarding the abortion. Others are upset that he might be the father of Amelias (Caterina Scorsone) baby.

Give Owen testicular cancer and have Catherine do the surgery with Richard, wrote one fan after others commented that the writers should kill off Owen.

Among the many, Kill Owen, comments in the thread, fans came up with the idea to have him die from testicular cancer. They believe his character has not done anything worthwhile in the show for many seasons.

To find out if any of these fan theories might be true, watch Greys Anatomy when it returns to ABC on Jan. 23, 2020.

Read more here:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 16 Return: The Most Outrageous Things Fans Are Hoping For, Plus Who They Want to Kill Off - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

The Next ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ and ‘Station 19’ Crossover Is ‘Ridiculous,’ But At Least This Character Makes It Out Alive – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

The Greys Anatomy Season 16 fall finale on Nov. 21 left everyone floored. As per usual when it comes to the Shondaland series, no one is safe. But at least fans can look forward to the next Greys Anatomy and Station 19 crossover event when the two shows return in the new year. So what will happen in the two-hour special on Thursday, Jan. 23? Theres plenty to unravel in the next few weeks.

In the final episode of Greys Anatomy in 2019, titled Lets All Go to the Bar, fans were left with multiple cliffhangers. Meredith (Ellen Pompeo) returns to Grey Sloan Memorial, where she receives Cristinas (Sandra Oh) gift the new Chief of Pediatrics, Cormac Hayes (Richard Flood).

Meanwhile, Jo (Camilla Luddington) brings as in steals an orphaned baby. And then to top it off, Amelia (Caterina Scorsone) finds out she might be pregnant with Owens (Kevin McKidd) baby. But just when Greys Anatomy fans thought they were in the clear, a car crashes into Joes Bar, trapping a group of fan-favorites inside.

From the looks of it, Jackson (Jesse Williams), Richard (James Pickens Jr.), Schmitt (Jake Borelli), Nico (Alex Landi), Helm (Jaicy Elliot), and Casey (Alex Blue Davis) are all trapped inside Joes. Ben and Captain Pruitt (Miguel Sandoval) from Station 19 are also present.

Then Greys AnatomyStation 19 crossover trailer, most characters that are shown seem unharmed minus Helms leg injury. But everyone involved seems to be in a panic, as the car crash itself isnt what theyre worried about.

We gotta get out of here before it collapses, Helm says as the car breaks down into Joes. Yikes.

Following the Greys Anatomy fall finale, Borelli spoke with TV Guide about the back half of the 16th season. And it seems like the car crash will affect everyone involved.

Everything is shaken up in this midseason finale. Every path we all thought we were going on is going to change drastically because of this disaster, Borelli said. I am just excited to see who pulls through and how their lives are changed because of it.

The actor then hinted the aftermath of the crash could alter Schmitts relationships with his friends. For those of you who dont remember, the character recently lost his Grey Sloan friends for being the one who reported Merediths insurance fraud to Bailey (Chandra Wilson). Borelli said:

We left [Schmitt] in one of his darkest moments. Hes been given the cold shoulder by all of his friends and confidants at the hospital. [He] is such a guy that loves humans and loves caring for humans and wants to make sure that everyone is OK. Hes in a difficult place right now where even his best friend has turned her back on him for what happened with him and Meredith. If everything pans out after this crash, its going to be interesting where hes at in his headspace with all of his friends. This car accident is going to throw a lot of wrenches in a lot of the plans that any of these characters had.

Regardless, Borelli also revealed something we already know to expect no one at Joes is safe.

I would say anyone that stepped foot in that bar is in danger and its going to be a very stressful holiday break, he said.

Now, the Shondaland team must know how nervous fans are to see the Greys AnatomyStation 19 crossover episodes. Merely three weeks after the fall finale aired, Entertainment Tonight released an interview with George, who teased whats coming next. But if the final edit is anything like filming, it looks like the crossover is going to be wild.

Its a two-hour block thats going to be ridiculous because its crazy to shoot, George said. Ill tell you that everyday its like, So where am I? Theyre like, Well, youre at Greys in the morning and Station 19 and then youre at Greys in the afternoon.

The actor also noted that the Greys AnatomyStation 19 crossover has been fun, with a new level of sexy thats coming in and a new level of danger.

Nevertheless, George also confirmed his character, Ben, will come out of the crossover alive. So hopefully, there wont be any Mark Sloan (Eric Dane) got better and now hes suddenly dying nonsense within the crossover.

Im not going to say it but [Ben Warren] makes it out OK, George said. But it seems everyones lives will still be in his hands. The actor added, So we got to use all the skills from doctors and firefighters to save everybody in the joint.

That said, dont get too comfortable. When Entertainment Tonight asked George whether Greys Anatomy and Station 19 could kill off two characters in the crossover, he didnt exactly say no. In fact, George just brought up Shonda Rhimes. And quite frankly, despite her genius, Georges remarks doesnt make us feel any better.

Shes breaking peoples hearts, he said. Thats what she does!

Read more: Greys Anatomy: Heres Why Ellen Pompeo Is Worried About the Series Finale

Check outShowbiz Cheat Sheeton Facebook!

Link:
The Next 'Grey's Anatomy' and 'Station 19' Crossover Is 'Ridiculous,' But At Least This Character Makes It Out Alive - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Model of human behavior is one factor in workplace personality testing – Universe.byu.edu

See also Personality assessments in the workplace: harmful or helpful?

William Mardsten introduced the DISC acronym in the 1920s to highlight four behavioral traits: dominance, influence, steadiness and compliance. This assessment has since been used by many companies to better understand the dynamics of the workforce.

Robert Rohm, owner of Personality Insights, developed a method to simplify and help people apply the DISC assessment. His refined model, known as the DISC Human Model of Behavior, modified the four-letter acronym to represent more intuitive primary descriptors: dominant, inspiring, supportive and cautious.

A distinguishing feature of the DISC assessment is that it highlights the strengths of a personality style.

It tells you whats right about you, not whats wrong about you. Its a wellness model, Rohm said.

An explanation of the primary descriptors of Rohms DISC model is as follows:

Dominant: Direct, demanding, decisive and determined. Individuals with this personality trait are outgoing and task-oriented.

Inspiring: Influencing, impressionable, interactive, impressive and involved. Individuals with this personality trait are also considered to be outgoing, but are more people-oriented.

Supportive: Stable, steady, sweet and shy. These individuals are more reserved, prefer consistency and are people-oriented.

Cautious: Calculating, competent, conscientious, contemplative and careful. Individuals with this personality trait are also more reserved and considered to be task-oriented.

People who understand the DISC Human Model of Behavior can gain confidence in their strengths and abilities, learn how to respond to conflict and discover what motivates them, according to Rohm.

The DISC assessment puts people where they can succeed and put their best foot forward, Rohm said. It puts them where they can sparkle and shine by using their gifts, talents and abilities.

Follow this link:
Model of human behavior is one factor in workplace personality testing - Universe.byu.edu

Waymo buys Latent Logic for simulation of human behavior – Robot Report

Waymo acquired Latent Logic, a UK start-up that uses imitation learning to simulate models of human behavior on the road. Financial details of the acquisition were not disclosed, but it marks the launch of Waymos first European engineering hub, which will be located in Oxford.

Spun out of Oxford University in 2017, Latent Logic develops simulations of motorist, cyclist, and pedestrian behavior using data collected from traffic cameras. This data is used to create simulation environments that might help autonomous vehicles interact more safely with human beings. Cyclists are considered by many to be the most difficult detection problem for autonomous vehicles.

An archived version of the Latent Logic website describes its technology: There are two stages to our learning process: extraction of behaviours from raw data, and learning to imitate those behaviours. Computer Vision detects road users and tracks their motion. Imitation Learning, also known as Learning from Demonstration, then learns to create new, artificial behaviours which are indistinguishable from the ones used as the demonstration input, meaning our virtual humans are completely realistic. Our virtual humans integrate with our customers preferred simulator via a standard API.

Latent Logic continues, rather than hard-coding a specific set of behaviours, we apply machine learning to create agents that develop their own behaviours based on how humans actually behave. Because an a-priori description of human behaviour in all possible situations is almost impossible, agents with hard-coded behaviour cannot have the same flexibility and adaptability as our AI agents.

The video below shows a short demonstration of the companys technology:

Waymo has often touted its approach to autonomous vehicle simulation. In July 2019, it announced it had driven 10 billion miles in simulation. It also said simulation becomes more realistic as you gain more real-world driving miles, and no company has more autonomous driving experience than Waymo.

Apparently simulation software is in high demand these days. Just yesterday, The Information reported Uber is in talks to acquire Silicon Valley-based simulation startup Foresight. According to the report, Ubers simulation software has suffered from various deficiencies and still has trouble predicting how its self-driving car prototypes will handle the real world.

Latent Logic tweeted that its team will remain in Oxford. And its two founders, Shimon Whiteson and Joo Messia, CEO Kirsty Lloyd-Jukes and other members of the engineering team will join Waymo.

By joining Waymo, we are taking a big leap towards realizing our ambition of safe, self-driving vehicles, said Latent Logic co-founder and chief scientist Shimon Whiteson. In just two years, we have made significant progress in using imitation learning to simulate real human behaviors on the road. Im excited by what we can now achieve in combining this expertise with the talent, resources and progress Waymo have already made in self-driving technology.

Today, Latent Logic becomes part of Waymo. Their uniquely talented team, based in Oxford, UK, uses imitation learning to simulate realistic models of human behavior on the roadkey to developing safe self-driving vehicles.

Waymo (@Waymo) December 12, 2019

Waymo recently started to operate its self-driving taxi service near Phoenix, Arizona, called Waymo One, without human safety drivers. The program turned one year old on December 5, and to celebrate the company launched its ride-hailing app in Apples App Store. While this shows it is interested in eventually expanding its customer base, the self-driving service will certainly remain hyper-localized for some time.

In August 2019, the Waymo Open Dataset was released for autonomous vehicle researchers. Available for free, the dataset covers a wide variety of environments, from dense urban centers to suburban landscapes. It also includes data collected during day and night, at dawn and dusk, in sunshine and rain.

Read more here:
Waymo buys Latent Logic for simulation of human behavior - Robot Report

Tips for Sustainably Forming Habits and Changing Human Behavior – Inc.

Whether your company wants to break into a new market, increase brand loyalty, or develop a healthy workplace culture, changing human behavior is a necessary aspect. And as any manager or marketer will tell you, this can sometimes feel like an impossible task - habit formation comes naturally to human beings, but this means the creation of new habits and behaviors is often a battle against deeply entrenched ways of doing things.

As if this wasn't difficult enough, companies also have to figure out how to change behavior in a sustainable way. It doesn't matter if employees behave responsibly and respectfully whenever a manager is looking but revert to destructive habits when left alone - or if consumers decide to try a new product or service for a few months only to abandon it. Companies have to understand how to encourage long-term habits that aren't liable to shift at a moment's notice.

With that in mind, let's take a look at what the experts have to say about facilitating sustainable behavioral change that will help companies become as productive and secure as possible.

Behavioral change begins with leadership

How many new senior-level executives have sat through a long and dreary PowerPoint presentation that included the word "leadership" on every slide? How many articles are published every day outlining the "top 10 ways to be a great leader"? When you think of all the books, podcasts, and seminars about leadership, it's striking that companies still have such a hard time identifying, educating, and supporting effective leaders.

According to Gallup's State of the American Manager Report, almost two-thirds of managers in the U.S. aren't engaged at work. Gallup points out that this has a direct impact on employee engagement (with 70 percent of the variance in employee engagement scores attributable to management), and a staggering 50 percent of U.S. workers report that they've left a job to get away from a bad manager.

Torch is a leadership development platform designed to solve these problems. By providing founders, CEOs, and senior-level executives with a personalized solution that gives them access to rigorous, data-driven performance metrics, one-on-one coaching, anonymous colleague feedback, and other tools that increase accountability and transparency, Torch helps companies maintain a consistent focus on leadership. As Torch co-founder and COO Keegan Walden explains, the platform exists to "create sustained positive behavior change among employees."

There's a reason Torch has raised $13.5 million and worked with high-profile clients like Reddit co-founder and CEO Steve Huffman. Garry Tan, the co-founder of Initialized Capital, learned that he needed to be less avoidant of conflict and has embraced radical candor (among other things) as a result of his coaching. Unlike typical training solutions, which treat leadership as a skill that can be taught in an afternoon or two, Torch recognizes that leadership has to be developed and maintained over time. As Walden observes, "If standard training seminars were all it took to make managers into great leaders, we would have solved this problem long ago." Considering the impact that effective managers and other leaders have on employee behavior, it's clear that a more holistic, evidence-based approach to leadership development is long overdue for many companies.

How education can change employee behavior

Just as leadership training can be a tedious and exhausting slog for managers, other forms of employee training are often even worse. If you've ever suffered through a battery of "training modules" on sexual harassment, updated HR policies, or cybersecurity, you'll know exactly what I'm talking about.

According to a survey conducted by the Society of Human Resource Management, just a quarter of employees say they're "very satisfied" with the job-specific training offered by their companies. Meanwhile, Gartner reports that 64 percent of managers "don't think their employees are able to keep pace with future skill needs." Despite the fact that companies spend more than $70 billion on training annually, it's clear that there are serious problems with the way companies are attempting to educate their employees and change their behavior.

Zack Schuler is the founder and CEO of a cybersecurity awareness training company NINJIO, and he's trying to change the dismal status quo when it comes to employee education. Like so many important subjects, cybersecurity is often addressed in a boring and perfunctory way - from mass emails to stuffy meetings with the IT team that are forgotten as soon as they end. Schuler describes these as "check-the-box" cybersecurity exercises that have nothing to do with creating lasting behavioral change - they're just a way for companies to feel like they've done something to make themselves more secure.

NINJIO emphatically rejects this approach. By offering three to four-minute Hollywood-style training episodes (which are based on real-life hacks and breaches), NINJIO makes employee engagement its top priority. The first step toward changing employees' behavior is capturing and holding their attention - how else will they retain the information they learn and put it into practice? This is why NINJIO relies on narrative-driven content, which has repeatedly proven to be a more effective learning tool than more traditional forms of studying. NINJIO also uses gamification techniques such as quizzes and leaderboards, which are designed to consistently reinforce what employees learn.

Behavior change begins with engagement and education, but this is a lesson many companies still haven't learned. While countless employees are still subjected to what Schuler describes as "death by PowerPoint" training initiatives, it's only a matter of time before companies realize that there's a better way to educate people.

Our habits define who we are

While it's crucial for employees to retain and recall what they learn, the ultimate goal is to get them to a point where they don't have to. In other words, they have to develop the right habits. A study in Psychology, Health & Medicine explains that habit formation "is an important goal for behavior change interventions because habitual behaviors are elicited automatically and are therefore likely to be maintained."

However, the most successful change agents don't stop there, which is why the theme of a recent NINJIO whitepaper is the intersection between habit formation and identity. For example, the whitepaper cites a 2019 study in Frontiers in Psychology, which reports that "individuals for whom habits are strongly related to feelings of identity show stronger cognitive self-integration, higher self-esteem, and a stronger striving toward an ideal self."

This is why NINJIO points out that good cybersecurity habits reflect "positive aspects of identity, such as responsibility, accountability, prudence, awareness, and so on." The same applies to the characteristics of an effective leader. A 2018 Deloitte survey found that U.S. employees value leaders who are communicative, flexible, and patient - all characteristics that Torch helps managers develop by giving them the tools to evaluate themselves, create a plan to change negative behaviors, and put that plan in motion.

The relationship between identity and behavior doesn't just apply to employees, either - consumers are also increasingly concerned about what their purchasing decisions say about who they are and what they value. This is why we've seen a dramatic rise in the number of belief-driven buyers - consumers who choose to do business with brands that reflect their attitudes on social and political issues. This is an extension of the surging demand for authenticity, which has a well-documented positive effect on brand trust. In other words, if brands genuinely believe in the principles they espouse and take steps to act on those principles, consumers will change their behavior accordingly.

Nobody wants to be a reckless employee who puts the whole company at risk, an ineffective manager who employees dread working with, or a consumer who supports unethical companies. This is why the most powerful behavior change strategy is to help people become the best version of themselves, a strategy that won't just make employees better at their jobs, companies better places to work, and relationships with consumers stronger than ever.

The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.

Read the original post:
Tips for Sustainably Forming Habits and Changing Human Behavior - Inc.

10 Books on Thinking About Thinking – Yahoo Finance

(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Thanksgiving is behind us, Christmas is around the corner and the rest of the long, dark winter lies ahead -- and that means peak reading season is upon us.So here are a few books I will read, or atleaststart. What attracted me to these books is how they approach thinking about thinking: Each tries to tease out why our general understanding on a subject is so often wrong; they explore better cognitive frameworks that could help us comprehend issues more clearly; they consider unique perspectives in securities trading, national security, genetics and artificial intelligence.

On to the reading:

No. 1. "Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst" by Robert M. Sapolsky.

The professor of biology and neurological sciences at Stanford University (and a MacArthur Fellowship winner in 1987) takes a deep examination into the most basic question of human behavior: Why do we do the things we do?

He probes the things that influence and determine behavior: neurology, endocrinology, structural development of the nervous system, culture, ecology and the millions of years of evolution. Why we do what we do turns out to be even more complicated than you might have imagined.

No. 2. "The Mosquito: A Human History of Our Deadliest Predator" by Timothy C. Winegard.

Forget sharks, terrorists or guns: Mosquitoes have killed more people than all other factors in history combined. Of the 108 billion humans who have ever lived, almost half -- 52 billion -- have died from mosquito-borne illnesses. For 190 million years, the mosquito has been waging a war against the rest of the planet, and for all of that history we have been fighting a mostly losing battle.

This has long been one of my very favorite topics; I am thrilled there is finally a book dedicated to it.

No. 3. "The Man Who Solved the Market: How Jim Simons Launched the Quant Revolution" by Gregory Zuckerman.

This is my nominee for finance book of the year: I read it, reviewed it and interviewed the author for Masters in Business. All thats left is to reread it slowly and deliberately, with no purpose other to enjoy the tale of how one brilliant man saw the markets in a different way from everyone else.

No. 4. "Hacking Darwin: Genetic Engineering and the Future of Humanity" by Jamie Metzl.

What will happen to children, lifespans, the plant and the animal world when humans begin to retool the world's genetic code? Metzl tackles the risks and potential rewards to tinkering with the determinants of life as if they're just another piece of software.

No. 5. "Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do" by Jennifer L. Eberhardt.

Investors know that unconscious bias is at work all the time, undermining our goals. What we may not realize is how bias infects our visual perception, attention, memory and actions. The author suggests solutions to managing our biases, but I remain skeptical we can get past our own error-prone nature.

No. 6. "Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World" by David Epstein.

Among top performers, specialization is the exception, not the rule. Thats the startling conclusion of Epstein, a journalist with Sports Illustrated and ProPublica. Considering some of the worlds most successful athletes, artists, inventors, scientists and business people, he found that it was the generalists who excelled, not the specialists.

No. 7. "The Spy and the Traitor: The Greatest Espionage Story of the Cold War" by Ben Macintyre.

What colleagues, institutions and competitors do you trust? How does counterintelligence and disinformation affect how we make decisions? These issues are explored in this nonfiction tale of the three-way Cold War game of espionage between the U.S., the U.K. and the Soviet Union.

No. 8. "Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion" by Jia Tolentino.

Tolentino looks at the basic building blocks of social media and how we use it to deceive not so much others as ourselves. This series of essays tracks among other things the evolution of the internet from a band of enthusiastic geeks and hackers to the trolls and agents of agitprop that have taken over.

No. 9. "Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know about the People We Don't Know" by Malcolm Gladwell.

Communication breakdown is the focus in this tour of errors, miscommunication and lies. One of our era's most engaging storytellers, Gladwell roams from Fidel Castro to Bernie Madoff and lots of folks in between. His big premise: the default condition of our species is to assume others tell the truth. This makes all of us vulnerable to the deceptions of politicians, salespeople and con artists.

Story continues

No. 10. "Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence," by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb.

What happens if we rethinkthe concept of artificial intelligence as a drop in the cost of prediction? That is the question tackled by the three authors of this book, all economists at the University of Torontos Rotman School of Management. The conclusion is that AI, instead of complicating human affairs, may improve decision-making.Enjoy, and let me know if youveread any good books lately atbritholtz3@bloomberg.net

To contact the author of this story: Barry Ritholtz at britholtz3@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Greiff at jgreiff@bloomberg.net

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

Barry Ritholtz is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is chairman and chief investment officer of Ritholtz Wealth Management, and was previously chief market strategist at Maxim Group. He is the author of Bailout Nation.

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion

2019 Bloomberg L.P.

Read the original:
10 Books on Thinking About Thinking - Yahoo Finance

Let’s get back to the human at the center of TV advertising – AdAge.com

In todays attention economy, when a viewer willingly chooses to watch a program, advertisers have to respect that choice. If they didnt, it would have drastic consequences.

Attention is a resource; a person has only so much of it, wrote Matthew B. Crawford in a 2015 New York Times column. Its trueand consumers have no shortage of choices to spend their TV viewing time. When they do make a choice, it should provide value, otherwise theyll find value elsewhere.

Opportunities to sincerely engage people today are few and far between, and in order to make the most of those opportunities to engage, marketers must consider the attention economy as part of their overall media plans. Effectively reaching a consumer today is a three-tiered problem: the device the viewer is using, the show the viewer is watching and when they watch it.

How a viewer directs their attention should mirror how advertisers approach their audiences. The challenge is that every consumer does this in different ways. For an advertiser, that means there are thousands of permutations of their viewers. They may want to reach an auto intender segment, but each viewer in the segment has a unique path to content.

To get back to the humanity at the center of TV advertising, marketers must return to the basics of the job: observing human behavior and reacting to it. Consumers are people, more than a collection of habits. Marketers must understand how people are watching TV today, across linear, OTT, VOD or any other means.

There are the advanced cord cutters who only watch on-demand; people who tune into linear TV for a set amount of time; and those who fall somewhere in the middle, sometimes watching live and sometimes on-demand. Whether theyre logging in through a set-top box or another device, no viewer is content to sit within one walled garden; everyone has their own stable of services and providers. Marketers need to continue the conversation with viewers across devices in a way that makes sense. If marketers dont account for dynamic consumer behavior in 2020, their heads will be in the sand.

Whats the right combination of channels, and how can a marketer frequency cap for those viewers? How can advertisers orchestrate a TV campaign across channels, dynamically reacting to consumer behavior without oversaturating?

These are a few basic tenets of orchestrating TV campaigns around human behavior:

1. Approach planning in a truly holistic way. Start with audience and data, and demand an understanding of the audience segment viewscape. Learn how the percentage of audience spreads across channels, and then find out about how they overlap. Holistic campaign planning isnt just about getting different teams to work together. Its about deduplicatingan audience.

Platforms have to react dynamically to consumer preferences to more accurately respect and respond to allocation by consumer. If youre a marketer, you need to allocate to mirror that allocation of attention.

2. Dont buy in siloes. Buying from only one provider is easy, but no one provider reaches everyone, and marketers cant drive their businesses forward this way. The same goes for buying just one mediumno one medium can provide complete access to audiences. When people cord cut, for instance, many still keep an over-the-air connection to local stations because they still want local news, or maybe they buy a service like Hulu to access live TV. Marketers need to understand how viewers move from app to app and view premium versus local content.

Dynamically reacting, or the ability to optimize across channels and devices, means learning what worked in one area, and letting it influence whats done in other channels.

3. Be your own scorekeeper. TV is about measurable business objectives, but its also about a media buy and reconciling your audience. At the end of every campaign, marketers should have a holistic story about their money. Each provider will tell the very best version of how a marketers money was spent, but stories from various channels may not correlate. Marketers must demand unified reporting across devices and segments in order to become their own scorekeepers. Otherwise they cant learn. Even with the best of intentions, results will be skewed at the service provider level, device level or otherwise.

More:
Let's get back to the human at the center of TV advertising - AdAge.com

Waymo enters the UK with acquisition of self-driving AI startup Latent Logic – Engadget

Latent Logic uses "imitation learning" to create simulations of human behavior which can be used in vehicle testing. Most AI training uses reinforcement learning, in which an AI gives answers to problems that are coded as either correct or incorrect. Over time, reinforcement-based AI can learn the correct answer more quickly.

However, this can be rather inefficient. By contrast, imitation learning has machines mimic human behaviors to learn some of the implicit knowledge that people have about the world, making it faster for the AI to model the optimal solution. Waymo could use this technique to train autonomous vehicles by having AI model complex human behaviors like cars cutting each other off or a pedestrian appearing in an unexpected location.

Latent Logic is based in Oxford, UK, which is something of a hub for self-driving vehicle research. For example, there's Oxbotica, a group which has trialed an autonomous grocery delivery vehicles, self-driving taxis and driverless shuttles. BAE Systems worked with researchers in Oxford to develop a hefty off-world autonomous vehicle based on a Bowler Wildcat. There's also the University of Oxford, which performs research into autonomous vehicles as well.

Acquiring the company gives Alphabet a foothold in a key location in the UK and access to a hub of local talent. "We see an exciting opportunity in Europe, not only in continuing to build our partnerships with major automakers but also in benefitting from the world-class technology and engineering capabilities in Oxford and beyond," Drago Anguelov, Waymo's principal scientist and head of research told The Guardian.

Waymo does not plan to launch self-driving car services in the UK yet, but the company has confirmed it has plans to operate in Europe in the future.

The rest is here:
Waymo enters the UK with acquisition of self-driving AI startup Latent Logic - Engadget