Genetics Reveal How Tibetans Evolved To Deal With High Altitude – IFLScience

Living at altitude really puts a strain on the human body. From slowing digestion to the extreme cold, there is a lot to contend with the higher up you go. Yet people living on the Tibetan Plateau have managed to survive at an altitude of around 4,500 meters (15,000 feet) for thousands of years.

A team of geneticists have nowuncovered exactly how they manage this, including the genes they may have gainedfrom an extinct species of human. After sequencing the entire genomes of 27 Tibetans, they managed to find five different genes that help them live at such lofty heights. The results highlight the influencethe extreme environment faced by these people, who have been living there for at least 3,000 years, has hadontheir evolution.

The five gene variants discovered are all related to helping the body cope with the low levels of oxygen, high altitude, and poor diet. Theyalso show how the ancestors to Tibetans at some point had shenanigans with an extinct human species. Some of these have already been identified before, as the researchers found the genes EPAS1 and EGLN1 both present in the population. These induce the body to produce more hemoglobin, which transports oxygen around the body when at altitude.

But they also uncovered a few genes we didnt know about. Related to low oxygen levels, PTGIS and KCTD12 were also found in the genome of the Tibetans, as well as a variant of VDR, which has been linked to vitamin D metabolism. The researchers suspect that this may help the people deal with vitamin D deficiency, which is a common problem on the plateau due to the poor growing conditions, and thus diet.

The comprehensive analysis of whole-genome sequence data from Tibetans provides valuable insights into the genetic factors underlying this population's unique history and adaptive physiology at high altitude, explains Tatum Simonson, who co-authored the study published in PLOS Genetics, in astatement.

Simonson continues: This study provides further context for analyses of other permanent high-altitude populations, who exhibit characteristics distinct from Tibetans despite similar chronic stresses, as well as lowland populations, in whom hypoxia-related challenges, such those inherent to cardiopulmonary disease or sleep apnea, elicit a wide-range of unique physiological responses.

But what is really interesting is how the genetics of the Tibetan people can provide insight into how an extinct species of human, the Denisovans, lived. Known only from a few hand bones found in a cave in Siberia, it is thought that the EPAS1 gene is derived from these mysterious people, suggesting that as a species, they too may have been adapted to high altitudes.

Link:
Genetics Reveal How Tibetans Evolved To Deal With High Altitude - IFLScience

Can’t hack it in high altitudes? It’s all about genetics – CBC.ca

Try to walk a mile in a Tibetan person's shoes and you will fail miserably.That's because they have evolved to live at high altitudes better than anyone else on the planet.

Just in time for the climbing season to open on Mount Everest, anew study from the University of Texas, Houston, tells us about the genes behind this incredible ability.

It's estimatedthat humans have been continually living on the Tibetan plateau for almost 60,000 years. That gives a lot of time for adaptations to develop and populations to evolve in order to live better in these extreme conditions.

When you are up there high on the Tibetan plateau, life is tough.When I was in Tibet in 2010 and again in 2011, it was amazing how hard it was just to walk around.There are a lotof high-altitude places in the world, but Lhasa, at an altitude of 3,600 metres, is one of the highest places where humans have lived for thousands of years.

I spoke with Chad Huff, the senior author of the study.

"Tibetan high-altitude adaptation is perhaps the most extreme example we have of human adaptation where most individuals from low altitude have a very difficult time at 15,00 feet," he said. "Tibetans survive and thrive there, so it's really fascinating as to the genetics behind those adaptations."

And that's what this new paper, published in the Open Access Journal PLOS, investigated; they looked at the genetic changes in Tibetans that make them such great mountaineers.

After sequencing the complete genomes of 27 Tibetans, they identified five possible genes that relate to the Tibetans' ability to thrive at such high altitudes.Two of them, EGL1andEPAS1,have been previously found,and both seem to be related to how much hemoglobin is in the blood.

Hemoglobin is what carries oxygen in the blood. When you acclimate to higher altitudes,your body adjusts to the low oxygen concentrations by making more hemoglobin to suck up more of that hard-to-get oxygen.

The two genes, EGL1andEPAS1,found in Tibetan populations seem to be doing the opposite: they seem to be decreasing the hemoglobin concentrations.

This makes no sense, until you realize that having blood thick with hemoglobin makes your heart pump harder and your vessels strain more. Having a heart that works harder all the time, coupled with vessels that are strained, doesn't add up to a healthy individual.This is one problem observed with the ethnic Han population, the dominant population of lowland Chinawho are trying to live in the Tibetan plateau to take advantage of some of the resource extraction that is happening.The non-Tibetansshow significant negative health effects, while the Tibetans show no such problems.

There's no exact number yet, but it looks like some of these genetic changes are as recent as 10,000 years old.The most common adaptation, and the one with the most variability in the population, is 45,000 years old. But still, that's pretty quick in evolutionary time, especially in humans who reproduce relatively slowly.

Chad Huff offers more insight.

"It is quite fast for humans. There are a few examples of somewhat faster evolution in humans, the lactase persistence in Europeans is one example; it's a few thousand years younger, butEPAS1andEGL1are among the strongest signals and fastest sweeps in human evolution."

You have to remember, the selective pressures the forces that pick the strongest individuals to survive are strong up there on the plateau. I can speak from experience.When I was hiking to Everest base camp it was one step breathe, two steps, breathe.I couldn't believe how hard it was,and there was my Tibetan guide, sprintingby, seemingly unfazed.

Researchers were interested in how Sherpa's work at such high altitudes. (Craig Steinback)

Yes, the study showed that Tibetans are literally genetically superior to anyone else trying to summit.

When I was there my guide had been to camp 4, the last one before the summit, more than a handful of times. That would be considered a huge success for most people attempting to climb Everest, and yetit was largely uncelebrated.

There is no doubt that in mountaineering, the earlier lack of credit for the Sherpas has been a huge controversy. Maybe because it is so much easier for them, it's almost as if the rest of the world hasn't been acknowledging the incredible risksthey take because it's so natural.

And yet, more Sherpas have been killed on Everest in the last three climbing seasons than ever before.And now we embark on another Everest climbing season, poised to the busiest ever.

The Sherpas are the lifeline to the mountain;no one can climb it without them.They set the routes, fix the ropes,carry a lot of the gearand do it better than anyone else on the planet.

Summitting Everest is an absolutely monumental achievement, and what the Tibetan people have survived and how they've adapted to the life in the mountains is equally monumental.

Original post:
Can't hack it in high altitudes? It's all about genetics - CBC.ca

Seattle Genetics (SGEN) Q1 2017 Results – Earnings Call Transcript – Seeking Alpha

Seattle Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:SGEN)

Q1 2017 Earnings Call

April 27, 2017 4:30 pm ET

Executives

Peggy Pinkston - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Darren S. Cline - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Todd E. Simpson - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Jonathan Drachman, M.D. - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Analysts

Michael Schmidt - Leerink Partners LLC

Paul Choi - Barclays Capital, Inc.

Shawn Fu - JPMorgan Securities LLC

Salveen Richter - Goldman Sachs & Co.

Yatin Suneja - SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.

Operator

Please stand by. We're about to begin. Good day and welcome to the Seattle Genetics First Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Peggy Pinkston Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Peggy Pinkston - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Thank you operator and good afternoon everyone. I'd like to welcome all of you to Seattle Genetics First quarter 2017 conference call.

With me today are Clay Siegall, President and Chief Executive Officer; Todd Simpson, Chief Financial Officer; Eric Dobmeier, Chief Operating Officer; Jonathan Drachman, Chief Medical Officer and Executive Vice President, Research and Development and Darren Cline, Executive Vice President, Commercial.

Following our prepared remarks today, we will open the line for questions. If we are unable to get to all of your questions, we will be available after the conclusion of the call.

Today's conference call will include forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial and operating performance of the company. Such forward-looking statements are only predictions based on current expectations, and actual results may vary materially from those projected.

Please refer to the documents that we file from time to time with the SEC, including the company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for information concerning the risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Now I'll turn the call over to Clay.

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Thanks, Peg, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us. Today, we'll discuss upcoming activities and review recent progress towards our goal of becoming a multi-product oncology company.

I'll start with the summary of our three main areas of focus. First, building ADCETRIS into a major global brand. Second, advancing our late stage clinical programs, notably vadastuximab talirine or 33A and enfortumab vedotin or 22ME. And third, investing in a robust pipeline of earlier stage programs, including SGN-LIV1A and others across both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.

Our first quarter sales of ADCETRIS in the U.S. and Canada were $70.3 million, a 20% increase over the first quarter of 2016. We remain on track with our 2017 guidance for ADCETRIS product sales in our territory of $280 million to $300 million. We are executing well commercially with our current labels. We are also preparing for several significant clinical and regulatory milestones intended to drive future growth of the ADCETRIS franchise. These are based on three phase 3 trials, ALCANZA, ECHELON-1 and ECHELON-2.

Starting with ALCANZA. We plan to submit a supplemental BLA to the FDA in mid 2017. As a reminder, our phase 3 ALCANZA trial was conducted in CD30-expressing cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The results showed a highly statistically significant benefit in favor of ADCETRIS across the primary and all secondary endpoints.

We received Breakthrough Therapy Designation for ADCETRIS in CD30-expressing mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, the most common subtypes of CTCL. We plan to submit the ALCANZA data to the FDA along with data from two investigator-sponsored trials in other subtypes of CTCL with the goal of obtaining a broad label in CTCL. The submission is on track for mid-year.

Another significant upcoming activity for the ADCETRIS program is the release of top line data this year from our phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial in frontline Hodgkin lymphoma. The ECHELON-1 trial is assessing modified progression-free survival in newly diagnosed advanced Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Patients were randomized to receive either an ADCETRIS-containing regimen called A+AVD or the standard of care known as ABVD. This trial represents a substantial opportunity for ADCETRIS to redefine and improve the treatment paradigm for newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma patients, which has not changed in decades.

Looking ahead to 2018, we expect to report data from ECHELON-2, our phase 3 trial of ADCETRIS in frontline mature T-cell lymphoma, often referred to by clinicians as peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We are evaluating progression-free survival of ADCETRIS plus CHP compared to standard of care CHOP, or CHOP chemotherapy, in newly diagnosed patients. This is a second opportunity to redefine and improve outcomes in a frontline non-Hodgkin lymphoma patient setting that has not changed in many years.

I'll now turn to vadastuximab talirine, or SGN-CD33A. We are conducting trials of 33A in AML and myelodysplastic syndrome, both of which broadly express CD33. Our first registration pathway with 33A is the ongoing CASCADE phase 3 trial in older patients with AML. CASCADE is a global randomized study comparing 33A plus decitabine or azacitidine to either of these hypomethylating agents alone. The primary endpoint is overall survival. Enrollment has been strong towards our target of over 500 patients.

We are also advancing 33A in frontline younger patients with AML. We plan to initiate a randomized phase 2 trial later this year, adding 33A to the standard regimen of cytarabine and daunorubicin or 7+3. This trial is designed to assess whether adding 33A to the standard frontline regimen can improve MRD-negative TR rate and event-free survival in frontline fit AML patient.

Our rationale for advancing 33A into two late stage AML trials is based on data from separate phase 1 trials. One of 33A plus HMAs in older AML patients and another of 33A plus 7+3 in younger AML patients. As reported at ASH in December, in both trials, the composite complete remission rate was more than 70%. And notably, in both studies, we observed a high percent of responders who were negative for minimal residual disease.

In these single-arm trials, interim survival measures were superior among responding patients who achieved MRD-negative remissions compared to responding patients who are not MRD-negative. Based on these data, we believe that adding 33A to standard regimens for AML could potentially be well-tolerated and yield superior outcomes to standard treatment alone.

In addition to AML, we are evaluating 33A in myelodysplastic syndrome through an ongoing phase 1/2 trial. In this trial, we are pursuing a similar strategy, combining 33A with azacitidine in newly diagnosed patients with high risk MDS and comparing tolerability and activity with azacitidine alone.

Next, I'll provide an update on enfortumab vedotin, or 22ME, our lead ADC for solid tumors. 22ME is in clinical development for metastatic urothelial cancer under our co-development collaboration with Astellas. Based on positive feedback from the FDA, we intend to initiate a pivotal monotherapy phase 2 trial in patients previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor, with the intent of providing the data for potential registration under the FDA's accelerated approval regulations. We plan to initiate this study in the second half of 2017.

We believe that 22ME could play an important role in this setting. This is an unmet medical need, given that the majority of patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors fail to respond and require further treatment options. We are also planning to combine 22ME with checkpoint inhibitors in a trial that we expect to begin late this year as part of our broad clinical development program.

We are positioned for several key milestones in 2017 that have the potential to significantly advance Seattle Genetics towards our goal of improving the lives of people with cancer and further establish the company as a leader in the field of oncology. We are expanding globally and are in a strong financial position to continue executing on our priorities.

Now, I will turn the call over to Darren to discuss our commercial activities. After that, Todd will discuss our first quarter financial results, and then Jonathan will highlight our research and development progress. Darren?

Darren S. Cline - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Thanks, Clay. In the first quarter, ADCETRIS sales were $70.3 million, an increase of 20% over the first quarter of last year. ADCETRIS continues to be the standard of care in its original approved indications of relapsed HL and relapsed ALCL.

As the brand approaches its 6th year on the market strong long-term follow-up data from our initial pivotal trials have further enhanced the clinical value proposition in these settings today. Despite the recent FDA approval of a second PD-1 inhibitor in relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma setting, we have seen no erosion in share in our existing relapsed HL business. Most prescribers have indicated they view the checkpoint inhibitor agents as interchangeable and would use both in post ADCETRIS later lines of therapy or palliative setting if necessary.

Beyond our current business, we're continuing to prepare ADCETRIS to become a major global brand. Our commercial resources are focused on launch preparedness for upcoming CTCL indication and most importantly our frontline Hodgkin lymphoma indication. In the near term, the CTCL approval will represent another important commercial milestone for ADCETRIS. Physicians and market research have been impressed with the strength of the ALCANZA data, and we believe it supports our goal for ADCETRIS to be the foundation of treatment for CD30-expressing lymphomas.

Leading up to ECHELON-1 results, we've invested resources to better understand how ADCETRIS plus AVD will be integrated into current practice in both community and academic setting, and how we can ensure rapid adoption of this novel regimen in the event of FDA approval. In parallel, we are also continuing education efforts to raise awareness and highlight the unmet need that exist specifically for advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients, who currently receive ABVD.

Lastly, our ECHELON-2 trial will potentially provide patients and providers a new targeted therapy option beyond traditional chemotherapy that will address the high unmet need in newly diagnosed T-cell lymphoma. Although, we are in the early stages of commercial planning for the E-2 launch, we have been ensuring our education efforts in CTCL and ALCL will be complementary to our frontline MTCL approval education efforts in the future. I look forward to updating you on our progress in preparing for these important growth opportunities for ADCETRIS.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Todd to discuss our financial results.

Todd E. Simpson - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Great. Thanks, Darren, and thanks to everyone for joining us on the call this afternoon. We ended the first quarter with $536 million in cash and investments. This along with our strong ADCETRIS sales and our collaborations enables us to continue executing on our strategy of expanding the ADCETRIS label advancing our 33A and 22ME programs and investing in the rest of our oncology pipeline.

Today, I'll summarize our financial results for the first quarter of 2017. Total revenues in the first quarter were $109 million, including ADCETRIS net sales of $70 million. As Clay mentioned, we continue to expect that total ADCETRIS sales for 2017 will be in the range of $280 million to $300 million.

Royalty revenues in the first quarter were $17 million compared to $32 million in the first quarter of 2016. Recall that in the first quarter of last year; royalties included a one-time $20 million sales milestone from Takeda. Excluding that milestone, first quarter 2017 royalties increased 38% compared to last year. This was driven by higher Takeda sales and by those sales reaching a higher royalty rates here in the fourth quarter of last year.

As a reminder, the royalty rate paid by Takeda begins in the mid-teens increases to the high-teens at $100 million in sales into the low 20%s at $200 million and ultimately to the mid 20%s. Since the rates reset annually and because we report royalties one quarter in arrears, royalty revenues will decrease in the second quarter, although we continue to expect them to be in the range of $50 million to $55 million for the full year. Collaboration revenues were $22 million in the first quarter, driven by amounts earned under our ADCETRIS collaboration with Takeda and our ADC deals.

R&D expenses were $118 million in the first quarter; ADCETRIS continues to be the primary driver of R&D expense and the increase over the first quarter of 2016 reflects investments in 22ME, 33A and our broad pipeline. SG&A expenses were $38 million in the first quarter, also in line with our expectations.

Now I'd like to turn the call over to Jonathan.

Jonathan Drachman, M.D. - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Thanks Todd. We are positioned for several very important activities this year with ADCETRIS 33A and enfortumab vedotin. We're also advancing and expanding our pipeline and conducting innovative research to remain the industry leader in ADC technology. With ADCETRIS, we're preparing the supplemental BLA submission for labeling CTCL. Our ALCANZA data were remarkable, and we believe ADCETRIS can make a meaningful difference for CTCL patients who requires systemic therapy to treat this debilitating disease.

In collaboration with Takeda, we're also preparing for top line data from our phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial in frontline Hodgkin lymphoma. This large global trial has the potential to redefine the way newly diagnosed patients, mostly young adults are treated by adding ADCETRIS and removing bleomycin from the standard regimen. It is exciting that this year we expect data that could drive improved outcomes for patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma.

With 33A, our development focus is on myeloid malignancies, including AML and MDS. We are encouraged by the significant percentage of MRD or minimal residual disease negative remissions achieved by patients in our phase 1 AML trials. MRD-negative remissions are more stringent and deeper than traditional response criteria and have been associated with better patient outcome. As we reported at ASH from our phase 1 trial, interim data suggest that patients who achieve MRD-negative status live longer than those who did not, regardless of whether they achieve a CR or a CRI. We will be evaluating MRD status in our CASCADE trial for older unfit patients and in our planned phase 2 randomized trial in frontline younger AML patients.

With enfortumab vedotin, we're working with regulators on refining our development plan for this program in metastatic urothelial cancer and look forward to initiating a registrational trial later this year. In addition, at the upcoming ASCO Annual Meeting in Chicago follow-up data in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer from the phase 1 trail of 22ME will be featured in an oral presentation. We're also evaluating additional tumor types in the ongoing phase 1 trial, including ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer. And lastly, we and Astellas recently initiated a phase 1 trial of 22ME in Japan. This trial will enable future studies and regulatory submission in Japan.

We and Astellas believe that enfortumab vedotin has the potential to become an important therapy around the globe for patients with urothelial cancer. In addition to our lead programs, we are advancing several other clinical stage programs, notably SGN-LIV1A and ADC in development for metastatic breast cancer, including triple negative disease. We are continuing to optimize the dosing schedule in phase 1 and expect to report additional data from SGN-LIV1A later this year. We are enthusiastic about the opportunity for SGN-LIV1A in triple negative breast cancer and we are evaluating next steps for this program, including potential registrational approaches and combination regimens.

At AACR earlier this month, we showcased our advances in research and preclinical development. Some notable presentations included reporting preclinical data demonstrating that ADCETRIS induces immunogenic cell death resulting in an inflammatory tumor microenvironment and added activity when combined with inhibitors of the PD-1, PD-L1 pathway. Under our collaboration with Bristol-Myers Squibb we're conducting clinical trials with ADCETRIS and nivolumab in multiple Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma setting.

In support of our own immuno-oncology portfolio, we reported preclinical data on SEA-CD40 that demonstrate activation of an antitumor immune response and potential for combination with checkpoint inhibitors. SEA-CD40 is an immuno-oncology agent that is in a phase 1 trial for the treatment of both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. In addition, preclinical data were presented supporting the ongoing phase 1 study of SGN-2FF for patients with advanced solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer. SGN-2FF is an oral, small molecule immuno-oncology agent that has been shown to inhibit fucosylation of protein, and thereby stimulate the immune system to slow the growth and spread of cancer. There were also several presentations that highlighted advancements in linker technologies for payloads which enable development of novel ADCs, including the planned clinical program SGN-CD48A for multiple myeloma.

And finally, Unum Therapeutics reported preclinical data with our sugar-engineered antibodies in combination with engineered antibody-coupled T cell receptor, or ACTR cells. Under our collaboration, Unum plans to initiate a phase 1 trial for patients with multiple myeloma targeting BCMA.

Seattle Genetics is built on innovation and scientific excellence. I'm proud that, even as we are advancing multiple exciting programs into registrational studies, we continue to focus on maintaining our leadership in the ADC field and broadening our pipeline by advancing multiple immuno-oncology programs into clinic.

Now I'll turn the call back over to Clay.

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Thanks Jonathan. Before we open the line for questions, I'll summarize our key upcoming activities.

For ADCETRIS, these include submitting a supplemental BLA to the FDA for CTCL in mid 2017, reporting data from the phase 3 ECHELON-1 trial in frontline Hodgkin lymphoma this year, and reporting data from the phase 3 ECHELON-2 trial in frontline MTCL in 2018. For 33A, we are advancing the phase 3 CASCADE trial in frontline older AML, and a phase 1/2 trial in frontline MDS. In addition, we plan to initiate a randomized phase 2 trial in the second half of the year in frontline younger AML patients. Lastly, for 22ME, together with Astellas, we plan to initiate a pivotal phase 2 monotherapy trial in the second half of 2017 for metastatic urothelial cancer patients, who had previously been treated with a checkpoint inhibitor. We are also planning a trial in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor to begin later this year. And we will report additional phase 1 data at ASCO. We will keep you updated on our progress, as well as activities across our earlier stage pipeline programs.

At this point, we will open the line for Q&A. Operator, please open the call for questions.

Question-and-Answer Session

Operator

Thank you. We will take our first question from Michael Schmidt with Leerink Partners.

Michael Schmidt - Leerink Partners LLC

Thanks for taking my questions, and congrats on a good first quarter. I had a follow-up question on your ASG-22ME discussions with the FDA. And just wondering if you could provide some more color there in terms of the feedback that you received, for example, number of patients, what is the potential size of the phase 2 study, which endpoints could be used here, and what is the approval hurdle potentially?

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Okay, Michael, thank you very much for the questions. So, what I would say is, it was a positive meeting with the FDA. The trial you asked about, and at this point, what we're saying is that the modestized (23:11) trial with a relatively rapid timeframe. We mentioned it's a single-arm monotherapy trial of patients who previously had been treated with checkpoint inhibitors. And this would be under the accelerated approval pathway within the FDA.

So overall, we're really excited with the data from 22ME. We previously presented data. At ASCO this year, you'll be hearing more data, and in fact it's an oral presentation. So that was fantastic. And so there'll be a lot of data that will be presented. And we are also going to do we said we're going to start a trial of 22ME with checkpoint inhibitors. And the thing that I really like about that is, you have the high overall response rate of an ADC, and then you have this long durability of a checkpoint and together that could be really exciting. And we've seen evidence of that with ADCETRIS, OPDIVO. We're excited with that. But for the approval trial that is the single arm monotherapy.

Michael Schmidt - Leerink Partners LLC

Okay, great, thanks. And then I had a follow up regarding Hodgkin lymphoma in particular around your activities and in second line Hodgkin lymphoma potentially, I was just wondering if you could just provide some more color there on your activities and sort of what your strategy and next steps are regarding the second line Hodgkin lymphoma setting? Thank you.

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Sure. So we've previously presented quite a lot of data in second line. As you know in frontline, we're trying to really redefine frontline with ADCETRIS every day and that's the E-1 trial. But in second line, I think when you look at what we've done historically, I think we've taken two approaches, we had ADCETRIS plus bendamustine. We had quite a lot of data there with a CR rate over 80%. So that is a one way to consider, although bendamustine does have some toxicities that are well known.

The other approach which we've done of late and perhaps I'm even more interested in is ADCETRIS plus checkpoint inhibitors, and we've put data out on ADCETRIS plus OPDIVO at the appropriate cancer conferences and the data looks really good. At this point, we haven't said anything specific on how we're going to follow it up. I mean those trials also were done with in partnership with Bristol-Myers Squibb. So they were done together with them. We've had a good relationship. We started out with two trials. We added a third trial in our relationship, so I think that's good. And I would say stay tuned for more information as soon as we can provide it in that area, but something that we're very keen to look at.

Michael Schmidt - Leerink Partners LLC

Okay. Great. Thanks, Clay. Thanks for that.

Operator

We'll take our next question from Geoff Meacham with Barclays.

Paul Choi - Barclays Capital, Inc.

Hi, everyone. It's Paul Choi. Thanks for taking our questions. Could you maybe provide a little bit of color on your perhaps pre-CTCL activities in terms of physician awareness and how they're thinking about current standard of care versus what you could do with ADCETRIS?

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Sure. I'd be delighted to talk about that, but probably better for Darren to talk about what our commercial team is doing to prep for CTCL based on this fantastic data, remarkable data that we had with ALCANZA.

Darren S. Cline - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

Yeah. Thanks. And as I alluded to in the prepared remarks that we've been doing a lot of market research around the ALCANZA data and physicians are quite frankly stunned at the results. And if you think about the CTCL patient population, there're about 2,000 that get systemic therapy annually in the U.S. about a 1,000 that express CD30, but as we think about the label, the implications, we're focused on identifying who the appropriate treaters are. Again, because this is somewhat of a rare disease and it's really been segmented with a few key physicians and treatment sites throughout the United States, so we're focusing on that.

Our marketing team is preparing and doing message testing, et cetera to quickly upon approval get the datasets in front of the patient or excuse me, the physicians. So we'll have the rapid uptake with these physicians.

So we're excited, the physician community is excited. They're most excited for a new option that if you think about cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, it's a very visible disease to both obviously the patients and the physicians, and I think with data like ADCETRIS in the setting, we're going to see I think patients are going to see remarkable results. And so, we're excited about it, physicians are and so our patient.

Clay B. Siegall - Seattle Genetics, Inc.

And I want to add one thing about CTCL. So we have Breakthrough Designation from our ALCANZA trial. And so, we have had a good opportunity to collaborate and discuss with FDA all of our data. And you may recall from earlier conference calls that we initially had guided that we would be submitting earlier in this year. And then we changed our guidance at our last conference call to mid-year. And that was because of our discussions with the FDA based on other data that we've had from investigator-sponsored trials, specifically two of them which showed strong activity in CTCL with patients that were below the histology cut off that we used in our ALCANZA trial and with patients that were in other subtypes of CTCL.

So our goal in presenting our data, ultimately submitting a supplemental BLA is to try to get the it will help the most patient that we can and that might be with helping all patients with CTCL. It's not clear that based on histology is the right way to select the patients, and that in fact our data says otherwise. And when you look at the listing in compendia, that does not have a CD30 cut off. So we think that we're in a good position to submit all our data, ALCANZA and from two other trials to try to get the broadest label that we can and help the most patients we can. But that's been our goal and we've been talking about that.

Paul Choi - Barclays Capital, Inc.

Great. Thank you very much.

Continue reading here:
Seattle Genetics (SGEN) Q1 2017 Results - Earnings Call Transcript - Seeking Alpha

NSA Looked for ‘Nefarious’ Genetics Projects – GenomeWeb

More than 10 years ago, the US National Security Agency was monitoring international research projects with the aim of spotting "nefarious" genetic engineering projects, Gizmodo reports.

A new document from the trove leaked by Edward Snowden in 2013 claims that the signals intelligence program was sifting through electronic and communication data it collected for information on genetic sequencing efforts, it adds.

Registering provides access to this and other free content.

Already have an account? .

Excerpt from:
NSA Looked for 'Nefarious' Genetics Projects - GenomeWeb

Embryology in action – York News-Times

YORK The 11 lively third-graders in Jillian Starks class received an eyes- and hands-on life lesson.

With help from York County Extension 4-H assistant Tanya Crawford and 4-H director Megan Burda, Stark and her students incubated, carefully monitored and hatched eggs in their classroom..

Embryology is a 4-H School Enrichment project taught in almost every elementary school across the state. The program is designed for grades 2-4. The Extension Office provides the incubator, eggs and educational materials.

In classroom discussions Crawford taught Starks students about eggs and the birds from tiny to very large - that lay them. They also found homes for the newly-hatched chicks.

Once Stark took up the Extension offer and signed on, Crawford came to class to introduce the project and then visited again with Burda to candle the eggs.

Students of all ages, Crawford said, enjoy taking care of eggs and anticipating the arrival of baby chicks.

We learn about the similarities and differences between chickens, as well as study the development of life. The program usually starts in March or April. I would love to bring embryology to your classroom, Crawford wrote in an earlier invitation to local teachers.

Embryology ran for 21 days during which time Stark and her students carefully checked temperatures in the hatching container and filled water to last over the weekends.

In the past, I have done up to three visits in the classroom (one per week), Crawford said, to deliver the following curriculum:

Lesson 1 introduce embryology and deliver eggs

Lesson 2 talk about egg development and candle the eggs

Lesson 3 talk about brooding and share egg collection

Article continued below advertisement

The eggs for Starks class came from Clare Quandt from Stromsburg and Jill and Ryan Koch from York.

For her part, Stark said, I decided to take on the embryology project because I thought it would be a great way for the students to learn about eggs and their connection to agriculture. The 4-H Extension office brought the supplies, including the incubator and the 24 eggs. After seven days the students candled the eggs to see if they were fertilized. After 14 days the students candled them again to check on their growth, she said.

By day 20 the eggs had begun to hatch.

The Extension Office then provided the necessary supplies to keep the chicks in the classroom for a few days, she explained.

The students have been really engaged throughout the whole process, she added. They were excited to watch the (chicks) hatch from the egg and hold them after the feathers had dried. Not only are they learning about science behind the chick, but they are also learning about the responsibility that comes along with having a pet. The experience has been great overall and I cant wait for next year.

Teachers of grades 2-4 are invited to contact Crawford about bringing the project to their classrooms, too.

Read the original post:
Embryology in action - York News-Times

Extension program brings life lessons to classrooms – Grand Island Independent

As part of the Nebraska Extension School Enrichment Program, elementary students in Hall County are learning lessons on where the food on their plates comes from.

Hall County Extension assistant Melinda Vlieger is in her fourth year of conducting an embryology project with local schools. On Thursday, she was at Newell Elementary and Shoemaker Elementary candling eggs with kindergrtners.

Vlieger said the four-week program is designed to teach students the life cycle of a baby chick from the time the mother hen lays her egg to the time the egg hatches, which occurs in around 21 days.

The eggs Vlieger was candling with students on Thursday were laid 10 days prior. Through the candling process, the students could see the living embryo as the chick develops inside the egg.

Throughout the project, Vlieger said, the students are in charge of taking care of the eggs. Depending of the school, every classroom gets an incubator for which she provides 18 fertilized eggs.

"It is their job to take care of the eggs as they grow and incubate into chicks," Vlieger said.

Vlieger said the embryology program has grown during the four years she has conducted it in Hall County schools. This year, its in 10 schools, reaching 45 different classes.

"It has grown every year since I started it, and this is the biggest year so far," Vlieger said.

During the eggs time in the incubator, the temperature is kept at about 100 degrees, and the eggs are turned up until several days before they hatch so the embryos dont stick to the egg shell while developing. The yolk and the egg white in the egg provide the developing chick nourishment and fluid.

When candling, Vlieger brings a bright light from an old slide project and holds the eggs up to the light. The children can see the developing chick move around, reacting to the brightness of the light.

"It is kind of like an X-ray almost for the egg," she said. "We can see the shadow and the blood vessels and air pocket in the egg. We also talk about how some of the eggs might not be growing. That it is just part of nature, and everything doesnt always survive. That helps reinforce the life cycle and helps them understand nature."

When Vlieger held each egg before the bright light, she told the students to determine whether the egg fell into one of three categories: a yolker, an egg that hadnt developed at all; a quitter, an egg that began to develop but stopped; or a winner, an egg that is continuing to develop.

Vlieger spoke to four kindergarten classes on Thursday at Newell. At her first stop, of the 18 eggs examined, 12 fell into the winner category, five were yolkers, and there was one quitter.

Vlieger told the students that, while there were 12 winners, that doesnt necessarily mean there will be 12 baby chicks. Some may stop their development during the remaining 11 days before they hatch.

She told the students that science doesnt really have an answer why those chicks stop their development in the egg.

Vlieger also explained the struggle the baby chicks go through as they begin breaking out of their egg. She said the chicks use a special tooth on their beak, especially designed during their evolution, to break out of their shell, which could take as much as an entire day. Once the chick is out of the egg, that beak tooth falls off.

Vlieger told the students what to expect when the eggs hatch and once the chicks escape the confines of their shells. The chicks, she said, will be wet and exhausted from the rigors of breaking out of their shells. They will rest and dry out and will have enough nourishment and fluids from the egg to survive for three days before taking their first food.

The program is designed from students from kindergarten through sixth grade. At each grade level, she said, the program teaches a different aspect of embryology.

"It is for them to learn about where their food comes from and where the eggs come from," Vlieger said. "These eggs come from a farm, and they look just like the eggs that come from a store."

In March, according to the U.S. Department of Agricultures National Agricultural Statistics Service, all laying hens in Nebraska totaled 8.42 million, which was down from 8.74 million the previous year. However, March egg production per 100 layers was 2,675 eggs, compared to 2,511 eggs in 2016.

Continued here:
Extension program brings life lessons to classrooms - Grand Island Independent

IVF clinic has hospital space despite ethos clash – Independent.ie – Irish Independent

Its clinical director, Professor Mary Wingfield, has brushed aside fears that treatments like IVF won't be allowed there due to its ownership by a religious order.

Instead she argued that the move by the Merrion Fertility Clinic will "benefit our patients".

The clinic - where NMH master Rhona Mahony is a voluntary director - is currently based on Lower Mount Street, and pays rent to the NMH next door.

It provides services like IVF to couples who are having difficulty conceiving - both public and private patients.

Concern has been raised by former NMH master Dr Peter Boylan that IVF treatment may not be permitted at the planned St Vincent's hospital site as it's owned by the Sisters of Charity.

The Catholic Church is against IVF treatment.

Dr Mahony has rejected Dr Boylan's concern, repeatedly insisting the new hospital will have "clinical independence".

Meanwhile, a senior source with knowledge of the project pointed to the provision of assisted conception facilities in the hospitals plans. They said this highlights the "absolute independence" of the hospital to provide services to women, despite arguments made to the contrary in recent days.

Architects' drawings for the new hospital show that fertility services are to be located on the first floor, which accommodates a 'reproductive medicine facility'.

This includes a 'cryo store' and 'embryology lab' and several procedure suites.

It is unclear what space at the hospital, if any, will be set aside specifically for Merrion Fertility Clinic.

The Department of Health appeared unaware the clinic would be moving there when first asked if it would be.

But a statement from Merrion Fertility Clinic confirmed it "will be moving to St Vincent's as part of the National Maternity Hospital Project". It said the "finer details" are under consideration and won't be finalised for some time.

Prof Wingfield said their "close affiliation" with the NMH will continue at the new site.

The Irish Independent asked if there is concern services the clinic currently offers won't be permitted at the St Vincent's site.

Prof Wingfield said the clinic "follows international guidelines for best practice in gynaecological and infertility care. This will not change when the NMH, including its fertility services, moves."

She added: "The enhanced facilities at the new hospital will, in fact, benefit our patients."

She said that the clinic will "continue to advocate for increased Government support for public funding for assisted reproduction services and for the urgent need for national legislation in this area."

The Department of Health said no provision has been made in the new hospital's design for the Merrion Fertility Clinic. Asked if the department was unaware that the clinic planned to move there, a spokesman later said there's an area for assisted conception. But he added: "It is not possible at this early stage to answer detailed questions regarding the operation of the new hospital."

See the rest here:
IVF clinic has hospital space despite ethos clash - Independent.ie - Irish Independent

New York Fertility Clinic Holds Baby ‘Lottery’ – Vocativ – Vocativ

A New York fertility clinicis holding acontest forfree in vitro fertilization ababy raffle, if you will. Its like the lottery, only insteadof winning a million bucks, 30winnerswillget the chanceata real,live genetically relatedhuman baby.In a dystopian flourish, theirnameswill be announced on Facebook Live for the world to see.

The contestis open to women under the age of 44 who have been referred for IVF and have never been to New Hope Fertility Center.The cost of a single IVF cycle typically costs around $12,000 to $15,000, so thetotal value of the prizeson offer is at least$36,000.

New Hope says the contest isbeing held to mark National Infertility Awareness Week, which began this week. The aim, says a press release, is to spread awareness about this growing epidemic and encourage open discussions about infertility and how it affects people around the country.

Of course, its also a great way to drum up national and even international publicity for the clinic, which wasfounded by Dr. John Zhang, who is no stranger to the spotlight. He made headlines this yearfor using a controversial technique tocreate the worlds first three-parent baby and, before that, for facilitatingthe oldest in-vitro pregnancy.

But he isnt the first to conceive of this baby lottery idea. The UK charity To Hatch held a similar lottery in 2011, only it (incredibly) charged people$25to enter the contest. The schemedrew intense controversy, with critics alleging that it exploited the vulnerability of couples struggling with infertility. As a spokesperson for The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, a clinic regulator,told The Independent,We are strongly of the view that using IVF as prize in a lottery is wrong and entirely inappropriate. It trivializes what is for many people a central part of their lives.

At least in this case, women dont needto buyalottery ticket but the winners will have to pay thecost of participating in the clinics social media stunt.The lottery will be drawnon May 5th at 2p.m. during thelive Facebook event.

See the article here:
New York Fertility Clinic Holds Baby 'Lottery' - Vocativ - Vocativ

Kimmel Scholar Award propels immune cell cancer research – Davis Enterprise

UC Davis assistant professor Sean Collins of the department of microbiology and molecular genetics has received a prestigious, two-year $200,000 award that will help advance the use of immune cells for cancer therapies.

The Kimmel Scholar Award is given to 15 of the nations most promising young researchers leading the fight against cancer.

Collins seeks to understand how immune cells process information, make decisions and respond to threats in the human body. His research explores the basic molecular mechanisms that allow immune cells to navigate to infection sites.

When there is an injury or infection, our bodies respond by sending specialized immune cells to evaluate and intercept foreigner invaders. These immune cells also help defend the body against tumors. However, in order to fight infections or tumors, the cells must first find the right location in the body, and the path to get there can be complicated.

By identifying key principles and molecular pieces, we hope to reengineer these processes to direct immune cells to tumor locations, Collins said.

The hope is that by guiding the seek and destroy ability of these immune cells, in combination with other therapeutic strategies, they will be able to more effectively target and destroy tumors.

Ive spent most of my career so far focused on understanding basic mechanisms like how a cell processes information about its environment, Collins said, but this is a new direction to try and apply some of those findings in a direct, medically relevant way to help develop strategies for cancer therapy.

From sports statistics to cell biology Professor Wolf-Dietrich Heyer, chair of the department of microbiology and molecular genetics, recognizes Collins as a rising star with a bright future.

Professor Collins work is an elegant combination of cutting-edge cell biology paired with rigorous quantitative analysis and creative mathematical modeling, Heyer said. His focus on immune cells will provide the underpinning for novel approaches in harnessing the bodys immune system in anti-cancer therapy.

Collins interest in science grew from a childhood fascination with solving problems.

At some level, it started with an interest in computer programming and statistics in sports, he said.

As a child, Collins and his twin brother were big sports statistics buffs, and would play sports simulation games on the computer. One day, their game malfunctioned, displaying a cryptic error message. So the two brothers spent the next few months figuring out how the game worked and eventually fixed it.

The Kimmel Scholar Award is sponsored by the Sidney Kimmel Foundation, which has funded more than 260 cancer researchers since its founding in 1993. Collins is the second researcher from UCD to be honored with this award, after professor Ken Kaplan of the department of molecular and cellular biology in 2001.

UC Davis News

Read the rest here:
Kimmel Scholar Award propels immune cell cancer research - Davis Enterprise

Researchers 3-D Bioprint Cartilage – Laboratory Equipment

A team of researchers at Sahlgrenska Academy has managed to generate cartilage tissue by printing stem cells using a 3D-bioprinter. The fact that the stem cells survived being printed in this manner is a success in itself. In addition, the research team was able to influence the cells to multiply and differentiate to form chondrocytes (cartilage cells) in the printed structure.

The findings have been published in Natures Scientific Reports magazine. The research project is being conducted in collaboration with a team of researchers at the Chalmers University of Technology who are experts in the 3D printing of biological materials. Orthopedic researchers from Kungsbacka are also involved in the research collaboration.

The team used cartilage cells harvested from patients who underwent knee surgery, and these cells were then manipulated in a laboratory, causing them to rejuvenate and revert into pluripotent stem cells, i.e. stem cells that have the potential to develop into many different types of cells. The stem cells were then expanded and encapsulated in a composition of nanofibrillated cellulose and printed into a structure using a 3D bioprinter. Following printing, the stem cells were treated with growth factors that caused them to differentiate correctly, so that they formed cartilage tissue.

The publicationis the result of three years of hard work.

In nature, the differentiation of stem cells into cartilage is a simple process, but its much more complicated to accomplish in a test tube. Were the first to succeed with it, and we did so without any animal testing whatsoever," says Stina Simonsson, Associate Professor of Cell Biology, who lead the research teams efforts.

Most of the teams efforts had to do with finding a procedure so that the cells survive printing, multiply and a protocol that works that causes the cells to differentiate to form cartilage.

"We investigated various methods and combined different growth factors. Each individual stem cell is encased in nanocellulose, which allows it to survive the process of being printed into a 3D structure. We also harvested mediums from other cells that contain the signals that stem cells use to communicate with each other so called conditioned medium. In laymans terms, our theory is that we managed to trick the cells into thinking that they arent alone, clarifies Simonsson. "Therefore,the cells multiplied before we differentiated them."

A key insight gained from the teams study is that it is necessary to use large amounts of live stem cells to form tissue in this manner.

The cartilage formed by the stem cells in the 3D bioprinted structure is extremely similar to human cartilage. Experienced surgeons who examined the artificial cartilage saw no difference when they compared the bioprinted tissue to real cartilage, and have stated that the material has properties similar to their patients natural cartilage. Just like normal cartilage, the lab-grown material contains Type II collagen , and under the microscope the cells appear to be perfectly formed, with structures similar to those observed in samples of human-harvested cartilage.

The study represents a giant step forward in the ability to generate new, endogenous cartilage tissue. In the not too distant future, it should be possible to use 3D bioprinting to generate cartilage based on a patients own, backed-up stem cells. This bioprinted tissue can be used to repair cartilage damage, or to treat osteoarthritis, in which joint cartilage degenerates and breaks down. The condition is very common one in four Swedes over the age of 45 suffer from some degree of osteoarthritis.

In theory, this research has created the opportunity to generate large amounts of cartilage, but one major issue must be resolved before the findings can be used in practice to benefit patients.

The structure of the cellulose we used might not be optimal for use in the human body. Before we begin to explore the possibility of incorporating the use of 3D bioprinted cartilage into the surgical treatment of patients, we need to find another material that can be broken down and absorbed by the body so that only the endogenous cartilage remains, the most important thing for use in a clinical setting is safety explains Simonsson.

Original post:
Researchers 3-D Bioprint Cartilage - Laboratory Equipment