Jaicy Elliot of ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ on Season 16 Picking Back Up – Cheddar

How "For the People's" Cast Got Up to Speed on Legal Jargon

She's made the medical, political, and educational worlds steamier than anyone could have ever imagined, now Shonda Rhimes is taking on the legal industry with her new show, "For the People." Stars Ben Rappaport and Susannah Flood join Cheddar, and tell us about the most interesting real trials they observed to prepare for their TV roles.

More:
Jaicy Elliot of 'Grey's Anatomy' on Season 16 Picking Back Up - Cheddar

Three Ways To Warm Up Sales Leads Using The Power Of Reciprocity – Forbes

When sales prospects are unresponsive, you can exploit a well-known cognitive bias to warm them up. Called reciprocity, this societal rule has governed human behavior for millennia and was (and still is) fundamental to our survival as a species.

Celebrated psychologist Robert Cialdini describes reciprocity as a situation where I am obligated to give back to you a form of behavior that you first give to me.

Reciprocity, therefore, plays to our ideas of fairness. If someone buys you a coffee, youll feel obliged to buy them one in return. To do otherwise would violate a societal norm.

The same thing applies to business. Give a prospect something of value, and theyll feel obliged to return the favor perhaps in agreeing to meet you or try your product even if the gift in question is unwanted or unsolicited.

Todays world is noisy. To sell, you need a sharp tool to cut through the chaos. Cold emailing is still useful, but less so, with some response rates as low as 1.7%. Cold calling fares a little better at 2%, perhaps because its harder to reject or ignore a person. With such high demand for your prospects attention, how can you harness reciprocity to warm up leads and boost responses?

Here are three examples:

Mail them something.

People love receiving personal, handwritten mail. Think of the last time you received a postcard or thank-you note remember that warm, fuzzy feeling it gave you? In a world of smartphones and digital marketing, the personal touch is often neglected. Americans receive just 10 items of personalized mail a year, despite it being one of the most thoughtful and endearing ways to communicate.

Mailing your prospects a handwritten, personalized letter or card will make them feel good. Theyll become warm and receptive to you.

Dont believe me? Direct mail has made a comeback: Responses average around 9% for subscribers and have been increasing every year since 2003. This is partly due to its novelty, but also the reciprocal response to the pleasure of receiving something through the mail.

Of course, you need to send something meaningful and personal. Otherwise, theyll simply see it as another piece of junk mail.

Importantly, avoid asking for more than the perceived value of the letter in return. Otherwise, you risk inducing the opposite effect. Its a good way to invite a call, for example, but dont use it to ask a stranger to hand over their cash.

Gift them something personal.

Salespeople have been employing this technique for years. Think of the fragrance and shampoo samples in fashion magazines, or the cocktail-stick testers given away in food stores. Businesses hope that giving you something relevant for free will make you feel obligated to buy. Its a simple tactic, but it works: Gifting can increase response rates by 17%.

Personalization amplifies this effect. If your prospect has been tweeting about a Lakers game, send them some team merchandise. If they recently came back from vacation in Napa Valley, send them a bottle of wine from the region. The initial cost might be higher than, say, a handwritten note, but thats the point. A personal gift induces a much stronger reciprocal response and, in turn, a warmer lead.

Of course, you dont need to stalk your prospects. Just a little background info is enough even something simple like their hometown or alma mater will generate ideas. Remember, the more personal the gift, the higher the perceived value, because people, even those in business, love to be recognized as individuals.

Send them some swag.

Swag is an ordinary item with a brand emblazoned upon it. Offices all over the world even homes are filled with swag. From notepads to keyrings, beermats to water bottles, swag can be almost anything it all. Its usually low-cost, mass-produced stuff, given away for free or handed out at promotional events.

Is it effective?

Well, the industry is worth around $17.4 billion. So all those little gifts that clutter homes and offices around the world must be doing something right. And smart or unique swag, like the Land Rover Escape key, provides utility as well as subtly reinforcing your brands selling points.

Swag works because it appeals to everyone. Whos going to throw away a notepad or pen? Swags value lies in its immediate, universal utility. Its cheap and effective, and it might be the key to opening conversations with your sales leads.

Reciprocity is fundamental in business. Be kind, generous and interested in your prospects, and you can expect the same behavior in return (most of the time).

While no reciprocal strategy guarantees a response, its certainly better than cold calling or emailing alone. So next time your prospects go cold, see if the power of reciprocity warms them up.

Read the rest here:
Three Ways To Warm Up Sales Leads Using The Power Of Reciprocity - Forbes

Australia’s Wildfire Catastrophe Isn’t the New Normal. It’s Much Worse Than That. – Mother Jones

One of the most prominent scientists studying climate change is Michael Mann, a climatologist and atmospheric science professor at Penn State University who has been a leader in explaining the contribution that human behavior has made in creating and exacerbating the climate crisis. He was one of the scientists who created the hockey stick graph, a popular visualization of mean global temperatures of the past several centuries, showing a sudden jump starting in the 20th century.

During his sabbatical year, Mann decided to visit Australia to study the effects of climate change on the scene of bleaching coral reefs and extreme weather events. He didnt plan for his visit to coincide with the catastrophic wildfires, but hes now found himself at what he calls the front lines.

There is no precedent for the scale and speed at which these brushfires are spreading, Mann tells the Mother Jones Podcast. Its almost like were being given a vision for our future if we dont act on climate.

To better understand the forces behind this seasons fires, Mother Joness James West, who happens to be Australian, spoke with Mann for this weeks edition of Mother Jones Podcast:

Since September, the combination of soaring temperatures and a severe drought has triggered wildfires across Australia that have enveloped more than six times the land burned during Californias devastating 2018 wildfire season. The current blazes encompass an areaabout the size of Scotland and have released an estimated 200 million tons of carbon dioxideequivalent to about 40 percent of the countrys annual average carbon emissionsinto the atmosphere above the state of New South Wales, where the fires have been the most devastating. With more than 100 separate fires still burning, the end isnt anywhere in sight. Some estimates have wildfires continuing for months into 2020.

The consequences are only starting to be tallied: At least 25 people have been killed, and about 3,000 military personnel have mobilized to assist in the evacuation of about 100,000 residents across NSW and Victoria. The toll on the ecosystem remains less clear, but a widely reported estimate puts the number of wildlife killed at 480 million, not including frogs, bats, or insects.

Meanwhile, the Australian government is led by conservative Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who has deep ties to the coal industry and a history of indifference toward climate change. His government, critics say, belatedlyhas allocated $1.4 billion to fire recovery efforts, buttressed with a promise that whatever it costs, we will ensure the resilience and future of this country. For many Australians, the fire has diminished the value of the prime ministers wordhes been criticized for vacationing in Hawaii while the wildfires were in full force in December. During public appearances, hecklers havent minced words, calling him an idiot. Morrisons indecisive behavior on the fires flies in the face of the scientific assessment that climate change has been a major contributor to their intensity.

A transcript of theMother Jones Podcast interview has been edited for clarity and length below:

Michael Mann, thanks for joining the Mother Jones Podcast. Now it just happens that youre in Australia. Tell us why.

Im going to be doing research here with some other climate scientists at the University of New South Wales trying to understand the linkages between climate change and extreme weather. Of course, Ive arrived at a time when Australia is seeing unprecedented extreme weather. Its a tragedy whats playing out here. And yet it feels oddly fortuitous that Im here on the front lines to observe and talk about it.

This is like a real-life everyday laboratory for you to see this extreme, unprecedented event take place.

Absolutely. Its one thing to make model projections and study data, but its something else when you see it up front, playing out in real time. Australia may soon break new all-time records [for heat]. Its not going to help that wildfires continue to spread across this continent.

Well get to this science in more detail in a moment, but I just wanted to get what you saw and what you felt when you were in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney, somewhere Im really familiar with. As a kid Id go there quite a lot. You were there, and what did you see?

We were saddened to arrive, expecting to see these remarkable vistas, this expanse of temperate rainforest thats framed by these ridges and mountains in the background. And the bluish tinge comes from the so-called terpenes,chemicals that are emitted from the eucalyptus trees that actually absorb and scatter light in a particular way that gives it sort of this bluish tint. But all we saw was brown smoke looking down into the valleys.

It was surreal to arrive at this. Now, there is a postscript. The morning that we were getting ready to leave, the wind directions shifted and we actually did finally get those views. But most of the time, we were looking at brown smoke rather than Blue Mountains.

Is there a sense in your science that some weather predictions are a bit broken because the fires themselves are creating weather? Are we in uncharted territory?

Thats right. There are surprises in store and theyre not going to be welcome. One of the things we worry about is sort of a tipping point.

You cross this threshold where you enter into this new regime of catastrophic wildfire. There is the possibility that there are processes playing out in nature that arent actually contained within our models. You allude to one, the fact that these wildfires can actually create their own weather and feedback on themselves.

You get these towering pyrocumulus clouds that produce thunder and lightning, but theyre actually created by heating from the fire beneath the atmosphere. And those lightning strikes can beget additional fires. Theres the very real possibility that we are under-predicting with our current models how bad things can actually get, because some of these things cascade. All of a sudden, things get far worse because a whole new set of processes enters the playing field. These are what keep us up at night as climate scientists who care about the impact of climate change.

I have people in my Twitter mentions who are basically saying its the drought. Australia is indeed in a historic drought. Its devastatingits drier than Ive ever seen it. And that cannot be separated from climate. Am I right on that?

We cant isolate. We cant just say, Hey, its in drought. People get bogged down with all this stuff and misattribute the problem: Its just nature behaving the way it behaves. But thats not true because these processes have been in operation for decades and centuries and millennia, and yet we have never witnessed the sorts of catastrophic impacts that were seeing right now. Yes, there is natural variability in the system that can cause Australia to be drier at some times or wetter at other times. But those natural variations are riding on a steady ramp of warming and drying. And its that steady ramp thats leading us to ever more extreme drought patterns.

Politics isnt too far away, particularly in Australia. Youve been doing media conversations and reflecting on the political reality in Australia. What are some of your top-line thoughts on that?

There are parallels and differences here relative to the United States when it comes to the politics of climate change. Of course, we have a [US] president who literally denies that climate change is real. Hes dismissed it as a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese and is doing everything to dismantle all of the progress that weve made on climate. Here things are a little more subtle. The current prime minister, Scott Morrison, is not really a climate change denier. [Hes] not literally dismissing the reality of climate change, but dismissing its significance.

Australia has basically joined Russia and the United States under Trump and Saudi Arabia and a small number of petroleum states who stand against the will of the rest of the world. [They] literally tried to sabotage the latest international climate negotiations in Madrid. Australia under this administration is certainly not demonstrating good faith when it comes to the international efforts to act on climate. Its different from what we have in the United States. Its not outright denial of the science, but its still the same sort of basic policies of inaction.

One of the similarities to being an Australian living here in the States is the Murdoch press, which you might be seeing around you in Australia. It has such a vast publication power in Australia that I think Americans underestimate.

Thats right. With the exception of Australian Broadcast Corporation, the Sydney Morning Herald, and a small number of independent media organizations, [Murdoch] essentially owns the print and television media here in Australia.

Whats remarkable to me is how resilient the people of Australia have proven to be in light of that. There are deniers here in Australia and there are contrarians, but the person on the street seems to get it, to understand that there is a real problem and we need to do something about it. Theyre demanding action, and theyve got a government right now that refuses to engage in that action.

The real challenge is going to be channeling that concern and that outrage. You can feel it here. Australians are outraged at whats happening, [and they must] find a way to channel that when it comes time to vote.

Read the rest here:
Australia's Wildfire Catastrophe Isn't the New Normal. It's Much Worse Than That. - Mother Jones

How to set a goal to save more money this year – The Boston Globe

If you want to save more money, please know there isnt just one perfect way. Instead, find what works for you. Heres how in four steps:

1) Make a list of all the actions you might take to save money. Youre not committing to any of theseyoure just making a list. Be creative and have fun. Try to come up with 15 items.

2) Put a star by each item that would be effectivethe action would lead to more savings. Dont think about if you want to do the action, just think about impact.

3) Now shift gears and be realistic. Circle each item on your list you could get yourself to do. Youll see most of the items you circle will be easy.

4) Finally, find all the items with both stars and circles. I call those golden behaviors. You focus on those, and you forget the rest.

_____________

BJ Fogg founded the Behavior Design Lab at Stanford University and teaches industry innovators about human behavior. He is the author of the new book Tiny Habits: The Small Changes that Change Everything, and has created the Tiny Habits Academy to help people around the world. Send comments to magazine@globe.com.

See more here:
How to set a goal to save more money this year - The Boston Globe

Why New Years Resolutions Fail 92% of the Time. – News Talk Florida

S. Joseph Scott

Special for News Talk Florida

Yesterday, January 2, my wife went to the gym at lunchtime, as she has done faithfully week after week. On her way out another faithful partner inquired about the resolutioners. Only a few additions, she replied. They will all be gone before Valentines Day, her friend observed. That is, as the Brits say, spot on.

New years resolutions are notoriously ineffective, research indicating that only about 8% of them keep beyond the first month or two. Various explanations are given by the so-called experts: The resolution isnt specific enough, It is promoted in a negative, rather than positive fashion (Youre giving up something), resolutioners are too influenced by the expectations of others. Year after year the same resolutions falter only to be picked up again next year. Will power, it turns out, isnt very powerful at all.

What is powerful is desire. Desire, another name for love, controls behavior like the engine powers a car. Behavior, good or bad, is always driven by something deeper than mere resolve or will. Our decisions have roots that feed them. Bad habits are like the red light on the dashboard calling us to look under the hood. New Years resolutions are like trying to turn off the warning light by taping over it.

Blaise Pascal (1623-1662), a French philosopher and mathematician asserted that All men seek happiness. This is without exception. Whatever different means they employ, they all tend to this endThe will never takes the least step but to this object. This is the motive of every action of every man, even of those who hang themselves. Pascal was also a Christian whose understanding of human psychology was shaped by the Bible.

The Bible uses different language to describe the same reality. Psalm 115, for example, describes a negative example of human behavior, or willing. It speaks of idols as objects that have mouths but cannot speak, eyes but cannot see, noses but cannot smell and then the Psalmist gives this punchline, Those who make them [idols] become like them (Psalm 115:8). We are what we worship and we worship only what we love. Those who love money become greedy. Those who love fame become self-absorbed. Those who love food become gluttons.

The Protestant reformer Martin Luther said, Whatever a man loves, that is his god. For he carries it in his heart; he goes about with it night and day; he sleeps and wakes with it, be it what it may, wealth or self, pleasure or renown. This is why when Jesus was asked, what is the greatest commandment, he replied You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Matthew 22:37-39). By nature we do not think in terms of selfless service to God and others; were not geared to believe love could be giving, without any expectation of a return.

We might try to resolve to stop being selfish this year, but that will fade faster than the exercise routine we started January 2. We need a heart re-orientation.

This is why resolutions fail 92% of the time. Our heart is not in it. And until the heart changes, until what we truly love shifts, the will inevitably falters. But, the good news is, when the heart is redirected, the will willingly follows.

So, here is a new years challenge. Take six months and read the first four books of the New Testament. Consider the life, claims, and teaching of Jesus found there. Consider the beauty of his character, the majesty of his claims to deity, and the redemptive power of forgiveness promised through his resurrection. You might be surprised by the manifold changes that blossom in your life when self-love and self-service are exchanged for the love of God and love of neighbor.

The secret to real change this year is not in another set of goals or resolutions, but in asking a deeper question. What or who do I really love? What have I given my heart over to, in service and worship? The answer to that question will explain the choices you make this year.

S. Joseph Scott has a Ph.D. in theology and has served in leadership positions in both higher education and religious institutions. He has published in both academic and popular journals and has a special interest in the intersection of faith and culture.

Read the original:
Why New Years Resolutions Fail 92% of the Time. - News Talk Florida

Why law of evidence supports the verdict that the president is guilty | TheHill – The Hill

The Constitution defines impeachment as a civil proceeding before the Senate. Its noncriminal nature means the principles of evidence that will govern federal civil trials offer a number of wise and appropriate guides for evaluating evidentiary issues, even though they do not necessarily apply to impeachment trials or control Senate decisions. They provide several established principles for reaching sound judgments about the truth as they are based on common understandings of human behavior.

Those principles reflect two such basic understandings. First, innocent people accused of wrongdoing generally make every effort to produce evidence to refute the charges against them. Second, guilty people who possess evidence of their guilt generally make every effort, whether legal or illegal, to withhold that evidence. To deal with the latter behavior, the law has developed a series of fair and founded evidentiary presumptions.

One deals with refusal to testify. In civil trials, unlike criminal trials, the law allows juries to infer that a person refusing to testify means his testimony would undercut or contradict his own position. The Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court has decided, does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them. Given the evidence in the record, much of which comes from the public statements of President TrumpDonald John TrumpIranian diplomat after strike: 'We do not seek escalation or war' Graham: Iran missile attack 'an act of war' 'All is well' Trump tweets after Iran hits Iraq bases housing US troops MORE himself, his failure to testify would allow such unfavorable inferences to be made.

Three other principles mean that if Trump did choose to testify, the law would allow his repeated lies to be used against him. First, one federal rule of evidence allows a witness to be questioned about his prior lies. Second, the same rule also provides that other witnesses may testify on the untruthfulness or reputation for untruthfulness of a witness. A third principle holds that, if a jury finds that a witness intentionally lied about any material fact, then it may reject all his testimony on the grounds that he is so untrustworthy that he must not be believed on any relevant fact.

Thus, among other sources, the information behind the Washington Post report published last month, which shows that Trump himself has made more than 15,400 false or misleading claims as president for an average of 15 such claims a day, could inspire a devastating cross examination and also allow compelling testimony from others impugning his truthfulness. Furthermore, these principles establish that the law would allow a jury to disbelieve virtually everything he says. No wonder he dares not testify.

Three more principles allow inferences against parties that block access to the evidence, as Trump has repeatedly done. First, if a party possesses relevant evidence and refuses to produce it, the law allows a jury to draw an unfavorable inference from the refusal. Second, if a party blocks key witnesses from testifying in a trial, the law allows a jury to infer that their testimony would damage the argument of the party. Third, if one or more witnesses are missing and under the control of a party that prevents their appearance at trial, many courts will allow juries to presume that the blocked testimony would contradict the position of the controlling party. All these rules justify the inference that Trump stands guilty as charged.

Another principle addresses the interpretation of documents and holds that the meaning of an incomplete or ambiguous document needs to be construed strictly against its drafter. Instead of releasing the full transcript of his call with the Ukrainian president, Trump produced an incomplete summary. Testimony confirmed that the summary is not only incomplete but inaccurate as well. The summary supports the impeachment charges because it confirms that Trump had requested a favor from the Ukrainian president, while other evidence reveals he contemporaneously directed that the appropriated funds for Ukraine be withheld. This principle means the admission in the summary that Trump had requested a favor during the call should properly be construed as attempted extortion or bribery.

Finally, the principle behind the best evidence rule means the summary should not be used when a full transcript exists. We already know that there is such a transcript from the White House, that it is locked away under control of Trump, and that he refuses to produce it. The logical inference is that the parts of the call excluded from the summary would add likely more decisive evidence of his guilt, so his refusal to produce the transcript would then allow a jury to draw that damaging inference.

The law has remedies for the methodical efforts of the president to hide the truth, and it lies in long honored principles designed to protect the integrity of the civil processes of the law. Those very rules seek to ensure either that the truth comes out or that, if a party attempts to prevent it, the jury is allowed to draw the logical inference. All point to the same conclusion and can support a verdict that Trump is guilty as charged.

Edward Purcell Jr. is a distinguished professor with New York Law School and is the author of Antonin Scalia and American Constitutionalism: The Historical Significance of a Judicial Icon set to be published this winter.

See the original post:
Why law of evidence supports the verdict that the president is guilty | TheHill - The Hill

ExecVision Launches New Brand & Product Strategy Centered Around Closing the Insights-to-Performance Gap – Yahoo Finance

Focus on Human Behavior Change and Helping Customer-Facing Teams Reach Their Fullest Potential

ARLINGTON, Va., Jan. 8, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- ExecVision, the only conversation intelligence platform that helps organizations close the Insights-to-Performance Gap, today unveiled a new brand and product strategy and visual identity. After consideration of the organization's strategic direction and analysis of its competitive differentiators, ExecVision's leadership team felt it was important to develop new positioning that more clearly communicated its value proposition in the market.

(PRNewsfoto/ExecVision)

The new strategy is centered around the concept of the Insights-to-Performance Gap, which is the inability to leverage data and insights to create behavior change that drives quantifiable results. Organizations have a wealth of data available to them, but the vast majority of it, while useful, is too high-level to be used in actually influencing behavior change on the frontlines with reps. Companies need to be focused on the data derived from conversation intelligence technology -- critical insights from customer-facing conversations -- to determine how effective their teams are. Only by understanding the dialogue that is exchanged between reps and their customers and prospects can an organization make the decisions needed and implement the coaching and training that will truly impact performance, which in turn, drive increases in top-line business metrics.

Other technology players in the conversation intelligence and speech analytics categories have solely focused on insights and analytics, leaving them unable to help organizations close the Insights-to-Performance Gap. To go the 'last mile,' ExecVision has taken a holistic approach by facilitating accountability, alignment and targeted coaching within its platform that leverages behavioral science principles proven to drive adult behavior change.

"The Insights-to-Performance Gap is plaguing nearly every organization today. We see companies all the time that don't understand how, given all the data they have at their fingertips, they aren't seeing performance improvement and tangible results," said David Stillman, CEO and Co-Founder of ExecVision. He continued, "ExecVision has developed a robust platform that helps organizations go the 'last mile,' enabling them to create more top performers, cut onboarding and ramp times, reduce attrition rates, decrease cancellations, and increase win rates and revenue."

About ExecVision ExecVision is a conversation intelligence platform built on a simple, almost inarguable premise: Insights mined from customer interactions are exponentially more valuable when you can translate them into performance improvements in your marketing, support, sales, and product teams. We shine where other conversation intelligence software falls short: Improving performance by changing human behaviors. Founded in 2015, our team leverages all the pattern recognition and human intelligence from ExecVision's 15 years of insights-based sales coaching, and applies it to uncovering actionable insights from customer-facing conversations, allowing organizations to make better decisions, coach and develop their team at scale, drive behavior change, and ultimately generate more revenue through performance improvement. Customers like The Madison Square Garden Company, Intuit, TransUnion, Imperial Supplies, and Zuora have seen a 30+% increase in win rates and onboarding cut by at least 30%. To learn more about ExecVision, visit http://www.execvision.io.

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/execvision-launches-new-brand--product-strategy-centered-around-closing-the-insights-to-performance-gap-300983049.html

SOURCE ExecVision

Continued here:
ExecVision Launches New Brand & Product Strategy Centered Around Closing the Insights-to-Performance Gap - Yahoo Finance

Leadership Insights Like Everyday Equations and Walking The Wellness Talk From Deloitte Consultings New CEO – Forbes

Detonating traditional business practices, horseshoes being greater than circles, and making a priority of personal passions outside of work are three of the provocative subjects shared by Deloitte Consultings new CEO Dan Helfrich when we sat down for an interview on Dec. 9, 2019. Helfrich became Chairman and CEO of the 56,000-person organization in June.

Here are a few highlights from the interview:

Dan, you have the unique dual perspective of both being a CEO and advising CEOs. What's one or two pieces of advice that you give that you're also practicing yourself?

With the incredible amount of disruption taking place across industries today, I am talking to CEOs about how to detonate traditional business orthodoxies. Detonating orthodoxies is about breaking away from convention and focusing the human behavior impacting your organization, not last years numbers or supposed tried-and-true way of doing things.

Detonating conventional orthodoxies within our own organization is one of my favorite things to do. I love to ask my teams, Why are we doing it that way and before they answer, I often say if its because thats the way its always been done then come back with another solution.

Many companies are investing enormous capital in the internet of things to capture massive amounts of real-time data from sensors. My advice to CEOs: Apply this concept to leadership. Build your own network of human sensors to get that real-time perspective about whats really happening in the field without that filter of myriad layers of management. I am a better leader because people of all levels in my organization are feeding me ideas and insights about what is or isnt working and I dont even have to ask.

Dan Helfrich CEO Deloitte Consulting and Robert Reiss

You also shared some of your leadership philosophy with us and how you boil it down to what you call, everyday equations such as 15 minutes of content is greater than 30 minutes of clutter, and horseshoes are greater than circles. Can you tell us more about that?

So much of an organizations culture depends on how people spend their time and how they treat each other. We can all relate to being in meetings in which the real purpose isnt addressed until 20 minutes in. We only have 1,440 minutes a day so lets spend them more valuably. If you change your standard meeting time to 15 instead of 30 minutes, I predict that you and your teams productivity and engagement in those meetings will skyrocket. And colleagues will appreciate getting time back to do something thats important to them.

In terms of horseshoes being greater than circles, inclusivity is critical to an organizations health and performance. Horseshoes are open to new people, ideas, partners, you name it. Sometimes people can form closed circles or cliques that dont benefit anyone. To me, the more someone has an inclusive mindset the better they are going to be and the better we are going to be as an organization.

You are also a sports broadcaster for your alma mater Georgetown University. Tell us about the importance of work - life balance.

I am a big believer in the importance of well-being, and I talk about it a lot internally with our teams. Well-being to me is taking care of yourself and doing what you need and want to do outside of work to achieve physical, mental and emotional health. In a demanding job, those interests can help center you, give you a broader perspective and quite simply - add more fun to life. One of the ways I maintain my well-being is by staying involved with the top-ranked Georgetown University Mens Soccer Team (Hoya Saxa!) where I played as an undergraduate.

For the past 15 years, I have been doing the play-by-play of every game. If you follow me on social media, youll see that I am very passionate about the team yes, my voice gets a bit excited upon the scoring of a big goal and about soccer in general. My broadcasting has required probably 60 midweek games during that timeframe, which means thoughtfully configuring my schedule and being willing to say no to work expectations that others might deem essential.

So thats great for my wellness, but it only helps the rest of my great Deloitte Consulting team if I share it instead of hiding it. That way, maybe one of my teammates finds a little more confidence to choose their own personal passion / hobby / family moment over Deloitte when it really matters. Walking the wellness talk.

To hear the commercial-free interview with Dan Helfrich, go to: http://www.theceoforumgroup.com

See the original post here:
Leadership Insights Like Everyday Equations and Walking The Wellness Talk From Deloitte Consultings New CEO - Forbes

Coyotes figured out how to survive in the city. Can urban Coloradans learn to coexist? – The Colorado Sun

It happened quickly and quietly. In fact, it was the silence that made David Brosh wonder why the familys two white Westies, taking a quick bedtime potty break, hadnt barked to come back inside.

On a frigid Sunday night in early December, he let them into the tiny yard behind their Parker home. It was dark until Chloe and Chuffys presence activated the motion-sensor floodlights. Beyond the 42-inch split-rail fence, webbed with wire fencing so the dogs wouldnt get out, a large swath of open space near Newlin Gulch had been blanketed by a recent snow.

Minutes later, when David stepped outside to check on the dogs, a coyote turned to meet his gaze just as it trotted into the shadows beyond the reach of the floodlights. It appeared to have Chloe, all 17 pounds of her, in its mouth.

David grabbed a flashlight, hopped the fence and followed the tracks as far as he could into the gulch, until they mixed with lots of other tracks and disappeared into some low brush. No sign of Chloe. When he returned to the yard, he saw 25-pound Chuffy lying in the snow, seriously injured. He called to his wife, Mardee, that they needed to get to the vet.

From there, the hours unraveled in a nightmare of tenuous hope for Chuffys survival from his neck wounds and the continued search for Chloe that yielded little more than a trail of reddish splotches in the snow.

Daylight revealed what looked like tracks from two coyotes in the Broshes yard. Meanwhile, surgery on Chuffy ended with a hopeless diagnosis. The couple made the decision to put him down.

They were the heart of our family, Mardee says, and got me through so many difficult times. You know, you get really attached to your dogs.

On top of their sorrow, word of similar coyote encounters throughout the rapidly growing community southeast of Denver heightened the couples concern. Theyve lived in their house for more than eight years and perhaps twice have seen coyotes venture this close until suddenly, reports of sightings, and particularly attacks on dogs, have spiked.

Wildlife experts say the situation reflects a recurring phenomenon, a cycle of coyote activity that ebbs and flows throughout the so-called urban-wildland interface and now, well into the urban core literally from Los Angeles to New York.

It does seem periodic, says Kristin Cannon, an area wildlife manager with Colorado Parks and Wildlife. Well go several years where theres no issues, or very minor ones. Coyotes are pretty ubiquitous anymore, but as far as conflicts with people, and with pets, that seems to flare up every few years one place or another. Because conflicts are so common, its hard to quantify.

Many communities along the Front Range have an official coyote management plan, which largely defines levels of interaction with the animals and prescribes at what point, and how, action may be taken to mitigate problems.

Attacks on humans tend to be the tipping point. And while lethal removal looms as an available tool, the emphasis remains on education and adapting human behavior. That strategy reflects the reality that coyotes, despite historical campaigns to eradicate them, have been a fixture on the continent for upwards of five million years.

And theyre not going away. As longtime coyote researcher Dan Flores, author of Coyote America, succinctly puts it: Resistance is futile.

The flurry of coyote activity in and around Parker marks yet another chapter of a centuries-long conversation surrounding the uncommonly adaptable creatures, one that ranges from todays real-time online postings to historical writings that freighted it with cultural meaning.

Its been an animated dialogue, in every sense.

Early periods of enthusiastic hostility toward the animal have dissolved into more recent arguments for coexistence. European explorers scouting the West initially didnt know what to make of coyotes, or even what to call them. From that uncertainty, the coyote eventually became a fixture in American culture, for better and worse.

MORE: Read more wildlife stories from The Colorado Sun.

In many Native American cultures, the coyote appears as an avatar for humans. Tales handed down through generations employ it as a four-legged metaphor, precisely for the way it holds a mirror to human behavior. Native to North America, the coyotes howl, Flores contends, is our original national anthem.

In early America, the disparagement of coyotes grew from the cross-pollination of politics and culture. Flores traced references to coyotes in 19th-century American literature and settled on Mark Twains humorous excerpt from Roughing It in 1872 as the launching pad for what became coyotes dismal reputation.

Twain writes, in part: He is always hungry. He is always poor, out of luck and friendless. The meanest creatures despise him He is so spiritless and cowardly that even while his exposed teeth are pretending a threat, the rest of his face is apologizing for it.

By the 1920s, even Scientific American inserted the coyote as the shifty trickster-villain in a contemporary political allegory in which it argued that good Americans, if they spy one, should shoot it on sight for patriotic reasons because the coyote is the original Bolshevik.

Much disdain for coyotes originated within the livestock industry, whose assets run afoul of predatory animals. And that, Flores says, led to an agency of the federal government, then called the Bureau of Biological Survey, seizing on the opportunity to brand itself, in the early 20th century, as the antidote to predation. It proved an effective strategy to guarantee congressional funding.

Colorado played a pivotal role in the extermination efforts that followed. The Eradication Methods Laboratory, which designed and manufactured the means to kill massive numbers of mostly wolves and coyotes, began producing strychnine in Albuquerque. But in 1921 it moved operations to Denver where, Flores writes in Coyote America, it would go on to perfect an amazing witchs brew of ever more efficient, ever deadlier pesticides.

Even the eradication campaign came with what Flores calls a concerted PR effort to demonize coyotes. Powered by a series of pre-packaged stories from the Biological Survey, he says, major publications all across the country ran fictionalized accounts that cast certain nuisance animals, including the coyote, as Al Capone-style gangsters. Those who would destroy them were cast as heroic G-men.

Its a Frankenstein story thats of our own making.

Wolves were essentially wiped out in the U.S. by 1925. But coyotes, despite lacking a public relations campaign of their own, more than survived attempts to snuff them. They flourished. So what did they have that wolves didnt?

In simple terms, coyotes can live in groups, when its advantageous. But when its not, they can disperse into pairs or even solitary individuals and scatter across the landscape, making them difficult to locate and eliminate.

Wolves are pure pack animals, and hunters discovered if you can track one of the animals in a pack, you can use its scent to prepare bait and get every one in the pack, Flores says. But coyotes dont have the same pack adhesion. Thats the single advantage over wolves that allowed them to survive.

So the eradication strategy backfired. Not only did the campaign not wipe them out, but it triggered colonization. When coyotes sense their numbers dwindling, the number of pups in their litters grows larger a phenomenon called compensatory breeding.

MORE: Colorado Springs downtown creek has long been viewed as a blight. Then one man started catching trout in it.

Coyotes migrated all over the country and grew comfortable in urban areas, where they face no natural predators, no hunters shooting at them from helicopters, no leg traps or poisons. Plus, urban areas attract plenty of smaller animals, like rabbits, squirrels, rats and mice, that provide a ready food source.

Its a Frankenstein story thats of our own making, Flores says.

But by the early 1960s, a cultural icon took a stand for the lowly coyote. Walt Disney, whose catalog of film and television productions adopted ecological advocacy in its infancy, in 1961 produced an hour-long feature for Walt Disneys Wonderful World of Color, a show that already had a reputation as appointment TV. The animated piece was called The Coyotes Lament and marked the first of six TV or movie features Disney would produce on coyotes.

And while that was happening, you had the Wile E. Coyote and Roadrunner cartoon, Flores notes.

While not exactly heroic, Wile E. Coyote presents at least a sympathetic image of the coyote. Hes humiliated by the Roadrunner at almost every turn, and his efforts to employ technology fail miserably. But he never gives up.

After a four-decade campaign to brainwash Americans, suddenly the pop culture movement portrayed the coyote in a different light, Flores says. That makes a lot of difference.

Considering their tarnished reputation, coyotes ability to adapt and survive has been nothing short of astounding.

For all the talk of how human development has encroached on animals natural habitat, the coyote has turned the tables. A recent story in National Geographic reported that coyotes actually have increased their range by 40% since the 1950s, can be found in every state except Hawaii, have become established in Central America and are expected to appear soon in South America.

Mary Ann Bonnell, a ranger for Jefferson County open space, has published research on coyotes and stars in widely viewed YouTube videos on wildlife that make her an in-demand source on dealing with urban arrivals. She can almost track their territorial expansion simply by picking up the phone.

Currently, its the D.C. area and New York City, she says of the calls seeking advice. Here in Colorado, we already went through that whole arc: In the early 2010s people were going, Heres this apex predator thats moved into the neighborhood, what does that mean? What happens to my dog? All these burning questions, all valid. Those residents have a quick learning curve to figure things out and make changes and understand what it means to have coyotes in the community.

Meanwhile, researchers in Colorado continue to keep tabs on coyotes everything from their interaction with humans to their diet and genetic clues that may offer insight into their adaptive behavior. But whats going on when we see an uptick in coyotes encounters with people and unusually fearless behavior that can include attacks on pets?

Stewart Breck, a researcher with the U.S. Department of Agricultures National Wildlife Research Center based in Fort Collins, also specializes in urban coyotes. He has a good idea whats going on. In fact, he sees two things.

First, urban coyotes tend to be bolder and more explorative, he notes. Breck drew this conclusion from research comparing coyotes in Denver to those that inhabit rural areas, which confirmed the behavior pattern. Similar studies have been repeated in many areas around the country.

Currently, its the D.C. area and New York City. Here in Colorado, we already went through that whole arc.

Second, researchers have identified certain problem individuals that appear periodically in urban environments. These bad actors tend to be responsible for most of the unusual conflicts with people. Studies on this phenomenon kicked into gear locally 10 years ago, when multiple people in Broomfield reported being bitten by coyotes. In 2011, coyotes in the area also bit three children.

That got a lot of people asking the same question youre asking, Breck says.

Cannon, the wildlife manager for CPW, says that when the first child was bitten in Broomfield, CPW made an effort to lethally remove the culprit. The problem is that coyotes tend to look the same and live in social groups, making it difficult to pinpoint the problem. When the second child was bitten, CPW responded again and eliminated more coyotes and repeated the process again after the third biting incident.

Finally, we were able to catch up with the correct coyote and the behavior stopped, Cannon says. Its hard to say why theyre behaving that way, if there was one or more than one, but it took multiple operations on our part before we eliminated the one. It wasnt for lack of trying, but its difficult to lethally manage coyotes in an urban setting.

Despite the troubling incidents, Broomfield has maintained a fairly conservative, hands-off approach with regard to coyotes that leans on measures like education and sometimes closing down open spaces if issues arise leaving removal as a last resort, Cannon says.

In 2009, Greenwood Village responded to a years worth of sightings and attacks on dogs which culminated with a teenage boy fending off a coyote in a local park by hiring Jay Stewarts Animal Damage Control to kill the problem animals. The subsequent media attention activated animal rights advocates, and their protests ignited what Stewart recalls as a fiasco that demonstrated the strong feelings humans have on both sides of the coyote issue and aborted his efforts.

Later, Stewart notes, a client who lived adjacent to the park where the well-publicized attack on the boy had occurred told him that people in the area had felt sorry for the coyotes and had been feeding them. Its not unlike the problem that has vexed wildlife authorities in other areas, where the same type of human behavior also has emboldened many bears, which then become so comfortable around people that they have to be put down.

Things go south when that happens, Stewart says. Even though it was a bad thing in the park with that kid, that problem was human-caused. Because they were being fed, it probably walked up to that kid thinking it would get something.

Stewart gets far fewer calls about coyotes than he used to because many jurisdictions have developed coyote management plans that emphasize education and hazing the animals as a primary means of dealing with them. When they need removal, they turn to state and federal agencies to handle the situation, or even local police.

Greenwood Village, which draws on Bonnells expertise, fine-tuned its coyote management plan over the past several years. It has seen a remarkable decline in incidents, says Cmdr. Joe Gutgsell, who oversees coyote management for the citys police department.

Since 2013, Greenwood Village has hosted an annual community meeting to familiarize residents with policies and recommendations for how to minimize coyote problems. It also has started a detailed reporting program that allows Gutgsell to chart location and frequency of incidents and, as a result, respond more effectively when necessary.

When circumstances do call for removal, Gutgsell says the police department has a selective and organized process that calls on two designated officers both firearms instructors to handle the problem. The city no longer contracts removal or relies on CPW.

Bonnell speaks at the yearly neighborhood meetings, and the city provides both printed and digital versions of an informational brochure that cover topics like normal coyote activity, leash laws that can help protect pets and admonitions against feeding wildlife.

We dont remove coyotes for being coyotes. We dont lethally control a coyote that becomes habituated to people and comfortable in urban neighborhoods.

While Gutgsell acknowledges that some of the recent decline in incidents may be due to simple luck and natural migration, the numbers over the past five years have been encouraging. In 2015, the city fielded 26 reports of coyote incidents involving pets, a number that includes both injuries and fatalities. When that number spiked the next year to 46, more than 100 residents showed up to the annual meeting, where they got a heavy dose of prevention education.

In 2017, the number fell to 20, then to five and finally, last year, to just a single reported incident.

There was no cause to remove any of the animals and only a few residents even showed up for the annual management meeting.

Bonnell calls it a model program, and notes that the city learned a lot from the 2009 debacle. She adds that communities in the Denver metro area that have taken advantage of templates offered for management plans (among others, the Humane Society of the United States has produced a sample plan) and that stress education tend to be best equipped to deal with coyotes as opposed to those that wait for a problem to emerge and then call Colorado Parks and Wildlife for help.

Coyotes are smart creatures and tend to work the system, she says. You have to be proactive. But because humans are hard to train, we usually dont do anything till something bad happens. Its hard to sell coyote education if nothing bad is happening.

CPWs Cannon notes that most plans she has seen respond to sightings with education or signs warning of coyotes presence. And some plans allow for lethal response when coyotes pose a threat or injure a person and often delegate that job to her agency.

We dont remove coyotes for being coyotes, she says. We dont lethally control a coyote that becomes habituated to people and comfortable in urban neighborhoods. And we dont remove coyotes that prey on pets. Theyre similar to its natural prey source, so its natural behavior for coyotes, unfortunately, and the onus is on the pet owner to supervise their pet when they live near coyotes.

While measures such as motion-sensor flood lights and even noisemakers like air horns are encouraged, especially for people living alongside open space or parks, the question of a homeowner using firearms to try to eliminate a problem coyote can raise legal issues. State law allows use of lethal force to prevent damage on your own property, but many urban jurisdictions have laws regarding discharge of firearms that could conflict with that method.

MORE: Remember the Fort Collins trail runner who killed an attacking mountain lion? Heres what his life has been like since.

For all practical purposes, its not an option, Cannon says.

The USDAs Breck adds that in most cases, elimination doesnt solve what people might think it will. Consider what experts call coyote math: 1 minus 1 equals 1. And the adage that holds: If you kill one coyote, six will come to the funeral. Targeting bad actors is one thing. Culling the pack is a pipe dream.

In light of that calculus, one helpful tactic is hazing, which involves non-lethal measures from making noise when coyotes become too comfortable to chucking rocks to intimidate them into shying away from humans.

Most coyotes in urban areas are not going to be a problem, Breck says. Theyll do what coyotes do, and youll hardly notice theyre around. The idea that we need to get in there and shoot them is not what Im recommending. That is not going to work, and not necessary.

On a national scale, coyotes still are eliminated, but primarily to protect livestock. Farmers and ranchers claim millions of dollars in economic losses. In 2018, according to the USDA, more than 68,000 coyotes were killed by a variety of methods. Nearly half were shot from either fixed-wing planes or helicopters. In five agricultural states, not including Colorado, more than 5,600 were poisoned with so-called cyanide bombs, a method re-approved for use last month by the Environmental Protection Agency (with some additional safeguards) over objections from conservation groups.

No coyote attacks on humans have been reported in Parker, according to police. But suddenly, neighbors throughout the area were seeing coyotes everywhere. And some exhibited unnerving behavior including additional attacks on dogs.

Parker police noted an uptick in sightings, but remained unaware of the dog deaths until the Broshes filed their report on Chloe. In fact, since mid-November, they have a record of just six calls for service involving coyotes five sightings and one dog fatality.

Meanwhile, a multitude of postings on the online neighborhood bulletin board Nextdoor warned when coyotes were spotted and reported incidents including attacks on dogs. Mardee says a neighbor filtered all the various accounts and counted 10 unique cases of dogs that were killed in the area in and around Parker.

That disparity with law enforcements records underscores the need for further public education, says Parker police spokesman Josh Hans. While law enforcement can post notices on Nextdoor, it isnt allowed to monitor the bulletin boards, so it relies on direct reporting from residents.

From the information reported to us, it doesnt make (coyotes) seem like an issue, Hans says. In the next month or two, we need to start getting some messaging out. Its great that people are letting their neighbors know so they can be watchful. But if theyre not telling us, we cant do anything about it.

In recent days, the Broshes installed video cameras outside their house in the hope of learning more about coyote activity. They would prefer a back fence higher than just 42 inches along their border with open space, but neighborhood covenants dictate the lower, split-rail style that leaves pets more vulnerable. They had the motion-activated flood lights installed, and always checked before letting Chloe and Chuffy loose in the backyard.

I dont want to have to worry about going to the mailbox and having to take pepper spray. I just want to be safe in my own neighborhood.

Mardee figures one or more of the coyotes from what appears to be a den in the gulch simply traced the fence line, checking the yards for possible prey. And when they got to mine, they just hopped the fence because my dogs were there. So we think theyve been actively hunting in the yards.

But her concerns run beyond her own loss.

Weve heard from other folks, people walking on the trail down here being harassed when theyre hiking with their dogs, which I can see because that den is very close to where the trail runs through, she says. And now people are saying theyre seeing them further up into the neighborhood.

Its not that I hate coyotes, she adds. We thought they were cool. I just dont want them in my yard. And I dont want them attacking people when theyre walking their dogs on the trail. I dont want to have to worry about going to the mailbox and having to take pepper spray. I just want to be safe in my own neighborhood.

Bonnell, the Jeffco open space ranger, conjectures that possibly a new pair of coyotes which mate for life moved into the neighborhood and were denning in preparation for a litter of new pups. And at least one is dog-aggressive, protecting territory by removing competition, she says.

The timing, if this has all happened in the last couple of months, makes sense, she adds. Right around the time we switch from daylight savings to standard time, you begin to see the dog awareness where coyotes are escorting dog walkers away from their den or even attacking and killing dogs. Theres an increase in conflict right around that time. Theyre establishing territory for the family thats coming.

CPWs Cannon empathizes with the frustration of people worried for their pets.

Theyre not wild animals, theyre family members, she says. And its extremely difficult when people are facing tragedy like that, for us to come in and say, Well, thats a coyotes natural prey source.

On top of that, she recognizes the inconvenience of having to constantly keep an eye on your pets, even on your own property, to ensure they dont fall victim.

I have dogs and a big backyard I like to let them run around in, she says. I understand what a burden that is, to think in order to protect your pet, you need to go out with them every single time and keep them on a leash. I just dont know that theres an alternative solution thats going to alleviate that. Its kind of a reality.

And so the conversation about coyotes continues. The interaction of humans and wildlife has become a hot area of research, and Joanna Lambert, a professor of environmental studies at the University of Colorado Boulder, has bitten off a considerable chunk almost literally.

Shes looking at what coyotes eat in different environments and how that may have changed their genetic makeup, which in turn might explain certain behaviors, particularly in urban environments. More precisely, her research examines whether there are particular genes involved with the digestion of carbohydrates in human food.

Dogs evolved the capacity to extract energy from starchy carbs, in a way wild wolves dont, Lambert says. Were looking at whether theres evidence of the same process in coyotes. A lot of other questions asked about coyotes are very difficult to distinguish between whether the behaviors were seeing are the result of learned behavior or genetics. Its very complicated. Were tackling that problem from a slightly different angle, looking at the food part and if the genome has shifted toward human food.

Lambert also has two graduate students pursuing studies related to coyote-human interaction in the Denver and Broomfield areas. One seeks input from people who frequent local parks and open space about their perceptions of whether coyotes have become more aggressive, curious or bold. Another student is tracking whether coyotes are more or less likely to avoid humans when more humans are present such as during a busy day in the park.

None of the studies has yet been completed and published.

Cities in some ways represent a refuge from natural predators, from human hunters, Lambert says. But they also offer a whole new array of food sources. These can be anything from birdseed, occasionally human garbage, cats and small dogs. It could also be almost certainly the case that theyre eating other animals that have adapted to humans, like house mice and rats, urban animals. Thats part of the big question.

Were used to a culture where you swipe your credit card and a problem goes away. This is not one of those problems.

Coyotes have learned to read human behavior, explains Coyote America author Flores, noting that while coyotes have no fear in cities, where theyre not being hunted, their behavior can be much different in rural areas. If you see coyotes while driving in rural New Mexico, he explains, and then pull your car over, theyll sprint away from the car running in a switchback pattern an evasive maneuver learned because in such situations they can expect gun shots.

I encourage people to keep them wild, keep them thinking that were a little too weird for them to trust, he says. When I see them standing around and not moving, Ill raise my arms and shout, maybe throw a rock. Its good for them to be a little spooked rather than nonchalant.

By the same token, it can be helpful for humans to understand something about coyote instincts. From May until August, roughly, they have pups to protect. So if a coyote emerges from the bushes to escort a hiker and their dog away, following but not quite threatening, it likely means they approached too close to a den. Its happened to Flores in the canyon near his home while running with his 135-pound malamute.

Bonnells interest in coyotes was piqued before she took her Jeffco ranger job, when she was working in Aurora and came across people who essentially treated the wild canids as pets, even naming them as they trotted up to windows to touch noses with their house pets. So when she talks about basic truths about coyotes, arguably the most significant one isnt about coyotes at all. Its that humans are extremely difficult to train.

Read more:
Coyotes figured out how to survive in the city. Can urban Coloradans learn to coexist? - The Colorado Sun

Hero and Monster of the 2010s: Listicles – Mother Jones

The staff ofMother Jonesis rounding up the decades heroes and monsters.Find them all here.

The listicle is such a ubiquitous online presence that it hardly seems worthy of a shoutout. But lets take a moment to remember the early 2010s, when it first took the internet by storm and helped put BuzzFeed, who best wielded its power, on the map.

The listicles genius lies in its simplicity. The to-do list offers us the sweet satisfaction of checking items off. Santa boils all of human behavior down to two lists and doles out gifts accordingly. Consumer print magazines stuff their front-of-the-book sections with listicles, the better to capture the skimmers attention long enough for them to notice the Tag Heuer ads. What BuzzFeed realized at the dawn of the decade gone by was that the internet is a kind of infinite front-of-the-book, and thatall human events can be rendered in list form. It turns out that (1 sentence + 1 image) x 10 is a great formula for explaining a federal government shutdown or making a convincing argument that Britney Spears is the queen of both the VMAs and Target. During my college years, they were the perfect distraction to break up monotonous hours of late-night studying, providing all the dopamine rush of scrolling through an Instagram feed but without the endless time suck. You read about the 15 goodest boys this week, then you go back to reading Kant. Balance is restored to the universe.

But the basic story of web publishing in the 2010s was that every innovation just meant more people could be more efficiently screwed. The listicle, an essential mode of meme transportation, was also a tremendous vehicle for theft. All too often the format was used to rip content from other parts of the internet, soaking up the work of other creatorsespecially many young creators of colorwithout paying for the privilege. The roundup listicle is a favorite of sites like BuzzFeed and HuffPost that aim to cover what the internet is talking about at any given moment. Every event, trend, or joke that gets sufficient attention online necessitates a summary post of what some cherrypicked group of people on Reddit, Twitter,or Tumblr are saying about it. This isnt plagiarism per se the posts on these social sites are available for reproduction, and BuzzFeed doesnt claim them as original content. In a 2012 interview with Slate, BuzzFeed founder Jonah Peretti referred to its team as popularizers of memes already on the internet. But as the sites got bigger and bigger, the model looked worse and worseventure capital-fattened media outlets driving up their own traffic thanks to the work of unpaid creators elsewhere.

The ultimate example of this theft: on fleek. The phrase was invented by then-16-year-old Kayla Newman in a viral 2014 Vine (RIP) she posted celebrating her sculpted eyebrows. Listicles were hardly alone in appropriating the catchphrase, but they more than did their part in pushing fleek into the popular lexicon, helping out advertisers along the way. Newman has been quite vocal about the fact that she didnt initially benefit monetarily from phrases success, and in doing so has become a sort of poster child for other online creators whose 15 minutes of fame resulted in someone elses payday.

And of course the listicles themselves often strayed over to the bad side of kitsch. In the quest for virality, they grew increasingly absurd. Are there really 19 distinct situations calling for 19 Olivia Holt reaction GIFs? Is there even one? Serious news events were thrust bathetically into the listicle template, the posts often defended on the grounds that they managed to inform people about serious matters in entertaining and approachable waysas if some crucial part of the meaning of, say, the Arab Spring protests werent lost in analogizing them to plot points in Jurassic Park.

Listicles arent going anywhere any time soon. Personally, I know the next time I see an internet pet roundup list, I absolutely will click on it. Ill do so fully aware that its only a slight variation of last weeks edition, yanked from a popular subreddit, and that I am enjoying it in part thanks to a breakdown in the link between creation and compensation. But after a long day of thinking, sometimes the minds only salve is 14 cats that will make you say yaaasss queen!

See the article here:
Hero and Monster of the 2010s: Listicles - Mother Jones