Spring 2017 Commencement at College of St. Scholastica – Brainerd Dispatch

Jessica Murphy of Wadena. Murphy graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Accounting.

Kelsey Box of Deer River. Box graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts in English.

Chloe Wolske of Boy River. Wolske graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Management.

Jace Swanson of Deer River. Swanson graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing.

Maurice Bakkila of Brainerd. Bakkila graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Organizational Behavior.

Travis Gleason of Baxter. Gleason graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Organizational Behavior.

Kayla Adkins of Pequot Lakes. Adkins graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology.

Anne Hofius of Brainerd. Hofius graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology.

Connie Moose of Brainerd. Moose graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Social Work.

Jacob Blong of Brainerd. Blong graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Physiology.

Gerrit Garberich of Brainerd. Garberich graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Physiology.

Sierra Hanowski of Swanville. Hanowski graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Physiology.

Kacy Livingston of Pequot Lakes. Livingston graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Physiology.

August Marleau of Deer River. Marleau graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Exercise Physiology.

Alyssa Anderson of Brainerd. Anderson graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Health Information Management.

Emily Jansen of Long Prairie. Jansen graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Health Information Management.

Laura Bandow of Isle. Bandow graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Sarah Becker of Long Prairie. Becker graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Adam Hiltner of Brainerd. Hiltner graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Jennifer Hortness of Little Falls. Hortness graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Joshua Klous of Pierz. Klous graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Mary Kraemer of Baxter. Kraemer graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Isabel Lawrence of Pine River. Lawrence graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Magan McCusker of Deerwood. McCusker graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Emily Orthman of Royalton. Orthman graduated Summa Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Rafael Pichardo of Wadena. Pichardo graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Karissa Posterick of Brainerd. Posterick graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Alyssa Stangler of Albany. Stangler graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Joshua Trosen of Hackensack. Trosen graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing.

Joan Kotila of Pierz. Kotila graduated with a Doctor of Nursing Practice in Advanced Practice Nursing.

Denise Lund of Baxter. Lund graduated with a Doctor of Nursing Practice in Advanced Practice Nursing.

Lisa Smeby of Swanville. Smeby graduated with a Doctor of Nursing Practice in Advanced Practice Nursing.

Carri Jones of Cass Lake. Jones graduated with a Master of Business Admin. in Business Administration.

Victoria Sechser of Pine River. Sechser graduated with a Master of Science in Athletic Training.

Thomas Nixon of Deerwood. Nixon graduated with a Master of Science in Project Management.

More:
Spring 2017 Commencement at College of St. Scholastica - Brainerd Dispatch

Clover Connection: Extension research center celebrating 50 years – Athens Daily Review

In addition to having county extension offices that serve the citizens of Texas, AgriLife Extension also has 12 Research and Extension Centers. The center that serves us here in Henderson County is located in Overton. It will be celebrating its 50th birthday on Wednesday, July 12.

For half a century, Texas A&M AgriLife Research has conducted trials and developed new innovations to help East Texas and Texas producers optimize their operations and to provide quality goods, including flowers, fruits and vegetables, and beef to consumers.

Overton center staff will welcome public, state and area officials and Texas A&M University System officials to the facility at 1:15 p.m., July 12, for presentations on its history and contributions to Texans.

Presentations by staff will be followed by a keynote address from John Sharp, Texas A&M System chancellor, and comments by Dr. Craig Nessler, AgriLife Research director, Dr. Doug Steele, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service director, and Dr. Mark Hussey, vice chancellor and dean for College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Texas A&M University, all from College Station. A reception will follow the ceremony.

Nessler said the 50-year milestone for the Overton center, and the future of AgriLife Research around the state should be celebrated by all Texans.

AgriLife Research scientists in Overton have made amazing contributions to the daily lives of Texans in the past 50 years, he said. Much of what we do as researchers is done behind the scenes, and without a desire for attention and accolades. But if you enjoy ornamental flowers or great lawn turf, produce or consume beef, or grow fruits and vegetables, theres a good chance youve benefited from AgriLife Research efforts in Overton.

AgriLife Research at the Overton center focuses on the problems and potential successes for residents and producers in East Texas, Long said. Developing new technology and techniques for producers and consumers is the mission of AgriLife Researchs statewide system.

Scientists at the center cover a wide range of disciplines, including horticulture, soil and crop science, animal science and related fields. The research trials performed by scientists at the center are provided to producers and consumers through coordinated efforts with AgriLife Extension specialists, and agents around the state who represent the educational arm of the system.

Dr. Charles Long, the centers director for the past 35 years, said research conducted at the center has made lasting impacts for Texas farmers and ranchers, various agricultural industries, the states economy and the residents who enjoy the end product.

Research activities at the center fit the highest regional agricultural priority, as available financial, facility and personnel resources allow, Long said.

The plan is to conduct research in areas of the highest need, while ensuring programs are sufficiently supported to provide a reasonably high probability of success, Long said.

Scientists at the Overton center conduct research in five disciplines soil science, pasture utilization, forage plant breeding, animal physiology and horticulture.

Over the past 50 years, AgriLife Researchers have developed and conducted trials on thousands of varieties of ornamental flowers, fruits and vegetables, and forages.

For example, Dr. Lloyd Nelson, AgriLife Research small grains breeder, developed Panterra and Axcella 2, turf-type annual ryegrasses bred specifically for winter overseeding of warm-season grasses on athletic fields and home lawns. The varieties have been used in the Olympics and World Cup and on Professional Golfers Association courses.

Nelson also developed forages. He is responsible for TAM 90, a ryegrass that combined cold and rust tolerance from other popular ryegrass varieties to create the winter forage. Since its creation in 1990, 85 million pounds of TAM 90 have been sold, enough to overseed 2.8 million acres.

Scientists also conduct research to identify physiological and temperamental traits in beef cattle that can optimize production for producers.

Dr. Ron Randel, an internationally known AgriLife Research physiologist, oversees several projects at the center focused on the reproductive physiology of tropically adapted cattle, the nutrition-reproduction interaction and most recently the temperament and stress responsiveness of beef cattle. He has researched the physiology and endocrinology of ovarian and pituitary functions in Brahman cattle for more than four decades.

Those two scientists are just a couple of examples of what AgriLife Research has been doing over the past five decades, Long said. There are success stories after success stories that continue to impact the lives of people all over the world, and they were written right here in Overton.

Kate Pittack is the Henderson County Extension Agent 4-H & Youth Development for Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. Contact her at: kate.pittack@ag.tamu.edu & visit our webpage at http://henderson.agrilife.org

Link:
Clover Connection: Extension research center celebrating 50 years - Athens Daily Review

How your risk of heart disease stems back to your time in the womb – Medical Xpress

July 11, 2017 Credit: Ryan Melaugh

Smoking, lack of exercise, bad diet and our genes are all well-known risk factors for heart disease, cancer and diabetes. But, as researchers are beginning to understand, the environment in the womb as we first begin to grow may also determine our future.

The history of science is littered with self-experimenters so passionate about their work that they used themselves as human guinea pigs, however ill-advisedly.

Sir Joseph Barcroft (18721947) was one such character. Professor of Physiology at Cambridge, he was best known for his studies of the oxygenation of blood. He also led mountain expeditions where he analysed the oxygen content of his blood and that of other expedition members.

In the middle of his career, Barcroft built an airtight glass chamber in his laboratory in Cambridge. There, he could live and exercise at oxygen levels equivalent to 16,000 feet. Like many self-experimentation stories, things did not always go to plan: in one experiment, he had to be rescued by colleagues after spending six days in the chamber and reportedly turning blue.

Despite his occasional misguided venture, Barcroft's scientific legacy was significant and so, in his honour, the University of Cambridge has recently opened a new state-of-the-art facility in his name. Research at the Barcroft Centre focuses on farm animals mainly sheep and chickens, but also pigs to model important aspects of human physiology.

The Centre's work spans several areas including Professor Jenny Morton's studies on understanding fatal neurodegenerative diseases such as Huntington's disease and a similar childhood disease, Batten disease, and Dr Frances Henson's work on bone diseases such as osteoarthritis.

However, a significant amount of its work focuses on how we develop in the womb and how this programmes us for increased risk of heart disease in later life. This seems fitting as, in later years, Barcroft became interested in fetal development, and in particular the effects of low levels of oxygen on the unborn baby in the womb.

Carrying on this legacy are Professor Dino Giussani and his postdocs Dr Kim Botting and Dr Youguo Niu. All are also members of the Centre for Trophoblast Research (CTR), which this year celebrates its tenth anniversary and focuses on the interactions between the pregnant mother and the fetus, as mediated by the placenta.

Low levels of oxygen or hypoxia can occur in high-altitude pregnancies. But, as Giussani explains, there are far more common causes. "Smoking, pre-eclampsia, even maternal obesity these all increase the risk of hypoxia for the mother's baby, as do inherited genetic variants," he says.

Housed in the Barcroft Centre is a suite of hypoxia chambers superficially similar, perhaps, to that in which Barcroft placed himself, but nowadays far more sophisticated (and much safer). These are not intended for humans, but rather for animals, each of which is very closely monitored, often remotely using technology developed by the team.

The smallest of these chambers doubles as an incubator for fertilised hens' eggs. Scientists can watch the development of the fetus directly. They can see how the heart grows, for example, how it is affected by hypoxia, and what effect potential drugs have in ameliorating possible complications.

Of course, we grow in a womb, with a placenta connecting us to our mother and controlling our nutritional intake. Mice and rats are the most commonly used mammals in research, but to model mammalian development in longer-living species with similar rates of development to humans, it is necessary to turn to larger animals. Sheep make a good model. Not only is their gestation and postnatal life more comparable to a human's than to a rat's, but a newborn lamb's physiology is also similar in a crucial way to a newborn baby's: its heart is mature at birth. By comparison, a newborn rat's heart is still very immature.

For part of gestation, the sheep are placed in hypoxia chambers, which contain finely controlled, lower-than-normal levels of oxygen. "This reduces the amount of oxygen in the blood of the pregnant sheep and thereby in her fetus," explains Botting. "This mimics conditions where the placenta is not working appropriately, as in pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia or maternal obesity."

The pregnant ewes deliver outside the chambers in normal ambient air. Once born, most of the lambs are put out to pasture in the paddocks adjacent to the Centre, where they grow to adulthood.

"The lambs which were hypoxic in the womb are not noticeably different," says Giussani. "The sheep will effectively live a normal life. That is the very point, because underneath, a silent killer is brewing; we want to investigate what happens as they grow because there is a theory that a complicated pregnancy may increase the risk of heart disease in the offspring later in life."

Professor Abby Fowden, Head of the School of the Biological Sciences, and another CTR member and user of the Barcroft Centre, says that the facilities are unique. "It's probably the only centre in the UK that has the capacity the surgical and care facilities to do these kinds of long-term developmental and neurodegenerative studies," she explains.

Like Giussani, Fowden and her collaborator Dr Alison Forhead are interested in how the early environment in the womb programmes us for disease in later life. They are particularly interested in the role of hormones in both the mother and the fetus and how they affect growth and development.

There are some conditions, such as hypothyroidism whereby the body produces insufficient thyroid hormones and maternal stress, that probably affect normal fetal development, but about which surprisingly little is understood. To model these conditions, Fowden and Forhead again turn to a range of mammals including sheep and pigs.

As Forhead explains, normal development of the fetus is crucial for health in later life. "In the case of many organs, you're born with a certain number of functional units, and in postnatal life you don't have the capacity to change that number. So the number you're born with has long-lasting consequences."

Take nephrons, for example. These are functional units of our kidneys that filter the blood and are responsible for how much salt and water is excreted into the urine. "If you're born with fewer nephrons, this has consequences for how much salt you retain, setting you up in later life to be at greater risk of developing high blood pressure."

What is apparent from this work is just how much of disease in later life is programmed in the womb. While our lifestyle our diet, how much we exercise after birth plays an important role in whether we develop heart disease or type 2 diabetes, for example, much of the risk is present before we are even born, programmed during pregnancy into how our DNA and tissues function.

And these effects don't necessarily stop at the next generation, as Giussani is discovering in his parallel work with rodents, which allows two or more generations to be studied in a comparably short time.

"If we look at the 'grandchildren' of pregnant rats that had a hypoxic pregnancy, we see this disease risk being passed on again, but in a really interesting way," he says. "A male 'child' passes on the cardiovascular risk to the 'grandchild', but female offspring confer protection. This is really exciting as inheritable protection against a future risk of heart disease has never been demonstrated in mammals."

In other words, while we must still recognise our own contribution to our risk of developing certain diseases, some of this risk was programmed into us before we were born: in fact, even before our parents were born. Work at the Barcroft Centre in monitoring animals for not just one generation but several will be vital for understanding the consequences of pregnancy not only for our children but also for their children and even their children's children.

Explore further: Study suggests that aging begins in the womb

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read the rest here:
How your risk of heart disease stems back to your time in the womb - Medical Xpress

Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles – Health24

11 July 2017 Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles A study found that couples who seek in vitro fertilisation are not at greater risk of divorce.

Most couples want to have children, and the inability to do so can put strain on their relationship.

It's been suggested that the disappointment of infertility and the stress of treatment can push relationships to the breaking point. However, those who undergo fertility treatment are no more likely to break up, according to a new study.

According to Health24, infertility can be diagnosed when a couple has tried to conceive for longer than a year but is unsuccessful. Normally, a couple will fall pregnant within six to 12 months of trying to conceive.

Benefits to relationship

A study of more than 40 000 women in Denmark who had fertility treatment between 1994 and 2009 found no link between the treatment and separation or divorce. Researchers said 20% split up within 16 years, compared to 22% of women who were not treated.

The study was presented this week at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Geneva, Switzerland.

Researcher Mariana Martins said the findings should reassure couples who have had or are considering in vitro fertilisation.

"Findings on the security of relationships and parenthood can be particularly helpful in supporting patients' commitment to treatment," said Martins, a psychology faculty member at the University of Porto in Portugal.

"We have previously found that subjects who divorce, re-partner and come back to treatment are the ones that five years before had the most stress," she said in a meeting news release.

"We also know that despite all the strain that this infertility can bring, going through [assisted reproduction treatment] can actually bring benefit to a couple's relationship, because it forces them to improve communication and coping strategies."

Read more:

Treatment for infertility: is it ever too late?

Fertility get the timing right

The A-Z of infertility

See original here:
Most couples do not get divorced after infertility struggles - Health24

Treatment for Infertility Does Not Appear to Raise Risk of Divorce – Doctors Lounge

Category: Endocrinology | Family Medicine | Gynecology | Nursing | Psychiatry | Urology | Conference News

Back to Journal Articles

Study finds couples who seek in vitro fertilization are not at added risk of divorce

Comments: (0)

Tell-a-Friend

MONDAY, July 10, 2017 (HealthDay News) -- Couples who undergo assisted reproduction treatment (ART) do not have a higher likelihood of divorce, according to research presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, held from July 2 to 5 in Geneva.

The study included 42,845 women in Denmark who had ART between 1994 and 2009.

The researchers found no link between ART and separation or divorce. They added that 20 percent of women who underwent ART separated or divorced within 16 years, compared to 22 percent of women who were not treated.

"Findings on the security of relationships and parenthood can be particularly helpful in supporting patients' commitment to treatment," Mariana Martins, Ph.D., a psychology faculty member at the University of Porto in Portugal, said in a news release from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. "We have previously found that subjects who divorce, re-partner, and come back to treatment are the ones that five years before had the most stress. We also know that despite all the strain that this infertility can bring, going through ART can actually bring benefit to a couple's relationship, because it forces them to improve communication and coping strategies."

Press Release More Information

Link:
Treatment for Infertility Does Not Appear to Raise Risk of Divorce - Doctors Lounge

Anatomy of anti-Comey talking point: the Trump-Fox feedback loop in action – CNNMoney

In what has become a familiar pattern, Trump tweeted something on Monday that was clearly influenced by his preferred morning television program, "Fox & Friends."

"James Comey leaked CLASSIFIED INFORMATION to the media," Trump tweeted at 6:40 A.M. ET. "That is so illegal!"

But the claim -- and the on-air report on which it was based -- was false.

Eight minutes before Trump's tweet, "Fox & Friends" tweeted this from its official account:

The tweet contained a clip from that morning's broadcast of the show. In the clip, an anchor explained that "a brand new bombshell report" suggests former FBI Director James Comey "may have actually broken the rules" and put "our national security at risk" when he shared with a friend a memo he'd written detailing one of his conversations with Trump.

The tweet itself, which was also shared by Trump, said the report "accuses" Comey of leaking "top secret information" to a friend.

But on-air and on Twitter, "Fox & Friends" had mischaracterized the report it cited, which was published Sunday night by The Hill.

The report, citing "officials familiar with the documents," indicated that more than half of the seven memos Comey wrote to memorialize his conversations with the president were determined "to contain classified information."

"Four of the memos had markings making clear they contained information classified at the 'secret' or 'confidential' level, according to officials directly familiar with the matter," the report said.

The Hill's article does not say, as "Fox & Friends" suggested, that the particular memo Comey shared with a friend with the intent of having it reported on in the news media contained "top secret information."

A Fox News spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

As the Washington Post's Philip Bump pointed out, Comey testified last month that the particular memo eventually reported on by the New York Times -- which memorialized a February conversation Comey had with Trump regarding the FBI's investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn -- was unclassified.

Columbia Law School Professor Daniel Richman, Comey's friend who received the memo and shared it with the Times, told CNN that the document "was not classified at the time and to my knowledge is not classified now."

"Jim Comey never gave me a memo that was classified; and the memo whose substance I passed on the Times has never to my knowledge been classified," Richman said. "Memos that went to Congress, and not me, may well have been classified. The Director of the FBI does indeed write classified memos."

Even The Hill's own report quotes from Comey's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, during which he recalled preparing "an unclassified memo of the conversation about Flynn and discussed the matter with FBI senior leadership."

But while Trump's cable news obsession might make it easier to identify the source of misleading reports he shares, fact-checking will likely do nothing to stop his supporters on social media from repeating the falsehood.

Later on Monday morning, senior White House adviser Kellyanne Conway hyped the report as she made the morning television rounds.

The feedback loop was complete shortly after 8 a.m., when Fox News reported that Trump had "accused former FBI Director James Comey of having illegally leaked classified material."

-- CNN's Manu Raju contributed reporting.

CNNMoney (New York) First published July 10, 2017: 3:08 PM ET

Go here to read the rest:
Anatomy of anti-Comey talking point: the Trump-Fox feedback loop in action - CNNMoney

Mkhwebane: Anatomy of a serious stuff up – Rand Daily Mail (registration)

Mkhwebane has made a number of questionable moves and statements since she took over from her revered predecessor Thuli Madonsela.

Her worst decision in her short tenure has got to be her instruction to parliament to change the constitution in order to tinker with the mandate and the independence of the SA Reserve Bank.

Lets recap.

A few weeks ago Mkhwebane found against Absa/Bankorp in a case involving the banks liability for the repayment of the R1.1 billion lifeboat the Reserve Bank extended to it between the late 1980s and the early 1990s.

The facts around whether or not Absa should repay the lifeboat in full are still in dispute. However what was bizarre about Mkhwebanes report was her instruction that parliament should change the wording of Section 224 (1&2) of the constitution.

She even gaves MPs the exact words they should substitute for the ones used by the crafters of our supreme law something that would have taken away the independence of the central bank.

She has united the Reserve Bank the national Treasury and parliament against her findings.

The rest is here:
Mkhwebane: Anatomy of a serious stuff up - Rand Daily Mail (registration)

Milwaukee Brewers: The Anatomy Of An All-Star Selection – Reviewing the Brew

MILWAUKEE, WI - JUNE 21: Corey Knebel

Milwaukee Brewers: This Is More Than Just A Ride by Steven Ohlrogge

Milwaukee Brewers: How They Stole The Cubs Soul by Matthew Dewoskin

With the season Knebel is putting together, there is little doubt he is the right guy for the job. He has saved 13 games since taking over for Neftali Feliz. He also adds a 1.76 ERA and 72 strikeouts to the mix in 2017.

Knebel came into to Brewers system in 2015 through a trade with the Texas Rangers. In order to get their All-Star closer, Milwaukee sent Yovani Gallardo to Texas. This deal ended with the Brewers gettinginfielder Luis Sardinas and pitcher Marcos Diplan as well.

Diplan currently sits as the number eleven prospect in the organization according to MLB Pipeline. Sardinas was eventually flipped later that year to get Ramon Flores from Seattle. Flores ended up hitting .205 for Milwaukee Brewers through 104 games in 2016.

While Diplan still has the potential to be a star, Knebel is the most beneficial part of the trade so far. His journey started after getting drafted 39th overall by the Detroit Tigers in 2013. He was a part of the deal that sent Soria from the Rangers to the Tigers. It ultimately ended with his selection to the All-Star team as a member of the Milwaukee Brewers.

Based purely on numbers Knebel has put together a great year. He has faced a total of 168 batters and has allowed only eight earned runs. It has been a display of dominance throughout the year. What is even more impressive is that opposing batters are hitting .168 off of him, and those who are getting hits are not stringing them together. He has left 91.5 percent of runners on base.

According to Fargraphs Knebelis able to pull this off with a very impressive fastball that averages 97 MPH. He compliments that with a curveball he throws just under 30 percent of the time. It may seem low, but for a player who generally only throws an inning every time he goes out there it is enough to keep hitters off balance.

Want your voice heard? Join the Reviewing the Brew team!

With the Milwaukee Brewers currently pacing the division, it is surprising they only have one All-Star this year. Players like Eric Thames or Jimmy Nelson have proven their worth of a bid this year, but were snubbed. In the end the honor would have been nice, but the team is after the ring at the end of October.

Continue reading here:
Milwaukee Brewers: The Anatomy Of An All-Star Selection - Reviewing the Brew

Should Self-Driving Cars Make Ethical Decisions Like We Do? – Singularity Hub

An enduring problem with self-driving cars has been how to program them to make ethical decisions in unavoidable crashes. A new study has found its actually surprisingly easy to model how humans make them, opening a potential avenue to solving the conundrum.

Ethicists have tussled with the so-called trolley problem for decades. If a runaway trolley, or tram, is about to hit a group of people, and by pulling a lever you can make it switch tracks so it hits only one person, should you pull the lever?

But for those designing self-driving cars the problem is more than just a thought experiment, as these vehicles will at times have to make similar decisions. If a pedestrian steps out into the road suddenly, the car may have to decide between swerving and potentially injuring its passengers or knocking down the pedestrian.

Previous research had shown that the moral judgements at the heart of how humans deal with these kinds of situations are highly contextual, making them hard to model and therefore replicate in machines.

But when researchers from the University of Osnabrck in Germany used immersive virtual reality to expose volunteers to variations of the trolley problem and studied how they behaved, they were surprised at what they found.

We found quite the opposite, Leon Stfeld, first author of a paper on the research in journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, said in a press release. Human behavior in dilemma situations can be modeled by a rather simple value-of-life-based model that is attributed by the participant to every human, animal, or inanimate object.

The implication, the researchers say, is that human-like decision making in these situations would not be that complicated to incorporate into driverless vehicles, and they suggest this could present a viable solution for programming ethics into self-driving cars.

Now that we know how to implement human ethical decisions into machines we, as a society, are still left with a double dilemma, Peter Knig, a senior author of the paper, said in the press release. Firstly, we have to decide whether moral values should be included in guidelines for machine behavior and secondly, if they are, should machines act just like humans.

There are clear pitfalls with both questions. Self-driving cars present an obvious case where a machine could have to make high-stakes ethical decisions that most people would agree are fairly black or white.

But once you start insisting on programming ethical decision-making into some autonomous systems, it could be hard to know where to draw the line.

Should a computer program designed to decide on loan applications also be made to mimic the moral judgements a human bank worker most likely would if face-to-face with a client? What about one meant to determine whether or not a criminal should be granted bail?

Both represent real examples of autonomous systems operating in contexts where a human would likely incorporate ethicaljudgements in their decision-making. But unlike the self-driving car example, a persons judgement in these situations is likely to be highly colored by their life experience and political views. Modeling these kinds of decisions may not be so easy.

Even if human behavior is consistent, that doesnt mean its necessarily the best way of doing things, as Knig alludes to. Humans are not always very rational and can be afflicted by all kinds of biases that could feed into their decision-making.

The alternative, though, is hand-coding morality into these machines, and it is fraught with complications. For a start, the chances of reaching an unambiguous consensus on what particular ethical code machines should adhere to are slim.

Even if you can, though, a study in Science I covered last June suggests it wouldnt necessarily solve the problem. A survey of US residents found that most people thoughtself-driving cars should be governed by utilitarian ethics that seek to minimize the total number of deaths in a crash even if it harms the passengers.

But it also found most respondents would not ride in these vehicles themselves or support regulations enforcing utilitarian algorithms on them.

In the face of such complexities, programming self-driving cars to mimic peoples instinctive decision-making could be an attractive alternative. For a start, building models of human behavior simply required the researchers to collect data and feed it into a machine learning system.

Another upside is that it would prevent a situation where programmers are forced to write algorithms that could potentially put people in harms way. By basing the behavior of self-driving cars on a model of our collective decision making we would, in a way, share the responsibility for the decisions they make.

At the end of the day, humans are not perfect, but over the millennia weve developed some pretty good rules of thumb for life and death situations. Faced with the potential pitfalls of trying to engineer self-driving cars to be better than us, it might just be best to trust those instincts.

Stock Media provided by Iscatel / Pond5

View original post here:
Should Self-Driving Cars Make Ethical Decisions Like We Do? - Singularity Hub

Israeli startup tracks behavior to outsmart hacker bots – The Times of Israel

You might think of hackers as people sitting at computers, but custom software applications, or bots, can be the ones doing the dirty work. Bots automate the business of hacking, tearing through massive troves of stolen account data, for example, or bombarding website login pages with passwords, probing for hits.

Enter Unbotify, an Israeli tech startup that analyzes human behavior patterns to differentiate between bots and humans and weed out the fakers.

Our claim is we are not raising the bar a little bit and waiting for the fraudsters to catch up as others do said Eran Magril, vice president of product and operations. We are looking at the data points which are the hardest for them to fake in order to go undetected.

The company took first place at the 2017 Cyberstorm competition last month at Tel Aviv University. It was also ranked first among Israels most innovative companies in 2017 by Fast Company magazine. Its product uses behavioral biometrics like how long keys are held down, how a mouse is moved and how a device is held to determine whether the user is a person or a bot.

We know if you are holding your device at a specific angle, and what happens if you tap your mobile device, how does this angle change? Magril said. This is a very granulated kind of data that even if youre just putting your phone on the table, it will still be sending data about the x, y, z [axes] of your machine and how it changes all the time from very small vibrations in the room.

Bots are the preferred method for committing the most common kinds of online fraud, which can cost industries millions of dollars or sway public opinion on important issues.

Eran Magril, Unbotifys vice president of product and operations. (Courtesy)

Account data stolen in attacks on major corporations can be bought on the dark web and used to take over other accounts that use the same credentials. Those accounts can then be abused in myriad ways to cash out, including buying products with saved payment methods and stealing stored gift cards or air miles.

In one case, a bot was attempting to register new accounts with an online retailer. It continuously entered emails to see if any were already registered and built a database of those that were. Then it tested common passwords on each in order to take over any accounts it gained access to.

With an average success rate of two percent, Magril said, a hacker with one million sets of credentials can take over 20,000 accounts. Thats the power of automation for fraudsters, he said. If they have automation they can operate on a big scale.

Other common tactics include content scraping and advertising fraud. Scraping is when a website uses bots to scan for competitors price changes and deals to get an unfair competitive advantage, or copies content like an airlines flight prices and availability in order to sell airline tickets on a separate platform, which diverts valuable traffic from the original sellers website.

Online ad fraud takes many forms, including bots simulating traffic to websites advertisers pay to run ads that arent being seen or clicked on by real people. Some bots will download and install games and programs that advertisers pay platforms for. Such tactics cost the industry billions of dollars each year.

That money goes to hackers instead, who keep getting more sophisticated, said Magril. This is also where the funding comes for developing new attack tools, for developing new bots, he said. Bots are always evolving because they have the incentive to evolve.

Bots are also used to create fake social media profiles that can flood specific countries and locales with legitimate or hoax news stories to influence public opinion. Fake profiles can ratchet up a public figures or companys popularity on a given platform, then disappear on command, creating the illusion that the subject lost support.

Its a huge problem and everyone is talking about it, especially in the last year with the elections in the United States and France and other places, Magril said.

Unbotifys technology goes well beyond the leading detection and protection measures, he said, because machines cant fake human behavior in all its diversity and complexity. The companys 12 employees are also constantly adding new characteristics to what they analyze to keep hackers from knowing what needs to be mimicked.

Founded two years ago by Yaron Oliker and Alon Dayan, the company has raised some $2 million from Israeli based Maverick Ventures. It boasts as its chief data scientist Yaacov Fernandess, whom Magril called a world-class expert in machine learning, of which there are only a handful, he said. Their headquarters are in the northern Israel town of Ramat Yishai.

Company founder Yaron Oliker. (Courtesy)

While the current product targets automation only, the company has noticed that there are specific behavioral indicators that can identify a person who is creating fake accounts. Certain keystroke habits, for instance, might be common among people who repeatedly register new accounts, without the help of a bot. We saw that analysis of behavioral biometrics can also be used to differentiate between different groups of people with different intentions, Magril said.

The company is focused on its core technology for now, though, and wants to break into new markets. They have customers in the US and Europe, and want to expand their clientele to China.

Visit link:
Israeli startup tracks behavior to outsmart hacker bots - The Times of Israel