All posts by medical

Professorship (W2) (6 years/tenure track) of Anatomy (Neuroanatomy) – Nature.com

As one of Europes leading research universities, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt (LMU) in Munich is committed to the highest interna-tional standards of excellence in research and teaching. Building on its more than 500-year-long tradition, it offers a broad spectrum that covers all areas of knowledge within its 18 Faculties, ranging from the humanities, law, economics and social sciences, to medicine and the natural sciences.

The Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Anatomy, invites applications for a

commencing as soon as possible.

The professorship should represent anatomy in its full breadth.

Macroscopic anatomy (gross anatomy course) and neuroanatomy should be in the foreground in teaching.

In research, the professorship should specifically strengthen and expand the existing research focus of the Chair of Neuroanatomy at LMU Munich. Desirable, but not a requirement, is a focus on prenatal programming of neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition, the future job holder must agree to take the lead in all animal experimentation projects of the Chair of Neuroanatomy at LMU Munich.

LMU Munich seeks to appoint a highly qualified junior academic to this professorship and, therefore, especially encourages early-career scholars to apply. Prerequisites for this position are a university degree and a doctoral degree or a comparable specific qualification. With an excellent record in research and teaching to date, prospective candidates will have demonstrated the potential for an outstanding academic career.

The initial appointment will be for six years. After a minimum of three years, it can be converted into a permanent position pending a positive evaluation of the candidates performance in research and teaching as well as his or her personal aptitude and if all legal conditions are met.

LMU Munich makes a point of providing newly appointed professors with various types of support, such as welcoming services and assis-tance for dual career couples.

LMU Munich is an equal opportunity employer. The University continues to be very successful in increasing the number of female faculty members and strongly encourages applications from female candidates. LMU Munich intends to enhance the diversity of its faculty members. Furthermore, disabled candidates with essentially equal qualifications will be given preference.

Please submit your application (curriculum vitae, scientific career, references, certificates, a list of publications and lectures, external funds) as well as a short application form (see http://www.med.uni-muenchen.de) to the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen, Bavariaring 19, 80336 Munich, Germany, no later than October 1, 2020.

Visit link:
Professorship (W2) (6 years/tenure track) of Anatomy (Neuroanatomy) - Nature.com

Anatomy of an anti-Catholicism complaint against the CBC – The B.C. Catholic

For years, I have read comments in the CBC websites discussion sections routinely calling Christians simple-minded fools and describing God as a mythical figure who, if he exists, is bloodthirsty, hateful, and vengeful.

As a proponent of free speech, I am fine with people saying whatever they want about my Roman Catholic faith and Christianity in general. Only by allowing free speech can we exchange ideas and undertake true evangelization. I have always been confident that truth will win out.

But the CBCs moderators seem uninterested in allowing that same freedom of speech when it comes to Catholics. I recently posted a comment under a story about rioting in the United States and the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting the time was right for every Canadian to repent of their sins, pick up a rosary, and pray to God for peace and healing.

That post resulted in several individuals asking about the Christian faith and challenging my religious beliefs. All my replies were respectful. There were no personal attacks or insults from me. Yet the CBC chose to ban me for that call to prayer. When I attempted to log onto the website again, this is what popped up:

The CBCs claims are false. There were no personal attacks toward anyone on my part, nor were there uncivil comments. During a time of riotous behaviour and illness sweeping the entire planet, any comment calling for peace and healing is most definitely on topic.

The only conceivable reason for this ban is that the CBC moderator discriminated against me because my post expressed a religious sentiment that of belief in God and the efficacy of prayer.

This is discrimination contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which in Section 15 (1) says, Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Since the taxpayer-funded CBC is breaking our countrys laws and displaying anti-religious bigotry, I filed complaints with the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council, the Canadian Human Rights Commission, and the CBC Ombudsman, asking for a formal apology and assurances that steps will be taken to prevent this type of discrimination. I specified that these assurances should come with a plan of action with specific goals that are measurable and observable so they are not just platitudes but concrete steps that will lead to significant changes.

The response from CBC Ombudsman Jack Nagler was instantaneous the same day and anything but reassuring. He claimed that as ombudsman he doesnt have any say on commenting or the moderation of comments in stories. My responsibility is to assess the content generated by CBC journalists, not the content generated by readers. Comments do not fall under my mandate.

He offered to share my complaint with programmers to make them aware of my concerns but there was no apology, no condemnation of bias against Catholics and other Christians, and no assurance that anti-Christian bias will be curbed at the CBC.

I received a reply from the broadcast standards council washing its hands of the matter, and saying it does not have jurisdiction over the public broadcaster, only private broadcasters. They forwarded my complaint to the Canadian Radio-television and telecommunications Commission, who replied the next day claiming they did not have authority over broadcasters websites and so could not look into this complaint.

About two weeks later, I finally got a reply from the Canadian Human Rights Commission, who tried to pass the buck, saying We have carefully reviewed your correspondence and it appears that your complaint is regarding content and moderating by CBC. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission is the more appropriate organization to address this matter.

I answered them, saying the CRTC does not handle this type of complaint and that Id contacted them first and have them on record as stating as much. I said Id also contacted the CBC Ombudsman, who told me he has no authority over the moderation of the comments section of the CBC website.

I closed by saying that if the human rights commission refuses to look into my complaint, it will mean Christians can be actively discriminated against by Canadas national, taxpayer-funded broadcaster with complete impunity.

Is that the message you want me to take to the media? I asked. Do you want me to let them know that the Canadian Human Rights Commission does not care about the rights of Christians?

Within hours the commission got back to me, saying, Upon further review of your correspondence with the Canadian Human Rights Commission, it appears that your inquiry might be within the jurisdiction of the Commission.

I cant help but wonder how seriously my complaint will be taken by a human rights commission that didnt want to investigate it in the first place.

More than two-thirds of Canadians are Christian, not an insignificant amount. We are the backbone of our country. We pay taxes and certainly the lions share of the funding the CBC relies on to operate. Without Christian taxpayers, there would be no CBC as we know it.

I ask for prayers that this complaint will not fall on deaf ears and that the rights of Catholics will be protected in Canada.

James Risdon is a New Brunswick writer and former B.C. Catholic contributor. He lives in Bathurst.

The rest is here:
Anatomy of an anti-Catholicism complaint against the CBC - The B.C. Catholic

Do You Know "Grey’s Anatomy" As Well As You Think You Do? – BuzzFeed

It's a beautiful day to save lives.

They're each others' person, platonically of course.

That's right. McDreamy started dating Grey while he was still technically married to Addison.

She was completely robbed! Hospital politics played a huge role and Cristina lost her well-deserved Harper Avery, smh.

While Meredith Grey has survived a lot of things, a robbery was not one of them... yet.

Seattle Grace was renamed Grey Sloan Memorial after Lexie Grey and Mark Sloan died in a plane crash.

Yeah she was! Bailey is the ultimate HBIC.

Somebody get Shonda on the phone, I have an idea!

Sign up to the BuzzFeed Quizzes Newsletter - Binge on the latest quizzes delivered right to your inbox with the Quizzes newsletter!

See the article here:
Do You Know "Grey's Anatomy" As Well As You Think You Do? - BuzzFeed

Jesse Williams (Greys Anatomy) responds to compliments from his fans on Twitter! – Explica

Jesse Williams is a big hit in Greys Anatomy. The actor has responded to his fans and is touched by their compliments.

Jesse Williams has been playing in the Greys Anatomy series for several years. The actor is crushing many fans and responded to one of them on Twitter.

For more than sixteen years, Greys Anatomy has known a big hit. The medical series appeals to the public and everyone cant wait to see season 17. In addition, the last season had to end earlier because of the Covid-19.

Jesse Williams has played Jackson Avery for a few years in the series. The actor made a very noticed entrance thanks to his dream physique. Indeed, he capsized the hearts of fans with his pretty blue eyes and his awareness.

For a long time, fans were completely behind the Jackson April couple. Besides, they were all very sad when Sarah Drew left the series. Indeed, the latter has left Jackson behind and the doctor is struggling to find love.

Fans of Greys Anatomy will soon be able to see Jesse Williams in the series again. Moreover, the actor seems very active on social networks and does not hesitate to respond to certain comments from his fans.

On Twitter, Ella, a fan of Greys Anatomy but especially of Jesse Williams left a little message. The latter made her parents believe that she was going to prom with the actor.

I dont know whats the funniest. The fact that my mom actually thought he was my date or the fact that she asked me if he was smart, she wrote on the social network.

Ella had shared a photo of Jesse Williams but didnt expect him to respond to her post. Still, it looks like the Greys Anatomy actor was somewhat flattered. Thus, he did not hesitate to answer him with humor.

Well done mom. Ask the right questions he wrote in response to Ella. The actors message did not go unnoticed and created a buzz. Indeed, many fans in turn left messages. For her part, Ella must have been very happy to see Jacksons character message!

Twitter is disabled.

Authorize the deposit of cookies to access the content.

Tags: greys anatomy jackson Grays Anatomy Jesse Williams Jesse Williams actor Jesse Williams couple Jesse Williams Greys Anatomy Jesse Williams Instagram

See the article here:
Jesse Williams (Greys Anatomy) responds to compliments from his fans on Twitter! - Explica

Is The Most Heartbreaking ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Episode The One When Derek Shepherd Dies? – TheThings

Many fans would argue that while Derek's passing was tragic, it wasn't the be-all-end-all when it comes to on-screen heartbreak.

Derek Shepherd's death was one that rocked 'Grey's Anatomy.' But was it really the most heartbreaking episode of the series? After 16 seasons and literally hundreds of episodes, many fans would argue that while Derek's passing was tragic, it wasn't the be-all-end-all when it comes to on-screen heartbreak.

After all, fans haven't forgotten other pivotal moments in the series. Case in point: When Izzie Stevens lost Denny Duquette.

Not to mention when George O'Malley died. Episode one, season six saw John Doe arrive with grave injuries. The patient was so severely disfigured that even his friends didn't know who he was, until he shared an inside joke with Meredith, revealing his identity.

But of course, there's also the storyline between Mark Sloan and Lexie Grey. After tons of back-and-forth and a whole lot of drama, the two finally found each other. Only to experience a plane crash in season nine that resulted in a painful goodbye and Lexie's tragic death.

Which was awful, but then Mark Sloan died later in the season, too. Perhaps Shonda knows best, though. How much more character growth could we expect from Mark after he confessed his love for Lexie and watched her die in front of him? Even if they were one of the top-ranked couples of Grey Sloan Memorial, according toVulture.

It's also worth mentioning that the patients (non-staff ones) had plenty of tragic stories that were heartbreaking in their own right. But because fans of 'Grey's Anatomy' become so involved in the characters' stories, they become rightfully wrapped up in hoping for good outcomes.

RELATED:The Behind The Scenes Drama Of Grey's Anatomy Used To Be Worse Than The Show's Storylines

So yes, Derek Shepherd's death was tragic and awful for fans (not to mention Meredith). But the truth is that viewers got to watch Mer-Der's story come full circle. From the angst of will-they won't-they to starting and growing their family together, the couple had an entire fairytale.

Fans got to track their story from beginning to end, and there was closure.

And while it didn't come with a fairytale ending,Derek had a full life and character arc, while others missed out on that opportunity. Besides, Meredith even found love again after Derek, notesBuzzFeed. Though, her main man turns out to be someone other than was originally planned.

Who knows where Izzie Stevens would have ended up if Denny Duquette had survived (even if it wasn't on a farm with Alex)? What could George O'Malley's future have held if he'd made it out of the hospital that last time? And how about Lexie and Mark's basically unrequited love story? Those two never even had a chance once they finally realized their feelings for each other. Talk about bad Grey's Anatomy exits.

Derek's death was heartbreaking, but that's sort of what 'Grey's' is all about: Getting viewers so wrapped up in the storyline that they feel elated when characters get happy endings and devastatedat their deaths.

NEXT:Here's How Fans Are Reacting To Grey's Anatomy Resuming Filming For Season 17

What Is Adeles Real Hair Colour?

Go here to see the original:
Is The Most Heartbreaking 'Grey's Anatomy' Episode The One When Derek Shepherd Dies? - TheThings

‘Making Peace with Conflict’ Book Uses Neuroscience to Reduce Conflict in Professional and Personal Lives – PR Web

WASHINGTON (PRWEB) September 10, 2020

With COVID-19 changing the way we work and live, combining those spaces in unprecedented ways, and happening concurrently with massive political divisions and economic distress, the potential for destructive conflict is increasing. Jeanine Hullformer corporate lawyer, now author, certified Conflict Transformation mediator, conflict engagement coach and public speakershows how to use this challenging time constructively to deepen relationships by changing the way you think about and respond to conflict. Her new book, Making Peace with Conflict: Using Neuroscience to Ease Difficult Relationships, is a scientifically comprehensive guide and is the first book that explicitly ties recent revolutionary trauma research to the way we deal with conflict.

We all know how miserable conflict is, but very few of us have experienced the benefits conflict can bring, such as deepening trust and strengthening relationships, said Hull. Like navigating a labyrinth, the process of harnessing the connective power of conflict lies in trusting the process, putting one foot in front of the other and maintaining progress toward the centera place of integration, peace and ease. Using clear and easy-to-understand language, my book uses neuroscience to educate you how to engage with and move through the unpleasantness of conflict to better your professional and personal lives.

Notably, Hull helps organizations and families create an environment that values diversity of opinions (which can often lead to conflictor worse, silence) with Rules of Conflict Engagement to normalize and respect diverging opinions. These Rules of Engagement make it safe for everyone to give their best to their jobs, families, communities and volunteer organizations.

Readers of the book will:

As Dr. James Gilligan, a leading authority on the causes of violence, clinical professor of Psychiatry and Adjunct Professor of Law at New York University, and author of Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic and Preventing Violence, writes:

In this truly remarkable book Jeanine Hull summarizes and synthesizes an enormous amount of the most important and up-to-date research, from the latest findings in neuroscience to new developments in the understanding and treatment of trauma to effective methods of conflict resolution. She shows how inseparable the body is from the mind, and how valuable that knowledge can be in helping us as individuals and as a society to deal more constructively with all forms of psychological distress and dysfunction.

Making Peace with Conflict is the book weve been waiting for: a straightforward and non-touchy- feely process to taking control of our behavior to live a more peaceful life.

Order your e-book or paperback copy today at Amazon (https://amzn.to/2RcE2Lo), Barnes & Noble (https://bit.ly/3ikivw4), IndieBound (https://bit.ly/3bG66A9) and Kobo (https://bit.ly/2Fqc0sQ) to receive in September 2020. To learn more about Making Peace with Conflict or to book Hull to speak during in-person or virtual corporate events, workshops seminars, keynotes and more, visit http://www.MakingPeaceWithConflict.com.

About the AuthorMaking Peace with Conflict: Using Neuroscience to Ease Difficult Relationships, is the first book by Jeanine Hull, who recently retired as a prominent energy attorney. She is an experienced public speaker, including keynote addresses and expert testimony before Congress. Hull regularly spearheads seminars and interactive trainings, while offering public speaking services and personalized coaching to corporations and individuals looking to harness the dynamic and creative power of everyday conflicts. By guiding individuals and teams to productively participate in conflict engagement, Hull helps her clients create a positive environment which fosters teamwork and collaboration. Jeanine resides in Washington, D.C. with her husband of 30 years, dog and two cats, as her adult son explores the world.

Share article on social media or email:

See the article here:
'Making Peace with Conflict' Book Uses Neuroscience to Reduce Conflict in Professional and Personal Lives - PR Web

Global Neuroscience Market New Trends, Future Growth, Outlook, Industry Overview, Application and Forecast 2020-2026 – Scientect

The GlobalNeuroscience Market report contains a complete analysis of the different aspects of the market such as the market size, key marketing regions, key players, leading firms, market structure, segmentation, revenue generation, demand, research, and development, and top marketing strategies. The Neuroscience Market report provides comprehensive data for the latest market entrants. Furthermore, the explosion delivers a market summary, SWOT analysis, and total market share.

Get Free Sample PDF Copy of Neuroscience Market Report @

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/life-sciences/global-neuroscience-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/69217#request_sample

List ofTop Key Playersof Neuroscience Market:

Xian Janssen Pharmaceutical Ltd.AstraZeneca plc.Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.KRRPShandong Renhetang Pharmaceutical Co Ltd.Kanghong PharmaceuticalJiangsu Nhwa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd

Neuroscience Market report also covers a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape, upcoming development trends, and key manufacturers of the industry. The recovery from COVID-19 is likewise being shared through this report discussed with the expertise in the industry. Besides the summary, the report shares a huge region of knowledge that has comprehensive evolution, definitions & classifications, with expert opinion. Also, itll mention Capacity, Amount, Revenue, Cost, and Gross margin of profit, growth rate, Import, Export, Market Share, and Technological Developments.

Get a huge Discount on Neuroscience Market Report @:

https://www.reportspedia.com/discount_inquiry/discount/69217

Neuroscience Market Segment by Type:

HospitalsDiagnostic LaboratoriesResearch InstitutesOther

Neuroscience Market segment by Application:

Anti-Parkinsons DrugsAlzheimer DiseasePsychotic DisordersEpileptic DisordersAutism Spectrum DisordersOthers

Important Features that are under Offering and Key Highlights of the Reports:

Enquire before purchasing this Neuroscience report@:

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/life-sciences/global-neuroscience-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/69217#inquiry_before_buying

The Neuroscience Market Research report delivers an all-inclusive overview of the competitive landscape along with an in-depth analysis of the company profiles, revenue estimation, and gross margin profits, and market size and share. Furthermore, the report studies the strategic initiatives taken by the companies to expand their customer base, market size. It also evaluates key industry trends and sales and distribution channels.

The Neuroscience Market Report Can Answer The Following Questions:

Reasons To Buy Neuroscience Market Research Report:

Table of Contents

1. Research Methodology 2. Executive Summary 3.Market Overview 3.1. Definition 3.2. Neuroscience Industry Market Value Chain Analysis 3.3. Porters 5 Forces 3.4. Regulations 4. Market Dynamics 4.1. Introduction 4.2. Drivers 4.3. Constraints 4.4. Trends 5. Global Neuroscience Market Segmentation, Forecasts, and Trends by Application 6. Global Neuroscience Market Segmentation, Forecasts, and Trends by Technology 7. Global Neuroscience Market Segmentation, Forecasts, and Trends by Region 8. Competitive Intelligence 8.1. Company Market Share Analysis 9. Company Profiles 10. Investment Opportunities

Click Here For a Detailed Table Of Contents @:

https://www.reportspedia.com/report/life-sciences/global-neuroscience-market-report-2020-by-key-players,-types,-applications,-countries,-market-size,-forecast-to-2026-(based-on-2020-covid-19-worldwide-spread)/69217#table_of_contents

Excerpt from:
Global Neuroscience Market New Trends, Future Growth, Outlook, Industry Overview, Application and Forecast 2020-2026 - Scientect

Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market is Thriving Worldwide 2020 | Trends, Growth and Profit Analysis, Forecast by 2027 – The Daily Chronicle

New Jersey, United States, The Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market report 2020 provides a detailed impression, describe the product industry scope and the market expanded insights and forecasts up to 2027. It shows market data according to industry drivers, restraints and opportunities, analyzes the market status, the industry share, size, future Trends and growth rate of the market. The Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market report is categorized by application, end user, technology, product / service types, and other, as well as by region. In addition, the report includes the calculated expected CAGR of chitosan acetate-market derivative from the earlier records of the Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, and current market trends, which are organized with future developments.

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market was valued at USD 2.42 Billion in 2018 and is projected to reach USD 5.14 Billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 9.7% from 2019 to 2026.

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Product

Consumables Instruments

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Technology

Clinical Chemistry Immunoassays/Immunochemistry Molecular Diagnostics Other Technologies

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Application

Drug Discovery & Development Research in Vitro Diagnostics

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By End-User

Hospitals & Diagnostics Centers Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies Academic & Research Institutes

The report provides detailed coverage of the Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, including structure, definitions, applications, and Industry Chain classifications. The Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, investment plan, business strategy, opportunities and development status of key regions. Development policies and plans are discussed and manufacturing processes and cost structures analyzed. This report also includes information on import / export consumption, supply and demand, costs, industry share, policy, Price, Sales and gross margins.

Ask For Discount @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=28342&utm_source=TDC&utm_medium=001

Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market forecast up to 2027, with information such as company profiles, product picture and specification, capacity production, price, cost, revenue, and contact information. Upstream raw materials and equipment as well as downstream demand analyses are also carried out. The Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market size, development trends and marketing channels are analyzed. Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed and general research results are offered.

The Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market was created on the basis of an in-depth market analysis with contributions from industry experts. The report covers the growth prospects in the coming years and the discussion of the main providers.

To understand how the effects of COVID-19 are addressed in this report. A sample copy of the report is available at https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/Neuroscience-Antibodies-&-Assays-Market/?utm_source=TDC&utm_medium=001

Verified Market Researchis a leading Global Research and Consulting firm servicing over 5000+ customers. Verified Market Research provides advanced analytical research solutions while offering information enriched research studies. We offer insight into strategic and growth analyses, Data necessary to achieve corporate goals, and critical revenue decisions.

Our 250 Analysts and SMEs offer a high level of expertise in data collection and governance use industrial techniques to collect and analyze data on more than 15,000 high impact and niche markets. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, expertise, and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research.

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes

US: +1 (650)-781-4080UK: +44 (203)-411-9686APAC: +91 (902)-863-5784US Toll-Free: +1 (800)-7821768

Email:[emailprotected]

Read more:
Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market is Thriving Worldwide 2020 | Trends, Growth and Profit Analysis, Forecast by 2027 - The Daily Chronicle

Study shows how inhibitory learning enables memories to be stable over time – News-Medical.Net

Reviewed by Emily Henderson, B.Sc.Sep 9 2020

In years to come, our personal memories of the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to be etched in our minds with precision and clarity, distinct from other memories of 2020.

The process which makes this possible has eluded scientists for many decades, but research led by the University of Bristol has made a breakthrough in understanding how memories can be so distinct and long-lasting without getting muddled up.

The study, published in Nature Communications, describes a newly discovered mechanism of learning in the brain shown to stabilize memories and reduce interference between them. Its findings also provide new insight into how humans form expectations and make accurate predictions about what could happen in future.

Memories are created when the connections between the nerve cells which send and receive signals from the brain are made stronger. This process has long been associated with changes to connections that excite neighbouring nerve cells in the hippocampus, a region of the brain crucial for memory formation.

These excitatory connections must be balanced with inhibitory connections, which dampen nerve cell activity, for healthy brain function.

The role of changes to inhibitory connection strength had not previously been considered and the researchers found that inhibitory connections between nerve cells, known as neurons, can similarly be strengthened.

Working together with computational neuroscientists at Imperial College London, the researchers showed how this allows the stabilisation of memory representations.

Their findings uncover for the first time how two different types of inhibitory connections (from parvalbumin and somatostatin expressing neurons) can also vary and increase their strength, just like excitatory connections.

Moreover, computational modelling demonstrated this inhibitory learning enables the hippocampus to stabilise changes to excitatory connection strength, which prevents interfering information from disrupting memories.

We were all really excited when we discovered these two types of inhibitory neurons could alter their connections and partake in learning. It provides an explanation for what we all know to be true; that memories do not disappear as soon as we encounter a new experience. These new findings will help us understand why that is."

Dr Matt Udakis, Study First Author and Research Associate, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol

"The computer modelling gave us important new insight into how inhibitory learning enables memories to be stable over time and not be susceptible to interference. That's really important as it has previously been unclear how separate memories can remain precise and robust."

The research was funded by the UKRI's Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, which has awarded the teams further funding to develop this research and test their predictions from these findings by measuring the stability of memory representations.

Senior author Professor Jack Mellor, Professor in Neuroscience at the Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, said: "Memories form the basis of our expectations about future events and enable us to make more accurate predictions.

What the brain is constantly doing is matching our expectations to reality, finding out where mismatches occur, and using this information to determine what we need to learn.

"We believe what we have discovered plays a crucial role in assessing how accurate our predictions are and therefore what is important new information.

In the current climate, our ability to manage our expectations and make accurate predictions has never been more important."

"This is also a great example of how research at the interface of two different disciplines can deliver exciting science with truly new insights. Memory researchers within Bristol Neuroscience form one of the largest communities of memory-focussed research in the UK spanning a broad range of expertise and approaches.

It was a great opportunity to work together and start to answer these big questions, which neuroscientists have been grappling with for decades and have wide-reaching implications."

Source:

Journal reference:

Udakis, M., et al. (2020) Interneuron-specific plasticity at parvalbumin and somatostatin inhibitory synapses onto CA1 pyramidal neurons shapes hippocampal output. Nature Communications. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18074-8.

Link:
Study shows how inhibitory learning enables memories to be stable over time - News-Medical.Net

Study reveals how brain waves may control flow of information throughout the cortex – News-Medical.Net

Reviewed by Emily Henderson, B.Sc.Sep 8 2020

To produce your thoughts and actions, your brain processes information in a hierarchy of regions along its surface, or cortex, ranging from "lower" areas that do basic parsing of incoming sensations to "higher" executive regions that formulate your plans for employing that newfound knowledge.

In a new study, MIT neuroscientists seeking to explain how this organization emerges report two broad trends: In each of three distinct regions, information encoding or its inhibition was associated with a similar tug of war between specific brain wave frequency bands, and the higher a region's status in the hierarchy, the higher the peak frequency of its waves in each of those bands.

By making and analyzing measurements of thousands of neurons and surrounding electric fields in three cortical regions in animals, the team's new study in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience provides a unifying view of how brain waves, which are oscillating patterns of the activity of brain cells, may control the flow of information throughout the cortex.

When you look at prior studies you see examples of what we found in many regions, but they are all found in different ways in different experiments. We wanted to obtain an overarching picture so that's what we did. We addressed the question of what does this look like all over the cortex."

Earl Miller, Picower Professor of Neuroscience in The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory and senior author of the study

Added co-first author Mikael Lundqvist of Stockholm University and MIT: "Many, many studies have looked at how synchronized the phases of a particular frequency are between cortical regions. It has become a field by itself, because synchrony will impact the communication between regions. But arguably even more important would be if regions communicate at different frequencies altogether. Here we find such a systematic shift in preferred frequencies across regions. It may have been suspected by piecing together earlier studies, but as far as I know hasn't been shown directly before. It is a simple but potentially very fundamental observation."

The paper's other first author is Picower Institute postdoc Andre Bastos.

To make their observations the team gave animals the task of correctly distinguishing an image they had just seen - a simple feat of visual working memory. As the animals played the game, the scientists measured the individual spiking activity of hundreds of neurons in each animal in three regions at the bottom, middle and top of the task's cortical hierarchy - the visual cortex, the parietal cortex and the prefrontal cortex. They simultaneously tracked the waves produced by this activity.

In each region they found that when an image was either being encoded (when it was first presented) or recalled (when working memory was tested), the power of theta and gamma frequency bands of brain waves would increase in bursts and power in alpha and beta bands would decrease. When the information had to be held in mind, for instance in the period between first sight and the test, theta and gamma power went down and alpha and beta power went up in bursts. This functional "push/pull" sequence between these frequency bands has been shown in several individual regions, including the motor cortex, Miller said, but not often simultaneously across multiple regions in the course of the same task.

The researchers also observed that the bursts of theta and gamma power were closely associated with neural spikes that encoded information about the images. Alpha and beta power bursts, meanwhile, were anti-correlated with that same spiking activity.

While this rule applied across all three regions, a key difference was that each region employed a distinct peak within each frequency band. While the visual cortex beta band, for instance, peaked at 11 Hz, parietal beta peaked at 15 Hz and prefrontal beta peaked at 19 Hz. Meanwhile visual cortex gamma occurred at 65 Hz, parietal gamma topped at 72 Hz and prefrontal gamma at 80 Hz.

"As you move from the back of the brain to the front, all the frequencies get a little higher," Miller said.

While both main trends in the study - the inverse relationships between frequency bands and the systematic rise in peak frequencies within each band - were both consistently observed and statistically significant, they only show associations with function, not causality. But the researchers said they are consistent with a model in which alpha and beta alternately inhibit, or release, gamma to control the encoding of information - a form of top-down control of sensory activity.

Meanwhile, they hypothesize that the systematic increase in peak frequencies up the hierarchy could serve multiple functions. For instance, if waves in each frequency band carry information, then it higher regions would sample at a faster frequency to provide more fine-grained sampling of the raw input coming from lower regions. Moreover, faster frequencies are more effective at entraining those same frequencies in other regions, giving higher regions an effective way of controlling activity in lower ones.

"The increased frequency in the oscillatory rhythms may help sculpt information flow in the cortex," the authors wrote.

Source:

Journal reference:

Lundqvist, M., et al. (2020) Preservation and Changes in Oscillatory Dynamics across the Cortical Hierarchy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01600.

Originally posted here:
Study reveals how brain waves may control flow of information throughout the cortex - News-Medical.Net