Research reveals how estrogen regulates gene expression | Baylor … – Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

Binding of steroid estrogen hormones to estrogen receptor (ER) in the cell nucleus triggers the sequential recruitment different coactivators to regulate gene transcription.

Estrogen hormones regulate gene expression. They achieve this by first binding to estrogen receptor in the cell nucleus, which triggers the recruitment of different molecules called coactivators in specific order. In a study published in Molecular Cell, a team of researchers at Baylor College of Medicine, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston shows that the sequential recruitment of coactivators is not simply adding molecules to the complex, it results in dynamic specific structural and functional changes that are necessary for effective regulation of gene expression.

Estrogens are a group of hormones that are essential for normal female sexual development and for the healthy functioning of the reproductive system. They also are involved in certain conditions, such as breast cancer. Estrogen also plays a role in male sexual function. Estrogens carry out their functions by turning genes on and off via a multi-step process. After estrogen binds to its receptor, different coactivators bind to the complex in a sequential manner.

Experimental evidence suggests that different estrogen-receptor coactivators communicate and cooperate with each other to regulate gene expression, said corresponding author Dr. Bert OMalley, chair and professor of molecular and cellular biology and Thomas C. Thompson Chair in Cell Biology at Baylor College of Medicine. However, how this communication takes place and how it guides the sequence of events that regulate gene expression was not clear.

In this study, OMalley, Dr. Wah Chiu, Distinguished Service Professor and Alvin Romansky Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Baylor during the development of this project, and their colleagues combined cryo-electron microscopy structure analysis and biochemical techniques and showed how the recruitment of a specific coactivator CARM1 into the complex guides the subsequent steps leading to gene activation.

For the estrogen receptor complex to be able to regulate gene expression, the coactivator CARM1 needs to be added after other coactivators have been incorporated into the complex, said first author Dr. Ping Yi, assistant professor of molecular and cellular biology at Baylor. We discovered that when CARM1 is added, it changes the complex both chemically and structurally, and these changes guide subsequent steps that lead to gene activation.

We now have a better understanding of how this molecular machine works and of what role each one of the components plays. We are better prepared to understand what might have gone wrong when the machine fails, OMalley said.

Other contributors to this work include Zhao Wang, Qin Feng, Chao-Kai Chou, Grigore D. Pintilie, Hong Shen, Charles E. Foulds, Guizhen Fan, Irina Serysheva, Steven J. Ludtke, Michael F. Schmid, Mien-Chie Hung and Wah Chiu.

Support for this study was provided by the Komen Foundation (5PG12221410), the Department of Defense (R038318-I and W81XWH-15-1-0536); National institutes of Health grants (HD8818, NIDDK59820, P41GM103832 and R01GM079429); CNIHR, R21AI122418 and R01GMGM072804; CPRIT grants (RP150648 and DP150052); and a National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support grant (P30CA125123) to the BCM Monoclonal Antibody/recombinant Protein Expression Core Facility.

Read more from the original source:
Research reveals how estrogen regulates gene expression | Baylor ... - Baylor College of Medicine News (press release)

Repetitive elements shape embryonic chromatin landscape – Phys.Org

Murine 2-cell stage embryo: L1 transcripts are visualized in white, DNA is shown in blue. Credit: Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen

Retrotransposons are repetitive elements that form almost half of the mammalian genome. Even though they are so common, they have previously been considered to be fairly insignificant. Together with colleagues from the USA, scientists from the Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen have now shown in Nature Genetics that retrotransposons play an important role in embryonic development.

The researchers specifically investigated the role of so-called LINE1 (L1) elements, the most abundant retrotransposon family in mammals. "We already knew L1 elements to be highly expressed in early embryogenesis and so we wanted to know if this transcription is important in the events taking place in the early embryo" says Prof. Dr. Maria Elena Torres-Padilla who headed the study. She is director of the Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells (IES) at Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen and professor of Stem Cell Biology at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen (LMU).

"Critical for the development of the embryo"

Examining the expression of L1 in an experimental model, the researchers observed a peak when the embryo consists of only 2 cells, followed by a decrease in expression by the time the embryo attaches to womb of the mother. These stages are crucial for a successful pregnancy. To understand the importance of L1 elements they used artificially designed transcription factors (TALE, for transcription activator-like effector) to prevent or promote L1 expression in embryos. "We found that too much or too little L1 expression caused development to come to a halt" explains Dr. Joanna Jachowicz (IES), first author of the paper. "This means that the precise timing and level of retrotransposon expression is critical for the development of the embryo."

Unexpectedly, the scientists showed that the mechanism behind this regulation was independent of the coding nature of the transcript and of retrotransposition, that is, the ability of these elements to 'jump' to other parts of the genome. The researchers instead turned their attention to the chromatin. Using their engineering approach, the researchers showed that expressing L1 caused chromatin to be more open, while stopping L1 expression caused chromatin to be more tightly packed.

"These results identify a novel role for retrotransposons in shaping the chromatin 'landscape' necessary for the early developmental programme", explains Torres-Padilla. "It was previously assumed that the activation of retrotransposons was simply a side-effect of the chromatin remodelling occurring after fertilisation, a process termed epigenetic reprogramming. Our study demonstrates that L1 elements have a specific role in regulating chromatin accessibility which in turn is necessary for the correct developmental programme to take place. This study is hugely significant in assigning a role to a large amount of the mammalian genome at the very earliest stages of life."

In the future, the scientists would like to explore this process further and investigate whether other transposable elements have similar functions. "The overall aim of our research is to understand the processes occurring in the early embryo" adds Torres-Padilla. "This is a very fascinating stage of development because all the cell types of the body will arise from the single cell present after fertilisation". This is particularly relevant for the field of regenerative medicine, which aims to create different cell types and organs in the petri-dish for therapeutic use.

Explore further: From pluripotency to totipotency

More information: "LINE-1 activation after fertilization regulates global chromatin accessibility in the early mouse embryo," Nature Genetics (2017). DOI: 10.1038/ng.3945

Journal reference: Nature Genetics

Provided by: Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen - German Research Center for Environmental Health

Read this article:
Repetitive elements shape embryonic chromatin landscape - Phys.Org

Gray’s Anatomy – 9780702052309 | US Elsevier Health Bookshop

Preface

Preface Commentary: The continuing relevance of anatomy in current surgical practice and research, R Shane Tubbs

Acknowledgements

Contributors

Historical introduction: A brief history of Gray's Anatomy, Ruth Richardson

Anatomical nomenclature

Bibliography of selected titles

Section 1 - CELLS, TISSUES AND SYSTEMS

Section Editor: Caroline B Wigley

1 Basic structure and function of cells, Abraham L Kierszenbaum

2 Integrating cells into tissues, Caroline B Wigley

3 Nervous system, Helmut Kettenmann

4 Blood, lymphoid tissues and haemopoiesis, Andrew JT George

5 Functional anatomy of the musculoskeletal system, Michael A Adams

6 Smooth muscle and the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems, Jeremy PT Ward

7 Skin and its appendages, John A McGrath, Joey E Lai-Cheong

Commentaries

1.1 Fluorescence microscopy in cell biology today, Dylan M Owen

1.2 Stem cells in regenerative medicine, Jonathan M Fishman, Paolo De Coppi, Martin A Birchall

1.3 Merkel cells, Ellen A Lumpkin

1.4 Metaplasia, Jonathan MW Slack, Leonard P Griffiths, David Tosh

1.5 Electron microscopy in the twenty-first century, Roland A Fleck

1.6 The reaction of peripheral nerves to injury, Rolfe Birch

Videos

Video 1.1 - Mitosis in a cell with fluorescently-labelled chromosomes and microtubules, Jonathon Pines, Daisuke Izawa

Video 1.5.1 - Diagnostic histopathology by electron microscopy, Roland A Fleck

Video 1.5.2 - Serial block face scanning electron microscopy(SBFSEM), Roland A Fleck

Section 2 - EMBRYOGENESIS

Section Editor: Patricia Collins

8 Preimplantation development, Alison Campbell, Patricia Collins

9 Implantation and placentation, Eric Jauniaux, Graham J Burton

10 Cell populations at gastrulation, Patricia Collins

11 Embryonic induction and cell division, Patricia Collins

12 Cell populations at the start of organogenesis, Patricia Collins

13 Early embryonic circulation, Patricia Collins

14 Pre- and postnatal development, Patricia Collins, Girish Jawaheer

15 Development of the limbs, Cheryll Tickle

Commentaries

2.1 Human anatomy informatics, Jonathan BL Bard, Paul N Schofield

2.2 An evolutionary consideration of pharyngeal development, Anthony Graham, Victoria L Shone

Videos

Video 8.1 - Human in vitro fertilization and early development, Alison Campbell

Video 9.1 - Ultrasound features of the maternal placental blood flow, Eric Jauniaux

Video 14.1 - Ultrasound features of the fetus at 26 weeks, Jonathan D Spratt, Patricia Collins

Section 3 - NEUROANATOMY

Section Editor: Alan R Crossman

16 Overview of the nervous system, Alan R Crossman, Richard Tunstall

17 Development of the nervous system, Zoltn Molnr

18 Ventricular system and subarachnoid space, Jacob Bertram Springborg, Marianne Juhler

19 Vascular supply and drainage of the brain, Paul D Griffiths

20 Spinal cord: internal organization, Monty Silverdale

21 Brainstem, Duane E Haines

22 Cerebellum, Jan Voogd

23 Diencephalon, Ido Strauss, Nir Lipsman, Andres M Lozano

24 Basal ganglia, Tipu Aziz, Erlick AC Pereira

25 Cerebral hemispheres, Guilherme C Ribas

Commentary

3.1 The resting human brain and the predictive potential of the default mode network, Stefano Sandrone

Videos

Video 18.1 - Interactive 3D rotation of the subarachnoid space, Jose C Rios

Video 18.2 - Interactive 3D rotation of the ventricles and cisterns, Jose C Rios

Video 19.1 - Rotational angiography of an intracranial aneurysm, Paul D Griffiths

Section 4 - HEAD AND NECK

Section Editor: Michael Gleeson

26 Head and neck: overview and surface anatomy, Michael Gleeson, Richard Tunstall

Head and Neck

27 External skull, Sue Black

28 Intracranial region, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda

29 Neck, John C Watkinson, Michael Gleeson

30 Face and scalp, Simon Holmes

Upper Aerodigestive Tract

31 Oral cavity, Barry KB Berkovitz

32 Infratemporal and pterygopalatine fossae and temporomandibular joint, Barrie T Evans

33 Nose, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, Claire Hopkins

34 Pharynx, Stephen McHanwell

35 Larynx, Stephen McHanwell

36 Development of the head and neck, Gillian M Morriss-Kay

Special Senses

37 External and middle ear, Michael Gleeson

38 Inner ear, David N Furness

39 Development of the ear, Susan Standring

40 Development of the eye, Jane C Sowden

41 Orbit and accessory visual apparatus, John G Lawrenson, Ronald H Douglas

42 Eye, Ronald H Douglas, John G Lawrenson

Commentaries

4.1 Surgery of the skull base, Juan C Fernandez-Miranda

4.2 The role of three-dimensional imaging in facial anatomical assessment, Vikram Sharma, Bruce Richard

4.3 Anatomy of facial ageing, Bryan C Mendelson, Chin-Ho Wong

Videos

Video 28.1 - 3D surface rotation of the sella turcica in the horizontal plane, Michael D Luttrell

Video 28.2 - 3D surface rotation of the sella turcica in the multiaxial plane, Michael D Luttrell

Video 28.3 - 3D surface rotation of the sella turcica in the vertical plane, Michael D Luttrell

Video 30.1 - Pan-facial fractures, Simon Holmes

Video 30.2 - Postoperative cranio-orbital imaging, Simon Holmes

Video 30.3 - A comminuted zygomatic fracture (plus Le Fort I) pattern, Simon Holmes

Video 30.4 - A comminuted zygomatic fracture pattern - post reduction, Simon Holmes

More:
Gray's Anatomy - 9780702052309 | US Elsevier Health Bookshop

Grey’s Anatomy stars send love to Houston – EW.com

The doctors of Greys Anatomy are sharing theirlove for Houston on Twitter.

Debbie Allen, who portrays Dr. Catherine Avery on the ABC show, posted a video to her Twitter account Monday alongsideChandra Wilson (Chief Miranda Bailey) and one of the shows writers Meg Marinis,to express well wishes for those facing dangerous weather conditions in Houston, Texas due to tropical storm Harvey.

Houston, we love you and we are thinking about you. From all of us at Greys Anatomy, say the three women in the clip. Allen, who is from Houston, also added a caption to the short video that shares a link to the Red Cross site, encouraging people to donate to the flooded city: To Houston from @GreysABC Help here: http://redcross.org.

RELATED:How to help the victims of Hurricane Harvey

The actress had previously tweeted a still from a news report with a caption, My hometown Houston God Speed. The photo shows victims of the flood being aided by good samaritan efforts after they had become trapped due to treacherous conditions and heavy rainfall.

Harvey has dumped some 25 inches of rain on Houston two days after the then-hurricane landfall northeast of Corpus Christi (around 220 miles southeast of Houston) Friday night. The extreme flooding has left many Houston residents stranded in their homes while emergency and rescue crews scramble to reach the overwhelming number of people calling for aid.

Greys Anatomy returns for its 14th season onThursday, Sept. 28 at 8 p.m. ET on ABC.

See the original post here:
Grey's Anatomy stars send love to Houston - EW.com

Ellen Pompeo Reveals ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Will End When – People’s Choice

Johnni Macke 2:04 pm on August 28, 2017

(Photo Courtesy: ABC)

With Greys Anatomy heading into season 14 this fall, fans cant help but wonder how much longer the veteran drama will continue. Now, thanks to star Ellen Pompeo, theyre getting some insight into when the series might bid farewell.

During a recent interview withVariety,Pompeo, who plays the lead, Dr. Meredith Grey, revealed that the fate of Greys Anatomyis directly tied to her interest in continuing her role, explaining thatshowrunner Shonda Rhimes has committed to ending the show whenever the actress decides the time is right to walk away.

Shonda [Rhimes] and I have both said that when Im ready to stop, were going to stop the show, Pompeo told Variety in March about how much longer Greys might go on. The story is about Meredith Greys journey and when Im done, the show will end.

The good news is that Pompeo doesnt think that journey is close to ending just yet, and shes not ready to walk away from something that people love.

You dont walk away from something for nothing, she toldVariety, after pointing out that someday, when the audience feels the time as right, and she thinks Meredith has finished her mission (or journey), the drama will come to a close.

Im really open to whatever the universe presents. I dont know how long the show will go on. I know the network and the studio like to say they see no end in sight, but I think the audience will tell us when the show is no-longer a fan favorite, Pompeo continued. I think its quite arrogant to assume the show can go on forever I dont like that approach. Right now, were very lucky to have the fans still hanging on, and I think the fans will let us know when its time to stop the show.

Seeing as fans still cant seem to get enough of doctor drama and are BIG supporters of Pompeos character, were hoping the actress sticks with her plan to stay until the series meets its natural end.

Greys Anatomy returns for season 14 with a two-hour premiere on September 28, 2017 at 8 p.m. on ABC.

For the latest pop culture news and voting, make sure to sign up for the Peoples Choice newsletter!

Excerpt from:
Ellen Pompeo Reveals 'Grey's Anatomy' Will End When - People's Choice

Anatomy of a Goal: Ola Kamara finishes the transition – Massive Report

Welcome to the Anatomy of a Goal, where each week we dissect one goal (or near goal) from Columbus Crew SCs previous match.

For match 28 of the 2017 MLS Season, we take a look at Ola Kamaras 50th minute goal that put Crew SC up 1-0 as part of the 2-1 win over FC Dallas on Saturday.

Heres a look at the finish from the Columbus striker.

The Black & Gold returned to the teams typical 4-2-3-1 against Dallas after a successful run with that formation during a midweek match with LA Galaxy. For the first half of the game, Crew SC saw more of the ball than the Hoops but were ultimately unable to put that ball into the back of the net.

This Columbus goal was an excellent example of the Gregg Berhalter system taking the team from one end of the field to the other. The goal begins with a short goal kick played from Zack Steffen to center-back Jonathan Mensah. As Jonathan is pressured by Maximiliano Urruti, he is able to find midfielder Mohammed Abu at the top of the penaty box.

With the ball at the top of the box, Abu can pass the ball forward to creative midfielder Federico Higuain, continue to carry the ball, play a square pass to Wil Trapp, drop a pass back to Jonathan, another drop to Steffen or yet another drop back to Josh Williams.

Abu decides to send the ball forward to Higuain, who is very briefly undefended.

However, Higuain senses the impending pressure from Kellyn Acosta, so he plays the ball back to Abu who has moved a few yards forward and is still unmarked.

Again, Abu provides an important link between the midfield, defense, and attack, with multiple options. He can either continue his dribble up the field, play a quick pass back to Higuain who is marked by Acosta, drop the ball back to Trapp or Williams or a pass up the field to left back Jukka Raitala.

Abu plays a pass up the field to Raitala and continues his run forward while tracked by Lamah.

With the ball at his feet, Raitala can do one of three things. He can play a pass up the sideline to Justin Meram, continue to dribble around Carlos Gruezo or a diagonal pass to Higuain.

Raitala carries the ball across midfield and then slots a pass over to Meram.

With the ball at his feet and very little space to operate, Meram can play a difficult through pass to Pedro Santos, knock a tough diagonal ball to Higuain or drop the ball back to Raitala.

Meram decides to force the ball into the area between Santos and Higuain, but Acosta is quick to pounce on the weak pass.

However, Kamara approaches the ball at the same time as Acosta. The forwards pressure causes Acosta to play a heavy touch on the ball, right into the body of Kamara.

The above video shows Kamara and Acostas battle for this ball, and the potential goal-voiding situation that resulted from this battle. As Acosta and Kamara clash, the ball pops up into the Crew SC players midsection. Both Acosta and Walker Zimmerman shout for a hand ball, but the official allows the play to continue.

Zoomed in, judge for yourself whether this was a handball. Acosta gave the referee his thoughts after the goal, but from here it looks like Kamara settles the ball with his chest/stomach and not his arm.

As with last weeks potentially offside goal, every play is reviewed by the video assistant referee. So, it appears that VAR decided that this was not a handball.

Having won the ball from Acosta, Kamara plays a quick pass over to Higuain.

At the top of the box, Higuain can continue to dribble toward the goal or play a through ball to Hector Jimenez.

Higuain could also chip a ball into the path of Kamara or Santos, but from this angle it is clear to see that both attacking players are offside.

Seeing little attacking space to move forward, Higuain plays a perfectly weighted through ball to Jimenez.

As Jimenez sprints toward Higuains pass, he must quickly decide whether to shoot or whether to cross the ball to Kamara or Santos. With Tesho Akindele bearing down, Jimenez has to play the ball with his first touch.

Jimenez approaches the ball, and squares his hips toward Kamara to play a cross on the ground toward the striker.

From the side angle, its clear that Kamara is onside right as Jimenez squares the ball.

Jimenezs pass is a half step behind Kamara, so the striker must alter his run in order to fire in a shot on goal.

Kamara contorts his body in order to get his foot behind the ball . . .

. . . and finds the back of the net.

Findings:

Excerpt from:
Anatomy of a Goal: Ola Kamara finishes the transition - Massive Report

Grayson’s Anatomy: How did the Sunderland manager rate after Saturday’s heavy defeat v Barnsley? – Roker Report (blog)

Team Selection: Dj Vu

With the exception of Robbin Ruiter between the sticks, and Bryan Oviedo slotting in at left-back it was a case of Grayson fielding the same side that has played every other league game this season. Unfortunately they couldnt muster a performance worth cheering about.

Now, Im not going to be harsh here, because what other options does Grayson have? Weve got an incredibly thin squad that isnt blessed with strength in depth, and as Grayson has mentioned several times recently, were vulnerable to losing more players this week.

Either the side thats fielded secures the win, or we struggle through with few to call on when in need of inspiration. Khazri looked uninterested, Gibson isnt that kind of player, Asoro is inexperienced, and Gooch needs time. Its tough for Grayson, and theres little he can do to really change things up.

Verdict: What else can Grayson really do?

This is an area in which Sunderland can, and must, improve.

The 4-4-2 used thus far this season saw early success, but unfortunately its not particularly difficult to combat when you know what to expect. I spoke about this very issue in an article yesterday, and I really do think were tactically limited with the players at our disposal.

If anything, Grayson could revert to the 3-5-1-1 he used against Carlisle in order to provide a more stable core to the side, but the issue is a lack of creative options. McGeady cannot be expected to be the crux of our attack - he needs reinforcements.

If we want to be successful this season (whatever that may be construed as), we must secure quality additions before the week is out.

Verdict: We need more players to become more tactically flexible, and if we want to do well this season.

Grayson did try to shake things up, but as already mentioned we just dont have the personnel to make a real difference.

What else can Grayson do, though?

Right now either plan A works, or it doesnt and we try to hang on. Hopefully the next couple of weeks give the boss time to work on tactics and to bed new players (fingers crossed) into the side.

Verdict: The manager tried his best, but what else can he realistically do?

One thing Grayson had perfect was his comments in the wake of the defeat. Sunderland fans were upset with his sides commitment and quality - something Grayson acknowledged and will be keen to rectify:

They deserved to win the game because they did the basics right. They ran further and harder, they made tackles and that's what the Championship is about.

It's never acceptable to lose a game and it's certainly not acceptable to lose a game in the manner that we did.

He also noted the fact that players didnt stick to the plan, which of course wouldnt have helped one bit. In all it was pleasing to see him accept the anger of the fans - it makes me feel like hes not here merely to pay us lip service:

Too many players wanted to do their own individual stuff instead of playing for the shape of the team. Our fans had a go and rightly so.

Grayson has about two weeks to prepare his men for their next league game at home to Sheffield United on September 9th.

Verdict: Fair play! Hopefully we respond to that poor performance.

See the original post here:
Grayson's Anatomy: How did the Sunderland manager rate after Saturday's heavy defeat v Barnsley? - Roker Report (blog)

Anatomy of Failure: How Charlottesville PD Lost Control – Crime Report (subscription)

By Crime and Justice News | 11 hours ago

The Washington Post analyzes the failure of police in Charlottesville, Va., to maintain control during the Aug. 12 showdown between white nationalists and counterprotesters.

Despite weeks of planning and warnings to the city manager and police chief that a more aggressive approach was needed, including an appeal from Gov. Terry McAuliffe, the local police in charge temporarily lost control of the city as people brawled on the streets. And though a torch-lit march the night before ended with white nationalists attacking college students, city officials said police stuck to a tactical plan that included an insufficient buffer zone between armed white nationalists and their armed opponents.

The police tactics mystified some law enforcement experts. Most dangerously, officers initially deployed without adequate protective gear to break up fighting and were not well positioned to keep the peace. As fights erupted, police stayed back. They stood not between the two opposing groups but behind them and off to the sides.

And when they cleared the park where rallygoers had gathered near a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, police flushed many of them directly onto the same street where counterprotesters were gathered. How do you allow two completely divergent and armed groups to come in contact with one another, knowing full well for weeks in advance that there were warnings of violence? said former Charlottesville police chief Timothy Longo, who now teaches about the use of force by police.

The rest is here:
Anatomy of Failure: How Charlottesville PD Lost Control - Crime Report (subscription)

Being a good scientist and a good human: thoughts on teaching during Trump – Vox

I've been teaching American politics at the collegiate level for nearly two decades. Entering the classroom this fall will be unlike previous semesters. The Trump presidency is unprecedented in many ways, and forces educators to rethink the way we approach teaching government and politics (as well as many other subjects, I'm sure, with which I am less familiar).

I've written before about one of the primary ways teaching about Trump can be challenging for political scientists. Most people assume (fairly) that professors tend to be politically liberal, but it is not ideologically liberal tendencies that make it difficult to teach about Trump. I recall no consternation about teaching politics during the George W. Bush administration, for example. Rather, President Trump presents challenges for two primary reasons.

First, a scientist's job is to be detached from her subject, and that is difficult in the current era of hyperpartisanship and outrageous events. Like most of my colleagues, when I'm in the classroom I encourage objectivity, curiosity, neutrality, and a nonjudgmental point of view. Such dispassion is necessary in the scientific process. As teachers of politics, this can be a challenging perspective to impart on students who select to study the topic because of their political passions, but this is a normal part of being a political science professor that many of us enjoy.

However, the challenge of getting students to take a detached, nonjudgmental viewpoint on current events is maximized in the Trump administration. How can one be dispassionate in the face of a leader who aligns himself with white supremacists? While commitment to scientific principles remains priority, it would be unethical and morally irresponsible not to express judgment against repugnant behavior that is baldly bigoted. As a social scientist, I can talk about the president breaking with democratic norms and precedent, but as a human being, I also want to expose the dehumanizing effects of vitriolic language and the violence it encourages.

My strategy in class this semester is to be both scientific and human. We can retain a commitment to social science by analyzing behaviors in the context of strategic behavior, institutional incentives, social influences, individual psychology, or any other typical and academic way of examining politics. We can respond as humans by openly noting when behavior is inhumane, immoral, unethical, or racist. American political scholars may be less accustomed to doing the latter when discussing current events and the US president, and instructors may feel like they are breaking scientific practice to do so, but we need only look to our colleagues in other subfields for guidance.

Comparativists do not wince at describing despotic regimes. They do just fine objectively identifying authoritarian, tyrannical, or violent leadership. No one accuses scholars in international relations as being ideologically motivated for observing warmongering or international exchanges that threaten American security. Americanists simply need to do what comparativists have been saying for years: treat the US as a single case, not a special one.

Calling out policy proposals that dehumanize classes of people is more of a normative discussion than I typically have in my courses on American political institutions, but not doing so would be irresponsible and naive. Allowing for some humanity does not invalidate the objective perspective I bring to 95 percent of my course material. If you include lectures on civil rights and the civil rights movement, for example, in your classes, you already have practice integrating humanizing and social scientific content.

To be fair, it's different when it's your own country. It's easier to appear to be a neutral observer when one is not enmeshed in the society of study. But it's not impossible, and we might seek advice from some anthropologists for further advice.

This is the second reason dispassionate study of Trump is challenging: Hes one of us. We participated in a voting system that selected him, and we must expect that we have colleagues and students who have, and may still, support him. We have to insist that critical observation of the president is not the same thing as supporting or opposing him as president. The nature of modern partisan polarization, and the extreme nature of negative partisanship in current American politics, means that criticizing Trump sounds an awful lot like expressing a partisan preference for Democrats, but it need not, and teachers should push back hard against this interpretation.

Even though our politics is governed right now by extreme partisan identity, and citizens are using party ID to decide their preferences over everything from candidates to vacation spots, this does not invalidate a social scientists observations about partisan behavior. If we teach about the powerful effects of negative partisanship and show a willingness to be challenged on our objectivity, we can teach our students to view politics with the same critical eyes we use, and not the partisan-dominated lens promoted in media. Further, doing so does not mean ignoring politicians morally reprehensible behavior.

To that end, here are some of the additions I'll be making to my opening-day lecture in Introduction to American Politics this term. First, Ill encourage students to develop a consciousness about whether they are viewing an event using a partisan filter. I want students to observe news, rather than react to it. Avoid the temptation to immediately agree or disagree with what you read, and resist the urge to respond emotionally to every headline. It helps to consume news from sources that aim for objective reporting rather than emotional responses. Evaluate the quality of news sources and aim to get most news from outlets with high integrity. Favor sources with the following characteristics:

My aim is to encourage social scientific thinking while maintaining a commitment to humanity. Students can develop greater self-awareness about their own news consumption habits and how they may affect their attitudes, and we can help them through modeling and instruction.

No one has to give up their social scientist card for calling out behavior or events that contradict American values or democratic norms. It may not always be straightforward, but Im committed to doing both.

See more here:
Being a good scientist and a good human: thoughts on teaching during Trump - Vox

Coach Kim: Are you too opinionated? – KSL.com

SALT LAKE CITY In this edition of LIFEadvice coaches Kim Giles and Nicole Cunningham explain why some of us are opinionated and how to handle someone like this in your life.

I work with a woman, who is very opinionated with severe black and white thinking. I find myself getting upset by the way that she voices her opinions all the time and wont even consider anothers point of view. We all eat lunch together and honestly, its getting hard to tolerate. What do you do with people who are that opinionated and not open to life having any shades of gray?

We are going to answer three questions inside your question.

First, why do some people see the world in this black-and-white way and feel they have to constantly share or even push their opinions on the rest of us?

Second, how do you know if you are one of these opinionated people?

Third, what can you do so people, who are like this, dont drive you batty?

It makes life a great deal easier if you understand what is really driving human behavior. Understanding what motivates people helps us to not take other peoples behavior as personally either.

We believe human behavior is driven (consciously or subconsciously) by what we fear and what we value. So, we are going to explain the fears and values behind very opinionated, black-and-white thinking.

These people often have fear failure (that they might not be good enough) and they have fear loss (that life wont be the way they want it to be). We know this because these two fears are behind almost all bad behavior.

These people feel safer if they have a clearly defined moral code, a black-and-white clear and solid code of behavior (the way people should behave) and other rules of correct living. If they have these rules clearly defined, they know exactly what they must do to be good enough. These guidelines make them feel safe. They also get a sense of safety from finding fault in the rule breaking and incorrect thinking in the people around them. If they can find people who are worse or wrong, it makes their ego feel a little better or right, which quiets their fear of failure a bit.

People who are quick to judge others as wrong are usually getting a strong sense of safety and self-worth from believing they are right. The more fear of failure they have about themselves, the more they might focus on black and white rules that prove they are right.

They may also be a tad controlling too because having things done right also makes them feel safer in the world. They are often defensive, territorial and protective of themselves, which can come across as selfish, arrogant and inflexible. They are often more focused on things being right and fair than they are on caring how other people feel.

These people also highly value ideas. They like learning and teaching. They believe correct ideas and doing things right are critical to success and happiness, and they tend to assume that everyone has or should have the same ideas, beliefs and values they have.

They also fear what would happen if their ideas (and rules) are not upheld. For example, people who are passionate about the environment and global warming value environmental issues, as well as fear the outcome if the planet is not looked after. They can at times be a tad judgmental or critical when they feel others dont value ideas, beliefs and opinions or have the wrong ones.

Ask Coach Kim

Now, the question is, are you this kind of person? Do you have a strong sense of right and wrong and often find yourself in judgment of others? Do you ever leave a situation and realize you may have talked too much or dominated the conversation? Do you get irritated when people disagree with you and do you see them as less than you, because of their choices?

If these are resonating as truth for you, dont worry we arent saying you are bad, wrong or less than others for being wired this way. The truth is the world needs people who care deeply about right and wrong, but we must all watch for unbalanced behavior that comes when we function from fear.

If you arent like this but have people in your life who are, here are some tips for dealing with these people:

1. Show compassion toward the fear that is driving their opinionated behavior and black-and-white thinking.

When we consciously choose to stay calm and not react to the behavior of others, we are able to look at what is motivating it. Think about this woman at work, what do you know about her story and what she has been through in her life? Do you think there is some fear of failure in her? Can you sense that her stand on issues is about feeling right somewhere? When you look underneath the behavior and try to identify where it comes from, we step into greater acceptance, tolerance and compassion. See if you can show greater kindness and compassion to her and recognize her insecurities, after all, you have those too, they just manifest themselves differently for each of us.

2. Dont react to the bad behavior, instead listen intently and then ask for permission to share your ideas

In the moment, when people are on a soap box and speaking down to us or sharing their strong opinions that we disagree with, we can become triggered and feel frustrated or angry. Often our ego wants to retaliate by interrupting or arguing, which can escalate the situation to conflict and confrontation.

Now, you understand their opinionated behavior is about their fear and their need for validation and safety. So, in reality, what they need is validation (which we know is the last thing you want to give them). If you can have a mutually validating conversation and make them feel safe, you might be able to get them in a place where they can listen to you too. You might even teach them something. The formula to having these conversations is on our website.

But, you basically must ask them more questions about their opinions and listen and validate their right to think the way they do. If you are willing to go here, you then earn the right to have a turn to share your opinion with them.

After you have given them some time to share and you make sure they feel heard, you can ask permission to share your thoughts. Would you be open to letting me share another opinion? This permission question opens the door for you to now be heard and share your opinion. If the person interrupts or tries to speak over you again, you have earned the right to say, Excuse me, please dont interrupt, I listened to your ideas on this, and I would appreciate you respecting my turn to speak and hearing my thoughts.

This can be done respectfully and without confrontation. But remember, its not about changing other peoples minds, its about coming to a place where both differing opinions are respected and validating everyone involved.

3. Dont take it so personally.

Other peoples need to be right or feel superior is their fear of failure at work. It is about their fears about themselves it isnt really about you. Ask yourself, Which part of you needs validation and recognition for your opinions and feels mistreated when you dont get that? Is your fear of failure being triggered?

All of us have this fear, on some level, but healthy self-esteem comes from knowing you dont need validation or recognition from others to have the same intrinsic worth as every other person on the planet. Remind yourself that you are a unique, one of a kind human soul and your value doesnt depend on your opinions, whether you are validated or liked by others, or whether other people think you are wrong.

As you remind yourself of this truth you will find yourself needing less attention and acknowledgment from others, and you will be able to better tolerate listening to the black and white views of others without feeling bothered.

If you are this kind of person and can recognize a need to be heard and validated for what you think, this is a great fear challenge to work on. Practice asking more questions and listening more than you talk next time you are with people. You will find validating others opinions feels even better than sharing yours.

Knowing you are lifting others up always feels better than being right. Practice setting aside your need to be right about how things should be. Try allowing people to have the same intrinsic value as you, even though their beliefs and values are different.

You can do this.

Load More Comments

Showing of 22 comments

Follow this link:
Coach Kim: Are you too opinionated? - KSL.com