How to boost recycling: Reward consumers with discounts, deals and social connections – Red, Green, and Blue

You finish that last sip of morning coffee and stare at the empty paper cup in your hand. Should it go into the recycling bin, compost, or be landfilled or incinerated?You are not alone. Most Americans are confused about recycling, and the crisis driven by Chinas decision to stop accepting most foreign scrap material is worsening the problem. At this point its hard to be sure that items put in the recycling bin are recycled.

By Magali (Maggie) Delmas, University of California, Los AngelesThe Conversation

Research shows that more often than not, Americans give up trying to sort their recyclables. Or they engage in wishful recycling, tossing nonrecyclables into the bin. Even so, most waste never gets that far. People feel intimidated by the task.

The average American generates about 4.5 pounds of waste each day. Only 1.5 pounds of it is recycled or composted. This means that over an average lifetime of 78.7 years, one American would send 67,000 pounds of waste to landfills. Thats more than twice the weight of a cruise ship anchor.

Although many communities and advocates have adopted regulations and action plans centered on moving toward a circular economy, major barriers still make it hard for individuals to reduce, reuse and recycle. Existing policies have been developed based on insights from engineering and economics, and give little consideration of how human behavior at the individual level fits into the system.

My colleagues and I use behavior science to foster goals ranging from energy conservation to community solidarity. In a recent paper, economist Marieke Huysentruyt, Ph.D. candidate Emma Barnosky and I uncovered promising solutions to the recycling crisis driven by personal benefits and social connections.

Why is getting Americans to recycle more so challenging? First, many of them dont understand waste problems and recycling strategies. Few are aware of the environmental problems waste causes, and most have a hard time connecting individual actions to those problems.

Most people dont know where their waste goes, whether it includes recyclables or what can be made from them. They may know what day to put out curbside trash and recycling, but are unsure which materials the companies accept. In a 2019 survey of 2,000 Americans, 53% erroneously believed greasy pizza boxes could be recycled, and 68% thought the same for used plastic utensils.

Another 39% of respondents cited inconvenience and poor access to recycling facilities as major barriers. California pays a 5- to 10-cent redemption fee for each beverage container, but the facilities often are inconvenient to reach. For example, the closest to my home in Los Angeles is eight miles away, which can involve driving for an hour or more. Thats not worth it for the few cans my family produces.

Most U.S. consumers are opposed to pollution, of course, but research shows that they seldom view themselves as significant contributors. As taxpayers, they hold local governments responsible for recycling. Many are not sure what happens next, or whether their actions make a difference.

What can be done to address these barriers? Better messaging, such as emphasizing how waste can be transformed into new objects, can make a difference.

But as I argue in my 2018 book, The Green Bundle: Pairing the Market With the Planet, information alone cant drive sustainable behavior. People must feel motivated, and the best motivations bundle environmental benefits with personal benefits, such as economic rewards, increased status or social connections.

In a 2014 survey, 41% of respondents said that money or rewards were the most effective way to get them to recycle. Take-back systems, such as deposits on cans and bottles, have proven effective in some contexts. Such systems need to be more convenient, however.

Returning bottles directly to stores is one possibility, but novel strategies are being deployed across the country. Pay-as-you-throw policies charge customers based on how much solid waste they discard, thus incentivizing waste reduction, reuse and more sustainable purchasing behavior. Recyclebank, a New York company, rewards people for recycling with discounts and deals from local and national businesses.

Social status also motivates people. The zero-waste lifestyle has become a sensation on social media, driving the rise of Instagram influencers such as Bea Johnson, Lauren Singer and Kathryn Kellogg, who are competing to leave behind the smallest quantity of waste. Visibility of conservation behavior matters, and could be a powerful component in pay-as-you-throw schemes.

Its also nice to have support. Mutual help organizations, or community-led groups, trigger behavioral change through social connections and face-to-face interactions. They have the potential to transfer empowering information and sustain long-term commitment.

One famous example is Alcoholics Anonymous, which relies on member expertise instead of instructions from health care specialists. Similarly, Weight Watchers focuses on open communication, group celebration of weight loss progress and supportive relationships among members.

French startup Yoyo, founded in 2017, is applying this strategy to recycling. Yoyo connects participants with coaches, who can be individuals or businesses, to help them sort recyclables into orange bags. Coaches train and encourage sorters, who earn points and rewards such as movie tickets for collecting and storing full Yoyo bags.

The process also confers status, giving sorters positive social visibility for work that is ordinarily considered thankless. And because rewards tend to be local, Yoyos infrastructure has the potential to improve members community connections, strengthening the perceived and actual social power of the group.

This system offers a convenient, social, incentive-based approach. In two years the community has grown to 450 coaches and 14,500 sorters and collected almost 4.3 million plastic bottles.

Such novel behavior-based programs alone cannot solve back-end aspects of the global waste crisis, such as recycling capacity and fluctuating scrap material prices. But our research has shown that by leveraging technology and human behavior, behavioral science can encourage people to recycle much more effectively than simplistic campaigns or slogans.

[ Insight, in your inbox each day. You can get it with The Conversations email newsletter. ]

(Magali (Maggie) Delmas, Professor of Management Institute of the Environment & Sustainability, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles.This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Top photo CC by Walter Parenteau on Flickr)

Here is the original post:
How to boost recycling: Reward consumers with discounts, deals and social connections - Red, Green, and Blue

Bushfires, bots and arson claims: Australia flung in the global disinformation spotlight – The Conversation AU

In the first week of 2020, hashtag #ArsonEmergency became the focal point of a new online narrative surrounding the bushfire crisis.

The message: the cause is arson, not climate change.

Police and bushfire services (and some journalists) have contradicted this claim.

We studied about 300 Twitter accounts driving the #ArsonEmergency hashtag to identify inauthentic behaviour. We found many accounts using #ArsonEmergency were behaving suspiciously, compared to those using #AustraliaFire and #BushfireAustralia.

Accounts peddling #ArsonEmergency carried out activity similar to what weve witnessed in past disinformation campaigns, such as the coordinated behaviour of Russian trolls during the 2016 US presidential election.

The most effective disinformation campaigns use bot and troll accounts to infiltrate genuine political discussion, and shift it towards a different master narrative.

Bots and trolls have been a thorn in the side of fruitful political debate since Twitters early days. They mimic genuine opinions, akin to what a concerned citizen might display, with a goal of persuading others and gaining attention.

Bots are usually automated (acting without constant human oversight) and perform simple functions, such as retweeting or repeatedly pushing one type of content.

Troll accounts are controlled by humans. They try to stir controversy, hinder healthy debate and simulate fake grassroots movements. They aim to persuade, deceive and cause conflict.

Weve observed both troll and bot accounts spouting disinformation regarding the bushfires on Twitter. We were able to distinguish these accounts as being inauthentic for two reasons.

First, we used sophisticated software tools including tweetbotornot, Botometer, and Bot Sentinel.

There are various definitions for the word bot or troll. Bot Sentinel says:

Propaganda bots are pieces of code that utilize Twitter API to automatically follow, tweet, or retweet other accounts bolstering a political agenda. Propaganda bots are designed to be polarizing and often promote content intended to be deceptive Trollbot is a classification we created to describe human controlled accounts who exhibit troll-like behavior.

Some of these accounts frequently retweet known propaganda and fake news accounts, and they engage in repetitive bot-like activity. Other trollbot accounts target and harass specific Twitter accounts as part of a coordinated harassment campaign. Ideology, political affiliation, religious beliefs, and geographic location are not factors when determining the classification of a Twitter account.

These machine learning tools compared the behaviour of known bots and trolls with the accounts tweeting the hashtags #ArsonEmergency, #AustraliaFire, and #BushfireAustralia. From this, they provided a score for each account suggesting how likely it was to be a bot or troll account.

We also manually analysed the Twitter activity of suspicious accounts and the characteristics of their profiles, to validate the origins of #ArsonEmergency, as well as the potential motivations of the accounts spreading the hashtag.

Unfortunately, we dont know who is behind these accounts, as we can only access trace data such as tweet text and basic account information.

This graph shows how many times #ArsonEmergency was tweeted between December 31 last year and January 8 this year:

Previous bot and troll campaigns have been thought to be the work of foreign interference, such as Russian trolls, or PR firms hired to distract and manipulate voters.

The New York Times has also reported on perceptions that media magnate Rupert Murdoch is influencing Australias bushfire debate.

Read more: Weather bureau says hottest, driest year on record led to extreme bushfire season

In late November, some Twitter accounts began using #ArsonEmergency to counter evidence that climate change is linked to the severity of the bushfire crisis.

Below is one of the earliest examples of an attempt to replace #ClimateEmergency with #ArsonEmergency. The accounts tried to get #ArsonEmergency trending to drown out dialogue acknowledging the link between climate change and bushfires.

The hashtag was only tweeted a few times in 2019, but gained traction this year in a sustained effort by about 300 accounts.

A much larger portion of bot and troll-like accounts pushed #ArsonEmergency, than they did #AustraliaFire and #BushfireAustralia.

The narrative was then adopted by genuine accounts who furthered its spread.

On multiple occasions, we noticed suspicious accounts countering expert opinions while using the #ArsonEmergency hashtag.

Since media coverage has shone light on the disinformation campaign, #ArsonEmergency has gained even more prominence, but in a different light.

Some journalists are acknowledging the role of disinformation bushfire crisis and countering narrative the Australia has an arson emergency. However, the campaign does indicate Australia has a climate denial problem.

Whats clear to me is that Australia has been propelled into the global disinformation battlefield.

Read more: Watching our politicians fumble through the bushfire crisis, I'm overwhelmed by dj vu

Its difficult to debunk disinformation, as it often contains a grain of truth. In many cases, it leverages peoples previously held beliefs and biases.

Humans are particularly vulnerable to disinformation in times of emergency, or when addressing contentious issues like climate change.

Online users, especially journalists, need to stay on their toes.

The accounts we come across on social media may not represent genuine citizens and their concerns. A trending hashtag may be trying to mislead the public.

Right now, its more important than ever for us to prioritise factual news from reliable sources and identify and combat disinformation. The Earths future could depend on it.

Follow this link:
Bushfires, bots and arson claims: Australia flung in the global disinformation spotlight - The Conversation AU

The Amalgamation of Data Science and Neuroscience – Analytics Insight

Discreetly, stealthily, another kind of neuroscientist is coming to fruition. From inside the myriadpositions of scholars have risen teams of neuroscientists that do science with information on neural activity, on the inadequate splutterings of many neurons. Not the production of techniques for analyzing data, however, all do that as well. Not the gathering of that information, for that, requires another, considerable, range of abilities. In any case, neuroscientists utilizing the full extent of modern computational strategies on that data to respond to scientific inquiries regarding the mind, neural data science has developed.

The why is equivalent to all areas of science that have spat out a data science: the amount of information is escaping hand. For the science of recording heaps of neurons, this information storm has a scientific reason, of sorts. Cerebrums work by passing messages between neurons. The majority of those messages appear as minor beats of electricity: spikes, we call them. So to numerous, it appears to be logical that if we need to see how brains work (and when they dont work) we have to catch every one of the messages being passed between every one of the neurons. Whats more, that implies recording whatever number of spikes from as many neurons as could reasonably be expected.

The key neuroscience idea driving the weakness of minds is normal statistics. It would seem animal brains have advanced to work in natural habitats, and they likewise adapt best in those equivalent situations. For instance, a couple of decades ago, it was indicated that the data processing properties of the mammalian visual system should have developed to work best in the forest-and-bush-heavy environment of nature, and in certainty, neurons do work that way.

At the end of the day, our eyes expect natural-looking fine detail all over the place. The common world is filigree. That is the thing that the visual system processes and learns from. Saying that nature looks like nature is presently quantifiable and has become a significant idea for seeing how brains work. For instance, lab creatures that experience childhood in confines, which are flat, exhausting and lit by flickering lights, have awful vision compared with ones that live outside. Neuroscientists definitely realize that hours daily of fake, diverting, unnatural input is awful for animal minds as a rule; for what reason would it not be valid for human brains?

Neuroscience and statistics, machine learning and data science all mix together, it is not considered to be totally unmistakable things. For individuals in neuroscience who need to learn more data science, it is suggested to get a book on statistical machine learning to get acquainted with some of the fundamental models that are used. For analysts who need to become familiar with neuroscience, it is important to get through some recent papers on explicit subjects that may be of interest, for example, calcium imaging or examination of numerous neuron datasets.

Then again, electronic innovation is always addictive, intrusive and productive, presently devouring half of our waking hours and social lives, pretty much. The issue isnt that innovation is fundamentally terrible. It isnt, yet that the particular sorts of advancements we find most dazzling are awful, in light of the fact that we discover them captivating.

Our informational appetites developed in the bush, where intriguing things and dopamine are elusive. Presently, we have speedy hits all over. Any sort of creature will, in general, get addicted when mouth-watering things once uncommon in nature, cocaine-switches for rats, laser spots for cats, treadmills for mice, become all of a sudden normal. For extremely bizarre stimuli, in any event, existing at all violates natures statistical agreement.

The significance is three-fold:1) any innovation that impacts our sensory interactions influences our minds from various perspectives;2) the vast majority of the harm is oblivious; and3) our reaction to harm for the most part looks for significantly a greater amount of the damage-causing media.

The data are famously noisy, and moreover, tend to go through numerous phases of preprocessing before the analysts even get the opportunity to see them. This implies an effectively indirect measure experience unsure amounts of data manipulation before analysis. That is a huge challenge that huge numbers of us have been thinking about for quite a long time. With respect to noise, there are numerous sources, some originating from the technology and some from the subjects.

To make it much increasingly complex, the subject-driven noise can be identified with the trial stimuli of interest. For instance, in fMRI investigations of eye motions, the subject may be enticed to somewhat move their whole head while glancing in the area of a stimuli, which taints the information. So also, in EEG there is some proof that the measured signal can be perplexed with facial appearances. Both of these would have implications on the utilization of imaging for neuromarketing and other popular applications.

Besides, the data are huge; not colossal in the size of numerous cutting edge applications, however, surely large enough to cause challenges of storage and analysis. At long lost, obviously, the way that we are not ready to get immediate measurements of brain movement and enactment, and perhaps will always be unable to do as such, is the biggest measurement challenge we face. Its difficult to make strong determinations when the measured data are fairly remote from the source signal, noisy and exceptionally processed.

See the article here:
The Amalgamation of Data Science and Neuroscience - Analytics Insight

New neuroscience reveals 5 secrets that will make you emotionally intelligent – Ladders

How are you feeling?

These days it seems like there are only two answers: Fine and Busy.

After all, if youdidsay everything thats on your mind, youd get strange looks from that barista for the rest of your life. And its no better at work, where the room for legitimate emotion can be measured in microns.

Were perpetually squashing feelings and playing roles everywhere. Its only 2 minutes into a rant that you realize youre angry.

Only after you unclench the muscles in your shoulders do you notice youve been on edge for hours.

As recently as the 1980s even manypsychologistsfelt emotions were things that just got in the way. Cognitive noise.

Stuff you had to ignore, get over and stop whining about. Yeah, back in the 1980s BFE (Before Feelings Era) there wasnt a concept of Emotional Intelligence.

That didnt exist until 1990 PFE (Post Feelings Era) when Salovey and Mayer published their landmark paper on the subject.

Cliffs Notes version: we all have feelings, they affect the majority of what we do in life, theyre not going away and they actually provide useful information if we pay attention to them.

They defined EI as:the ability to perceive accurately, appraise, and express emotion; the ability to access and/or generate feelings when they facilitate thought; the ability to understand emotion and emotional knowledge; and the ability to regulate emotions to promote emotional and intellectual growth.

And subsequent studies showed the multitude of benefits high EI provides.

FromPermission to Feel:

Among adolescents, higher emotional intelligence is associated with less depression and anxiety and may be a protective factor against suicidal behaviorThere is also data suggesting that emotional intelligence is related to higher SAT scores, greater creativity, and better grades among high school and college studentsThe benefits dont go away once we reach adulthood. Individuals who score higher on emotional intelligence tests tend to report better relationships with friends, parents, and romantic partnersResearch has also linked emotional intelligence to important health and workplace outcomes, including less anxiety, depression, stress, and burnout and greater performance and leadership ability.

But 30 years out from that first paper on EI and, if anything, weve gottenworseat it.

FromPermission to Feel:

According to the 2019 World Happiness Report, negative feelings, including worry, sadness, and anger, have been rising around the world, up by 27 percent from 2010 to 2018 According to a Stanford University study, more than 120,000 deaths annually may be attributable to workplace stress, which accounts for up to $190 billion in health care costsour research at Yale revealed that high school students, teachers, and business professionals experience negative emotions up to 70 percent of the time they are in school or at work.

Alright, no more ignoring the valuable info and benefits feelings can provide. We gotta tear this one down to the studs and get to the science. Because if we can harness the power of emotions both good and bad were gonna live much better lives. You feelin me?

So who knows this stuff? Marc Brackett is the founding director of the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence. His book isPermission to Feeland it has a simple system we can use to build real Emotional Intelligence skills.

Lets get to it

Feelings can make us smarter and sharpen real world skills.But we often hit the snooze button every time the feelings alarm goes off.We take good emotions for granted and try to ignore or eliminate the bad, never really paying attention to what they mean or how we can leverage them. And then we wonder why our performance is so inconsistent, happiness is elusive and our relationships are unsatisfying.

Feelings (even negative ones) direct our attention and focus our thinking, often in helpful ways.

FromPermission to Feel:

Pessimism can make it easier for us to anticipate things that could go wrong and then take the proper actions to prevent them. Guilt acts as a moral compass. Anxiety keeps us trying to improve things that a more generous mood might be willing to accept. Even anger is a great motivatorunlike resignation, it drives us to act and perhaps to fix what made us angry in the first place

Feelings have an enormous impact on our decision making but we rarely realize it.

FromPermission to Feel:

In an experiment we conducted at Yale, teachers were divided into two groups. One was told to remember and write about positive classroom experiences, and the other was assigned to recall a negative memory. Then all were asked to grade the same middle school essay. The positive-mood group marked the essay a full grade higher than the negative-mood group. When we asked the teachers if they believed their moods affected how they evaluated the papers, 87 percent said no.

Your emotions have a major impact on your health.

FromPermission to Feel:

Negative emotions have been associated with hypertension, increased heart rate, constriction of peripheral blood vessels, unhealthy blood lipids, and decreased immune system function In one study, laughter caused by watching a comedy film increased the flow of beta-endorphins, which enhance our mood, and stimulated growth hormones, which repair our cells.

And do I even need to mention the effect feelings have on your social life? No? Thank you.

Im not saying youre gonna study Emotional Intelligence and develop super mutant mind powers that will bring you unrelenting waves of orgiastic happiness. Thats for infomercials.But if you improve your EI skills even a tad, youll have a better idea of how youre feeling, what youre emotionally missing, and what you need to be thriving in life. Youll be able to ask those you love to help you getexactlywhat you need when things get challenging.

(To learn more about how you can lead a successful life, check out my bestselling bookhere.)

Marc lays out a 5-step process. Remember the acronym RULER:Recognize, Understand, Label, Express and Regulate.First up

Weve all had days where the world is awful and only later do we realize its just a crappy mood and Earth has not undergone major changes overnight. Its like the scene in the war movie where the person doesnt realize theyve been shot until they look down and see the blood.

You need to check in with yourself.You cant address bad emotions or increase good ones if you dont take the time to recognize your emotional state.

FromPermission to Feel:

We need to pauseto physically stop whatever were doing, check in with the state of our minds and bodies, and ask ourselves: At this exact moment, what is my emotional state? Am I feeling up or down? Pleasant or unpleasant? Would I like to approach the world or steer clear? Next, lets check for physical clues. Am I energized or depleted? Is my heart racing, am I clenching my fists, is there a knot in my stomach, or am I feeling balanced, cool, and at ease?

Make it a habit. Tie it to something you already do, even if its only a couple times a day.

This isnt a test. Theres no right or wrong answer. You want to be anemotion scientisthere. Examine, dont judge. Getting angry about feeling angry is rarely helpful.

(To learn the two-word morning ritual that will make you happy all day, clickhere.)

Youre recognizing. Awesome. Now youve got something to work with. Next step?

Its all about the word why. Why are you feeling this way? Dont ask it in a rhetorical, judgmental way. Be a sincere and curious emotion scientist.

Whythisfeeling? Why now? Whats causing it? What happened before it? What events, associations or memories could have triggered this feeling?

You may not have a big epiphany but this is the first step on the path to self-understanding. Just one little data point but, with time, youll start to see connections and patterns. Youll start to make more accurate emotional predictions. Youll be able to prepare effectively: to avoid, to cope or ask for help.

Its deceptively simple but keep doing this and youre on the path toemotional self-authorship.

(To learn how to deal with passive-aggressive people, clickhere.)

Done playing detective? Good. Now were gonna zero in and really start building those EI skills

Neuroscience studies by Matthew Lieberman at UCLA have shown the incredible power of labeling to help us control and dampen powerful emotions. When we put feelings into words we get our thinky brain (prefrontal cortex) on the case and put the brakes on our wet yourself in fear and punch people brain (amygdala). Gotta name it to tame it.

FromPermission to Feel:

participants who were identified as having extreme fear of spidersarachnophobiawere placed in a room with a caged spider. Some subjects used emotion words to describe their feelings in that situation, while others used emotion-neutral words to simply state the facts. The result? Members of the first group were able to take more steps closer to the cage than the other participants. Additionally, greater use of words such as anxiety and fear during exposure to the spider was associated with reductions in those emotions.

Ironic as it might seem, saying the word anxiety reduces anxiety.And if we take the time to broaden our emotional vocabulary to think about the different things we feel and give them distinct names we can better regulate our emotions and get the most out of them. We need to take those big emotional buckets like happy and make them more granular: are youhappyorjoyousorecstatic?

FromPermission to Feel:

participants who were deemed granular were better able to differentiate their emotional experiences. Subjects who were low in granularitycalled clumperswere less skilled at differentiating emotions (e.g., angry, worried, frustrated). When the two groups were compared, she reported, granular individuals were less likely to freak out or abuse alcohol when under stress and more likely to find positive meaning in negative experiences. They also were better at emotion regulationmoderating their responses in order to achieve desired outcomes. The clumpers, on the other hand, scored worse on those counts, tending to be physically and psychologically ill at a higher rate than the granular crowd.

Imagine if the only diagnosis a doctor could give was sick or not-sick.No cancer or flu or multiple sclerosis, just sick. How useful would that be?Ah, Ive found the problem: youre sick.Thats what most of us are like with our feelings. Butif you understand on a fine-grained level what youre feeling, then with time you can discover the best way to address it, dampen it or amplify it.

Maybe you feel stressed. More granularly, is itanxietyabout an uncertain future? Orfearof what you assume will happen? Orpressurebecause of too many responsibilities?This level of understanding allows you to solve the problem. Now the doctor can say contact dermatitis instead of just sick.

Once you start regularly playing emotion scientist you can realize that when youresadyou need to distract yourself, when youremelancholyyou need to see friends, and when youreunfulfilledyou need to attack some personal goals.

All this wordplay may sound crazy but its not. Other cultures have whole emotions youve never delineated and therefore never experienced.

FromPermission to Feel:

Iktsuarpok is the Inuit word that describes the anticipation you feel when youre so impatient for a guests arrival at your home that you keep going outside to check Kvell is the Yiddish word that describes the feeling of overwhelming love and pride you get when you see what your child can do In Mandarin, there were more than one hundred different shame-related terms

Dont accept emotions off the rack; custom-tailor them. Break out the thesaurus next time youre feeling something and start playing wine connoisseur. Is this a bold, supple distress with an aftertaste of hopelessness? Or perhaps an unbalanced and stinging longing with a regret finish? Direct your descriptive powers toward your inner life, not toward fermented grape juice.

With time, youll developA Field Guide to Yourself. And then you can share these insights with others. How much easier would it be to help loved ones understand what you need if your self-knowledge was this rich and detailed?Im lucky enough to have people around me who can distinguish between Ericspeeved, better change the subject or Ericsangry, better talk this out or Erics gonequantum dumpster fireagain, evacuate a three-mile radius and call the National Guard.

And its not all about negative emotions either. If you understand the difference betweenpleasantandjoyfulyou can learn what it takes to get yourself to that next rung and what it takes to extend it.

(To learn the 4 harsh truths that will make you a better person, clickhere.)

Okay, its time to deal with the scary stuff

No, Im not telling you to run around venting. Dont go allemotion grenadeat work or at home saying the blogger-man gave you permission to act on every impulse. No, the blogger-man most certainly did not.

But nor do you want to suppress all those feelings. Surface-acting takes its toll. Its correlated with burnout, lower job satisfaction,and even increased anxiety and depression.

Jamie Pennebakeris a psychologist at the University of Texas at Austin and hes done work showing that bottling stuff up makes you sick. On the flip side,converting emotions into words improves health. When people talk about their problems or write them down, research shows a drop in doctor visits, lower blood pressure, less absenteeism, higher grades and a long-term improvement in mood.

So we should just open up and express our emotions, right?Ah, if only it were that easy

Heres the part where Imsupposedto say its okay to express emotions everywhere at any time and nobody will think youre crazy or weak And I willnotbe saying that. Were afraid of expressing our emotions to others fordamn good reasons.Some people will say youre weak. Some will say youre crazy.

You gotta be choosy about where, when and with whom you open up. This is why psychologists talk about display rules. Those arethe unwritten but widely agreed-upon guidelines for how, where, when, and in whose presence we may express our feelings.You need to test the waters and build your personal display rules. Take your time and slowly discover your safe people and safe zones.

When you open up and are vulnerable with someone, its about as intimate as youll ever be. Thats how real relationships are forged.

(To learn more about how to make friends as an adult, clickhere.)

Last one. How do we regulate difficult emotions, in the moment, when they suddenly hit us?

We all have methods for regulating our emotions. Babies suck their thumbs.(No, Im not recommending that during work meetings.) Which strategies do experts recommend?

1) Positive Self-Talk

Yeah, youve heard this one before. Heres the new twist, courtesy of neuroscience:always do positive self-talk in the third person.

FromPermission to Feel:

In one experiment, subjects were shown neutral and disturbing images or asked to recall negative moments from their own lives. By monitoring their emotional brain activity, the researchers found that the subjects distress decreased rapidlywithin one secondwhen they performed self-talk in the third person compared with the first person.

Saying, Eric, everything is going to be fine tricks your brain. Its like a friend reassuring you. Youre being empathetic with yourself.

2) Reframing

Deliberately choose to see things in a way that generates fewer negative emotions and assumes others have good intentions.

FromPermission to Feel:

Students who were asked to think of pretest anxiety as being beneficial performed better on exams than a control group. In another experiment, reframing anxiety as excitement was found to improve negotiating and public-speaking skills.

When someone yells at you dont assume they hate you; assume theyre having a bad day. Believing that will make you feel better, youll respond compassionately instead of harshly, and even if it isnt true it will certainly make the situation better rather than worse.

3) The Pause

When you feel a negative emotion rising, pause. Dont do anything. Take a deep breath.Pausing helps you refrain from making a permanent decision based on a temporary emotion.Then ask yourself one question:

What would my Best Self do next?

Take another deep breath. And then be your best you.

(To learn an FBI behavior experts tips for getting people to like you, clickhere.)

Okay, weve covered a lot. Time to round it all up and learn the fun thing that can put all of the above on Easy mode

Heres how to increase emotional intelligence.Remember RULER:

So how do you make RULER easier? By taking care of yourself. Getting enough sleep. Exercising. Seeing friends.

FromPermission to Feel:

Spend time with family and friends, pursue passions and pastimes, get in touch with your spiritual side, immerse yourself in nature, read a good book, watch a funny movie. We build up cognitive reserves that way, which will help us when emotional turmoil inevitably strikes.

When youre fully charged, its easier to follow the steps above. But when youre not getting enough rest or not having any fun, youre gonna have a very short fuse.

Get to know yourself. Become the author of your emotional life. And share your findings with those you love

And so I ask you again:How are you feeling?

Fine or busy wont cut it with me.Im hoping more for:

Flamboyantly serene with crisp silky notes of optimism and a hint of buttery enthusiasm.

Read more from the original source:
New neuroscience reveals 5 secrets that will make you emotionally intelligent - Ladders

Meditation can better the brain. Are we morally obligated to meditate? – Vox.com

Eight weeks ago, I started meditating every day.

I knew Id be going home to visit my family at the end of December, and well, I have a bad habit of regressing into a 13-year-old whenever Im around them. All my old immaturities and anxieties get activated. I become a more reactive, less compassionate version of myself.

But this holiday season, I was determined to avoid fighting with my family. I would be kind and even-tempered throughout the visit. I knew that in order to have a chance in hell of achieving this, Id need a secret weapon.

Thats where the meditation came in.

Starting in 2005, Harvard neuroscientist Sara Lazar began to publish some mind-blowing findings: Meditation can literally change the structure of your brain, thickening key areas of the cortex that help you control your attention and emotions. Your brain and possibly, by extension, your behavior can reap the benefits if you practice meditation for half an hour a day over eight weeks.

Just eight weeks? I thought when I read the research. This seems too good to be true!

I was intrigued, if skeptical. Above all, I was curious to know more. And I wasnt the only one. By 2014, there had been enough follow-up studies to warrant a meta-analysis, which showed that meditators brains tend to be enlarged in a bunch of regions, including the insula (involved in emotional self-awareness), parts of the cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (involved in self-regulation), and parts of the prefrontal cortex (involved in attention).

A host of other studies showed that meditation can also change your neural circuitry in ways that make you more compassionate, as well as more inclined to have positive feelings toward a victim of suffering and to see things from their perspective.

Further research suggested that meditation can change not only your internal emotional states but also your actual behavior. One study found that people made charitable donations at a higher rate after being trained in meditation for just two weeks. Another study found that people who get that same measly amount of meditation training are about three times more likely than non-meditators to give up their chair when they see someone on crutches and in pain.

Still skeptical, I fell down an internet rabbit hole and soon found many more neuroscientific studies. Looking closely at them, I did find that a fair number are methodologically flawed (more on that below). But there were many others that seemed sound. Taken together, the literature on meditation suggested that the practice can help us get better at relating to one another. It confronted me with evidence that a few weeks of meditation can improve me as a person.

I say confronted because the evidence really did feel like a challenge, even a dare. If it takes such a small amount of time and effort to get better at regulating my emotions, paying attention to other people, seeing things from their point of view, and acting altruistically, then well am I not morally obligated to do it?

The word meditation actually refers to many different practices. In the West, the most well-known set of practices is mindfulness meditation. When people talk about that, theyre typically thinking of a practice for training our attention.

Heres how Jon Kabat-Zinn, a scientist who helped popularize mindfulness in the West, defines it: Mindfulness is awareness that arises through paying attention, on purpose, in the present moment, non-judgmentally.

And heres what mindfulness meditation practice often involves: You sit down, close your eyes, and focus on feeling your breath go in and out. When you feel your attention drifting to the thoughts that inevitably arise, you notice, and then gently bring your attention back to your breath.

This combination of attention training and direct observation is the basic practice. Sounds simple, right? But according to some studies, it can have profound effects on your brain.

In a 2012 study, people who were new to meditation underwent eight weeks of mindful attention training, practicing for around four hours each week. Before the training, they got fMRIs, scans that show where brain activity is occurring. While they were in the MRI scanner, they viewed a series of pictures, some of which were upsetting (like a photo of a burn victim). After eight weeks of mindfulness meditation, when they viewed the upsetting pictures in the scanner again, they showed reduced activity in a crucial brain region: the amygdala.

The amygdala is our brains threat detector. It scans our environment for danger, and when it perceives a threat, it sets off our fight-flight-freeze response, which includes releasing stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. It glues our attention to the threat, making it hard for us to focus on anything else.

Whats striking about the study is that the reduced amygdala activity lasted even when the participants were in their ordinary baseline state in other words, not actively practicing mindfulness. This suggests the effects of meditation may result in enduring changes in mental function, as the authors wrote. A control group showed no such effects.

In another, similarly designed study, participants showed reduced amygdala activity in response to upsetting pictures after practicing mindfulness for 20 minutes per day over just one week. However, the lessened amygdala reactivity only showed while they were engaged in mindfulness, suggesting we need more continued practice if we want the changes to be permanent.

To see why attention-training can be helpful when it comes to treating others better, think back to a time when you saw someone in distress. Maybe it was a friend who wanted to talk about his painful breakup, or a colleague who was caught in a swirl of anxiety, or a homeless person who needed something to eat.

If you were distracted by your own distressing thoughts if your amygdala was activating like crazy you may have had a hard time putting your issues aside long enough to deal with theirs. You may not have even noticed that they needed something from you until it was too late.

But if your mind is undisturbed, youll probably have an easier time paying attention to what the present moment asks of you: to help this person whos in front of you, right here, right now.

Thats common sense, said Thupten Jinpa, a Tibetan Buddhist scholar and the main English translator to the Dalai Lama. I grew up as a monk, so for me, the most powerful evidence is really the anecdotal evidence in my own personal life.

But as an academic with a PhD in religion, Jinpa doesnt rely only on common sense or personal experience he also works with psychologists on scientific research. In 2015, he co-authored a study titled A wandering mind is a less caring mind, which found that reducing mind-wandering through meditation was associated with increased caring behavior, both for oneself and for others.

Although Jinpa believes mindfulness is important, he told me that when it comes to making us more altruistic, theres another type of practice thats even more effective: loving-kindness or compassion meditation.

Two other meditation practices loving-kindness meditation and its close cousin, compassion meditation have interesting science behind them, too. These practices, which involve concentrated attention to cultivate certain qualities, have been growing in popularity in the West over the past couple of decades thanks to American teachers like Sharon Salzberg. And evidence shows they can change your neural circuitry even faster than mindfulness meditation.

The meditation for loving-kindness typically looks like this: You repeat certain phrases in your head, such as may I be safe, may I be healthy, or may my life unfold with ease. After youve wished these things for yourself, you widen the circle of caring, wishing the same things for the people you love, then for people you feel neutrally about, and then for all living beings including those who get on your nerves or have hurt you. (One compassion meditation works much the same way, except instead of wishing that people be safe and healthy and full of ease, you wish that they be free from suffering.)

So, how does loving-kindness or compassion meditation affect the brain, and in turn, affect our behavior?

Before we answer that question, its important to note that loving-kindness and compassion meditation which involve cultivating love for people who are suffering are not the same thing as empathy, even though we often conflate these concepts.

Empathy is when you share the feelings of other people. If other people are feeling pain, you feel pain, too literally.

Not so with compassion. In a 2013 study at the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, researchers put volunteers in a brain scanner, showed them gruesome videos of people suffering, and asked them to empathize with the sufferers. The fMRI showed activated neural circuits centered around the insula exactly the circuits that get activated when were in pain ourselves.

Compare that with what happened when the researchers took a different group of volunteers and gave them eight hours of training in compassion, then showed them the graphic videos. A totally different set of brain circuits lit up: those for love and warmth, the sort a parent feels for a child.

When we feel empathy, we feel like were suffering, and thats upsetting. In the short term, it can cause us to tune out to help alleviate our own feelings of distress. And in the long term, it can cause serious burnout, as many a nurse and social worker can attest.

A little bit of empathy is important, because we need to be able to detect another persons suffering in order to be helpful, Richard Davidson, a prominent University of Wisconsin-Madison neuroscientist whos spent decades studying meditation in the lab, told me. But empathy by itself can be toxic.

Amazingly, compassion because it fosters positive feelings actually attenuates the empathetic distress that can cause burnout, as neuroscientist Tania Singer has demonstrated in her lab.

In other words, practicing compassion or loving-kindness doesnt just help us make other people happier; it makes us happier, too.

Loving-kindness also boosts the connections between the brains circuits for joy and happiness and the prefrontal cortex, a zone critical for guiding behavior, Davidson writes in Altered Traits, his authoritative 2017 book on the neuroscience of meditation, which he co-authored with Daniel Goleman. And the greater the increase in the connection between these regions, the more altruistic a person becomes following compassion meditation training.

In fact, one fMRI study showed that in very experienced practitioners (think Tibetan yogis), compassion meditation actually triggers activity in the brains motor centers, preparing their bodies to physically move in order to help whoever is suffering, even as theyre still lying in the brain scanner.

Given such evidence, Jinpa believes its clear that we can strengthen our compassion through concrete practices, just as we strengthen our muscles through exercise. Working out of Stanford Universitys Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education in 2009, he created the Compassion Cultivation Training, an eight-week course designed with input from neuroscientists and psychologists. Blending formal meditation with other contemplative practices, the course is now taught around the world.

After I started wondering if were morally obligated to meditate, I soon realized thats a very Western and Judeo-Christian way of thinking about it. Growing up, Id had to memorize the Ten Commandments and a long litany of sins, and my mind is still conditioned to think in terms of commandments and obligations.

But Eastern traditions like Buddhism or Confucianism arent grounded in commandments that come from a divine being. Among Buddhists, youre more likely to hear about skillful and unskillful means for minimizing suffering and maximizing the possibility for liberation.

The everybody ought language that wouldnt be the language theyd use, Evan Thompson, a University of British Columbia professor who specializes in Asian philosophical traditions, told me. The idea is that in order to lead a good life, we need to engage in certain self-cultivation practices, such as training our minds to calm down so we can pay attention to the present.

Plus, whereas the language of oughts and obligations suggests a prescriptive or proselytizing attitude, Buddhist tradition has generally been more interested in inviting people to try meditation and discover its benefits for themselves, rather than in mandating adherence. (Not all people who identify as Buddhist practice meditation.)

Jinpa said it would be naive to think someone could get everyone to meditate. That wont happen, he told me. So Im interested in promoting the idea of compassion training that wouldnt necessarily involve formal sitting meditation. He pointed to his Compassion Cultivation Training as an example, saying its likelier to be widely adopted in part because its presented as secular.

Meanwhile, to Davidson, the neuroscientist, the virtues you cultivate by meditating are so crucial as to make the practice feel almost obligatory.

I see this as a public health need, he told me, using the analogy of brushing our teeth something that takes only a few minutes a day, and something that virtually everyone does because we see it as important for our physical hygiene.

I think most people would agree their minds are just as important as their teeth. If we spent such a short time on our mind as we do on brushing our teeth, this world would be a different place, Davidson said, because our emotional well-being would be improved. So there is some sense of a moral obligation, almost.

But theres a caveat: For a small minority of people, meditation can actually provoke adverse effects, like intense mental distress or impaired physical functioning. Brown University psychologist Willoughby Britton is studying these cases in a project called Varieties of Contemplative Experience. More research is still needed, but given that meditation practices might precipitate or exacerbate challenging conditions in some people, it would be wrong to say that absolutely everyone would do well to meditate.

Scientists are publishing more and more studies on meditation each year. But many of these studies are beset by methodological flaws, leading to overhyped results. Davidson calls this neuromythology.

Some studies fail to replicate in other labs. Others fail to include active controls they dont test the potential benefits of a meditation regimen against those of a different regimen, like exercise or health education classes. Still others fail to disaggregate the data of participants who are relatively inexperienced with meditation and those whove had enough hours of practice to be considered experts.

Even though there are methodological issues with some of the studies, others do hold up. And when you consider the hundreds of studies altogether, there is substantial evidence that meditation can help us become better people.

So, the next question is: How much better? Is it worth spending hours on meditation when you could just get out there and start volunteering?

My response to that is, why pose it as an either/or question? I think both are important, Davidson said. Id say the biggest bang for your buck would be to engage in a compassion meditation practice in your mind while youre volunteering.

When we think about meditation, we often picture ourselves sitting on a cushion with our eyes closed. But it doesnt have to look that way. It can just be a state of mind with which we do whatever else it is were doing: volunteering, commuting to work, drinking a cup of tea, washing the dishes.

In fact, the Zen Buddhist monk Thich Nhat Hanh is fond of saying, Washing the dishes is like bathing a baby Buddha. The profane is the sacred. Everyday mind is Buddhas mind.

As for me, Ive found that I have enough bandwidth at the end of the day to sit down and close my eyes for a few minutes. So, for eight weeks, I sat in meditation every night.

Then I went home to visit my family.

Im happy to report that we had our best, calmest visit in years. By the end of the holiday break, the number of fights Id gotten into was a glorious, miraculous zero.

Its not that all of my reactive or unkind impulses magically disappeared. But whenever I felt myself starting to get snippy, I went into my old childhood bedroom and closed the door. I took a deep breath, and recalling the heaps of scientific evidence that had confronted me, I did what seemed to me like the reasonable response, a response so easy and so beneficial that it felt like a no-brainer.

Reader, I meditated.

Reporting for this article was supported by Public Theologies of Technology and Presence, a journalism and research initiative based at the Institute of Buddhist Studies and funded by the Henry Luce Foundation.

Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Twice a week, youll get a roundup of ideas and solutions for tackling our biggest challenges: improving public health, decreasing human and animal suffering, easing catastrophic risks, and to put it simply getting better at doing good.

Future Perfect is funded in part by individual contributions, grants, and sponsorships. Learn more here.

Continue reading here:
Meditation can better the brain. Are we morally obligated to meditate? - Vox.com

Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market 2020 Analysis Focusing On Top Companies- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tecan, Santa Cruz Biotechnology,…

New Jersey, United States, The report titled Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market is one of the most comprehensive and important additions to Verified Market Researchs archive of market research studies. It offers detailed research and analysis of key aspects of the Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays market. The market analysts authoring this report have provided in-depth information on leading growth drivers, restraints, challenges, trends, and opportunities to offer a complete analysis of the Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays market. Market participants can use the analysis on market dynamics to plan effective growth strategies and prepare for future challenges beforehand. Each trend of the Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays market is carefully analyzed and researched about by the market analysts.

Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market was valued at USD 2.42 Billion in 2018 and is projected to reach USD 5.14 Billion by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 9.7% from 2019 to 2026.

Request a Sample Copy of this report @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/download-sample/?rid=28342&utm_source=BTN&utm_medium=009

Top 10 Companies in the Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market Research Report:

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market: Competitive Landscape

Competitive landscape of a market explains strategies incorporated by key players of the market. Key developments and shift in management in the recent years by players has been explained through company profiling. This helps readers to understand the trends that will accelerate the growth of market. It also includes investment strategies, marketing strategies, and product development plans adopted by major players of the market. The market forecast will help readers make better investments.

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market: Segment Analysis

This section of the report includes segmentation such as application, product type, and end user. These segmentations aid in determining parts of market that will progress more than others. The segmentation analysis provides information about the key elements that are thriving the specific segments better than others. It helps readers to understand strategies to make sound investments. The Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market is segmented on the basis of product type, applications, and its end users.

Global Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market: Regional Analysis

This part of the report includes detailed information of the market in different regions. Each region offers different scope to the market as each region has different government policy and other factors. The regions included in the report are North America, South America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East. Information about different region helps the reader to understand global market better.

Ask for Discount @https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=28342&utm_source=BTN&utm_medium=009

Table of Content

1 Introduction of Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market

1.1 Overview of the Market 1.2 Scope of Report 1.3 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Research Methodology of Verified Market Research

3.1 Data Mining 3.2 Validation 3.3 Primary Interviews 3.4 List of Data Sources

4 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market Outlook

4.1 Overview 4.2 Market Dynamics 4.2.1 Drivers 4.2.2 Restraints 4.2.3 Opportunities 4.3 Porters Five Force Model 4.4 Value Chain Analysis

5 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Deployment Model

5.1 Overview

6 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Solution

6.1 Overview

7 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Vertical

7.1 Overview

8 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market, By Geography

8.1 Overview 8.2 North America 8.2.1 U.S. 8.2.2 Canada 8.2.3 Mexico 8.3 Europe 8.3.1 Germany 8.3.2 U.K. 8.3.3 France 8.3.4 Rest of Europe 8.4 Asia Pacific 8.4.1 China 8.4.2 Japan 8.4.3 India 8.4.4 Rest of Asia Pacific 8.5 Rest of the World 8.5.1 Latin America 8.5.2 Middle East

9 Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market Competitive Landscape

9.1 Overview 9.2 Company Market Ranking 9.3 Key Development Strategies

10 Company Profiles

10.1.1 Overview 10.1.2 Financial Performance 10.1.3 Product Outlook 10.1.4 Key Developments

11 Appendix

11.1 Related Research

Request Customization of Report @ https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/product/Neuroscience-Antibodies-&-Assays-Market/?utm_source=BTN&utm_medium=009

Highlights of Report

About Us:

Verified market research partners with clients to provide insight into strategic and growth analytics; data that help achieve business goals and targets. Our core values include trust, integrity, and authenticity for our clients.

Analysts with high expertise in data gathering and governance utilize industry techniques to collate and examine data at all stages. Our analysts are trained to combine modern data collection techniques, superior research methodology, subject expertise and years of collective experience to produce informative and accurate research reports.

Contact Us:

Mr. Edwyne Fernandes Call: +1 (650) 781 4080 Email: [emailprotected]

Go here to read the rest:
Neuroscience Antibodies & Assays Market 2020 Analysis Focusing On Top Companies- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tecan, Santa Cruz Biotechnology,...

ProMIS Neurosciences to present at Sachs 3rd Annual Neuroscience Innovation Forum – Benzinga

TORONTO and CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Jan. 09, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- ProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. (TSX:PMN) (OTCQB:ARFXF), a biotechnology company focused on the discovery and development of antibody therapeutics targeting toxic oligomers implicated in the development of neurodegenerative diseases, today announced its participation in the Sachs 3rd Annual Neuroscience Innovation Forum being held on January 12, 2020 at the Marine's Memorial Club, San Francisco, CA.

ProMIS' President and CEO, Elliot Goldstein, MD will provide overviews of its novel drug discovery and development programs for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and ALS(amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). The audio webcast and slides of Dr. Goldstein's presentation will be available approximately one week following the conference presentation on ProMIS' web site https://promisneurosciences.com.

About ProMIS NeurosciencesProMIS Neurosciences, Inc. is a development stage biotechnology company focused on discovering and developing antibody therapeutics selectively targeting toxic oligomers implicated in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). The Company's proprietary target discovery platform is based on the use of two complementary thermodynamic, computational discovery engines ProMIS and Collective Coordinates to predict novel targets known as Disease Specific Epitopes on the molecular surface of misfolded proteins. Using this unique precision approach, the Company is developing novel antibody therapeutics for AD, ALS and PD. ProMIS is headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, with offices in Cambridge, Massachusetts. ProMIS is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol PMN, and on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol ARFXF.

To learn more, visit us at http://www.promisneurosciences.com, follow us onTwitter and LinkedIn and listen to the podcast, Saving Minds, at iTunes or Spotify.

For media inquiries, please contact:Shanti Skiffingtonshanti.skiffington@gmail.comTel. 617 921-0808

For Investor Relations please contact:Alpine Equity AdvisorsNicholas Rigopulos, Presidentnick@alpineequityadv.comTel. 617 901-0785

The TSX has not reviewed and does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This information release contains certain forward-looking information. Such information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those implied by statements herein, and therefore these statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results. All forward-looking statements are based on the Company's current beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to it as well as other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this press release. Due to risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties identified by the Company in its public securities filings, actual events may differ materially from current expectations. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Read more here:
ProMIS Neurosciences to present at Sachs 3rd Annual Neuroscience Innovation Forum - Benzinga

Mahana Therapeutics Enters Into Licensing Agreement With King’s College London for Innovative Digital Therapeutic to Treat Gastrointestinal Condition…

SAN FRANCISCO and LONDON, Jan. 10, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Mahana Therapeutics, a digital therapeutics company reimagining the treatment of chronic diseases, today announced that the Company has entered into a licensing and collaboration agreement with King's College London, a leading research university and one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in England.Mahana has acquired a worldwide exclusive license to an innovative digital therapeutic for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

Professor Rona Moss-Morris, Head of Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King's College London led the development of the digital program in collaboration with Trudie Chalder, Professor of Cognitive Behavioural Psychotherapy and Dr. Alice Sibelli both also from King's, Hazel Everitt, GP and Professor of Primary Care Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, and a broad multi-university team."We spent over 18 years developing and clinically testing a personalized digital CBT program for adult IBS patients," said Rona Moss Morris."We believe our multi-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 558 patients is the largest clinical trial ever conducted demonstrating the clinical safety and efficacy of a digital CBT product for IBS."The trial, with results published in 2019 prestigious medical journal Gut[1],demonstrated that web-based CBT showed substantial and durable IBS symptom severity improvements versus treatment as usual (i.e. doctors visits alone) and also led to reductions in anxiety and depression in patients over three, six and twelve-month time periods.

"The digital era has allowed us the opportunity to explore new ways to reach patients and provide them with access to psychological-based therapies that help control symptoms in a more convenient way. We are thrilled to partner with Mahana Therapeutics. Mahana shares our vision to provide patients in the U.K. and abroad with clinically and cost-effective treatments for gastrointestinal diseases and they have been an amazing collaborative partner,"said Professor Moss-Morris.

"This is the perfect union of our vision at Mahana plus a leading academic institution's desire to bring world-leading research into the hands of patients,"said Robert Paull, co-founder and CEO of Mahana Therapeutics. "The digital therapeutic developed by Professor Moss-Morris and her colleagues at King's College London is best-in-class and supported by extensive clinical data. We are excited to bring this important treatment option to patients in the United Kingdom, United States and globally."

About Mahana Therapeutics

Mahana is focused on developing digital therapeutics for children and adults living with gastrointestinal diseases and conditions. The company is a diverse mix of healthcare and technology entrepreneurs, gastroenterologists, psychologists, behavioral scientists, and passionate patients looking to improve the health and quality of life of people living with chronic gastrointestinal conditions.Mahana is based in San Francisco, California and London, England and is backed by leading venture capital firms Lux Capital and JAZZ Venture Partners.For more information please visit http://www.mahanatx.comor email press@mahanatx.com.

About King's College London and the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & NeuroscienceKing's College London is one of the top 10 UK universities in the world (QS World University Rankings, 2018/19) and among the oldest in England. King's has more than 31,000 students (including more than 12,800 postgraduates) from some 150 countries worldwide, and some 8,500 staff.King's has an outstanding reputation for world-class teaching and cutting-edge research. In the 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF), eighty-four per cent of research at King's was deemed 'world-leading' or 'internationally excellent' (3* and 4*).

The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King's College London is the premier centre for mental health and related neurosciences research in Europe. It produces more highly cited publications in psychiatry and mental health than any other university in the world (Scopus, 2016), with 31 of the most highly cited scientists in this field. World-leading research from the IoPPN has made, and continues to make, an impact on how we understand, prevent and treat mental illness and other conditions that affect the brain. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/ioppn@KingsIoPPN

About University of Southampton

The University of Southampton drives original thinking, turns knowledge into action and impact, and creates solutions to the world's challenges. We are among the top 100 institutions globally (QS World University Rankings 2019). Our academics are leaders in their fields, forging links with high-profile international businesses and organisations, and inspiring a 24,000-strong community of exceptional students, from over 135 countries worldwide. Through our high-quality education, the University helps students on a journey of discovery to realize their potential and join our global network of over 200,000 alumni. http://www.southampton.ac.uk

[1] Everitt HA, et al. Gut 2019;0:111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317805

Related Images

mahana-therapeutics-logo.jpg Mahana Therapeutics Logo

View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mahana-therapeutics-enters-into-licensing-agreement-with-kings-college-london-for-innovative-digital-therapeutic-to-treat-gastrointestinal-condition-300985209.html

SOURCE Mahana Therapeutics

Originally posted here:
Mahana Therapeutics Enters Into Licensing Agreement With King's College London for Innovative Digital Therapeutic to Treat Gastrointestinal Condition...

Michael Egnor: How Experiments Show that the Mind Is More than the Brain – Discovery Institute

On a classic episode of ID the Future, host Ray Bohlin talks with Michael Egnor, a pediatric neurosurgeon and professor of neurosurgery at Stony Brook University, about ways modern science validates the idea that the mind is not reducible to the brain. They delve into oddities of neuroscience that indicate that there is more going on in the brain than mere chemistry, and, in particular, walk through the seminal work of Adrian Owen on MRIs and what they reveal. Download the podcast or listen to it here.

Photo: Michael Egnor at theinauguration of the Walter Bradley Center for Natural & Artificial Intelligence, by Nathan Jacobson.

See the article here:
Michael Egnor: How Experiments Show that the Mind Is More than the Brain - Discovery Institute

Brains Are Amazing Neuroscientists Discover L2/3 Human Neurons Can Compute the XOR Operation – Synced

When talk of artificial neural networks began some fifty years ago the idea was to mimic the behaviour and function of the neurons in human brains a premise that has more or less survived to this day. But new research now suggests scientists may have severely underestimated the power and potential of our neurons.

Brains are amazing. Our lab demonstrates that single human layer 2/3 neurons can compute the XOR operation. Never seen before in any neuron in any other species The tweet from Humboldt University of Berlin Research Fellow and Neuroscientist Jaan Aru introduced the paper Dendritic Action Potentials and Computation in Human Layer 2/3 Cortical Neurons to a surprised neuroscience research community. Recently published in Science, the paper authors are from Humboldt, Charit Universittsmedizin Berlin, and the Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH).

The human brain has evolved an extraordinarily thick cortex with layers 2 and 3 (L2/3 of 6) particularly important in cognitive function. These L2/3 human cortical neurons form dendritic trees, which the researchers explain largely determine the repertoire of transformations of the synaptic inputs to axonal action potentials (APs) at the output. Thus, they constitute a key element of the neurons computational power.

Its believed one of the reasons these human brain neurons abilities remained undiscovered is because previous knowledge of active dendrites was developed almost entirely from studies on rodents.

In their investigation of the dendrites of L2/3 neurons the researchers discovered waveform and effects on neuronal output fromdCaAPs, a class of calcium-mediated dendritic action potentials: In contrast to typical all-or-none action potentials, dCaAPs were graded; their amplitudes were maximal for threshold-level stimuli but dampened for stronger stimuli. These dCaAPs enabled the dendrites of individual human neocortical pyramidal neurons to classify linearly nonseparable inputsa computation conventionally thought to require multilayered networks.

It had been assumed that tasks such as XOR could not be performed by a single neuron. In fact it takes a two-layer artificial neural network to compute XOR (Exclusive Or) a basic logical operationthat gives a true (1 or HIGH) output when the number of true inputs is odd.

The discoveries provide an exciting new perspective on how neurons work and how our brains process information. Says Oberlin College Neuroscience graduate Yujia Liu: If the findings can be further examined in more detail in terms of explainability and interpretability, there may be some insights for creating a new type of artificial neurons. Inspired by the research, an equally powerful artificial neural network could be created without so many neurons.

The paper Dendritic Action Potentials and Computation in Human Layer 2/3 Cortical Neurons is available on Science.

Journalist: Fangyu Cai | Editor: Michael Sarazen

Like Loading...

Excerpt from:
Brains Are Amazing Neuroscientists Discover L2/3 Human Neurons Can Compute the XOR Operation - Synced