Lotamore House has been saved from decay and dilapidation – Irish Examiner

But, now after a chequered past decade of decay, and having been rescued from the point of rapidly deteriorated dereliction during the slump, (or, even from a fate similar to that of Corks Vernon Mount House, gutted last year by fire while empty,) Lotamore House is back in rude good health, and in a use which scarcely could have been thought of, at almost anytime in its last centuries of use.

With Cork Merchant Prince family generations of ownership, renting and occupation behind it, today in its new guise it is the very real point of conception and where new life starts for many, many dozens of generations and the most diverse array of families and precious prince and princess dynasties yet to come.

John Waterstone

Its the sparkling new base for the Cork Fertility Centre, arguably the countrys most advanced such clinic, after having had new life breathed into it by fertility consultant Dr John Waterstone and his wife Susan, self-confessed aficionados of old buildings, and, indeed, private family residents for almost 20 years in one of Corks old rectory homes.

Now spanning 13,000 sq ft of calm, period conserved property and utterly graceful features with purposeful, dedicated medical suites, labs, scan rooms and consulting rooms, at heart Lotamore House this spring is a cutting edge medical and fertility centre employing 55 staff.

It literally is creating and cradling life, where a new-build 1,500 sq ft lab glows with the latest embryology technology, cryopreservation storage area, with diagnostic facilities, which can detect and prevent debilitating genetic conditions being passed on to new-borns and future generations.

When opting to grow their clinic and business from a base on College Road (the Waterstones also have outreach fertility clinics in Limerick, Waterford and now Dublin too) , they could have built or bought almost anywhere.

They might have been expected to buy something more predictably medical than a down-at-heel, 215-year-old Georgian villa on a hill, with water coming through the roof, and gardens lying idle since it ceased guest accommodation uses in 2006: it had sold then for well over 3 million, with investor notions of turning the still-elegant house into a 90-bed nursing home.

(It also featured on TV news slots for a period when briefly and controversially occupied by protest group, the Rodolphus Allen Private Family Trust, after Lotamore Houses future was to be decided by receivers Deloitte, and it had been effectively squatted in also for a short spell.)

It has grown from 8,000 sq ft on the point of decline to 13,000 sq ft of immaculate space and balancing old side wings with a restored original Georgian villa done to best conservation standards under the guidance of architects, Jack Coughlan Associates.

Getting from first approach to a finished product took the best part of three years, with about half of that spent in layout, detailing and planning etc, and the other 18 months was on-site work with Rose Construction, whove been in operation in Cork for more than 30 years.

As a team effort, its delivery include re-roofing, new sash windows throughout the original building, salvage and repair of old stone such as the Wicklow granite for the steps, conservation of cast iron railings, new lime harling or dash render on the exterior walls.

In particular there was painstaking input from master joiner and carpentry craftsman Frank Gaffney, who saved the original staircase as it was about to sink after a few years of water ingress, and which had also threatened, and damaged, much of the original ceilings.

Key decorative plasterwork sections and friezes were rescued, saved and in cases copied, done by Capitol Mouldings and serve as statement pieces in the central hall, stairs and landings.

Also involved with project manager Susan Waterstone (wholl admit to being a very demanding client!) on the interior design front was Keith Spillane and the likes of MMOS Engineering were vital to knitting old and new uses and services together, while Q Fab were onboard for the stainless steel lab work in what is now a hard-working, repurposed building.

Reversing Lotamore Houses fortunes was, clearly, a labour of love for John and Susan Waterstone, who now are in full operation mode at Lotamore, whose labs also serve the businesss other smaller clinics in Limerick, Waterford and Dublin.

And, while the houses fabric is fully secured, future phases will see the grounds (currently full of young rabbits, as if such symbols of fertility were needed) also taken back to suitable grandeur.

All the essentials are here though, from walled gardens to specimen hardwood trees and spectacular, blazes of in-flower rhododendron, visible from even across the Lee around Blackrock.

On the Irish Examiners visit and tour, the couples commitment and interest down to the minutiae of historic buildings is evident, in every square inch, of patinated old and shiny new.

John Waterstone even designed some of the furniture, such as the single, 18 long dining table in the staff canteen made out of 2 thick pitch-pine floorboards (egalitarian as well as aesthetic, and necessary as staff numbers jumped 30% with the move to Lotamore.)

They commissioned a lengthy history and biography of the 1798-built Lotamore House, linking it to the likes of far grander Lota House itself a few hundred metres along this shouldering, sunny, south-facing Cork valley hill.

S the older sibling, Lota House itself currently houses the Brothers of Charity, and was designed by Davis Duckart for a Robert Rogers, whose family built and leased out the seven-bay Lotamore House to a succession for Cork merchant prince families. Surnames include Harrison, Hackett, Perrier, Mahony, Lunham (of bacon fame), and from the 1920s, the fruiterer family the Cudmores as last private occupants.

Lotamore Houses own architects arent recorded, but in the way of coincidences, the related Lota Houses architect Davis Duckart also designed Corks elegant Mansion House, which is now the main point of entry to the citys Mercy Hospital.

In another unrelated hospital link, Lotamore House was the HQ of the Hospitals Trust/Irish Hospitals Sweepstakes after 1961.

Now again in a new eras medical usage, Lotamore Houses current owners have documented every stage of the physical transition too for future generations to peruse, moving from blueprints and working documents to decorative flourishes and plasterwork conservation, via photography and video.

Initially, an independent TV production company, GoodLookingFilms, started documenting Lotamore Houses transition to reproductive technology/fertility clinic, but in the end RT didnt commission the series which was going to mix embryo technology and micro, medical manouvres with a smattering of Grand Designs with About the House and Room to Improve.

It seems quite the lost opportunity: some of the couples and families that featured in early filming now have one and two-year-old children, as a coda to what would have been TV (and, far more importantly, personal) golden moments.

: New life.

Read the original here:
Lotamore House has been saved from decay and dilapidation - Irish Examiner

Sioux Falls makes cameo on ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ – Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Subscribe today for full access on your desktop, tablet, and mobile device.

1022

Let friends in your social network know what you are reading about

Sioux Falls made a cameo appearance Thursday night in the latest episode of the medical drama "Grey's Anatomy."

Try Another

Audio CAPTCHA

Image CAPTCHA

Help

CancelSend

A link has been sent to your friend's email address.

A link has been posted to your Facebook feed.

GREY'S ANATOMY - "Hope for the Hopeless" - Richard performs his 10,000th surgery on a pair of bickering sisters (Nia Vardalos and Peri Gilpin) who come into the hospital for a liver transplant; Derek and Lexie take on a neuroblastoma case that has been previously deemed inoperable; Teddy and Cristina cross the line when they go against Owen's orders and try to steal a case from Alex and Dr. McQueen; Ellis Grey's shadow looms as Meredith searches for a specialty; meanwhile Adele is brought into the hospital after she is found wandering the streets, on Grey's Anatomy, THURSDAY, JANUARY 19 (9:00-10:02 p.m., ET) on the ABC Television Network. (Photo by Colleen Hayes/ABC via Getty Images) JAMES PICKENS JR., CHANDRA WILSON, ELLEN POMPEO(Photo: Colleen Hayes, ABC via Getty Images)

Sioux Falls made a cameo appearance Thursday night in the latest episode of the medical drama "Grey's Anatomy."

Without going into too much detail so as to not spoil the episode for those who've yet to watch, a pair of characters ends up at Joe Foss Field after a cross-country flight takes an unexpected turn.

"I don't even know what town we're in," one character says, standing on the tarmac with Sioux Falls police and fire vehicles in the background.

"Sioux Falls apparently," another replies.

Actress Ellen Pompeo, who plays Meredith Grey, tipped off fans that the show would feature South Dakota's biggest city in November. She posted an Instagram photo that led some to wonder whether they'd walk into a scene with Pompeo or creatorShonda Rhimes.

Local authorities and hospital spokespeople said the filming was done in Hollywood, not on location at Sioux Falls Regional Airport.

Follow Dana Ferguson on Twitter @bydanaferguson, call (605) 370-2493 or email dferguson@argusleader.com

Read or Share this story: http://argusne.ws/2pBpxRv

0) { %>

0) { %>

See more here:
Sioux Falls makes cameo on 'Grey's Anatomy' - Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Eden Hazard and Jos Mourinho: anatomy of a rollercoaster relationship – The Guardian

Eden Hazard was in imperious form when Chelsea and Manchester United met in the Premier League in October. Photograph: Catherine Ivill - AMA/Getty Images

Fans, content with a perfunctory victory, were beginning to drift away from Stamford Bridge. Chelsea were leading Porto 2-0, having been in control for most of the game. In a turbulent season, the Champions League had again provided a pocket of calm. And then Jos Mourinho decided to take off Eden Hazard, who had been involved in the buildup to both Chelsea goals. It had probably been Hazards best performance of the season to that point and he left the pitch to warm applause. He slapped hands with Loc Rmy but then, as Mourinho went to congratulate him, Hazard shrugged him off.

It is easy, of course, to read too much into individual moments in retrospect but even at the time that felt telling. To show such obvious disdain for your manager in the moment of victory exposed the palpable discord that existed within the squad a week before Michael Emenalo, the Chelsea technical director, spoke of it in the wake of Mourinhos sacking. From that moment, it felt that Mourinho was doomed, that, even with his abilities, there was no way back.

Then, as the curtain was falling, even during that final game away at Leicester City five days later, as Claudio Ranieri dealt the final blow to avenge his own sacking by Chelsea 12 years earlier, there came the strange incident of Hazards hip. Mourinho clearly felt Hazard, who had been troubled by the problem since the summer, was not particularly badly injured and cajoled him to go back on after treatment on the touchline, only for the Belgian to decide within seconds that he did not fancy it and march off, ignoring his manager as he did so.

Not surprisingly, Hazard was one of three players highlighted as rats by disgruntled Chelsea fans the following weekend as the post-Mourinho age began with a comfortable victory over Sunderland. Of all the many things that went wrong for Mourinho at Chelsea last season, the most significant was surely the disintegration of his relationship with the Belgian. It would be misleading to suggest some feud still simmers between the two but as Chelsea go to Old Trafford on Sunday for what appears the last significant obstacle on their run-in to the title, the fraying of their bond stands as an emblem of the collapse of Mourinhos Chelsea reign.

Right from the start, Mourinho would provoke Hazard in front of the squad, telling the team: Today were playing with 10, to try to goad him into great defensive effort. Initially, Hazard, used to more overtly supportive managers, was troubled. If he looks you in the eye, its terrifying, he said.

Hazard is not a natural rebel, however. He accepted his managers ways, even if he preferred to go home and spend time with his family after training rather than staying at Cobham for extra gym work. The two found an understanding and, while there were occasional hiccups, as when Mourinho publicly criticised Hazard after the Champions League defeat by Atltico Madrid in 2014 Eden is the kind of player who is not so mentally ready to look back at his left-back and live his life for him, he said, after Hazard had commented that Chelsea were better counterattacking than taking the game to the opposition the relationship worked. When Hazard was named Chelseas players player of the year and joked that the other nominees would have to work harder, Mourinho appreciated the dig.

That was the height of their connection. The manager recognised Hazard as a humble, diligent player lacking a little ambition. Hazards father announced that he saw Mourinho as the manager to give his son a little more ego, to make him a wonderful player as well as the fantastic dad and wonderful husband he already was. Mourinho began to acknowledge his respect for Hazard, highlighting an opponent in team meetings and saying he was no Maradona, no Messi, no Hazard.

The warmer approach brought the best out of Hazard and Chelsea won the Premier League as Hazard was named PFA and Football Writers player of the season.

But then Mourinho ramped up the pressure, describing Hazard as my new Messi while at the same time urging him to take more defensive responsibility. At the same time, Hazard was struggling to recover from a hip problem that afflicted him until last April. At one point a frustrated Mourinho allegedly told him: Youre not good enough for the top. Ill have to sell you. He began to criticise him in press conferences again.

As reports surfaced that the pair had fallen out, they met to discuss the situation. Hazard asked to play centrally and Mourinho agreed for the home game against Liverpool. With the score at 1-1, though, Mourinho took him off, shattering what remained of Hazards confidence.

Yet there is no acrimony between the two. When Mourinho was sacked, Hazard sent him a text message saying he felt responsible because he had not been at the same level as before. Mourinho replied, accepting Hazards sentiment and wishing: Good luck to you and your wonderful family. Mourinho felt he lacked the necessary hardness; by the end Hazard, along with a number of players, felt wearied by Mourinhos relentless abrasiveness. In Hazard was expressed a wider malaise.

Hazard has clearly benefited from taking a more central role this season. Playing almost as an inside-left in Antonio Contes 3-4-2-1, he has been able to drift infield, knowing Marcos Alonso is always there to go outside him and offer creative width, while also being able to initiate the press, if required, on the opposing full-back. For all the meticulousness of Contes planning, that perhaps has made his movement less predictable and with that freedom within a system some of the swagger has returned to his play, most notably in that goal against Arsenal when he beat Laurent Koscielny at both the beginning and the end of a 40-yard burst.

Hazard has taken full toll on Mourinho as well, scoring one and generally sparkling with menace in Chelseas 4-0 win over Manchester United. So dangerous was he that for the FA Cup quarter-final in March, Mourinho seemingly targeted Hazard. Whatever the rights and wrongs of Ander Herreras dismissal in that game, the red card resulted from Hazard being kicked every time the ball came near him, an intriguing focus, taking into account Chelseas slickness as a unit this season.

Given the way that game went, any strategy to counter Hazard on Sunday will have to be rather more subtle. And if United are to prevail, Hazard will have to be neutralised. For Mourinho, perhaps, that is not only a tactical imperative but also a psychological one.

Originally posted here:
Eden Hazard and Jos Mourinho: anatomy of a rollercoaster relationship - The Guardian

Grey’s Anatomy Recap: Experiencing Some Turbulence – Vulture

L-R: Martin Henderson, Ellen Pompeo. Photo: Mitchell Haaseth/ABC

On one hand, its kind of mind-boggling that just five seasons after the crash that took Lexie and Mark and maybe some years off our own lives, Greys Anatomy would be subjected to yet more plane drama. But, on the other hand: CUTE PEDIATRIC DENTIST ALERT. Oh, sorry while helpful Dr. Harrison Peters (Callard Harris) is a lovely addition to my television screen, the real upside of this episode is that it is very, very good.

Directed by Dr. Miranda Bailey (Chandra Wilson) herself, the tight quarters and constant turbulence we experience for the full hour expertly heighten the drama as Meredith and Riggs who, unbeknownst to each other, are headed to the same medical conference attempt to tend to an entire plane full of patients. Its exciting, a little scary, and paced so well I could barely believe it when I looked up and saw there were only ten minutes left. And, you guys, I havent even gotten to the Derek stuff yet. Because there is a lot of Derek stuff.

In the Air Tonight Season 13 Episode 20

Editor's Rating 4 stars

Meredith is not enthused when she switches seats in order to help a family sit together and winds up sitting in the same row as Nathan Riggs. To Riggs, its a sign; to Meredith, its an annoyance. They bicker back and forth a little bit about not being a thing and why they arent a thing and how Riggs knows Meredith totally wants to be a thing you know, the same thing these two have been arguing about since they hooked up LAST SEASON. Listen, Meredith is my homegirl, and Dr. Dimples is very enjoyable, but the back-and-forth was old months ago. Its time to put up or shut up!

Before long, Meredith puts up err, puts out, really. Yes, Riggs follows her into the bathroom because he thinks shes making eyes, which she swears she is not. After Riggs reminds her that there is no one around who they know (mainly, Maggie), the two doctors join the Mile-High Club. Lets be real: Riggs is totally already in that club. He navigated that airplane bathroom like a pro.

Just as Meredith and Riggs return to their seats, and Meredith returns to her we are not a thing schtick (seriously, they go from on-again to off-again in the span of minutes), the plane goes through some serious turbulence. People-thrown-up-into-the-air kind of turbulence. The plane is headed through a big ol storm. Welp, here comes the craziness.

Meredith, Riggs, and the aforementioned cute dentist, Harrison, swing into action, helping the many, many people who make use of their call button when asked who needs medical assistance. This plane just became a very busy emergency room. The doctors spend time with various passengers (Greys has always been great at making you care about relative strangers within a few minutes and that talent is put to great use in In the Air Tonight), but the majority of the episode is focused on trying to save Max (Jai Rodriguez), a very nice man with a very cute boyfriend. Max was too good for us you knew something dramatic was headed his way.

Max hits his head pretty hard, and almost immediately Meredith diagnoses him with a brain bleed. If they were in the hospital, hed be rushed to the OR and they would drill into his skull to relieve some of the pressure. As it stands, they are stuck on a plane with limited medical supplies and a pilot who refuses to land until its safe. (Greys, of course, gives us a female pilot, because Greys is good.) That may not be for hours, since they are currently navigating their way through two separate storms. All Meredith can do is wait it out.

During a rare break, Meredith and Riggs take a seat on the floor. Riggs wants to know more about the plane crash Meredith mentioned to him earlier. At first, Meredith doesnt want to get too into it (WHO WOULD?), but she begins to talk about the Seattle Grace Five now only three and how she lost Lexie. Things are starting to make sense to Riggs. He understands Merediths overwhelming desire to protect Maggie at all costs. But Meredith disagrees. She makes sacrifices for her family, sure, but thats normal. Riggs presses and presses until Meredith finally blurts out the real reason she cant fully commit: Shes married.

Oof. Was the air sucked out of your room, too?

Before they can take a deep dive into that little nugget, Meredith and Riggs are called back to Maxs side. Hes getting worse. They cant wait for a proper OR they need to do something now. Meredith has an idea: Theres a syringe in the medical kit. Shes going to stick that in the dudes skull and drain blood. Then shes going to do it over and over again until the pressure is relieved. On a very unsteady airplane. In case you havent guessed: This is insane.

But when has something being insane stopped Meredith from doing it before? This is the girl who stuck her hand on a bomb inside a mans chest. Who stands in front of a gunman and tells him to shoot her in order to save her husband. Meredith isnt afraid of insane. So, the woman who just a few minutes earlier told Riggs how shes cursed and that everyone around her seems to die, sticks a needle inside a mans skull. The sequence that follows with Meredith, Riggs, Harrison, and Candace the Flight Attendant (Spencer Grammer) working together to save Max amid some major turbulence is excellent. Things get dicier when Riggs has to leave to go resuscitate an annoying dude with pulmonary hypertension and Meredith decides her syringe isnt cutting it, so she deftly turns a cocktail straw into a surgical tool. Finally, mercifully, the plane lands and Riggs turns out to be right: No one dies today.

Okay, so taking a step to the side to allow for a bottle episode of Greys Anatomy that does very little to push most of the main stories forward, it does get a pass for the action-packed storytelling.

And not all storylines are put on hold: Once the plane lands and everyone is ushered to safety, Riggs once again confronts Meredith over the reason why she keeps pushing him away. Its not because of Maggie, and not because she is prioritizing her family. Its because shes scared. Shes scared of letting go of Derek. Riggs obviously knows how she feels, but he also knows that the two of them are alive, and he wants to live his life. He wants to move forward and he thinks Meredith should too.

And then it arrives. The Meredith and Derek montage for the history books. Meredith sees their story told backward, with very familiar flashes of car crashes and hospital shoot-outs and Post-it notes and elevator proposals and one very fateful meeting in a bar. Meredith considers it all all the turbulence in her own life, and how sometimes, knowing it may get bumpy, you still have to get on the plane anyway. So, she looks at Riggs and takes him up on his offer of a hotel room in Sioux Falls. But it better be nice.

Its good to see that even though Meredith is embarking on a new adventure, shes still the same old girl we know and love. And that means absolutely no hand-holding.

Laughter Is The Best Medicine, Except For Real Medicine:

Of course Meredith is the type of person to shame a stranger for shaming a mother on a plane. Its a perfect character moment.

Spencer Grammer is great as a doesnt-take-shit-from-anyone flight attendant, and her not-so-subtle hints at wanting to see Riggs again are both hilarious and understandable.

What patience Harrison has for all the doubt cast over his chosen occupation. And when Meredith and Riggs just assume he has drills with him on his flight because hes a dentist, he responds with gentle, spot-on sarcasm. THE CUTE DENTIST HAS JOKES. Dont let his non-goodbye to Meredith be the last we see of him.

The elderly lady on the aisle never really gets her due, so I shall give it to her here. She shades Pulmonary Hypertension Guy perfectly and has Viagra at the ready when Riggs needs it to save said guys life. She seems like a great time.

Sob Scale: 4/10It was all too thrilling to really sit and have a proper cry, but the reverse flashback that left us with that image of Meredith and Derek meeting at the bar was a nice touch. A low blow, but a nice touch.

Tig Notaro Isnt Too Happy About Louis C.K.s SNL Clown Sketch, Which Bears a Striking Resemblance to Her Short Film

Ludacris Gives Ludicrous Health Advice and Explains His Vitamin D Abs to Conan

The Minaj/Jonas collaboration continues.

Heres hoping for an exclusively gay Frankenstein moment.

New transmissions from the Satellite of Love.

Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy corrects remarks made previously by Fishers brother, Todd.

A rough cut of the trailer was thrown together in three days.

When the Furious A-listers face off, things have a way of ending in a tie.

From Kendrick Lamars DAMN. to Little Dragons Season High, heres a selection of new, recently released albums worth checking out.

And what kinds of originals to expect.

Everyone thinks they have the answer.

Imagine, for a moment, that you possess footage of Laura Dern in space. Would you keep it to yourself?

Its hard to trust a show when the main narrative is driven by professional manipulators.

One of the silliest SNL cast members ever reveals how there was a reason behind his mid-sketch laughing.

There isnt a ton of new information, but lets see what we can suss out.

From Jenny Slate to Shiri Appleby.

I think Pam would have been out there in the world campaigning for Hillary but mainly because she wanted to bone her.

While the show grapples with a lot of important issues, it never really touches the mystery it sets out to solve.

Read more here:
Grey's Anatomy Recap: Experiencing Some Turbulence - Vulture

Fans Are Weirded Out By Grey's Anatomy's New Incestuous Storyline – Refinery29

With Riverdale and its "twincest" jokes, plus the Jaime-Cersei dynamic on Game Of Thrones, TV is officially at capacity when it comes to characters giving off serious incest vibes. Grey's Anatomy is the latest show to hop on this trend, with last night's episode featuring some hardcore flirting between step-siblings Jackson (Jesse Williams) and Maggie (Kelly McCreary). Fans have no idea what to make of it.

Read the rest here:
Fans Are Weirded Out By Grey's Anatomy's New Incestuous Storyline - Refinery29

TJC to host Human Anatomy & Physiology Society regional conference – Tyler Morning Telegraph

Tyler Junior College has been selected as the host site for Saturdays regional conference of the Human Anatomy & Physiology Society.

HAPS is a national society of more than 1,700 educators from high schools, two- and four-year colleges, universities, and private businesses in the United States, Canada and throughout the rest of the world, said Dr. Betsy Ott, TJC biology professor and recent past president of the organization.

Ott has been a professor at TJC since 1982, teaching anatomy and physiology, general biology for non-science majors, and biology for majors.

In addition to her term last year as HAPS president, Ott was also named an honorary member of the National Association of Biology Teachers, the groups highest honor.

Meetings and workshops will be in the newly renovated Anatomy & Physiology labs in the Pirtle Technology building on the TJC main campus. Exhibitors will be on hand from textbook, teaching and technology companies, along with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Workshops will range from content updates to innovations in teaching techniques and technology. At the end of the day, participants will be given a tour of the state-of-the-art simulation labs in TJCs Rogers Nursing & Health Sciences Center.

For more on TJC science programs, go to http://www.tjc.edu/science .

-Melissa McTee

Continued here:
TJC to host Human Anatomy & Physiology Society regional conference - Tyler Morning Telegraph

TV Ratings Thursday: ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ stays low, ‘The Blacklist … – TVbytheNumbers

Broadcast primetime live + same-day ratings for Thursday, April 13, 2017

The numbers for Thursday:

CBS led the night once again in the Thursday ratings this week, with The Big Bang Theory scoring a 2.4 rating in adults 18-49. This was two-tenths of a point lower than its 2.6 in the week before, but still well above anything else in the night. Also on CBS, The Great Indoors (1.2), Mom (1.3), and Life in Pieces (1.1) were all down from their previous numbers, while The Amazing Race held steady with a 0.9.

ABC nabbed the second-highest spot of the night with Greys Anatomy though it tied its series low for the second week in a row with a 1.7. Scandal (1.4) was up one-tenth and The Catch was even with its previous 0.7 on the network.

On NBC, both Powerless (0.6) and Chicago Med (1.0) held steady. With its season finale episode as well, The Blacklist: Redemption ticked up from last weeks season low to a 0.7.

Supernatural (0.5) and Riverdale (0.3) continued to perform as expected on The CW, with both maintaining their previous numbers. FOX rounded out the rest of the night with Masterchef Junior (0.9) and Kicking and Screaming (0.5).

Network averages:

Late-nightmetered market ratings (adults 18-49, households):

11:35 p.m.

The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon R: 0.5/3, 1.6/4

Jimmy Kimmel Live: 0.5/3, 2.0/5

The Late Show with Stephen Colbert R: 0.4/2, 1.8/5

12:35 a.m.

Nightline: 0.3/2, 1.3/4

Late Night with Seth Meyers R: 0.2/2, 0.8/3

The Late Late Show with James Corden R: 0.3/2, 0.9/3

Definitions: Rating: Estimated percentage of the universe of TV households (or other specified group) tuned to a program in the average minute. Ratings are expressed as a percent. Fast Affiliate Ratings: These first national ratings are available at approximately 11 a.m. ETthe day after telecast. The figures may include stations that did not air the entire network feed, as well as local news breaks or cutaways for local coverage or other programming. Fast Affiliate ratings are not as useful for live programs and are likely to differ significantly from the final results, because the data reflect normal broadcast feed patterns. Share (of Audience):The percent of households (or persons) using television who are tuned to a specific program, station or network in a specific area at a specific time. Time Shifted Viewing:Program ratings for national sources are produced in three streams of data Live, Live +Same-Day and Live +7 Day. Time-shifted figures account for incremental viewing that takes place with DVRs. Live+SD includes viewing during the same broadcast day as the original telecast, with a cut-off of 3 a.m. local time when meters transmit daily viewing to Nielsen for processing. Live +7 ratings include viewing that takes place during the 7 days following a telecast.

Source: The Nielsen Company.

Like Loading...

More:
TV Ratings Thursday: 'Grey's Anatomy' stays low, 'The Blacklist ... - TVbytheNumbers

Anatomy of a murder: Intense investigation spent seven days solving … – Houston Chronicle

Intense, 7-day hunt for lawman's killer brought together many agencies

By James Pinkerton, St.John Barned-Smith, and Andrew Kragie

A memorial for Harris County Precinct 3 Assistant Chief Deputy Clinton Greenwood was set at his parking spot outside the Baytown Courthouse Tuesday, April 4, 2017, in Baytown, Texas. Greenwood was fatally shot at that parking spot as he arrived to work Monday morning.

A memorial for Harris County Precinct 3 Assistant Chief Deputy...

No one knows when William Kenny decided it was time to act. He had been seething for years, the anger gnawing at him, the list of those who had wronged him growing. Now he was going to do something about it.

Go here to read the rest:
Anatomy of a murder: Intense investigation spent seven days solving ... - Houston Chronicle

Uber Shows How Not to Apply Behavioral Economics – Harvard Business Review

Executive Summary

ANew York Timesarticleon how Uber is using insights from behavioral economics to push, or nudge, its drivers to pick up more fares sometimes with little benefit to them has generated quite a bit of criticism of Uber. It raises a question that executives often ask about how their own organizations might apply behavioral economics: Isnt there a danger it will be used with ill intent? Behavioral economics takes the view that people have fallible judgment and malleable preferences and behaviors, can make mistakes calculating risks, can be impulsive or myopic, and are driven by social desires.Organizations that embrace behavioral economics design processes to use these tendencies to nudge people to do something. The determining factor between when nudges should be deemed good and when they should be deemed bad is: Are they being used to benefit both parties involved in the interaction or do they create benefits for one side and costs for the other?

A recent New York Times article on how Uber is using various insights from behavioral economics to push, or nudge, its drivers to pick up more fares sometimes with little benefit to them has generated quite a bit of criticism of Uber. Its just one of several stories of late that have cast the company in a poor light.

When I read the piece, it reminded me of a question executives often ask me when I talk to them about the benefits of behavioral economics or give them examples of how they could use it in their own organizations: Arent you afraid itwill be used with ill intent?

I always respond that, like many tools, it can be used in good and bad ways. Before I delve into the differences between the two, I should first make sure you are familiar with the somewhat new field of behavioral economics.

According to the traditional view in economics, we are rational agents, well informed with stable preferences, self-controlled, self-interested, and optimizing. The behavioral perspective takes issue with this view and suggests that we are characterized by fallible judgment and malleable preferences and behaviors, can make mistakes calculating risks, can be impulsive or myopic, and are driven by social desires (e.g., looking good in the eyes of others). In other words, we are simply human.

Behavioral economics starts with this latter assumption. It is a discipline that combines insights from the fields of psychology, economics, judgment, and decision making, and neuroscience to understand, predict, and ultimately change human behavior in ways that are more powerful than any one of those fields could provide on its own. Over the last few years, organizations in both the private and public sectors have applied some of the insights from behavioral economics to address a wide range of problems from reducing cheating on taxes, work stress, and turnover to encouraging healthy habits, increasing savings for retirement as well as turning up to vote (as I wrote previously).

Uber has been using similar insights to influence drivers behavior. As Noam Scheiber writes in the Times article, Employing hundreds of social scientists and data scientists, Uber has experimented with video game techniques, graphics and noncash rewards of little value that can prod drivers into working longer and harder and sometimes at hours and locations that are less lucrative for them.

One such approach, according to Scheiber, compels drivers toward collecting more fares based on the insight from behavioral sciences that people are highly influenced by goals. According to the article, Uber alerts drivers that they are very close to hitting a precious target when they try to log off. And it also sends drivers their next fare opportunity before their current ride is over.

Now lets return to the question of when are nudges good and when are they bad. In discussing this topic with executives, I first provide a couple of examples. One of my favorites is the use of checklists in surgery to reduce patient complications. Checklists describe several standard critical processes of care that many operating rooms typically implement from memory. In a paper published in 2009, Alex Haynes and colleagues examined the use and effectiveness of checklists in eight hospitals in eight cities in the Unites States. They found the rate of death for patients undergoing surgery fell from 1.6% to 0.8% following the introduction of checklists. Inpatient complications also fell from 11% to 7%.

In a related paper published in 2013, Alexander Arriaga and colleagues had 17 operating-room teams participate in 106 simulated surgical-crisis scenarios. Each team was randomly assigned to work with or without a checklist and instructed to implement the critical processes of care.

The results were striking: Checklists reduced missed steps in the processes of care from 23% to 6%. Every team performed better when checklists were available. Remarkably, 97% of those who participated in the study reported that if one of these crises occurred while they were undergoing an operation, they would want the checklist used.

Another example I often give concerns the use of fuel- and carbon-efficient flight practices in the airline industry. In a recent paper, using data from more than 40,000 unique flights, John List and colleagues found significant savings in carbon emissions and monetary costs when airline captains received tailored monthly information on fuel efficiency, along with targets and individualized feedback. In the field study, captains were randomly assigned to one of four groups, including one business as usual control group and three intervention groups, and were provided with monthly letters from February 2014 through September 2014. The letters included one or more of the following: personalized feedback on the previous months fuel-efficiency practices; targets and feedback on fuel efficiency in the upcoming month; and a 10 donation to a charity of the captains choosing for each of three behavior targets met.

The result? All four groups increased their implementation of fuel-efficient behaviors. Thus, informing captains of their involvement in a study significantly changed their actions. (Its a well-documented social-science finding called the Hawthorne effect.) Tailored information with targets and feedback was the most cost-effective intervention, improving fueling precision, in-flight efficiency measures, and efficient taxiing practices by 9% to 20%. The intervention, it appears, encourages a new habit, as fuel efficiency measures remained in use after the study ended. The implication? An estimated cost savings of $5.37 million in fuel costs for the airline and reduced emissions of more than 21,500 metric tons of CO2 over the eight-month period of the study.

Both in the case of surgeons using checklists or captains receiving feedback about fuel efficiency, one of the main goals of the intervention was to motivate the participants to act in a certain way. So, in a sense, the researchers were trying to encourage a change in behavior the same way managers at Uber were trying to bring about a change in their drivers behavior.

But there is an important difference across these three examples. Are the nudges used to benefit both parties involved in the interaction or do they create benefits for one side and costs for the other? If the former, then (as Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein argue in their influential book Nudge) we are nudging for good. Thaler and Sunstein identify three guiding principles that should be on top of mind when designing nudges: Nudges should be transparent and never misleading, easily opted out of, and driven by the strong belief that the behavior being encouraged will improve the welfare of those being nudged.

Thats where the line between encouraging certain behaviors and manipulating people lies. And thats also where I see little difference between applying behavioral economics or any other strategies or frameworks for leadership, talent management, and negotiations that I teach in my classes. We always have the opportunity to use them for either good or bad.

If the interests of a company and its employees differ, the organization can exploit its own members as Uber appears to have done. But there are plenty of situations where the interests are, in fact, aligned the company certainly benefits from higher levels of performance and motivation, but the workers do, too, because they feel more satisfied with their work.

And that is where I see great potential in applying behavioral economics in organizations: to create real win-wins.

More here:
Uber Shows How Not to Apply Behavioral Economics - Harvard Business Review

NewLink Genetics to Host Its First Quarter 2017 Financial Results Conference Call on May 4, 2017 – Yahoo Finance

AMES, Iowa, April 13, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NewLink Genetics Corporation (NLNK), today announced that it will release its first quarter 2017 financial results on Thursday, May 4, 2017. The company has scheduled a conference call for 8:30 AM ET the same day to discuss the results and to give an update on its clinical and development activities.

NewLink Genetics' senior management team will host the conference call, which will be open to all listeners. There will also be a question and answer session following the prepared remarks.

Access to the live conference call is available by dialing (855) 469-0612 (U.S.) or (484) 756-4268 (international) five minutes prior to the start of the call. The conference call will be webcast live and a link can be accessed through theNewLink Geneticswebsite at http://edge.media-server.com/m/p/qa52gxjk. A replay of the call will be available for two weeks from the date of the call and can be accessed by dialing (855) 859-2056 (U.S.) or (404) 537-3406 (international) and using the passcode 7503837.

About NewLink Genetics Corporation

NewLink Genetics is a biopharmaceutical company at the forefront of discovering, developing and commercializing novel immuno-oncology product candidates to improve the lives of patients with cancer. NewLink Genetics product candidates are designed to harness multiple components of the immune system to combat cancer. For more information, please visit http://www.newlinkgenetics.com.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements ofNewLink Geneticsthat involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, contained in this press release are forward-looking statements, within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "target," "potential," "will," "could," "should," "seek" or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include any statements other than statements of historical fact. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements thatNewLink Geneticsmakes due to a number of important factors, including those risks discussed in "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in NewLink Genetics' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2016and other reports filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The forward-looking statements in this press release represent NewLink' Genetics' views as of the date of this press release.NewLink Geneticsanticipates that subsequent events and developments will cause its views to change. However, while it may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking statements as representing NewLink Genetics' views as of any date subsequent to the date of this press release.

Read the original:
NewLink Genetics to Host Its First Quarter 2017 Financial Results Conference Call on May 4, 2017 - Yahoo Finance