NOT! (Click to enlarge.)
Last Tuesday, Biglaw was rocked by reports of supposed merger talks between Quinn Emanuel and Williams & Connolly. The news spread rapidly, perhaps because it was so surprising.
Other than being two of the nations finest litigation firms with a shared reputation for zealous representation of their clients, QE and W&C share little in common. Quinn Emanuel is obscenely profitable ($5 million in 2016 profits per partner), rather large (700+ lawyers), and rapidly expanding, with offices in eight U.S. cities and more than a dozen cities overseas.
In cultural terms, Quinn reflects its founder, legendary litigator John Quinn. The firm isentrepreneurial and risk-taking, doing a fair amount of contingency work, and its brash and publicity-seeking. How many Am Law 100 firms have ever advertised in airports?
(Not surprisingly for the staid precincts of Biglaw, the Quinn approach has its detractors. QEs critics or player haters question the accuracy of its profitability, the sustainability of its expansion, and the tastefulness of its self-promotion.)
Compared to Quinn Emanuel, Williams & Connolly is less profitable ($1.6 million in PPP) and smaller (under 300 lawyers). And this is intentional. Given the tremendous talent under its roof and its worldwide reputation, W&C could be much larger and more lucrative than it currently is. But the firm has made a deliberate decision to focus on quality and collegiality, refusing to expand beyond its one D.C. office or even hire many laterals. As Jenna Greene noted in an interesting post-mortem, Why Its a Good Thing That Williams & Connolly Isnt Merging With Quinn Emanuel:
As big law firms fell over themselves to jack up their PPPs and lure top laterals, Williams & Connolly has been like the last samurai, refusing to go with the flow. In the firms 50-year history, the partnership has only hired two laterals U.S. Supreme Court advocate Kannon Shanmugam in 2008 and tax expert Gerald Feffer in 1986. The rest are homegrown.
This approach instills lawyers with the Williams & Connolly culture, which is in many ways the opposite of Quinns. Despite its overall political liberalism its zealously pro-criminal-defendant, for example, and its more likely to hire a former criminal defendant than a former federal prosecutor W&C is culturally (and fiscally) conservative. It does most of its work based on hourly rates, eschewing exotic alternative-fee arrangements, and it pays above-market base salariesbut no bonuses to its associates (who have been wondering, ever since last summers Cravath pay hike, about when theyll get a raise). And you definitely wont see W&C advertisements in airports heck, it took years for the firm to even put up a website.
Given the big differences between the two firms, I reacted with surprise and skepticism to last weeks rumored merger talks. After Williams & Connolly issued its unequivocal denial, I tweeted:
So I decided to do a little digging. I reached out to both firms; both declined to comment. But I also spoke to individual lawyers at both places, and here is what I managed to piece together.
The meeting that gave rise to the rumors took place not last week, but a while ago several weeks or even a month ago. It took place over breakfast, at a Marriott in downtown D.C.
Okay, hold on right there a power breakfast to discuss the merger of two leading law firms at a Marriott? I have great respect for Marriott as a business and stay often at its hotels (Gold Elite, baby), but Marriott is a solid rather than glamorous brand. If the firms wanted to support Marriott International maybe its a client? they could atleast have met at the D.C. Ritz-Carlton, Marriotts top-of-the-line property in the nations capital.
UPDATE (6:51 p.m.): In defense of the Marriott pick, a source points out that it was probably the Washington Marriott at Metro Center(775 12th Street NW), conveniently located down the block from Williams & Connolly (725 12th Street NW).
The breakfast involved a small number of Quinn Emanuel and Williams & Connolly lawyers. The W&C representatives were people that John Quinn knows personally at the firm, through personal friendship or prior work together as co-counsel. Some folks you might have expected at a merger-related meeting were not present; for example, W&C chairman Dane Butswinkas did not attend, nor did all members of the Executive Committee.
What was discussed at the breakfast? The two sides disagree. The QE sources say that business matters were discussed, including referrals of work between the two firms. The W&C sources say that most of the discussion centered on families and summer plans and that to characterize it as an official business meeting would be quite erroneous.
Near the end of the breakfast, John Quinn tossed out somewhat spontaneously, and in very general terms the idea of stronger ties, such as a strategic partnership or maybe even a merger. The W&C lawyers were taken by surprise, since nobody went to the breakfast anticipating such a discussion.
How did the Williams & Connolly lawyers respond? Again, theres some divergence.
The QE sources say that the Williams & Connolly folks did not say no, at least not in a way that would satisfy a clear statement rule. And they claim that John Quinn followed up with W&C lawyers after the breakfast as well, which led to talk of a follow-up meeting sometime in September for further discussion.
The W&C sources disagree. Although the Williams & Connolly lawyers at the breakfast might not have been as blunt as they could have been they were taken by surprise, and didnt want to be rude they made quite clear that the firm was not interested.
According to the W&C camp, when John Quinn raised the subject of a merger, he prefaced it by saying something like, Heres a crazy idea. The W&C lawyers responded along these lines: Haha, that sure IS a crazy idea! Merging with a giant international law firm more than twice our size? We havent opened a second office in our half-century of existence! Heck, we dont even hire laterals!
And thats where things were left until Legal Business, a U.K.-based publication, reported on the supposed merger talks last Tuesday. Their article included comment from John Quinn: It is true that we had a meeting on this subject but it was very preliminary and we dont know what, if anything, will come of this.
This news quickly jumped the pond given credibility by Quinns confirmation, and picked up promptly by the American Lawyer, Law360, and Above the Law and it caused a lot of tsuris over at Williams & Connolly. Senior partners and Executive Committee members were besieged by calls and emails from anxious clients, colleagues, and recruits, expressing concern that the firm they know and love was about to get transformed through absorption into the Quinn Emanuel borg. (As a litigation partner at another Biglaw firm told me, the merger rumors created some serious consternation among W&C clients, associates, etc. and gave me an endless source of amusement.)
As noted earlier, Williams & Connolly can be somewhat press-shy, even secretive. This makes sense; in many of their cases, the best result involves their client never being in the newspaper. But given all the drama, here W&C had no choice but to speak. Firm chairman Dane Butswinkas issued a statement: While Quinn Emanuel is an excellent law firm, we are happy just the way we are. We have no plans to merge with them or any other law firm.
What went down here, from the point of view of each firm?
From the perspective of Quinn Emanuel, there was enough there to justify John Quinns confirmation of something when contacted by Legal Business. Remember that Legal Business contacted John Quinn i.e., Quinn Emanuel didnt make an announcement of its own and remember his caveat that the talks were very preliminary. (Side note: the U.K. legal-media outlets tend to be more aggressive in their coverage of the industry than we are in the States, and they will often report out stories that we might hold pending further confirmation.)
From the perspective of Williams & Connolly, this was something spun out of nothing, and there was no way anyone could have thought that even preliminary discussions were underway. This was an informal breakfast meeting, not attended by W&C top brass, focused on personal rather than business matters. Yes, John Quinn randomly tossed out his crazy idea at the end but that idea was not discussed further back at W&C, and certainly not discussed in the Executive Committee that runs the firm. To the contrary, many Executive Committee members and other firm leaders learned of the supposed merger talks the way everyone else did from news reports.
Whose version of events am I inclined to credit? Speaking for myself, I view the W&C account as more credible. Heres why (in addition to the fact that the talks took place over breakfast not dinner, breakfast at a Marriott.)
John Quinns incredible success, as both a lawyer and businessman, rests upon his energy, enthusiasm, and view that almost nothing is truly impossible. When he gets an idea in his head, he runs with it over mountains, through walls, and past any obstacle standing in his way.
In many cases over his long and distinguished career, many of Quinns ideas including the idea for Quinn Emanuel itself, which he launched after leaving Cravath have turned into huge wins. But sometimes Quinns vision can get ahead of reality, which I suspect is what happened in this case. When he raised the idea of a merger with a few Williams & Connolly partners over breakfast, the fact that they didnt explicitly say hell to the N-O even if they gave many other strong indications that anyone else might have viewed as dispositive gave him just enough of an opening to think that preliminary discussions were underway.
(An alternative hypothesis: John Quinn knew full well that this breakfast chat didnt amount to merger discussions, but decided to confirm to Legal Business anyway. Im not sure, however, what his motivation would be for such a move. Did he want to burnish QEs brand by touting talks with another top firm? Did he want to make mischief for W&C? Its all too speculative.)
If law firm consultants were to use this episode as a case study for how to conduct merger talks, what lessons would they draw from it? Here are three that come to my mind:
1. Communicate clearly. This sounds obvious, but its easier said than done. Despite its reputation for ruthlessness, Biglaw can actually be quite genteel and passive-aggressive. Many lawyers like to think of themselves as learned professionals who are above money-grubbing pursuits, so they can turn skittish when talk turns to dollars and cents.
But a merger is a business deal in which money matters, so dont be afraid to be blunt polite, certainly, but honest. And dont defer difficult issues to the post-merger integration, especially issues surrounding compensation and internal leadership, just because its too awkward to talk about them in advance.
2. Get leadership involved early. This is usually not a problem in most law firm mergers, where the deals originate at the top and then get sold to or foisted upon rank-and-file partners later. But in the rare situation where this is not the case, bring the people with actual decision-making authority into the loop as soon as possible. Otherwise youre just wasting everyones time.
3. Prevent leaks. This apparent misunderstanding would never have seen the light of day if someone hadnt leaked the news to Legal Business. Again, plugging leaks is easier than said than done just ask Jeff Sessions but it can be done, especially if the talks take place between firm leaders and are kept inside a small group.
So thats the skinny of how the supposed QE/W&C merger talks came into existence, along with lessons learned. Best of luck to Quinn Emanuel and Williams & Connolly in their very independent respective futures.
Why Its a Good Thing That Williams & Connolly Isnt Merging With Quinn Emanuel [Litigation Daily]
Earlier:
David Lat is the founder and managing editor of Above the Law and the author of Supreme Ambitions: A Novel. He previously worked as a federal prosecutor in Newark, New Jersey; a litigation associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz; and a law clerk to Judge Diarmuid F. OScannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. You can connect with David on Twitter (@DavidLat), LinkedIn, and Facebook, and you can reach him by email at dlat@abovethelaw.com.
Originally posted here:
Anatomy Of A Rumor: The Quinn Emanuel / Williams & Connolly ... - Above the Law
- Anatomy of the Phillips curve - CEPR - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Don't Expect Arizona To Return To Grey's Anatomy Anytime Soon After This Exciting Jessica Capshaw Update - Screen Rant - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Pacers vs. Thunder NBA Finals: Anatomy of a comeback How the Pacers once again did the unthinkable - Yahoo Sports - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Anatomy Of A Debacle: How Mayor Adams Went From Visionary to Bully on E-Bikes - Streetsblog New York City - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Anatomy of an At-Bat: How Matt Wallner Conquered Kevin Gausman - Twins Daily - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Enhancing anatomy education with virtual reality: integrating three-dimensional models for improved learning efficiency and student satisfaction -... - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Season 22 Cast Updates: Just Two Actors Confirmed After Shocking Finale, Though 7 More Stars Have Deals to Return - Just Jared - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- S11E20: 5 Things You Should Know About Tactical Anatomy With Steve Moses - concealedcarry.com - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Airport security held Greys Anatomy star for an hour over snack - Yahoo - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Wine Walk: The anatomy of a wine bottle, its cork and how it is sealed - The Courier of Montgomery County - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- MSc grad reflects on learning and legacy in the anatomy lab - Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy star Ellen Pompeo says TSA detained her over sunflower seeds - Washington Times - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Cardiac Anatomy & Orientation of the 3D Heart Part 3 - University of Nebraska Medical Center - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Star Chris Carmack Teases Link and Jos Season 22 Storyline: Anything Can Happen - Life & Style - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Star Reveals Her Secret to Flying Under the Radar on Planes - EntertainmentNow - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- None of her preserved anatomy looked like any other fossil. Scientists Realize That A Fossil Thats Millions Of Years Old Was Fossilized From The... - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy star is fighting to get Denzel Washington on the show: 'Im hoping he does it' - GeekSided - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- No, Sandra Oh is not watching Greys Anatomy in her free time - GeekSided - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron the anatomy of a slap - The Spectator World - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Sandra Oh Reveals If She Watches Grey's Anatomy Reruns 11 Years Since Cristina Yang Left The Show - Screen Rant - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Fan-Favorite Greys Anatomy Star Sandra Oh Reveals Whether She Still Watches the Show or Not - Collider - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy: Why Did Sandra Oh Leave The Show? Revisiting Her Shocking Exit & Remarkable Legacy - Koimoi - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Warfare at night, deepfakes by day: The anatomy of a rumour in modern era conflicts - The Indian Express - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Hunk, 59, Turns Heads in Rare Monaco Outing With Wife - parade.com - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy season 22 confirmed to premiere in fall 2025 - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy season 21 finale: Where to watch for free tonight - MassLive - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Showrunner Meg Marinis Confirms Your Fears After That Explosive Cliffhanger Finale - The Hollywood Reporter - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' Recap: Did Firebomb Just Kill Off Lucas Adams, Teddy Altman, or Miranda Bailey? - TV Insider - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy season 22 will not introduce any major new additions: 'I have a big enough cast as it is' - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 8 Biggest Unanswered Questions & Mysteries After The Grey's Anatomy Season 21 Finale - Screen Rant - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Only 2 Grey's Anatomy characters are confirmed to be safe in season 22 - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy': Meredith Puts Herself in Harm's Way Once Again as a Hostage Situation Leaves Grey Sloan Reeling - People.com - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- This Greys Anatomy character death still remains the shows most gut-wrenching - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Anatomy Of A Perfect Trip Cybercaf Across The Algarve - Quartersnacks - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Why the Greys Anatomy Hospital Is Facing Another Bomb Threat in Season 21 Finale - E! Online - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Streaming Set Another Record In April, But Greys Anatomy And The White Lotus Prove Linears Reach, Nielsen Says - Deadline - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' Boss Answers the Biggest Questions From That Explosive Season Finale (Exclusive) - parade.com - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Season-Finale Recap: Explosions in the Sky - Vulture - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Boss Breaks Down That Explosive Season 21 Finale Cliffhanger, Merediths Surprising Decision - TheWrap - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy boss confirms one new star will return in season 22 - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Season 21 Finale Review: I Cant Believe The Show Pulled Off This Cliffhanger Reminiscent Of Its Glory Days - Screen Rant - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy Finale Preview: Chris Carmack Teases 'Be Afraid' - Us Weekly - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- ABC NEWS STUDIOS ANNOUNCES HEY BEAUTIFUL: ANATOMY OF A ROMANCE SCAM BEGINS STREAMING MAY 20, ONLY ON HULU - dgepress.com - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 5 Grey's Anatomy characters who might not return for season 22 after that fiery cliffhanger - GeekSided - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Explosion & Possible Character Deaths: Showrunner Explains Why Shes Doing This to Link & Jo - Just Jared - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' season 21 ending explained: Is Meredith returning to Grey Sloan for good? - Entertainment Weekly - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy Season 21 Finally Resolved Its Most Frustrating Plot In Limbo - Screen Rant - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy Season 21 Ending Explained: Amelia Survives A Near-Death Experience While Tragedy Strikes A Fan-Favorite - Screen Rant - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- James Pickens Jr. Says Every Day Is an Adventure on 'Greys Anatomy' (Exclusive) - People.com - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- The Doctor Is Out: Greys Anatomy Ends Season 21 With a Devastating Death - Yahoo - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Season 22 Cast: Only 2 Characters Confirmed Alive After Finale, Though 7 More Actors Have Deals to Return - Just Jared - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' Interview: James Pickens Jr. Reflects on Pilot and Reveals Season 22 Hopes (Exclusive) - TV Insider - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy tells fans to "brace yourself" for season finale that's as dramatic as this iconic episode - Digital Spy - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- I Can't Believe Grey's Anatomy Still Hasn't Told Us Who Adams' Mother Is - Cinemablend - May 21st, 2025 [May 21st, 2025]
- Katherine Heigl Shares Why She's Grateful Her Daughters Aren't Interested in Grey's Anatomy (Exclusive) - parade.com - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' Fans Are Just Realizing This Fun Fact About the Series That Affects All but 1 Episode - People.com - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- In a Nutshell: Turning anatomy education into online sensation - Ohio University - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- 'Grey's Anatomy' Gets Musical Again: Link Serenades Jo With Song at the Wedding Altar - TV Insider - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Boss Unpacks Jo and Links Momentous Wedding Song, Teases Bonkers Season 21 Finale - TheWrap - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Generating cervical anatomy labels using a deep ensemble multi-class segmentation model applied to transvaginal ultrasound images - Nature - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy creator Shonda Rhimes reveals the hardest death she had to write - Yahoo - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Katherine Heigl Reveals What 1 Medical Trick She Thinks She Could Still Do After Grey's Anatomy (Exclusive) - parade.com - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Season 21, Episode 17 Review: As A Long-Time Fan, I Loved This Romantic & Poignant Episode That Felt Like Classic Greys - Screen... - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- As One Greys Anatomy Couple Weds, Another Breaks Up and a Third Relationship Lands on Life Support - TVLine - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Every Wedding on Greys Anatomy , Ranked - Vulture - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- 'Greys Anatomy': Link Surprises Jo at Their Wedding, Owen Holds onto the Past and 1 Couple Calls It Quits - People.com - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Here comes the bride: Where to stream Greys Anatomy for FREE - PennLive.com - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Preview: Will Link and Jo I Do It Right On Their Wedding Day? Plus, [Spoiler]s Back - TVLine - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy boss reveals the disappointing reason Meredith missed Jo and Links wedding - GeekSided - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Anatomy Of Startup Governance Issues, Funding Zooms & More - StartupNews.fyi - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Shock: Lucas and Simone Split Will Fans Even Miss Them? - Decatur Metro - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- 9 Secrets of the Greys Anatomy Sets Superfans Need to Know - Architectural Digest - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy Continues to Ignore a Key Character's Storyline (& It's Frustrating Fans) - Comic Book Resources - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Jo & Link's Unique Wedding Set-Up Is Exactly Why Their Romance Works In Grey's Anatomy - Screen Rant - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Greys Anatomy creator Shonda Rhimes reveals the hardest death she had to write - The Independent - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy fans are just realizing clever aspect of 'every episode' after 20 years - The Mirror US - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Did the Success of The Substance and Anatomy of a Fall Finally Teach Cannes a Lesson? - IndieWire - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Grey's Anatomy fans floored after spotting 'hidden message' in every episode - Irish Star - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Anatomy of an apprehension: Where are you taking the baby? - Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows News - May 12th, 2025 [May 12th, 2025]
- Isaiah Washington Says Sandra Oh Brought Him Back on Greys Anatomy Years After Firing - E! Online - April 27th, 2025 [April 27th, 2025]