Genetics Research May Help Identify More Dangerous Strains of the Virus That Causes COVID-19 – SciTechDaily

Viral mutations during the COVID-19 pandemic could cause the SARS-CoV-2 virus to become more dangerous. A new study published inGenetic Epidemiologyhas examined the genetic code of SARS-CoV-2 viruses that have infected patients, looking for links between different mutations and patient deaths.

For the study, investigators analyzed 7,548 SARS-CoV-2 genomes of COVID-19 patients worldwide and looked for an association between genomic variants and mortality. In total, 29,891 locations in the viral genome were assessed.

One location was significantly linked with patient mortality. Mutations at this location cause changes in part of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which plays a key role in viral entry into host cells.

When, in the fall of 2020, we applied methodology from genome-wide association studies to COVID-19 genomes, we noticed one locus in the COVID-19 genomes from Brazil that was associated with mortality and that later became part of the definition of the P.1 strain from Brazil, said co-lead author Georg Hahn, PhD, of Harvard University. The P1. strain was behind a deadly COVID-19 surge in the Latin American country. Its more contagious and more resistant to antibodies than the original strain.

For more on this research, see Genome-Wide Association Studies Accurately Flag More Deadly COVID-19 Variants.

Referemce: Genome-wide association analysis of COVID-19 mortality risk in SARS-CoV-2 genomes identifies mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that colocalizes with P.1 of the Brazilian strain by Georg Hahn, Chloe M. Wu, Sanghun Lee, Sharon M. Lutz, Surender Khurana, Lindsey R. Baden, Sebastien Haneuse, Dandi Qiao, Julian Hecker, Dawn L. DeMeo, Rudolph E. Tanzi, Manish C. Choudhary, Behzad Etemad, Abbas Mohammadi, Elmira Esmaeilzadeh, Michael H. Cho, Jonathan Z. Li, Adrienne G. Randolph, Nan M. Laird, Scott T. Weiss, Edwin K. Silverman, Katharina Ribbeck and Christoph Lange, 22 June 2021, Genetic Epidemiology.DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22421

Read more:
Genetics Research May Help Identify More Dangerous Strains of the Virus That Causes COVID-19 - SciTechDaily

4 new weed products to try from Compound Genetics, Papa & Barkley, and more – Weedmaps News

With so many great cannabis brands releasing exciting new products in new markets, it can be hard to keep track of every release. So we're rounding up a few significant releases. This week, we look at releases by Insane, Kal, and more.

Insane just came out with a new strain available at all Dr. Greenthumb dispensaries in California. Stuffed French Toast is a cross between Paris OG and Faceoff OG, and appeals to the wake 'n' bake crowd with a flavor profile of cinnamon, pine, and orange, tasting just like the breakfast staple it was named after.

Available: California

California-based topicals brand Papa & Barkley just announced infused THC capsules to its lineup. The two-ingredient, whole-plant THC Releaf Capsules are made from coconut and cannabis oils and contain 25 to 50 milligrams of THC.

Available: California

Compound Genetics started dropping three strains at the June 26 grand opening of the Cookies Santa Ana location. These strains include Apples and Bananas, Gummiez, dropping on July 1, and Pav, which was made in collaboration with rapper Quavo.

Available: California

Kal will be dropping new flavors on July 2 in its seltzer line in time for summer. Each 12-ounce can of Kal contains 15 milligrams of hemp-derived CBD and 2 grams of sugar. The new flavors include black cherry, ruby red grapefruit, ginger lemonade, and blood orange mango.

Available: Nationwide

High Tales, a video series produced by Monogram, the cannabis line from Jay-Z, just dropped its latest episode featuring rapper Curren$y. The episode shows Curren$y's very own grilled-cheese recipe, along with weed-related stories he's experienced throughout his life and career.

Available: Nationwide

Featured image by Gina Coleman/Weedmaps

Hannah is a Seattle-based writer and editor. Shes worked in the cannabis industry for three years and continues to learn and explore.

More:
4 new weed products to try from Compound Genetics, Papa & Barkley, and more - Weedmaps News

These 12 individuals have a rare genetic quirk that prevents ‘self-eating’ in cells – Livescience.com

Scientists uncovered a rare genetic quirk in 12 people, from five different families, that leaves their cells unable to properly recycle their worn-out parts. Such mutations could be lethal, but these individuals have survived and instead live with neurodevelopmental conditions.

Normally, cells dispose of broken internal machinery, dysfunctional proteins, toxins and pathogens through a process called autophagy, which translates from Greek as "self-eating." In the process, cells package all their trash into special bags, called autophagosomes, which then fuse with the cell's garbage disposal, the lysosome. Lysosomes contain digestive enzymes that break down all the trash so that the component parts can be reused by the cell.

In humans, when autophagy goes awry, the subsequent buildup of cellular junk can contribute to various diseases, from neurodegenerative disorders to cancer, according to a 2020 report in the New England Journal of Medicine. This dysfunction can occur when mutations crop up in one of about 20 key genes involved in autophagy.

Related: 5 ways your cells deal with stress

And according to animal studies, if any of these 20 genes are severely impaired or completely disabled, it's usually impossible for the animal to survive. For instance, genetically modified mouse pups born without an essential autophagy gene called ATG7 die within 24 hours of birth, according to various reports. And deleting the same gene from adult mice causes them to die of infection or neurodegeneration within months, according to a 2014 report in the journal Cancer Discovery.

"The studies from mice suggest you can't live without them," meaning the 20 core genes, said senior author Robert Taylor, a professor of mitochondrial pathology at Newcastle University in England. "So, we thought that was the same in humans." But now, Taylor and his team have identified 12 people with defective ATG7 genes that leave them with little to none of the protein that the gene encodes, they reported June 23 in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM).

The ATG7 protein jumpstarts the process of building autophagosomes, the cell's special garbage bags, supposedly making it crucial to the entire autophagy process. The fact that the 12 identified individuals have survived, albeit with neurological disorders, "tells us something, that there is something that we don't know yet about autophagy biology that must be compensating for this process in humans," Taylor said.

"An obvious question is what allows these patients to survive so long with greatly diminished autophagic capacity?" said Daniel Klionsky, a cell biologist and professor at the University of Michigan's Life Sciences Institute, who was not involved in the study. If other mechanisms do compensate for the lack of ATG7, the next step is to identify them and determine whether those mechanisms can be manipulated as a form of treatment for such genetic disorders, Klionsky told Live Science in an email.

Since mutations in autophagy-related genes often have lethal consequences, "it is difficult to find an adequate number of patients to have meaningful results" when researching such genetic changes in humans, Klionsky noted. The fact that the team was able to find this number of people with ATG7 mutations "makes the findings more robust," he said.

The researchers found the first two study participants through a clinic that specializes in mitochondrial diseases, as some of their symptoms seemed consistent with mitochondrial conditions, Taylor said. The patients two sisters whose respective ages were 28 and 18 both showed mild-to-moderate learning difficulties, muscle weakness and a lack of coordination, known as ataxia, as well as hearing loss, eye abnormalities and facial dysmorphisms.

Brain scans taken of the elder sister revealed cerebellar hypoplasia, a condition where the cerebellum, located behind the brainstem, fails to develop properly. This region of the brain is critical for coordinating movement. The corpus callosum, a bundle of nerves that connects the two halves of the brain, also appeared unusually thin toward the back of the brain.

In seeing the shared symptoms between the sisters and striking brain scans from the eldest, "We realized that the best way to approach this was genetically, and we took it from there," Taylor said. The team found that both sisters carried recessive mutations in the ATG7 gene that greatly reduced or eliminated its ability to make ATG7 protein.

"And we thought, 'This can't be right,'" given the disastrous effects of ATG7 deficiencies seen in mice, Taylor said. "And yet we were able to show ... that actually, we can't detect ATG7 in the muscle [or] in the cells that we've grown from the first family." Hoping to better understand these counterintuitive results, the team went in search for more individuals with similar ATG7 mutations to the sisters.

Related: Genetics by the numbers: 10 tantalizing tales

"You can't make a compelling case with one family," whereas finding several families with the same combination of genetic mutations and clinical symptoms would strengthen their findings, Taylor said. "Then you start to kind of do the detective work that puts all this together and makes you think, 'We're onto something.'"

So the study's lead author Jack Collier, then a doctoral student in Taylor's lab, used an online tool called GeneMatcher to find the 10 other patients in the researchs cohort of 12. The tool, developed with support from the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics, is intended to connect patients, researchers and clinicians with an interest in the same genes.

Through GeneMatcher, the team identified four more families, located in France, Switzerland, Germany and Saudi Arabia. The family members who carried ATG7 mutations ranged from 6 weeks to 71 years in age and showed a similar suite of neurological symptoms, although the severity of the symptoms varied between individuals. In general, the patients showed neurodevelopmental deficits, facial dysmorphisms and ataxia. One or more patients from each family also underwent brain scans, and like the first patient, had underdeveloped cerebellums and thin corpus callosums.

In all but the first two patients, the team found some residual ATG7 protein in sampled muscle cells, as well as in fibroblasts cells in connective tissue that secrete collagen that the team grew from patient samples. And even in the first two sisters, some proteins involved in autophagy still cropped up in their cells, albeit in very low quantities. This hinted that the individuals' genetic mutations didn't completely suppress autophagy.

Looking closer at the mutations, the researchers found that each patient carried slightly different variations of the ATG7 gene, Taylor said. A mutation occurs when one DNA building block is swapped out for another, and the location of this swap along the DNA strand determines how the mutation will change the resulting protein. Using computer models, the team mapped out where all the patients' mutations appeared and found a general theme: The mutations cropped up in highly conserved portions of the DNA sequence, meaning they're usually the same across a wide range of organisms, from yeast to mice to humans.

In fact, the ATG7 gene is highly conserved in all eukaryotic cells the complex cells that make up animals, plants, fungi and protists. Because of this, the team could test how mouse and yeast cells were affected by the mutations seen in the human patients. In lab dish studies, the mutations reduced or eliminated autophagy in both mouse and yeast cells, strengthening the case that the same was happening in the human patients' bodies.

"It is difficult to carry out experiments with humans," Klionsky said. "Certainly, the inclusion of data from mouse and yeast studies makes the results much stronger."

Related: How to speak genetics: A glossary

That said, many questions about these mysterious mutations remain unanswered. Namely, how do people survive when their cells can't "eat themselves" through the usual means?

The cells must be dealing with dysfunctional proteins and broken machinery to some degree, "because accumulations of cellular 'junk' was not observed," Ian Ganley, a principal investigator whose lab studies autophagy at the University of Dundee in Scotland, wrote in a commentary in NEJM. This indicates that some other mechanism fills in for the lack of ATG7-related autophagy, Ganley wrote.

Identifying such mechanisms will be key to developing treatments to syndromes where autophagy is impaired, whether due to a genetic quirk as described in the new study or in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, he added. Such treatments could include drugs that boost the activity of these alternative mechanisms, helping cells to rid themselves of junk more efficiently, Taylor said. Another option could be gene therapy, where working copies of faulty autophagy genes are inserted into the genome to replace the mutant versions, Klionsky said.

For now, Taylor and his team plan to run experiments in cells to better understand how the mutations impact specific tissues, such as the brain and muscles, Taylor said. To this end, the team has already begun developing a line of induced pluripotent stem cells those that can mature into any cell in the body from patient samples. With those stem cells, the researchers can create fibroblasts and brain cells to see how the mutation impacts those cells.

"At the moment, we're still trying to understand some of the biology but want to do that in a relevant system," Taylor said. Only then can the team tackle the question of which potential treatments might be able to boost autophagy when it falters.

Originally published on Live Science.

See more here:
These 12 individuals have a rare genetic quirk that prevents 'self-eating' in cells - Livescience.com

Penn scientists correct genetic blindness with single injection into the eye – Big Think

This article was originally published on our sister site, Freethink.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have reversed a genetic form of blindness in a patient using just one course of antisense oligonucleotide therapy, Clinical OMICS reports.

The therapy, which takes aim at mutant RNA, was injected into the patient's eyes a year ago, in a trial treating Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). LCA predominantly affects the retina, leaving people with severely impaired vision from birth, according to the NIH.

The trial, held at the Scheie Eye Institute at Penn's Perelman School of Medicine, focused on using antisense oligonucleotide therapy to treat LCA patients with one of the disease's most common mutations.

Antisense oligonucleotide therapy works by altering the RNA, the messenger that carries instructions from your DNA to crank out proteins.

An article in Nature Reviews Neurology describes antisense oligonucleotides as "short, synthetic, single-strand" molecules, which can alter RNA to cause protein creation to be reduced, enhanced, or modified.

In the Penn study, the targeted protein was created by the mutated LCA gene.

The team, led by professors Artur V. Cideciyan and Samuel G. Jacobson, injected an antisense oligonucleotide (called sepofarsen) into the eyes of 11 patients.

In a previous study, according to Clinical OMICS, the team had shown that administering the therapy every three months increased the amount of the proper protein levels in 10 patient's eyes, improving their sight in daytime conditions.

But it's the experience of the eleventh patient that's the subject of their new paper, published in Nature Medicine.

That eleventh patient chose to receive only one course of sepofarsen and turned down the additional doses.

The patient had suffered from poor visual acuity, reduced fields of view, and zero night vision, Clinical OMICS reports, but after one shot, the patient showed remarkable improvement over the course of the next 15 months similar to people who got multiple, regular injections.

"Our results set a new standard of what biological improvements are possible with antisense oligonucleotide therapy in LCA caused by CEP290 mutations," Cideciyan told Clinical OMICS.

Interestingly, the effects of the shot had a delayed onset; while improvement was shown after one month, the gains peaked around three months later, the authors write. That slow uptake was unexpected, and it may hold insights into treating other diseases that impact retinal cell's cilia (aka, those little vibrating hairs), the physical cause of LCA.

Antisense oligonucleotide therapy may be effective because the tiny molecules can slip inside the cell's nucleus, but don't get swept out too quickly, so they can stick around until the job's done.

The therapy's success, and the unexpected success of a single injection, is inspiring other clinical trials.

"There are now, at least in the eye field, a series of clinical trials using antisense oligonucleotides for different genetic defects spawned by the success of the work in CEP290-associated LCA from Drs. Cideciyan and Jacobson," Joan O'Brien, chair of ophthalmology and director of the Scheie Eye Institute, told Clinical OMICS.

Multiple antisense therapies have already been approved by the FDA, particularly for neurological conditions, and have shown success in treating spinal muscular atrophy and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Per Neurology Genetics, antisense oligonucleotide therapy trials are currently being developed for Huntington's, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's disease, among others.

And now add genetic blindness to that list.

"This work represents a really exciting direction for RNA antisense therapy. It's been 30 years since there were new drugs using RNA antisense oligonucleotides," Jacobson told Clinical OMICS, "even though everybody realized that there was great promise for these treatments."

Related Articles Around the Web

Read the original:
Penn scientists correct genetic blindness with single injection into the eye - Big Think

Epigenetics The spirituality of genetics – The Financial Express

SHAERI NAWAR | Published: June 30, 2021 12:56:05

Imagine a twin - Rahim and Karim. One day they visited a festival where Karim got lost and had ever since lived on the roadside. Rahim grew up in a stable normal family household while Karim grew up with less stability, less access to nutritious food and education but more laborious activity.

Forty years later, Rahim unexpectedly found his long lost sibling. More than the reunion with his brother, what shocked Rahim was the fact that his twin brother was not like him. Karim was shorter than him, had a deeper voice and no longer suffered from any genetically inherited disease that they both had in childhood.

As the traits are genetically inherited, Rahim decided to consult a genetic scientist. The scientist studied their genetic code and found that their DNA is exactly the same as it used to be when they were born. However, it turns out that they dont just look different but they actually have become genetically different just by living in different conditions despite having the same genetic codes. This is where epigenetics comes in the picture.

Epigenetics is the study of how the environment influences our genetic makeup. According to the national public health agency of the United States, The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC,) it is the study of how your behaviours and environment can cause changes that affect the way your genes work. Unlike genetic changes, epigenetic changes are reversible and do not change your DNA sequence, but they can change how your body reads a DNA sequence.

An example can help to understand it better. Say, our genome is a paragraph and all of the letters and punctuations would be in the exact same order and give the paragraph a meaning. Now keeping the letters in the same order while shuffling the punctuations would potentially change the message of the paragraph for a reader. Similarly, no cell of the body will be able to read and follow the instructions in the DNA sequence as it results in epigenetic changes. Epigenetics literally means above genetics where a change is evident without a physical change in the DNA sequence.

What causes epigenetic changes?

Diet, physical activity, smoking, environmental pollutants, family relationships, psychological stress, working on night shifts, financial status and many more are the core causes of epigenetic changes.

How epigenetics works

The genetic mechanism of epigenetics is quite complex following a cascade of biological reactions. Nonetheless, a simplified explanation for the curious minds has been presented.

Genes act as the switch that controls everything our body does. Specific genes are there to do specific functions and show specific traits. This genetic switch needs to be turned on or off in order for a gene to work. This turning on/off phenomenon is controlled by a chemical (a methyl group) being added or removed from that gene. This phenomenon is called DNA methylation. For example, a gene that is normally supposed to remain off and if a methyl group is added to turn the gene on, then that could result in epigenetic changes.

The placebo effects

Placebo is a substance or treatment, based on the idea that our brain can convince our body into accepting a fake treatment and thus having a cure somewhat. But have you ever pondered about the mechanism behind it? How does a supposedly fake treatment magically improve health like real ones? Many would answer it happens because we are conditioned to think that we are getting treated which is partially correct.

Our thoughts influence the level of our hormones which run some of the brain functions. The brain sends signals to the cell to function in a certain way. The cell signals to switch a gene on or off to carry the cellular function. As a result, it all comes down to the regulation of the genetic switch. The bottom line is that our mind-body connection is reinforced by epigenetics.

For instance, the genome is the actual hardware of the computer (your body), then epigenome is more like the software which tells the hardware what to do even though the genome is going to do all the work. The fact is that you can influence your genetic expression.

Interestingly, epigenetic characteristics are passed on to children from parents as well. If somebody is a chain smoker, thats bad for the individual but it is thought that he wouldnt necessarily be harming his unborn child in any measurable way. However, this idea is changing pretty rapidly because some of the epigenetic information get stuck on the genomes and are passed from generation to generation. So, if you are a chain smoker, chances are your kids would have more affinity towards smoking than a non-smokers kid.

Epigenetic anomalies

Over the last few decades, numerous scientific studies have been conducted to decode the science behind male infertility. As a matter of fact, the valid cause behind the mechanism of more than 50 per cent of male infertility cases is unknown. Owing to this concern, a number of studies have been conducted, which have inferred that the abnormal methylation of the sperm is highly correlated with male infertility.

Also, epigenetic changes are now considered as one of the hallmarks of many cancers. Disruption of epigenetic processes can lead to altered gene function and transform cells causing malignancies and cancer.

However, as the old saying goes, the cure lies in the problem. Epigenetics both causes and cures cancer. In a study published in the Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, it has been found that methylation that takes place in tissues and that is non-cancerous acts as a signal to identify the risk of tumour formation. So, this is emerging as a target for cancer prevention.

Epigenetic drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved seven epigenetic drugs for the treatment of haematological malignancies or cancer. Some of these drugs have been acquired from the enzymes that function during epigenetic occurrences.

All in all, from being the cause of some potential diseases and cure of some, epigenetics has enormous advantages. It gives one the power to shape oneself and as a matter of fact, soon epigenetics would be the personalised healthcare tool for individuals.

Shaeri Nawar is a life science researcher. He is currently a research fellow at Asian Network for Research on Antidiabetic Plants (ANRAP). E-mail: [emailprotected]

View original post here:
Epigenetics The spirituality of genetics - The Financial Express

Study shows genetic link to age of first sex, childbirth – New Zealand Herald

Lifestyle

1 Jul, 2021 11:24 PM2 minutes to read

You might think that your first time was linked to a number of factors, such as love, lust, morality or social mores.

But new research has revealed that the age we lose our virginity may actually be tied to our unique genetic code.

An international team of scientists, led by Oxford University and including input from New Zealand, found 371 regions of our DNA that influence milestones such as when we first have sex and have our first baby, both for women and men.

"This is one of these studies where you wonder, did my genes make me do it?" Andrew Shelling, head of the University of Auckland's Medical Genetics Research Group, told The AM Show.

Shelling also revealed that environmental factors do play a bigger part, saying: "Just because they found a correlation with a gene doesn't mean to say that's going to cause us to have sex at an earlier age than anyone else."

The study's leader, Professor Melinda Mills at the Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science at the University of Oxford, said that the research could have wide-ranging implications.

"Age at first sexual intercourse and age at first birth have implications for health and evolutionary fitness. We anticipate that our results will address important interventions in infertility, teenage sexual and mental health," she said.

Professor Mills told the Daily Mail that the study shows an "interaction of both nature and nurture".

According to a 2016 survey by condom makers Durex, New Zealand had one of the youngest average ages of first sex in the countries surveyed.

Kiwis had an average age of 17.5, compared to 18.4 in the US and 21.2 in China.

30 Jun, 2021 09:46 PMQuick Read

1 Jul, 2021 03:32 AMQuick Read

1 Jul, 2021 10:10 PMQuick Read

25 May, 2021 10:50 PMQuick Read

Brazil 17.3 New Zealand 17.5 Germany 17.8 UK 18.3 US 18.4 Canada 18.5 France 18.7 Ireland 18.7 Mexico 19.1 Spain 19.5 Japan 20.4 China 21.2 India 22.5 Malaysia 23.7

However, an earlier study from a Kiwi sex toy retailer showed that our sexual confidence doesn't peak until our late 20s, spiking again in our early 50s.

Original post:
Study shows genetic link to age of first sex, childbirth - New Zealand Herald

Daniel M Davis: Unbelievable things will come from biological advances – The Guardian

Daniel M Davis is a professor of immunology at the University of Manchester. He has published over 130 academic papers and two lauded popular science books, The Compatibility Gene and The Beautiful Cure. His third, The Secret Body, describes the forthcoming revolution in human health.

As an immunologist, when you overhear conversations about antibodies or T-cells in the pub (when regulations permit), is it pleasing to you that these aspects of science have entered the public domain?Many terrible things have happened because of this pandemic, but the science of viruses and infections has come right to the foreground. As an immunologist I always thought my subject was quite important, but right now its become blatantly clear to everyone how critical it is to understand how the immune system works and how viruses evolve, and how infections spread between people. Without that deep understanding there wouldnt have been progress in creating vaccines and many, many, many more people would have died.

Particularly at the beginning of the pandemic there were lots of stories in the media about what you could do to boost your immune system. As an immunologist does that make you groan a little?I do understand where it comes from. Even before the pandemic, if I gave a public talk, that was the question I would get asked the most. Essentially, we dont really know the answer because an experiment isolating a food or supplement to see if it boosted your immune system is really hard to do. The only thing most scientists would agree on which does affect the ability of your immune system to respond to an infection is stress. And theres a molecular level of understanding of why that is: because when you are stressed the cortisol levels in your blood go up and that quietens down the immune system because you divert energy to the fight-or-flight response. So if you have chronic stress you may have a long-term quieting of the immune system, which could be a problem. My message would be to be very sceptical of anything which makes a claim to boost your immune system.

At degree and PhD level, you studied physics. What led you to pivot to the outer reaches of the cosmos to our insides?As a young kid I always wanted to be a scientist. And in my youth physics felt to me like it was the most fundamental science. It was science about rules that work across the whole universe motion and gravity, electromagnetic waves thats why I should study it. But as I got older I really felt that life was more fundamental and that understanding life is perhaps most special. Moreover, physics is a very mature science.

You felt you could make a bigger contribution to biology?There are so many questions that just instantly catapult you to the frontier of biology. In biology were at that point where everything is kicking off in a big way. Unbelievable things are going to come about because of the biological advances that are happening now. In the same way that early 19th-century physics led to the internet, biology now will lead to, I dont know what its just going to be insane.

Last month a study was published about a baby in San Diego who was admitted to neonatal intensive care with unexplained symptoms. His genome was sequenced and within 43 hours, a gene defect had been diagnosed, treatment ordered and symptoms resolved. How commonplace can this therapy become?Yes, this is surely going to be a part of medical practice more and more. In fact, I think all sorts of new ways to analyse our health will eventually come online. Not tomorrow, but in years or decades to come. For example, microbiome compositions might one day be used to help diagnosis of any number of illnesses. Small packets of proteins and fat molecules called exosomes, which circulate in our blood, as well as circulating cell-free DNA, are less well understood right now, but they too are likely to vary across different states of health and disease, and might be used diagnostically in the future. How about analysis of breath or the sweat from the palms of hands? This is science fiction right now, but it is the direction of travel.

Does the future of personalised medicine depend on context and regulation, ie whether youre a patient in an insurance-based system or how much you trust the authorities with your genomic data?I think this is very important. To be honest, its not that I know the answers, its just that I know we should be talking about it. Across all the different aspects of the human body, its clear that everything is kicking off and we are soon going to be exposed to all sorts of difficult personal decisions. I think that whatever legislation is in place or wherever you live, each of us will need to decide for ourselves if and when to use new science thats available to us. Again, not tomorrow but sometime in the future. For example, would you want to take personal nutritional advice from an algorithm that has analysed the components of your own stool and blood?

What makes you think individuals will act on these insights? Broadly speaking, we all know its good for our health to exercise, drink less, eat wholefoods and so on, but many people dont bother.That is true, but as things get more detailed, it will have an effect. For example, lots of people diet to try to lose weight, but if it became clear that a personalised diet plan based on analysis of your microbiome and other aspects of your body was more effective, people would consider that path.

Quite a lot of data about our potential health outcomes are already accessible through something like a 23andMe genetic test. However, some people would rather not know about their chances of developing Alzheimers disease and all the rest of it. Do you sympathise with that position?It comes down to where the knowledge is. With a lot of things, it doesnt help you to know because theres not much you can do about it. Famously, Angelina Jolie had a mastectomy on the basis of BRCA1 mutation, but she had relatively clear facts from which to make a decision.

Most other things are a bit too fuzzy to make clear decisions about. But it is going to come. There will be an onslaught of information about ourselves as knowledge progresses and people are going to have difficult decisions to make about their own lives. This is where were heading, but at the moment its a bit fuzzy.

On one hand The Secret Body is about scientists making insights and identifying mechanisms, but its also about scientists inventing new instruments to see what was previously obscured. Is there a fantasy instrument which would advance your own work?Because of my background in physics, one of the things that enabled me to make inroads in the immune system was to use high-powered microscopes to look at immune cells interacting. The super-resolution microscope we have now is a complete dream compared to what we had 20 years ago. The next level would be to see a molecular view of the immune system within the human body. A lot of the high-powered microscopes I use inside my lab are restricted to looking at cells interacting with each other in a dish.

Many of the breakthroughs you describe come about through chance meetings between scientists at conferences. Are you worried that, post-pandemic, these kinds of expensive events involving lots of air travel will be less likely to happen? Can serendipity occur on Zoom?I think about that a lot because, personally, Im not a great fan of travelling around to conferences, because you miss your family, its exhausting and bad for the environment. Yet it is definitely true that an informal face-to-face interaction is where things spark. So Im hoping the technology could improve. Surely some type of virtual reality headset can put me in a conference situation. Certainly you cant get a lot of banter on Zoom.

The Secret Body by Daniel M Davis is published by The Bodley Head (20). To support the Guardian and Observer, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Read this article:
Daniel M Davis: Unbelievable things will come from biological advances - The Guardian

New immunotherapy treatment for cancer patients is more effective and less dangerous – News-Medical.Net

Cell toxicity during immunotherapy is a major limitation to cancer treatment, but researchers are now able to isolate harmful cell reactions with a renewed potential to offer treatment without side effects.

Immunotherapy. Image Credit: Lightspring/Shutterstock.com

Despite immunotherapy rapidly advancing the field of cancer treatment, inflammatory reactions in healthy tissues frequently trigger side effects that lead to the permanent discontinuation of treatment. Indeed, the treatment is based on massive stimulation of the immune system but does not proceed without consequences as cell populations suffer from toxic effects.

This induced toxicity remains poorly understood, but scientists from the University of Geneva (UNIGE), Switzerland, and Harvard Medical School, United States, have succeeded in establishing a breakthrough to distinguish deleterious from beneficial cells produced during the immune reaction.

"When the immune system is activated so intensively, the resulting inflammatory reaction can have harmful effects and sometimes cause significant damage to healthy tissue", stated Mikal Pittet, holder of the ISREC Foundation Chair in Onco-Immunology at UNIGE Faculty of Medicine Department of Pathology and Immunology and Centre for Translational Research in Onco-Haematology.

Therefore, we wanted to know if there are differences between a desired immune response, which aims to eliminate cancer, and an unwanted response, which can affect healthy tissue. The identification of distinctive elements between these two immune reactions would indeed allow the development of new, more effective and less toxic therapeutic approaches."

The study, published in the journal Science Immunology, showed that cell populations could be distinguished based on whether they were deleterious immune reactions or those targeting tumor cells that are sought after. Such findings may provide more accurate and more effective treatments whilst minimizing the harmful by-products incurred during immunotherapy.

Researchers used samples from liver biopsies from patients who had suffered such toxic reactions to study the cellular and molecular mechanisms causing such reactions.

During immunotherapy, macrophage and neutrophil populations appear to be the two main cell types responsible for attacking healthy tissue but are not involved in killing targeted cancer cells. Dendritic cells are also not involved in attacking healthy tissue but are essential cell types for eliminating cancer cells.

"Immunotherapies can trigger the production of specialized proteins that alert the immune system and trigger an inflammatory response, explains Mikal Pittet. In a tumor, these proteins are welcome because they allow the immune system to destroy cancerous cells. In healthy tissue, however, the presence of these same proteins can lead to the destruction of healthy cells. The fact that these inflammatory proteins are produced by such different cells in tumors and healthy tissue is, therefore, an interesting finding."

However, the cell types involved differ in density as dendritic cells are very rare whereas macrophages and neutrophils are much more common, this is a key indication as to which cells may be responsible for unwanted cell damage. Importantly, some macrophages contained within organs do not necessarily inhibit inflammation but, when stimulated by immunotherapies they trigger a harmful inflammatory response in the healthy tissue where they reside, thus explaining why toxicity can affect different organs.

The production of inflammatory proteins by macrophages when activated by drugs then activates neutrophils in turn, which execute the harmful toxic reaction. This chain of reaction is a key process to the inflammatory response and induced cell toxicity observed in immunotherapy.

Mikal Pittet suggests "This opens the possibility of limiting immunotherapy's side effects by manipulating neutrophils".

By testing this loophole in mice, the researchers were able to short-circuit this process using inhibitors that negate the action of factors produced by neutrophils. These inhibitors are already being used to modulate the immune response in people with arthritis and could perhaps be useful in inhibiting the toxic effects of neutrophils during immunotherapy.

Furthermore, inhibiting neutrophils could be a more effective way to fight cancer: in addition to triggering a toxic response, some of these cells also promote tumor growth. Thus, by managing to control them, we could have a double beneficial effect: overcome the toxicity in healthy tissues, and limit the growth of cancerous cells"

Mikal Pittet

See original here:
New immunotherapy treatment for cancer patients is more effective and less dangerous - News-Medical.Net

The outing of science – TT Newsday

Commentarymarinasb57 Minutes Ago -

When I worked as a BBC programme producer, I became deeply aware of the disconnect between science and the people. In the BBCs vast array of programmes, science and scientists seemed to be in a box of their own. They lived in ivory towers, impervious to humankind, who one might imagine were supposed to be the beneficiaries of their work and great minds.

The huge ructions that took place at that time, staged by animal-rights groups which had turned to extreme violence in protest over the use of animals in laboratory testing, started winkling scientists out and making them accountable for their work. The men in white coats resisted but could not withstand the onslaught.

The BBCs science programmes were then mainly weekly magazine formats with short, interesting exposes of scientific developments, such as Science Now or a programme on medicine or stargazing. All very interesting but safe stuff.

The protests changed that by making scientists and their work big news stories. Yet, when I tried, in my BBC capacity, to encourage scientists to take part in wide-ranging discussion programmes, they recoiled so unused were they to being in an environment where the talk was about more than science.

One scientist declined my invitation, explaining that a scientists place was in the laboratory, not holding forth in public arenas. He may not have meant that it was a time-waster mixing it up with people who were challenged to understand what he said. And I cannot imagine what he thought about me telling him that his work had no relevance if it stayed in the lab.

However, through the strategic featuring of reputable scientists with a broader view of the role of the scientist in society, we gradually made others see the merits of wider communication.

In the late 1980s, Miroslav Holub helped break the ice. A wonderfully charming man, he was a Czech immunologist whose poetry casually revealed the influence of his scientific knowledge and was as much admired as his scientific work.

He would never have imagined being as famous as Dr Fauci, the immunologist and chief medical adviser to the US President whom Donald Trump tried to discredit and instead made into a household name, but, in fact, had Holub been around now, he would have brought much to the debate and be the living proof of the benefits of an open approach to science. Because of his intellectual breadth he thought boldly about immunology, and his ideas have gained new currency, according to his fellow Czech immunologists.

People educated when I was all had to come to terms with CP Snows analysis that the western world was divided into two cultures: science and the arts. Himself a physicist, Snow critiqued the complete ignorance about scientific ideas amongst even the most highly educated who commonly regarded scientists as illiterate.

And it is true, few people who could look at a Picasso painting and be moved by it considered it relevant to be awed by the wonder of a scientific theory, when in fact art and science, although often polarised, are two elemental parts of the human experience.

The fault is that we were educated to consider art as of and for the people, and science the opposite. Science was for nerds and the arts were for those not bright enough to study it.

Alas, some of this thinking still prevails in schools in TT. A young relative in a prestige school and with a bent for science not so long ago brushed off my entreaties to read a novel, assuring me that he had no need of that.

My programme trail blazed with fruitful discussions about the two cultures divide and might include David Attenborough, whose nature films played a major role in proving that we all belong to the same wondrous world, and Ernst Gombrich, author of The Story of Art, the great classic. People who had split the atom and those who had won Nobel prizes for literature exchanged ideas on air, or the biographer Brenda Maddox who reclaimed overlooked female scientists, and perhaps David Hockney, with his extraordinarily broad view of life, would have a conversation about exclusion or about Darwin. The audience rocketed and we helped turn the tide.

Today, scientists populate all manner of mainstream broadcasting in the UK and elsewhere and are keen to listen to the views and concerns of non-scientists as much as give insights into their own work.

A 2014 UK Public Attitudes to Science Survey revealed that two-thirds of respondents had experienced a science-related leisure or cultural activity and were just as likely to attend a non-science related cultural event. Londons Science Museum attendees are just as interested in the arts as science, its 2017 survey showed. The rise of health science, space travel and the internet have helped popularize science.

The pandemic has brought it more out of the woodwork still. Holub would be amazed that the man in the street now argues about immunology and has a theory of his very own.

Original post:
The outing of science - TT Newsday

WellNow Allergy is launched to bring ease and flexibility to testing and immunotherapy, can follow up in Batavia – The Batavian

Press release:

BUFFALOWellNow Allergy, an affiliate of leading urgent care providerWellNow Urgent Care, is now accepting patients in Western New York to provide allergy sufferers of all ages with convenient, on-demand access to allergy testing and immunotherapy (also known as allergy shots).

Children and adults interested in seeing an allergist to diagnose and treat their environmental allergies can schedule an initial appointment with same-day allergy test with Dr. Jeanne Lomas, director of Allergy & Immunology, at WellNow AllergysClarenceorOrchard Parkcenters.

Follow-up allergy shots, if needed, can be scheduled at any of WellNow Urgent Cares 17 locations in Western New York, including one in Batavia at4189 Veterans Memorial Drive, Batavia. It is open from 8 a.m. 8 p.m. Same-day PCR* Results Testing Time: 2:20 p.m. Tests administered after this time will return results within 24 hours.

There is a critical need for easier access to allergy services in the United States, as the number of board-certified allergists currently represents only a small fraction of all practicing physicians.

In Western New York, one of the most allergic and asthmatic regions in the country, the shortage of allergy doctors and clinics has become particularly pronounced as incidences of environmental allergies and asthma continue to rise year over year.

Allergy patients in Western New York typically face an average six-week wait to see an allergy doctor with little flexibility to cancel or change appointments if needed, and to schedule immunotherapy visits at times that dont interfere with work, school and everyday life.

Allergies and asthma are on the rise, especially in the Western New York region, and unfortunately, so is the time it takes for patients to actually see an allergist, said John Radford, M.D., president at WellNow Urgent Care.

Theres a clear need for better access, convenience and ease when it comes to allergy diagnosis and treatment. Were excited to deliver a better experience to patients suffering from allergy symptoms, and were thrilled to welcome Dr. Jeanne Lomas to lead our allergy service.

Lomas attended the University at Buffalo for undergraduate studies and completed her medical degree at Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine in Erie. She completed her pediatric residency, chief residency and allergy fellowship training at the University of Rochester.

Most recently, she held a dual appointment at the University of Rochester in the department of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology as well as the department of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology. During her time at the University of Rochester, Lomas treated both adult and pediatric patients and served as clinical director for Pediatric Allergy & Immunology and co-director of the Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) program.

"A six-week wait to see an allergist is simply unacceptable, especially when proper diagnosis and treatment of allergies can make such a significant impact on a patient's quality of life," Lomas said. "That's why I'm so proud to introduce WellNow Allergy. Our patients can go online to schedule an appointment with us within three weeks.

"Even more important, perhaps, is that patients needing allergy shots will have the option to go to any WellNow Urgent Care center across Western New York, on a day and at a time that first their schedule."

During the initial visit and consultation, allergy patients will meet with Dr. Lomas to complete a skin test, sometimes known as a scratch test, to identify what environmental allergies they may have.

Based on the results of their allergy test, patients will receive and review a personalized, comprehensive treatment plan. At this time WellNow tests for and treats seasonal and environmental allergies, including common indoor and outdoor allergens such as tree and grass pollens, mold, dust and pets.

Following the initial consultation and first allergy shots, patients can select the times andWellNow locationsthat are most convenient for them to continue their immunotherapy.

For more information about WellNow Allergy, including locations, hours of operation and insurances accepted, visitWellNow.com/Allergy.

*PCR -- polymerase chain reaction

See original here:
WellNow Allergy is launched to bring ease and flexibility to testing and immunotherapy, can follow up in Batavia - The Batavian