BNI Shoreline Jan. 28th Meeting Presentation Anatomy of a Divorce – Zip06.com

Date: Tuesday morning, January 28, 2020 @ 7:15amTopic: The Anatomy of a Divorce: Review of Court File Speaker: Divorce Attorney Cynthia Sheppard of Riccio & Beletsky, LLCAttorney Sheppard will access online a divorce matter shes handling and will go through the following pleadings and motions available for public access: 1) Divorce complaint including summons and automatic orders2) Pendente Lite motions3) Divorce judgment and incorporated Separation Agreement4) Post-Judgment MotionsFREE! Visitors welcome as guests of a member. To be invited, contact BNI PR at BNI.Clinton.PR@gmail.com or BNI.Clinton@gmail.comBNI Business Network International is the worlds leading business networking and referral organization. BNI Shoreline (Clinton) Chapter meets every Tuesday morning from 7:15am to 9am.Any of our professionals will speak, free of charge, to civic, philanthropic and/or affinity groups. For more information or a list of topics, please contact BNI PR at BNI.Clinton.PR@gmail.com

Here is the original post:
BNI Shoreline Jan. 28th Meeting Presentation Anatomy of a Divorce - Zip06.com

Stars Who Almost Played Other TV Roles on Grey’s Anatomy, NCIS, Lost, Gilmore Girls, Friends and Other Shows – TVLine

Somewhere, theres an alternate universe where Rob Lowe practiced medicine not on Code Black, but as Greys Anatomys McDreamy. Where Katie Holmes played Orange Is the New Blacks Piper Chapman. And where Game of Thrones Iwan Rheon almost played Game of Thrones Jon Snow?!

The TV landscape is littered withalmost-casting stories the many cases in which a major small-screen role was nearly filled by someone else. If some of them had come to fruition, we could have seen Houses Lisa Edelstein slipping into Carrie Bradshaws Manolo Blahniks, orParks and Recreations Chris Pratt sporting a Buy More name tag.

In some cases, actors didnt land the lead roles for which they originally auditioned, but they did pop up as other characters on those same shows. Such was the case for Smallvilles Jensen Ackles,Arrows Anna Hopkins andThe Affairs Colin Donnell, to name a few.

In the attached photo gallery, weve gathered more than 20 almost-casting stories from TV shows past and present, all of which got us wondering about how those series would play out with different stars. (Note: We of course havent included every case of an actor missing out on a certain role, but simply a selection that struck us as particularly fun or curious. Admit it: You want to know what True Blood would be like with Benedict Cumberbatch as Bill, right?)

Scroll through the attached gallery or click here for direct access to see the aforementioned almost-castings and many more, then drop a comment with the stories that intrigue you most!

Follow this link:
Stars Who Almost Played Other TV Roles on Grey's Anatomy, NCIS, Lost, Gilmore Girls, Friends and Other Shows - TVLine

You’ll Worry About Everyone in ‘Station 19’-‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Crossover – TVInsider

Regarding the cliff-hanging return of Grey's Anatomy: "Watch with a whole box of tissues!" So says showrunner Krista Vernoff, who now holds the same job on companion series Station 19.

The Grey's fall finale closed with a car crashing through the wall of Joe's Bar, the watering hole frequented by staff from both Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital and the firehouse three blocks away. When Thursday's crossover kicks off on the new season of Station 19 (the Seattle-set shows have switched timeslots), there's a very real danger the building will collapse.

The firefighters hustle to save team members Ben Warren (Jason George) and retired captain Pruitt Herrera (Miguel Sandoval), along with a batch of doctors including Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams), Levi Schmitt (Jake Borelli), and an injured Taryn Helm (Jaicy Elliot), who are all trapped inside.

"The bar is underground, and the structure is unstable," Vernoff notes. "Arguably, we could worry about everyone [in there] which includes the responding [firefighters]."

(ABC/Eric McCandless)

You might also worry about someone outside. When we last saw Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson, above), the surgery chief and wife of Ben had suffered a miscarriage. Now she waits to see if she will lose her husband as well.

Looking ahead on Station 19, Vernoff says to expect a darker, grittier tone, "with more death and chaos." She also promises flashbacks illuminating who these heroes are "and what makes them want to run toward fire."

Station 19, Season Premiere, Thursday, January 23, 8/7c, ABC

Grey's Anatomy, Thursdays, 9/8c, ABC

Read more from the original source:
You'll Worry About Everyone in 'Station 19'-'Grey's Anatomy' Crossover - TVInsider

Anatomy of an advertisement: The story behind Greenpeace’s terrifying turtle extermination – gotech daily

After the impact of the rank tan palm oil campaign, Aardman and Greenpeace unveiled Turtle Journey last week a heartbreaking stop-motion animation that encourages people to take action against the maritime crisis.

The campaign brought together Greenpeaces strength as an activist with the famous creative from Aardman Animations, the creators of Wallace and Gromit and famous voices such as Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren and David Harbor from Stranger Things.

The drum went behind the scenes to find out how the major project came about.

One of Greenpeaces main concerns has been to raise public awareness of the problems the worlds oceans face as a result of climate change. What started as a Twitter joke in 2018 led David Harbor from Stranger Things to dance with penguins in Antarctica to raise awareness of their plight.

https://t.co/29mTHvLYOA

Here is a petition to create the largest protected area in the world. @ Greenpeace has 1 million characters.

Lets give them 1.8.

1.8 million.

1 for each square kilometer proposed

for the guins.

here i dance with them,

as promised.

they have no netflix. @ greenpeace? pic.twitter.com/jjLBk2XOIr

David Harbor (@DavidKHarbour), February 20, 2018

The same year, Radiohead singer and environmental activist Thom Yorke released a single in support of Greenpeaces mission to protect the Antarctic Ocean from the effects of climate change, commercial fishing and human interference. The message of the ominous instrumental was broadcast on the London Marble Arch.

To celebrate World Ocean Day 2018, people from 25 countries and all seven continents have painted blue and made waves of people to demonstrate their support for the protection of the oceans.

Happy World Oceans Day! Together we are committed to a rescue plan for the oceans that would create huge new marine reserves around the world. If it

Despite all the steps Greenpeace has taken to bring this message home, Chris Till, deputy director of fundraising at Greenpeace, admitted that it was not as effective as it would have liked.

If you spoke to most people, you would have no idea that the United Nations (UN) is in the process of negotiating a major new global ocean treaty, he said on Earth.

The Greenpeace team recognized that it needed to do something to break out of its support bubble and spread its message across the world.

Ahead of the UN negotiations on the World Ocean Treaty in March, Greenpeace wanted to draw up an action plan and file a petition to ensure that the treaty was brought to life.

Greenpeace also fought peoples resistance to shocking shots. For decades, bodies like Comic Relief and Children in Need have relied on painful footage to get people to donate. However, recent reports claim that hearts are persistent against excruciating content.

In preparing this campaign, Greenpeace quickly came to the conclusion that emotional animation would be a more effective tactic.

As a society, we quickly get used to pictures that used to be shocking, Till admitted. Animation can be different because it enables people to connect emotionally. You can see yourself in history as it is difficult in the real world.

The team had also learned a lesson from its highly successful rank tan campaign. Greenpeaces emotional story with actress Emma Thompson, who has summed up the harsh reality of palm oil and the effects of its cultivation on Earth.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQQXstNh45g (/ embed)

With the help of Iceland, which converted the video for its Christmas advertising, the film brought the topic of palm oil into the popular mindset. This in turn encouraged more people to take this into account when buying food and products.

It really put it in the public eye, said Till. And we knew we had to do something similar in our next campaign to really get people talking and take action against the maritime crisis.

Around the time Greenpeace was designing this campaign, Aardman Animation contacted the company to let them know that it was interested in working with the organization.

It just felt perfect, said Till. We were looking for something that would create a strong connection with our audience, and Aardman is brilliant at it. Since we are both familiar names, it would help to get the word out.

After market tests for more extensive ocean communication, the study convinced the team to focus on turtles. Till argued that while Greenpeace talks about whales, they are received differently around the world. In contrast, turtles have a universal appeal.

The Greenpeace team then talked to the Aardman producers about what they wanted to get out of the film, what reaction they wanted, and soon they started working on a job.

This was then used to reach Aardmans director network, which asked 12 questions about what this film could look like. They were brilliant and varied and offered many different ways of dealing with a potentially very difficult topic, said Till.

We knew we wanted the animation to be instantly recognizable as Aardman, he said of Greenpeaces creative vision. We wanted something that was immediately accessible and that took people on a real emotional journey.

Till explained that emotional shock was a phrase that kept popping up in their discussions, as Greenpeace knew that while it is good to provide facts and figures, it is not always enough to clarify the case or that To get people to prioritize the problem .

According to Till, the decision for the director was a fun, if painful, decision-making process, in which the team refined and restricted ideas until they chose Gavin Strange.

Just hearing Gav talk about his vision showed that he really got to the heart of the problem, said Till. He not only understood it intellectually, but also had a strong emotional connection to history. As an added extra, Strange read it to boost its pitch, along with a real musical mood.

With the first premise agreed in mid-September, Aardman started animation while Greenpeace stayed in close contact all the time, with Till admitting that the main producer was his primary speed dial.

We had to do it right because its a big story to tell in a short video, he said. Due to the process of stop motion animation, the script, sentence and characters had to be signed off before the start of the filming, since all changes become more difficult, so to speak, once they have been set in sound. When you go back and revive, you lose days and a lot of effort.

Due to the nature of the stop motion function, the team used an animated storyboard instead of a script. In this way, they were able to calculate the timing of each shot to a fraction of a second.

One problem was how the characters should be presented, since they had to agree on the exact type of turtle to focus on the color of the shell. And this had to be reconciled with the story itself to ensure that each character was scientifically correct, with clear distinctions and personalities.

The team then had to keep to a tight schedule to ensure that it was ready by January to have enough airtime to make waves before the final outcome of the United Nations maritime treaty in March was known.

To manage the team. Aardman, who worked individually on recordings, attached boards with pictures of the individual recordings on the walls so that they could move between the studios to show how it worked.

In total, the stop motion recording took six weeks a tedious process, considering that the total length of the film is just under two minutes.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVDciiQT4c4 (/ embed)

Well-known voices include Olivia Colman, Dame Helen Mirren and David Harbor as well as Bella Ramsey from Game of Thrones, Jim Carter from Downton Abbey and the comedian Ahir Shah.

In addition to the scientific data and facts, Greenpeace also has an extensive telephone directory of famous stars who want to support their campaigns.

Colman really did everything, said Till of the Oscar winners performance. She took the time to take the latest The Crown recordings and deliver them in less than an hour. She just got it.

Till said he was in Harbors ear while he was recording when the actor was working remotely in New York. He said the whole process was interesting to experience as each famous voice approached the shoot in different ways.

We dont want to be accused of being hyperbolic, Till explained why, alongside the video, a report was released about the threats that tortoises face in the real world. We know that as a lobby and science organization, it is vital for us to show that science is there to underpin this story.

Turtles Under Threat reports that six out of seven sea turtles are on the Red List of the International Union for Nature Conservation and are threatened with extinction, even though the creature has crossed the worlds oceans for more than 100 million years.

Unfortunately, our film is a fiction, but what happens to our turtle family in this film unfortunately happens to real turtles around the world, said Till dejectedly.

The campaign has not yet started last week. But Greenpeace said it had already collected over 280,000 signatures not far from its 300,000 goal.

(embed) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQB4RAZVMf4 (/ embed)

Continued here:
Anatomy of an advertisement: The story behind Greenpeace's terrifying turtle extermination - gotech daily

How the Application of Neuroscience in Design Can Separate Us from Artificial Intelligence – Interior Design

Intuitively, most people can see a well-designed space and say, Yes, that looks nice. But what is it that makes us respond this way? Why do some spaces appeal to our senses better than others? And in an era of artificial intelligence, how can designers tap into those sciences to design spaces that help us continue to develop our humanistic traits and skills?

Frederick Marks, president of the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture, shares that neuroscience is a multidisciplinary branch of biology that deals with the structure or function of the nervous system and the brain. This includes psychology, physiology, anatomy, molecular and developmental biology, neurochemistry, cytology, and mathematical modeling.

According to Marks, Neuroscience is an emerging field whose focus is primarily, because of need and available funding, on the prevention of disease and treatment. But what is being learned has potential secondary applications for design and architecture. The environments we live, work, and play in are changing our brains and our behavior all the time. As explained by one neuroscientist, while the brain controls our behavior and genes control the blueprint of our brain, our environment can modulate the function of genes and, ultimately, the structure of our brain.

Because this research shows that design plays such an active role in the continuous formation of our brain, the science behind how we respond to and interact with different environments is coming to the forefront. And its applications are fascinating. Lets take a look.

The importance of designing spaces that cater to our continued desire to learn

According to architecture, design, and planning firm Gensler, one of the keys to scientifically backed design is an understanding of how our built environment can best support cognitive development. A separate research report from the Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture led by Amrita Kulkarni and Vincenzo Centinaro of Gensler Chicago suggests that creative behaviors like critical thinking, problem-solving, empathy, and emotional intelligence are foundational skills of tomorrows workforce and are traits that make us intrinsically human.

These researchers have deducted that, contrary to popular belief, learning is not a fourth work mode beyond focus, collaboration, and socialization, but instead it is a continuous path that occurs every moment during our workday. And Kulkarni and Centinaro suggest there are four distinct kinds of learning dimensions we transition to throughout the day: training-based, mentorship-based, chance-based, and platform-based.

Designing for each learning environment

Training-based learning traditionally takes place in formal or structured learning environments such as classroom settings designed for CEUs or certification. According to Kulkarni and Centinaro, designers focusing on training-based learning need to adapt their designs to prioritize cross-training and forge connections among learners. These types of learning scenarios should offer an open-concept feel, with the ability to have breakout sessions, as seen with activity-based workstations.

Contrarily, mentorship-based learning happens in more informal ways, in environments like management offices or even in cafeterias or common places. Organizations have an opportunity to amplify learning by demonstrating commitment, offering protected time, coaching on critique styles, facilitating dialogue among unexpected groups, and encouraging opinion sharing openly throughout the workplace. To facilitate this, we often see designs that prioritize water cooler conversations or spontaneous touchdowns, complete, of course, with amenities and technology like smart boards, teleconferencing capabilities to loop in remote workers, and adjustable workstations for groups to congregate as they see fit.

In chance-based learning, people learn in unplanned and unstructured ways by creatively thinking about problems they face. These creative learners often request environments filled with visualization and co-creation tools so they can problem solve wherever the creativity strikes. Again, a popular method here is activity-based workstations and unassigned seating, allowing learners to position themselves where they can collaborate best.

And lastly, in platform-based learning, curators need to boost participation through seamlessness, friendliness, persistence, and diversity in available platforms. This type of learning occurs in formal settings such as fireside chats, town halls, or even in online forums, resulting in the need for a variety of workstations, from conference rooms to even less formal settings like caf workstations or even outdoor work spaces.

Deloittes 2018 Future of Work studysuggests that 65 percent of our future jobsthose that todays primary school children will grow intodont exist yet. Because of this, Kulkarni and Centinaro suggest that skills that separate us from artificial intelligencethings like critical thinking, creative problem-solving, empathy and emotional intelligence, systemic understanding, interdisciplinary collaboration, camaraderie and fellowship, comfort with ambiguity, and iterating contextsare all foundational skills of tomorrows workforce. By fostering these skill sets through design elements that encourage learning, we can continue to nurture the very elements that make us human.

In this spirit, Marks leaves us with this prediction for the future of neuroscience and design: As knowledge grows in neuroscience and provides insight into how and why neurons fire in response to certain conditions, data also will increase relevant to the built environment. The hope is that a branch of neuroscience will emerge that is dedicated to understanding how humans interact with space and place. Designers are ultimately in the business of creating experience. The more they may know about pattern statistics and visual perception, how sound waves enter the ear, how the skin reacts to various textures and temperatures, what smells initiate pleasure, and what is retained in our collective memory, the more they will be proficient at their craft.

This article originally was published in Bellow Press and was reposted here with permissions.

Amanda Schneider is President of ThinkLab, the research division of Interior DesignMedia. At ThinkLab, we combine Interior DesignMedias incredible reach within the architecture and design community with proven market research techniques to uncover relevant trends and opportunities that connect back to brand and business goals in a thought-provoking, creative, and actionable way. Join in to know whats next at thinklab.design/join-in.

Read more: Experts Explain How User-Centric Design Will Play Out in 2020

View post:
How the Application of Neuroscience in Design Can Separate Us from Artificial Intelligence - Interior Design

UGA SGA approves proclamation asking for creation of undergraduate neuroscience major – Red and Black

The first Student Government Association Senate meeting of the semester addressed a wide range of topics as senators gathered in preparation for their remaining three months in office. Senators approved a proclamation asking for the creation of a neuroscience major at the University of Georgia.

Tonight is the culmination of over a decade of work, said Sen. Max Harris, who introduced the legislation on the floor.

Proclamation 32-12 addresses the benefits of an undergraduate neuroscience major, such as an increase in grant funding to the university, which is the case for universities such as Georgia State University and Georgia Institute of Technology. A survey was created earlier in the year to determine initial student interest, Harris said.

This is an important thing for the state of Georgia as well, said Janna Jernigan, an undergraduate researcher of physiology and pharmacology.

Jernigan continued to discuss active grants available to universities with neurobiology and neurosurgery areas of study.

Sen. Selitha Haudey presented Proclamation 32-10 to support University Unions role in showing more diverse films in Tate Theater. Haudley said meetings will be held on Tuesdays where students can voice their opinions. Members voted to pass the legislation.

Next on the agenda was Proclamation 32-11, which acknowledged relief efforts for the Australian bushfires and supports students affected. Sen. Mennah Abdelwahab said there are strong connections to Australia that comprise a vital part of UGAs community.

In addition to legislation passed at Senate, executive members held their second Cabinet meeting of the semester. Madison Drummond, Alpha Smith, Grant Mitchell, Eisha Baig, Mahathi Mula, and Sam Driggers were sworn in by Treasurer Nav Singh to serve on the All Campus Allocations Committee. The committee works with Student Affairs to determine the distribution of funding for clubs and organizations on campus.

SGA members are also working to update the parking application process. Vice President Melissa Hevener said students have voiced their dissatisfaction with the current parking process. She said the current online map to determine what lot to apply for is confusing due to the map configuration and multiple color-coded keys.

I think there are ways we can modify the application so you know exactly what spot youre applying to, Hevener said.

President Rachel Byers discussed potential updates to bus signage on campus, including painting and renaming bus stops. Cabinet members worked in groups to brainstorm the most commonly used names for each bus stop.

We're going to pick your brains to make sure that we have the most accurate and reflective name as we possibly can, Byers said.

See the original post:
UGA SGA approves proclamation asking for creation of undergraduate neuroscience major - Red and Black

DeepMind Discovers New Correlation Between Neuroscience and AI – Analytics Insight

We usually hear a lot about human-level AI or artificial intelligence but little do we realize that the human mind and AI are actually quite interlinked. The brains neural network and artificial neural network possess some similarities between themselves. Both are trained on data, while the brain learns from real-life data and experiences involuntarily, AI neural networks are trained purposely with gathered data voluntarily. Both respond in accordance with the learnings they have received. Moreover, with the advancement in technology AI has begun to learn and evolve on its own which is quite similar to the regular evolution of the human brain.

However, they do have tons of differentiation as well, but when it comes to neuroscience and AI, they are way more connected than one could ever wonder.

AI is more linked to dopamine-reinforced learning than you may think. DeepMind AI published a blog post on their discovery that the human brain and AI learning methods are closely linked when it comes to learning through reward.

Computer scientists have developed algorithms for reinforcement learning in artificial systems. These algorithms enable AI systems to learn complex strategies without external instruction, guided instead by reward predictions.

As noted by the post, a recent development in computer science which yields significant improvements in performance on reinforcement learning problems may provide a deep, parsimonious explanation for several previously unexplained features of reward learning in the brain, and opens up new avenues of research into the brains dopamine system, with potential implications for learning and motivation disorders.

DeepMind found that dopamine neurons in the brain were each tuned to different levels of pessimism or optimism. If they were a choir, they wouldnt all be singing the same note, but harmonizing each with a consistent vocal register, like bass and soprano singers. In artificial reinforcement learning systems, this diverse tuning creates a richer training signal that greatly speeds learning in neural networks, and researchers speculate that the brain might use it for the same reason.

The existence of distributional reinforcement learning in the brain has interesting implications both for AI and neuroscience. Firstly, this discovery validates distributional reinforcement learning it gives researchers increased confidence that AI research is on the right track since this algorithm is already being used in the most intelligent entity they are aware of: the brain.

Secondly, it raises new questions for neuroscience and new insights for understanding mental health and motivation. What happens if an individuals brain listens selectively to optimistic versus pessimistic dopamine neurons? Does this give rise to impulsivity or depression? A strength of the brain is its powerful representations how are these sculpted by distributional learning? Once an animal learns about the distribution of rewards, how is that representation used downstream? How does the variability of optimism across dopamine cells relate to other known forms of diversity in the brain?

Finally, DeepMind hopes that asking and answering these questions will stimulate progress in neuroscience that will feed back to benefit AI research, completing the virtuous circle.

Share This ArticleDo the sharing thingy

About AuthorMore info about author

Smriti is a Content Analyst at Analytics Insight. She writes Tech/Business articles for Analytics Insight. Her creative work can be confirmed @analyticsinsight.net. She adores crushing over books, crafts, creative works and people, movies and music from eternity!!

Read more:
DeepMind Discovers New Correlation Between Neuroscience and AI - Analytics Insight

Barry Jacobs, renowned neuroscientist and serotonin researcher, is dead at 77 – Princeton University

Barry L. Jacobs, an emeritus professor of psychology and neuroscience who became internationally known for his research on serotonin, sleep and depression, died Friday, Jan. 10, in Princeton. He was 77 years old.

Princeton neuroscientist Barry Jacobs, seen here at his 2004 wedding, died on Jan. 10.

Jacobs joined the Princeton faculty in 1972 and transferred to emeritus status in 2017. Among his roles at the University, he served as director of the neuroscience graduate program from 1988 to 2000.

Barry Jacobs was a truly wonderful colleague brilliant, knowledgeable, interesting, generous, and always upbeat and friendly, said Ronald Comer, an emeritus member of Princetons psychology faculty. Deeply committed to his work and to all of neuroscience, he was just as interested in and curious about the work of his other psychology colleagues, including those of us in social and clinical psychology. As a result of his special accomplishments in neuroscience, multiple interests, extraordinary skills as a teacher and communicator, and contagious passion for science, Barry was able to develop and teach, for decades, one of the Universitys most successful and popular courses, The Brain: A Users Guide a course that brought the wonders of neuroscience to life for University students of all concentrations and interests.

Jacobs was born Feb. 26, 1942, in Chicago. He received his B.S. in economics from the University of Illinois-Chicago, in 1966, and his doctorate in psychology from the University of California-Los Angeles in 1971. He was a postdoctoral fellow in the psychiatry department at Stanford University Medical School before coming to Princeton.

Jacobs was passionate to understand more about the brain, in areas from serotonin to sleep to psychoactive drugs. The author or editor of six books and many articles in top scientific journals, Jacobs central interests were in the chemicals that communicate from neuron to neuron and their role in physiology, behavior and pain as well as how biological factors, drugs and stress affect the production of new brain cells.

Jacobs, seen here in 1983 with a model of the brain, was an emeritus professor of psychology and neuroscience.

Photo by

Robert Matthews, Office of Communications

Jacobs was a member of several professional societies and served on editorial boards of some half-dozen neuroscience journals. He also participated in review panels for federal and non-federal organizations, including for the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Alliance for Autism Research.

Barry cared very much about making neuroscience accessible to everybody, regardless of age, background and education, said University Provost Deborah Prentice, who chaired the psychology department from 2002 to 2014. That was the goal of his signature course, The Brain: A Users Guide. He offered that course every year on campus and made the material available to alumni and adult learners in many other venues. Barry had a special affection for community auditors: He loved having them in his courses and loved being one he audited many courses at the University himself. For Barry, teaching and learning were more than a vocation; they were a passion.

In 2012, Jacobs advisee Nathaniel Fleming became valedictorian of Princetons graduating class. From an academic standpoint, I was always struck by Barry's curiosity, creativity and imagination, said Fleming, who is now a neurology resident at the University of California-San Franciscos Weill Institute for Neurosciences. Most importantly, his warmth and kindness were second to none.

Jacobs had a gift for maintaining long friendships, said Charles Al Sorenson, who met Jacobs in graduate school and who is now an emeritus professor of psychology and neuroscience at Amherst College. "Barry and I remained good friends after he moved on to his career at Princeton, and because I was so impressed with his scientific acumen, I recommended to some of my very best students at Amherst College that they pursue graduate research in neuroscience under Barry's tutelage, Sorenson said. I would not have done this if Barry also were not a wonderful person, who would keep his students welfare uppermost in his thinking.

Many of Jacobs colleagues praised his commitment to his students: They loved him and he loved them, said Joel Cooper, a professor of psychology at Princeton and Jacobs friend for more than 40 years. He would do anything for his students, and the feeling was reciprocated. His relationship with his graduate and postdoctoral students was lifelong. Barry was a model of how to transform students into professionals and then have them remain lifelong friends and colleagues.

Over his long career, Jacobs worked with hundreds of undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers. Jon Horvitz was one of the many who came to Princeton specifically to work with him. I first met Barry in his office early in 1991 to talk about the possibility of my working with him as a postdoc, said Horvitz, now a psychology professor at the City College of New York and the co-author of Jacobs upcoming textbook, "The Brain Toolbox."

Within two minutes of speaking together, I knew that I had found my ideal mentor smart, easygoing, quick to smile and laugh, bright in his disposition," said Horvitz. "He supported me every step of the way, always providing help and resources, encouragement, discussion. Almost 30 years have passed, and he has remained a wonderful friend and kindred spirit.

Jacobs is survived by his wife, Susyn Suzie Berger, and his nieces, nephews and their children.

View or share comments on ablogintended to honor Jacobslife and legacy.

Read more:
Barry Jacobs, renowned neuroscientist and serotonin researcher, is dead at 77 - Princeton University

Neuroscience Market interpreted by a new report | GE Healthcare NeuroNexus Siemens Healthineers Mightex Bioscience Thomas RECORDING GmbH Noldus…

The Neuroscience market has been changing all over the world and we have been seeing a great growth In the Neuroscience market and this growth is expected to be huge by 2025. The growth of the market is driven by key factors such as manufacturing activity, risks of the market, acquisitions, new trends, assessment of the new technologies and their implementation. This report covers all of the aspects required to gain a complete understanding of the pre-market conditions, current conditions as well as a well-measured forecast.

The report has been segmented as per the examined essential aspects such as sales, revenue, market size, and other aspects involved to post good growth numbers in the market.

Top Companies are covering This Report:- GE Healthcare, NeuroNexus, Siemens Healthineers, Mightex Bioscience, Thomas RECORDING GmbH, Noldus Information Technology, Plexon, Blackrock Microsystems, Phoenix Technology Group, Tucker-Davis Technologies, Alpha Omega.

Get Sample PDF [emailprotected] https://www.reportsintellect.com/sample-request/899104

Description:

In this report, we are providing our readers with the most updated data on the Neuroscience market and as the international markets have been changing very rapidly over the past few years the markets have gotten tougher to get a grasp of and hence our analysts have prepared a detailed report while taking in consideration the history of the market and a very detailed forecast along with the market issues and their solution.

The given report has focused on the key aspects of the markets to ensure maximum benefit and growth potential for our readers and our extensive analysis of the market will help them achieve this much more efficiently. The report has been prepared by using primary as well as secondary analysis in accordance with porters five force analysis which has been a game-changer for many in the Neuroscience market. The research sources and tools that we use are highly reliable and trustworthy. The report offers effective guidelines and recommendations for players to secure a position of strength in the Neuroscience market. The newly arrived players in the market can up their growth potential by a great amount and also the current dominators of the market can keep up their dominance for a longer time by the use of our report.

Neuroscience Market Type Coverage:

Whole Brain ImagingNeuro-MicroscopyElectrophysiology TechnologiesNeuro-Cellular ManipulationStereotaxic SurgeriesAnimal BehaviorOther

Neuroscience Market Application Coverage:

HospitalsDiagnostic LaboratoriesResearch InstitutesOther

Market Segment by Regions, regional analysis covers

North America (United States, Canada, Mexico)

Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia)

South America (Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, etc.)

Europe, Middle East and Africa (Germany, France, UK, Russia and Italy, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa)

Discount PDF Brochure @ https://www.reportsintellect.com/discount-request/899104

Competition analysis

As the markets have been advancing the competition has increased by manifold and this has completely changed the way the competition is perceived and dealt with and in our report, we have discussed the complete analysis of the competition and how the big players in the Neuroscience market have been adapting to new techniques and what are the problems that they are facing.

Our report which includes the detailed description of mergers and acquisitions will help you to get a complete idea of the market competition and also give you extensive knowledge on how to excel ahead and grow in the market.

Why us:

Reasons to buy:

About Us:

Reports Intellect is your one-stop solution for everything related to market research and market intelligence. We understand the importance of market intelligence and its need in todays competitive world.

Our professional team works hard to fetch the most authentic research reports backed with impeccable data figures which guarantee outstanding results every time for you.So whether it is the latest report from the researchers or a custom requirement, our team is here to help you in the best possible way.

Contact Us:

[emailprotected]Phone No: + 1-706-996-2486US Address:225 Peachtree Street NE,Suite 400,Atlanta, GA 30303

Read this article:
Neuroscience Market interpreted by a new report | GE Healthcare NeuroNexus Siemens Healthineers Mightex Bioscience Thomas RECORDING GmbH Noldus...

The clock is ticking and the time to green our labs is now! – The Irish Times

What is the main area of research in neuroscience?

I am interested in brain cells that become damaged during the autoimmune disorder multiple sclerosis. I am currently the lead PI (principal investigator) and co-ordinator of a 3.9 million EU-funded Innovative Training Network, which aims to develop a novel device for treating the late, progressive phase of MS.

The consortium will train 15 PhD students based in eight countries across Europe and five of these students are based in Cram, the SFI-funded Centre for Research on Medical Devices at NUI Galway.

You also lead the Galway Green Labs initiative how did you develop an interest in the environmental impact of labs?

I was inspired by a book that I read in 2018 called No. More. Plastic. by Martin Dorey. I immediately changed my shopping habits, I bought keep cups, reusable water bottles and life-long shopping bags. That was all very well, but once I walked through the labs at work, alarm bells started ringing, as I was witnessing and contributing to the wholesale disposal of large volumes of laboratory plastics on a daily basis.

What did you do next?

After doing some digging online, I discovered disturbing statistics about the impact of lab activities on the environment. For example, while the average Irish person generates 61kg of plastic per year, a study completed in the University of Exeter estimated that the average bench scientist generates around 1,000kg of plastic per year. In addition, labs can use 10 times more energy than office spaces.

How did you start to make your own lab greener?

By far the best road map that I found for implementing green lab practices is produced by mygreenlab.org a non-profit company whose mission is to create a culture of sustainability through science.

Its CEO, Allison Paradise, is a neuroscientist who left the lab in 2013 in order to set up the non-profit. She is an inspiring leader. One statistic she explained stuck out for me, which is that if just 2 per cent of lab plastics were diverted from landfill, it would offset carbon emissions equivalent to the planting of 100 million acres of rainforest. We found the Green Lab Certification programme run by MyGreenLab to be a great tool for defining and improving laboratory practices.

What practical steps were involved?

We registered our lab with MyGreenLab, which involved answering around 200 questions, covering 10 different aspects of lab activities: energy, water, lighting, waste, green chemistry, transport, recycling, cold storage, autoclaves and purchasing.

The lab was given an initial rating and, over the following six to eight months, our researchers and facilities managers collaborated with staff in MyGreenLab to improve scores and embed green lab practices within the workplace.

We were over the moon when we heard that our final rating was in the top-scoring band of green. On November 7th, the same day that I gave a talk about green labs at the Science Foundation Ireland Summit, our Cram lab at NUIG became the first lab in Europe to be Green Lab certified.

Congratulations! What would you say to others who are alarmed by the rising tide of single-use plastics and other consumables in the lab?

The clock is ticking and the time to green our labs is now! We hope to roll out the initiative across Ireland we have many labs across third-level institutions, public sector bodies, State and hospital facilities, and I think lab users and funders can play a huge role in making them greener.

To this end, I was delighted to have recently been invited to chair the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland working group that is focusing on greening public sector labs.

Originally posted here:
The clock is ticking and the time to green our labs is now! - The Irish Times